“Against Christian nationalism, FOR Christian nations.
Nationalism makes the nation-state the ultimate organizing principle, whereas Christianity makes the Kingdom of God the ultimate organizing principle—nations being subsumed under that principle.
Nationalism is the wrong priority. It takes something good (nation) and puts an overemphasis on it such that it supplants the true priority for the Christian (the Kingdom of God).”
Christopher Perone
Of course the key here in learning that Christopher is wrong is the adjective “Christian” that defines the noun “Nationalism.” A Nationalism that was indeed Christian would not be idolatrous and would not do what Mr. Perone describes.
I’m sure that some versions of Nationalism do indeed become a species of Statolatry. However, all because there are some forms of Nationalism that are unbiblical doesn’t mean there are not forms of Nationalism that are Biblical.
Yes, some forms of Nationalism can become idolatrous as they lift the Nation State above God so that in the Nation state we live and move and have our being. In these expressions of idolatrous Nationalism it is often the State as it embodies a particular race of people, that becomes God walking on the earth. However, by definition such an arrangement would not be Christian Nationalism.
What Mr. Perone describes was the Italian and German Nationalism that the fascists were doing during the 1930s. Perhaps even Spain with the rise of Franco would be included here, though that’s more debatable.
This explains why Biblical forms of Nationalism insist that authority be not located in any one Institution (the State) but rather be diffuse being embedded in multiple jurisdictions such as family (Fathers), church (Elders), state (Magistrates), and possibly others. In such Christian Nationalism, God alone is the sovereign authority with each jurisdiction operating under and with His delegated and specific authority. In such Christian Nationalism, there are thus inter-dependent authority centers that serve to delimit the sovereignty of any one authority center thus reducing the capacity for any one authority center to seek to divinize itself as God walking on the earth.
In the end there can be no Christian nations without Christian Nationalism. It’s like arguing for alcohol but without fermenting. If you have a Christian Nation you will have Christian Nationalism just as if you have alcohol you will have fermentation.
“If … I bring up the dangers of the politicizing religious confessions, it is only because we see in them those long-known entities that are siblings of Marxism. … The [NS] party does not have, and has never had, any intention of waging some battle against Christianity. Quite the opposite. … It has worked to remove the organizations of the atheist movement in Germany; and in this way it has sanitized our whole life of these phenomena, which the Christian denominations should also consider it their mission to fight. But the National Socialist will have no patience for the politicization of the confessions through some roundabout method. … We have already fought the political clergy once before and threw them out of the parliaments, and this after a long fight during which we held no political power and they held all of it. … We will never fight this battle as a battle against Christianity or even against either one of the two confessions. But … we will fight for the unmasking of those who claim the creed is in danger, while they themselves are unfortunately all too free of their creed when the opportunity arises. We National Socialists do not really want this fight. For we see the Jewish Bolshevik danger that is now looming over the world all too clearly. … A communist victory would just as much be a problem for the twenty-six state-level churches as for the Catholic Centrists. In any case, wherever Bolshevism has come to power, the “churches militant” put up a much less honorable fight than the “militant” National Socialist movement in Germany. pp. 67-8. ”
Adolf Hitler, ‘Voice of Triumph: Concluding Remarks at the 1933 Party Congress in Nuremberg’, trans. David Kelly