Tucker Carlson Says; “Satan Rules The World”

“The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers so they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.” 

I Corinthians 4:4

I will no longer talk much with you, for the ruler of this world is coming, and he has nothing in Me.

John 14:30

“Satan rules the world.”

Tucker Carlson
Interview with Ambassador Mike Huckabee

This is my Father’s world:
Oh, let me ne’er forget
That though the wrong seems oft so strong,
God is the ruler yet.
This is my Father’s world,
The battle is not done:
Jesus who died shall be satisfied,
And earth and Heav’n be one.

Maltbie Davenport Babcock 

I can’t count how many times I’ve heard the Carlson quote from well meaning but errant Christians who cite it in order to suggest that the bad things that happen in this world can be explained by a saying, “Well, Satan is, after all, the God of this world.”

This is a serious misunderstanding of what is being said in Scripture. When John records Jesus saying,”the ruler of this world is coming,” we must take into account a few matters. First, John, throughout is book uses the word “world” in at least ten different ways. Indeed, the word “world” in John, at times, becomes a bit of a frequently used word with a technical meaning.

In 12:40 when Jesus says, “for the ruler of this world is coming,” he does not mean that the triune God is not sovereign over all matters and all men. If Jesus did mean that He would be in contradiction with Himself as He says elsewhere when speaking of the Elect;

“I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all, and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father’s hand”

John 10:28-29

Clearly, if God is “greater than all” that means that God is the ruler over Satan and being the ruler over Satan, God is the ruler over the ruler of this world.

How do we resolve then, this apparent contradiction in John’s Gospel where on one hand Jesus speaks of “the ruler of this world is coming,” and on the other hand Jesus stating that “My Father … is greater than all?”

The answer is not complex.  In John 14 where Jesus speaks of Satan as “the ruler of this world,” He is speaking of the world here, not in a physical sense as if Satan is in charge of planet earth. Instead, Jesus is speaking of Satan being the ruler of this fallen world system as it lies in Adam’s rebellion.

John uses the word “world”in the sense of “world system” other times in His Gospel;
 
John 12:31 Now is the judgment of this world; now will the ruler of this world be cast out. 

John 16:11 concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged.

So, we have to make distinctions then between the John’s usage of the word “world” being use to communicate a contemporary world system in its moral, ethical, and cultural dynamics, which because it is fallen, hates Jesus Christ and His Kingdom and the usage of the word “world” to mean planet earth and everything that happens upon it.

This reminds us that in this world (planet earth) there exists two world systems or Kingdoms. There is the world system (Kingdom) wherein Satan remains the ruler in the sense that it lies under the evil one. Paul mentions this world when he writes the Colossians (1:13) and says, “You’ve been delivered from the dominion of Darkness,” but then adds the phrase that teaches us that there exists also another world system (Kingdom) on planet earth; “to the Kingdom of God’s dear Son, whom He loves.”

So, Satan remains the “ruler of this world” but that does not mean that Satan has a domain that is outside of God’s sovereignty over Satan. Indeed, with the coming of Christ’s Kingdom we know that Satan’s world system is being increasingly driven back. Like a mustard seed the Kingdom that Jesus established is ever growing and with each expansion of growth this present evil age is being constricted. A day will one day come when the Kingdom of God shall cover the earth as the waters cover the sea.

In order to reinforce God’s exhaustive sovereignty in John’s Gospel we remember Jesus’ words to Pilate;

“You would have no authority over me at all unless it had been given you from above.”

Pilate had authority over Pilate the same way that Satan is the ruler of this world. In both cases the authority or rulership is derivative of God’s sovereignty. Yes, each had their authority or rulership but only as governed by the Sovereign God.

All this to say that Satan is not God over God in this world. Satan does not rule the world, though Satan does rule over those who are under His sway, but only so long as the sovereign God determines. Satan has had countless human minions that he once ruled under his world system, but God, who is great in mercy, plundered His elect from Satan’s rule and brought them into a different Kingdom, under a different ruler.

