Introduction to the Second Word

Passages,

Exodus 19:4, 20:22-26, 34:17, Lev. 26:1-2, Dt. 4:15-24, 11:16-17, 27:15

We note here that this prohibition does not forbid art work in general.

Priest’s garments — Pomegranates (Ex. 28:33-34, 39:24)
Mercy seat — Two Cherubim of Gold (Ex. 25:18-22)
Sanctuary as whole richly ornamented

These types of things in the OT could be used in the context of worship. The prohibition in the 2nd commandment concerns itself w/ forbidding turning any created thing into a talisman that would serve as a conduit between God and His people.

To create such a talisman was to violate the Creator vs. Creature distinction.

This ban on images makes God non-manipulable.

Jeroboam — I Kings 12:25f

Without Images God can not be controlled to the controller’s desired end.

So, idolatry generally speaking is forbidden in the 1st word but in the 2nd word we have prohibition concerning how the cultic worship is to be shaped. The Second word informs us we can only approach God on God’s terms, there are to be no Talismans between God and man — no mediation between God and man — except that which is ordained by God.

Nadab and Abihu — Lev. 10:1f

In terms of the prohibition we must keep in mind that whenever man believes that can establish His own approach to God in worship it is not long until he believes that he can his own autonomous law word in every other area of life.

This is why some have contended that until we get worship right, and begin to worship God upon His terms, we will never get anything else right in other jurisdictional spheres. And this has some merit. If man is homo adorans — man the worshiper — then man a man who worship God by His own will and lusts will live all of his life according to his own will and lusts.

So, this commandment reminds us that the lawful approach to God is entirely of God’s ordination. This in turn reminds us of Christ since the whole OT economy is one reminder after another of how God graciously came near His people and how Worship was entirely God centered.

Author: jetbrane

I am a Pastor of a small Church in Mid-Michigan who delights in my family, my congregation and my calling. I am postmillennial in my eschatology. Paedo-Calvinist Covenantal in my Christianity Reformed in my Soteriology Presuppositional in my apologetics Familialist in my family theology Agrarian in my regional community social order belief Christianity creates culture and so Christendom in my national social order belief Mythic-Poetic / Grammatical Historical in my Hermeneutic Pre-modern, Medieval, & Feudal before Enlightenment, modernity, & postmodern Reconstructionist / Theonomic in my Worldview One part paleo-conservative / one part micro Libertarian in my politics Systematic and Biblical theology need one another but Systematics has pride of place Some of my favorite authors, Augustine, Turretin, Calvin, Tolkien, Chesterton, Nock, Tozer, Dabney, Bavinck, Wodehouse, Rushdoony, Bahnsen, Schaeffer, C. Van Til, H. Van Til, G. H. Clark, C. Dawson, H. Berman, R. Nash, C. G. Singer, R. Kipling, G. North, J. Edwards, S. Foote, F. Hayek, O. Guiness, J. Witte, M. Rothbard, Clyde Wilson, Mencken, Lasch, Postman, Gatto, T. Boston, Thomas Brooks, Terry Brooks, C. Hodge, J. Calhoun, Llyod-Jones, T. Sowell, A. McClaren, M. Muggeridge, C. F. H. Henry, F. Swarz, M. Henry, G. Marten, P. Schaff, T. S. Elliott, K. Van Hoozer, K. Gentry, etc. My passion is to write in such a way that the Lord Christ might be pleased. It is my hope that people will be challenged to reconsider what are considered the givens of the current culture. Your biggest help to me dear reader will be to often remind me that God is Sovereign and that all that is, is because it pleases him.

One thought on “Introduction to the Second Word”

  1. Grammar:
    Original: “If man is homo adorans — man the worshiper — then MAN A MAN who WORSHIP God by His own will and lusts will live all of his life according to his own will and lusts.”
    Edit: 1) I’m not sure whether “a man who worships God by His own will and lusts” is describing the man you are referring to. If that is the case, it is a clause and should be encased in parenthesis. It might also be the case that there is an extra “man.” If so, it can be taken out. 2) “Worship” should be “Worships” as it is singular. 3) Also, if “His” is speaking of the man, it shouldn’t be capitalized. 4) The pronoun use is a bit confusing because it mentions both man and God before using the pronoun “his.” Capitalization does help clear it up, but it might be helpful to either move prepositional phrases to be closer to the things they modify or specify the nature of the will and lusts.
    If I’m reading it correctly, it would be clearer to say:
    “If man is homo adorans — man the worshiper — then a man who worships God by his own sinful will and lusts will also live all of his life according to his own will and lusts.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *