Ethnic considerations

Daily Kinist Quote — R. J. Rushdoony & McAtee on the Noble Savage NAPARC

“Norman Mailer has pointed out that the modern outsider to God and law finds his hero in the Negro, whom he sees as a ‘natural and social adventurer sworn against respectability, conformity, dullness, and emotional timidity. The modern ‘white Negro’ is a man who imagines the Negro to be the ideal man, a natural anarchist and nihilist, and therefore social hero. Moreover, to gain the acceptance of the Negro, irrespective of his character, is to gain a victory against law and standards in the name of equality.

“There is indication already of another ‘civil rights’ offensive as a next step after the Negro: ‘the sodomite may be partially replacing the Negro as an object of liberal solicitude and the prime test of liberal tolerance. If there is no God and no divinely ordained law, then not only does perversion have equal rights, but actually, truer rights, because Christian morality is seen as an imposition on an a dehumanization of man, whereas perversion is an act of liberty and autonomy for this school of thought.”

“In any case, the goal is, whether directly or slowly total destruction of Christian civilization. Some have called for … a long period of chaos and revolution, and the total destruction of civilization.”

R. J. Rushdoony
Roots of Reconstruction – p. 618

Much of this began with the age of Romanticism and its infatuation with the idea of the Noble Savage. Initially the noble savage was identified with the American Indian. Because the American Indian was untouched by civilization, the American Indian bore a automatic nobility about him per the Romanticists. As time continued the noble savage mantle passed on to others. In Rushdoony’s time it was the American Negro that was seen as the noble savage. Precisely because he was not civilized, as seen by crime rates, the civil rights movement latched on to the cause of the American Negro and the championing of civil rights became proof positive of one’s own nobility. To support the noble savage in one’s midst was to clothe one’s self with nobility.

As Rush mentions, the status of “more of a noble savage than thou” eventually passed on to the sodomite. Until the rise of the Tranny, it was the sodomite and lesbian who were the noblest of all noble savages. To be friends with a sodomite or a lesbian proved how much humanity one had, just as previously having friends among Negroes once proved how broad minded one was. Now of course the class of people who get to be designated “the most noble savage of all the noble savages” are those who have had their breasts or genitals removed. Well, unless they are out positioned by the pederasts and pedophiles.

Of course, all this corresponds perfectly with the cultural Marxist work of the long march through the Institutions. The Cultural Marxists have recruited these very same noble savages as well as the adjacent noble savages to overthrow civilization. Cultural Marxism was a good fit with American Romanticism in this regard. As such, it is the case, that the noble savages have turned our whole former Christian civilization into a vast jungle of savagery.

Even our “Conservative” Christian churches have pursued this Noble Savage theme as seen in their embrace of “MLK 50” and their embrace of Side-B sodomy and their embrace of Rev. Greg Johnson and Sam “honest, I can resist temptation” Allberry. The Christian churches with their overt hostility to traditional, heritage and historic Christianity are doing all they can to rid themselves of people who would write honest prose as I have given here. If they hated Rushdoony when he was alive (and they did) how much more do they hate anybody today who dares quote RJR approvingly? The “conservative” Christian church in the West today with their thoroughly Romanticist/Cultural Marxist inclinations is aiding and abetting the end of Christian civilization all in the name of being “nicer than Jesus ever was.”

This is all proven by the fact that NAPARC churches today would NEVER ordain a Knox, a Calvin (read his pamphlet on the Jews), a Chrysostom, a Machen, a Van Til, Luther, etc. The modern conservative church today is the enemy of historic Biblical Christianity. If you’re in one of these NAPARC churches (yes, I understand there are always exceptions) you are supporting the very thing that Rushdoony warned of in the quote. If you are supporting NAPARC churches and clergy (or the CREC) then you are “Noble Savage adjacent.”)