The passage in I Cor. 4 is much the same. Again, we have Satan, as the “god of this age.” But keep in mind that with the triumph of Christ the age to come (which is a different age than “this age”) has arrived and with that arrival of the age to come the strong man (Satan) has been bound (Luke 11:21) and Jesus who has bound the strong man is plundering his kingdom. There remain those (unbelievers) whom the god of this age (Satan) has blinded so that they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. However, the elect among these unbelievers will, in God’s time, come to see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ. Satan does not have totalistic control. He is only a god (of this age) in a very limited sense. That limited sense is limited because the Lord God Omnipotent Reigneth and of Him and through Him and to Him are all things, to whom be glory forever.

Amen.

 

Slaughter of the Innocents 2025

“[T]he suffering of the Mediator does not date from the end of His stay on earth…. The blood of the Savior’s circumcision is as much atoning blood for us as is the blood shed on Golgotha. His entire life was a continual suffering.”

Geerhardus Vos

Yesterday, on the Church calendar, is the day when the “Slaughter of the Innocents” is remembered. Matthew’s Gospel records this event as being continuous with OT anticipation as he connects the lamentations of the Bethlehem mothers with the lamentation or Rachel as recorded in the book of Jeremiah (31:5).

Matthew is informing us that Rachel’s weeping was a type of the weeping that was present in Bethlehem when Herod ordered the slaughter in an attempt to kill off any King that might arise to replace him.

Interesting enough, Rachel was known to have been buried in Ramah, a town not far from Bethlehem. Jeremiah’s prophecy, in its immediate context, spoke of the sorrow that would arise surrounding the Babylonian exile. Matthew, by reaching for this prophecy, informs us that the mourning and lamentation had a dual fulfillment. First, what Jeremiah speaks of was fulfilled when Israel went into captivity, but there is a deeper and greater fulfillment in the weeping surrounding the slaughter of the innocents. In doing so, Matthew, as he does throughout his Gospel, teaches us to read the Bible, as one book, with one overarching narrative. This in turn reminds us that all attempts to read the Bible in terms of discontinuity and dispensations except when explicitly informed by Scripture is a misinformed way of reading Scripture that leads to no good results.

Moving from reading the slaughter of the innocents exegetically we consider the theological significance. Theologically we find the slaughter to be consistent with the promise found in Genesis 3:15 that there would be constant conflict between the seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent. Herod is the seed of the serpent making war on the seed of the woman. Much like Pharaoh ordering the extermination of the seed of Israel, Herod likewise takes up the attempt to extinguish the seed of the woman. Matthew gives us Jesus through whom Israel’s story is retold, with the difference being where Israel failed as God’s Son, Jesus is God’s faithful son who does not fail.

Teasing this out, we would notice that the slaughter of the innocents puts on display the ongoing conflict that continues between the children of their father the Devil, and those who have been swept up in the train of Christ’s blessed redemption. Herods exist even now who continue to seek the death of those who champion the Redeemer King’s truth.

Christmas Eve Address — 2025

“The people who sat in darkness have seen a great light, And upon those who sat in the region and shadow of death Light has dawned.”

Matthew 4:16

12″Again Jesus spoke to them, saying, ‘I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.’”

John 8:12

And this is the verdict of condemnation, that the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.

John 3:19

The Son is the effulgence of the Father’s glory, and the very image of his substance, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had made purification of sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;

Hebrews 1:3

“You are the light of the world. Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorify your father in heaven.”

 
Matthew  5:12

Christmas speaks of numerous realities. We have seen some of those as we have preached Christ in His saving offices during this Advent season. In all honesty we could spend a year preaching on the anticipated coming of Christ. All year long could be a Advent preaching series.

