Category: Uncategorized

“Friend of the Court control”

I guarantee you that teachers, ministers, lawyers, doctors, shrinks, social workers, and friends of the court have each and all done far more harm to people as tools that are out of control (they are the tools of the humanists) than guns have done over the last 35 years.

In point of fact, if it is our desire to ban tools that can cause grave and serious harm then why not just ban Humanism, Marxism, Romanticism, Transcendentalism, Nihilism, Existentialism, Post-Modernism, etc. and all forms of nutcase occultism? (Let’s throw in Roman Catholicism, Pentecostalism, R2K’ism, Dispensationalism, and Baptist-ism just to be really safe.)

Of course, tools are only as good as the people handling the tools and with some tools, unlike guns, (see list in paragraph above) it is not possible to handle them safely. I’d rather my grandchildren go hunting with the two nutcases that shot up Columbine High School (if that were possible) than sit in a classroom with a typical University educated school teacher or sit in church under a typical Seminary-trained minister. I’ll take my chances with the guns.

A propositional nation, is, by definition a slave colony because if it is required of you to believe the propositions of the said propositional nation you are no longer free to have loyalties that are contrary to the propositions to which your primary allegiance belongs. A propositional nation is a slave colony because in a propositional nation you are not allowed to have any loyalties higher than the state. Whatever propositions the state advances, even if they are propositions that are counter to your religious convictions about the nature of Marriage (Obergefell vs. Hodges anyone?) –as just one example — you as the slave are obligated to embrace those state-sanctioned propositions or risk not being thought of as a member of the propositional nation. If your loyalties to your family, or your place, or your faith are higher than your loyalties to the propositions that make up the propositional nation then you are for all intents and purposes outside the law. In a propositional nation, one is a slave to the propositions that the state seeks to advance or one is for all intents and purposes an outlaw.

Solzhenitsyn wrote about the phenomenon of the “non-person.” These were the people who dared disagree with the Soviet propositions. They were also the people who were sent off to the Gulag Archipelago. Only once one was in the Gulag did the idea of identity by propositions waned;

“Before the camps, I regarded the existence of nationality as something that shouldn’t be noticed—nationality did not really exist, only humanity. But in the camps one learns: if you belong to a successful nation you are protected and you survive. If you are part of universal humanity—too bad for you.”

This teaches us to beware anyone who comes to you insisting either explicitly or implicitly that a chief truth — a chief proposition — about Christianity that must be believed by all Christians everywhere is that for the Christians all their previous identities of race, family, and national religion disappear once they are converted.  This is just Communism going under the brand of Christianity.

When the neo-cons and their barely educated clergy corps in America blather about this being a propositional nation, just keep in mind that they are serving up the same dish as Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin. Next remember that the propositions, and their interpretations of them, are exactly contrary to Biblical Christianity.

The Biblical Christian historian admits that he interprets and reads history through a Christian world and life view. For example, he doesn’t see chance or fate in history but rather he sees the providential hand of God. The Christian Historian views events as to whether they are in accordance with God’s revealed will or not, therefore, the Christian Historian, for example, would not glorify a Robespierre, a Lenin, or a social Revolution based on anti-Christ principles.

When we read history we need to keep the above principle in mind. Historians, like most white-collar professionals, do not write from a Biblical Christian perspective and so we must dine with them using a long spoon. We must seek to reinterpret their unbiblical interpretation in a biblical direction. This takes a great deal of practice and time to learn.

The push for sodomite rights is not a concession we throw to a tiny percentage of our population in a compromise that will bring no real harm to society. Pushed with ethical fervor through appeals to anti-discrimination, equal rights, equality legislation, and the checking of privilege, this social movement deconstructs the foundational social concepts like family, gender, and social achievement. There is no ‘live and let live,’ when faced with advocates of this agenda.

Dr.Peter Jones

The sodomite/trannie agenda will not be satisfied with having a “place at the table.” As I have often said their goal in coming out of the closet is to shove heterosexual normies and all those Biblical Christians who support the Scripture’s view on family into the closet. They desire us to be treated the same way that they were treated for millennia. Of course, that was our mistake. We should not have shoved them in a closet. We should have followed Scripture’s prescription for those who embrace the perverted lifestyle.

We are, however, past that exit, and the thing we need to be clear about is that the LGBTQ movement will eventually demand the criminalization of being heterosexual. They will eventually pursue the idea that heterosexuality is a perversion. It is just a matter of time. At the same time, they will seek to mainstream more and more perversions. Already, we are seeing a push to normalize pederastry. (They are even now seeking to lose the label “pedophile” in place of “minor-attracted adults.”)

See this podcast for a brief outlining of this new push to normalize;

For those who like precision technically, pedophilia and pederasty are different perversions though there can certainly overlap between the two.

The LGBTQ contest with Biblical Christianity is a steel cage wrestling match. Two opponents are thrown into a steel cage that has not exit. Only one will walk out alive. Either Biblical Christianity will crush the LGBTQ movement or Christianity will be redefined as being inclusive of LGBTQ’ism. There is no other options.

And already we are seeing, even in the formally most of conservative quarters, that Christianity is being redefined in such a way that it can include perversion.