DKQ …. Dr. J. Gresham Machen vs. Dr. Alan Strange

“It is true some of them are ‘sticklers’ for the civil rights of Negroes – it always makes me intensely angry to hear people talking glibly about equal civil rights of Negroes when in many parts of the South those equal rights would mean that every legislator and every judge would be of a savage type and the white men would be more unsafe in parts of this country than in most parts of the world where at least protection of his home government is to some extent with him.”

J. Gesham Machen

“What about the whole notion that nations think themselves better than the other nations? Do you think that is not a result of sin … that ethnic groups think their superior to other ethnic groups? BECAUSE THEY’RE NOT! We’re all made in the image of God. Somebody’s not better than the other. When Paul stood on the step of the Areopagus and he said, ‘God made all nations of one blood,’ Do you think the Greeks were standing there saying, ‘yes?’ They were, like, ‘SHUT UP. We’re Greeks. We are not like those Africans.’

Did they think that? Oh, we know they thought that.”

Dr. Alan Strange
President – Mid America Seminary

You’d think a President of a Seminary could think in proper categories.

Are all peoples equal?

Yes … inasmuch as all peoples are fallen

Yes … inasmuch as all peoples are guilty before the law

Yes … inasmuch as all peoples are creatures

In brief, when considered ontologically then, yes…”a fallen man is a fallen man is a fallen man.”

But even here gradations exist.

Though all peoples are fallen not all peoples are equally depraved in their expression of total depravity.

Though all peoples are guilty before the law some peoples have violated God’s law more egregiously than others (consider the Cretans in the book of Titus in the Bible) though all will be damned.

Though all peoples are creatures, God’s common providence has not made all people the same.

Are all peoples equal?

No … if by that you mean that all peoples have the same genetic predispositions

No…. if by that you mean that all peoples have the same potentials.

No…. if by that you mean that because all people are equal, they are interchangeable cogs that are by definition non distinct.

This is just ignorance on Dr. Strange’s part and is in agreement with Classical Marxist thought.

Obviously, Dr. J. Gresham Machen and Dr. Alan Strange do not agree. In today’s NAPARC church, if Machen’s views were known Machen would be excommunicated.

DKQ – Twin Spin from Abraham Kuyper

“The fact that now for the first time the actual history of our human race gets underway is expressed in the prophecy of the Holy Spirit placed on Noah’s lips. It led him (Noah) to sketch out the lines along which the history of the world would unfold, in his full blessing for Shem, his partial blessing for Japheth, and his curse on Ham. Within the prophecy lay embedded the concise program of all of the world history; the disappointing experience with blacks, the enduring significance of Jews and Muslims as Shem’s offspring, and the great significance Japheth has currently achieved provide us to this day with the key for explaining world history…. Whoever ignores this powerful act of God’s grace (as Strange is enjoining us to do) and thereby also His common grace, distorts his view on life, ends up with a false dualism, and easily runs the risk of allowing the Christian religion to deviate from the Reformed track, that is, from the correct track.”

Abraham Kuyper
Common Grace – Vol. 1 – pg. 110

“No flower exudes a fragrance other than that of its own kind, whether it is a rose, a daisy, or a lily; and no precious stone sparkles except in accordance with the special name it bears, whether a diamond, a ruby, or a jasper. So also, no human beings live under the sun without belonging to their own country and their own people, be it Russian, Spanish, Belgian, or whatever nation you might name. It is no different with us. We too are not just human beings, but come from the province of Zeeland, Friesland, or North or South Holland. But together we are the people of the Netherlands, and as such, we are proud of our country and thank our God that the love of our native soil dwells innately in our lives. We also love the House of Orange-Nassau, and we continue to grow in our national history. No blow should destroy our national conscience more than if our existence as a people were destroyed and the Netherlands were to disappear from the ensemble of European states.”