Not only might we preach on Jesus the Christ promised coming to fill the office of Prophet, Priest, and King to save His people we could preach on a multitude of redemptive-historical themes. We could preach on the anticipation of Jesus coming as the lamb of God to be the sin-bearer of God’s people. We could preach on Jesus coming as the desire of the nations. We could preach on Jesus the God-Man. We could preach on the anti-types of Christ in the OT that Christ fulfilled as the type. We could preach on the Old Testament Scriptures and references to Christ that are used in the New Testament by New Testament writers to illumine the presence of Christ in the OT and to declare Him present in the 1st century. We could pick up on the unfolding of the Covenant of Grace in the OT that finds its climax in the New and Better covenant in the coming of Christ. One covenant coming to full maturity with the arrival and work of Christ — a covenant that bespeaks unity in diversity … continuity over discontinuity.

These and many other are reasonable advent themes could well make for a year long preaching on the Advent, Incarnation and arrival of Jesus the Christ.

However, as is our custom here we complete Advent by speaking of Christ as “The Light of the World,” combined with His instructions that we also, are the light of the World who are to let our light so shine before men that they might see our good works, and glorify our Father in heaven.

The great premise of Advent is the fall of mankind into darkness. The Old Covenant speaks of a coming light and indeed that coming light is in the Old Covenant for those with eyes to see. With the arrival of the Christ though the darkness is dispelled.

The Hymn “O Holy Night” captures some of this w/ the lyrics,

“Long Lay the World in sin and error pining

Till he appeared.”

Christ comes as the light of the world but John tells us that men loved the darkness because their deeds were evil.

But the light has come and it can not be quenched. The light shines forth and so we have great hope as bearers of the light. The darkness continues to seek to overcome the light but the light overcomes the darkness and wins out, sometimes in the most unexpected ways.

This Christmas season then proclaims Christ as the light of the world and His people as little refracting points of Christ the great light. Because we are refracting of a light that continues to shine we do not despair. We understand that the greater the darkness the more powerful the light to roll back that darkness.

During this Advent season we are reminded that Christ is the light of the World. As being the light of the world He will not leave Himself without witness. He will continue to provide illuminating power to a world that struggles to remain in the darkness.

This is the problem with pessimistic eschatologies. They one and all teach that the darkness finally wins out in the end in this time and on this planet. However, we believe that the light will never be snuffed out … even temporarily. We believe that the light will continue to overcome darkness until that day that He who is the light returns in glorious triumph.

And so Christmas reminds us not only of the promised coming light but as Christ remains the light of the World it reminds us of coming victory and the dominion of God’s rule over darkness. The light who is Christ reminds us that there is no war against the darkness that cannot or should not be waged with confidence. The light who is Christ reminds us that the children of the devil will be exposed to the light and so either convert or be scattered. The light who is Christ means missionary efforts will succeed and the nations of this world will become the nations of the Lord and His Light … His Christ.

The Crowds & The Messiah … A Look At Divine Control In Securing Confession That Jesus Christ Is Prophet, Priest, and King

14 Jesus returned to Galilee in the power of the Spirit, and news about him spread through the whole countryside. 15 He was teaching in their synagogues, and everyone praised him.

16 He went to Nazareth, where he had been brought up, and on the Sabbath day he went into the synagogue, as was his custom. He stood up to read, 17 and the scroll of the prophet Isaiah was handed to him. Unrolling it, he found the place where it is written:

18 “The Spirit of the Lord is on me,
    because he has anointed me
    to proclaim good news to the poor.
He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners
    and recovery of sight for the blind,
to set the oppressed free,
19     to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.”[f]

20 Then he rolled up the scroll, gave it back to the attendant and sat down. The eyes of everyone in the synagogue were fastened on him. 21 He began by saying to them, “Today this scripture is fulfilled in your hearing.”

22 All spoke well of him and were amazed at the gracious words that came from his lips. “Isn’t this Joseph’s son?” they asked.

23 Jesus said to them, “Surely you will quote this proverb to me: ‘Physician, heal yourself!’ And you will tell me, ‘Do here in your hometown what we have heard that you did in Capernaum.’”