Abrham Kuyper
Two-fold Fatherland
On the Church – p. 286

Ask yourself, “How might it occur for the people of the Netherlands for their existence to be destroyed, resulting in the disappearance of the Netherlands from the ensemble of European states? Well, that could happen several different ways, but one of those ways would be for a New World Order mindset to seize control of the Dutch government with the end in mind of importing non Zeelanders, Frieslanders, and North and South Hollanders into the Netherlands knowing that such action would lead to breeding that would breed out the Dutch. Mass miscegenation would be one way to make the Dutch disappear.

Those who want to protect their people are considered Kinists/racists though. Consider this account from Britain,

English Nobleman, Rev. Dr. Lord Nigel Biggar, has made a defense of Punjabis in England who have become Christian who insist that their children only should marry other Punjabi Christians. He is said to have suggested that it is was hogwash to call Punjabi fathers restricting those who courted their daughters to fellow Punjabis, “kinists” and therefore vile racist sinners. He called the fathers concern for who courted their daughters a good, natural, and proper thing. For not condemning such blatant kinism; Lord Nigel Biggar is a man to be held in contempt. and viewed according to WOKE Indian (Dot not Feather) Academic Dr. Priyamvada Gopal, as “one beyond the pale.”

Note here the equation of “Kinist” with “vile racist sinners.” Also note that these Punjabi fathers are being Kinist.

And that’s a good thing.

Now, what the Punjabis are doing in Britain … well, that’s a whole different kettle of fish.

DKQ … Charles Hodge

“If the fact that the master and slave belong to different races, precludes the possibility of their living together on equal terms, the inference is, not that the one has the right to oppress the other but that they should separate. Whether this should be done by dividing the land between them, and giving rise to distinct communities, and wise conditions, is not for us to say. We have undertaken only to express an opinion as to the manner in which the Bible directs those, who look to it for guidance, to treat this difficult subject, and not to trace out a plan to provide for ulterior results. It is for this reason, we have said nothing of African colonization, though we regard it as one of the noblest enterprises of modern benevolence.”

Charles Hodge
Slavery – p. 511

“Whether the slaves of this country may be safely admitted to the enjoyments of personal liberty, is a matter of dispute, but what they cannot, consistently with the public welfare, be entrusted with, is the exercise of political power. This is on all hands admitted.”

Charles Hodge
Slavery, Essays and Reviews – p. 502

Now tell me that the NAPARC denominations, who are disciplining men for agreeing with Hodge, are not out of their ever-loving minds.

DKQ – Palmer, Washington, Hodge

“I have said to them — and to their credit be it testified, the proposition has generally been accepted as the council of wisdom – if you are to be a historic people, you must work out your own destiny upon your own foundation. You gain nothing by a parasitic clinging to the White race; and immeasurably less, by trying to jostle them out of place. If you have no power of development from within you, you lack the first quality of a historic race, and must, sooner or later, go to the wall…. Were I a Black man, I should plead for a pure Black race, as, being a White man I claim it for the White race; and should only ask the opportunity for to work out its mission…. The true policy of both races is, that they shall stand apart in their own social grade, in their own schools, in their own ecclesiastical organizations, under their own teachers and guides: but with all kindness and helpful co-operation to which the old relations between the races, and their present dependence on each other would naturally predispose.”

Rev. Benjamin Mogan Palmer
19th century Southern Minister
As Quoted by Morton Howison Smith
Brotherhood and Race – p. 213-214

___

“In all things that are purely social we can be as separate as the fingers, yet one as the hand in all things essential to mutual progress”

Booker T. Washington
19th Century Southern Black Leader
Atlanta Exposition Speech

____

“This is a law of our being…. Members of the same nation have a feeling for each other which they have not for foreigners. Members of the same tribe or class in a community are bound together by a still closer tie.”

Dr. Charles H. Hodge
19th century Northern Presbyterian Minister

Given these quotes from men of different races and different regions one has to wonder what has happened to the “conservative” “Reformed” churches of NAPARC that they should be forming Kangaroo courts in order to pursue a political purge of men in their midst whose views on race are mild compared to these quotes from giants in the Presbyterian world in a previous age.