24 “Truly I tell you,” he continued, “no prophet is accepted in his hometown. 25 I assure you that there were many widows in Israel in Elijah’s time, when the sky was shut for three and a half years and there was a severe famine throughout the land. 26 Yet Elijah was not sent to any of them, but to a widow in Zarephath in the region of Sidon. 27 And there were many in Israel with leprosy[g] in the time of Elisha the prophet, yet not one of them was cleansed—only Naaman the Syrian.”

28 All the people in the synagogue were furious when they heard this. 29 They got up, drove him out of the town, and took him to the brow of the hill on which the town was built, in order to throw him off the cliff. 30 But he walked right through the crowd and went on his way.

Luke 4

 

28 After Jesus had said this, he went on ahead, going up to Jerusalem. 29 As he approached Bethphage and Bethany at the hill called the Mount of Olives, he sent two of his disciples, saying to them, 30 “Go to the village ahead of you, and as you enter it, you will find a colt tied there, which no one has ever ridden. Untie it and bring it here. 31 If anyone asks you, ‘Why are you untying it?’ say, ‘The Lord needs it.’”

32 Those who were sent ahead went and found it just as he had told them. 33 As they were untying the colt, its owners asked them, “Why are you untying the colt?”

34 They replied, “The Lord needs it.”

35 They brought it to Jesus, threw their cloaks on the colt and put Jesus on it. 36 As he went along, people spread their cloaks on the road.

37 When he came near the place where the road goes down the Mount of Olives, the whole crowd of disciples began joyfully to praise God in loud voices for all the miracles they had seen:

38 “Blessed is the king who comes in the name of the Lord!”[b]

“Peace in heaven and glory in the highest!”

Luke 19

There is a harmony of reasoning behind these two events, as unlikely as that might seem upon first glance.

In the first instance Jesus is entering into his official ministry, having just been tried and tempted in the desert. In Nazareth where he is rejected the Lord Jesus calls attention especially to His office of “Prophet,” though even here there are hints in the Isaiah passage that Jesus reads to His office of King as the King was associated with healing (“recovery of sight for the blind”). However the emphasis seems to be that Jesus is saying that he is the long expected great Prophet promised in the OT.

Detu. 18:15 “The Lord your God will raise up for you a Prophet like me from your midst, from your brethren. Him you shall hear…

There in Luke 4 with His reading of the Isaiahanic passage Jesus creates the turmoil with His declaration that He is the great Prophet long ago promised. At the conclusion of Jesus speaking the inhabitants gathered from His hometown sought to put Him to death, for they doubtless believed, that Jesus had blasphemed in claiming to be God’s promised great prophet. Quickly a mob mentality developed and as a result Jesus was stampeded to the edge of a cliff. Remember, none of this happens by coincidence. Jesus created the crisis and tumult he desired. The question must be asked … “Why create this scenario? … Why did Jesus let it go as far as it did before the miraculous exit?” I mean, He could have gone all miraculous before the Jewish mob reached a fever pitch.

I believe the answer is found in the intent of the Lord Christ to impress unmistakably on the minds of His hometown the truth that He is the Messiah who fills the needed office of the great prophet. By the reading of the Scripture and by the application of the Isaiah text to Himself Jesus is drilling into the minds of the Jews that He is who He is. His hometown would never forget either His claim nor their response. Their response, in seeking to throw Him off a cliff, would forever be a testimony against them as to the truthfulness of His claim when considered in light of His whole ministry. It was a fulfillment that He was indeed “despised and rejected of men.”

Now near the end of His ministry Jesus does something similar but instead of purposefully creating a scenario where a Jewish mob wants to kill Him because of His rightful claim to be the promised great prophet, Jesus now creates a scenario where a Jewish mob hails Him as the long promised King from the OT prophecies.

There is thus seen a harmony between the opening of Jesus career where Jesus is claiming to be the great prophet required in He who was the Messiah and the end of His career  where Jesus creates a scenario again where there is a claim to be the Messiah. The only difference is the office under consideration. In the opening passage from Luke 4, occurring at the beginning of His Messianic ministry, Jesus lets hostility to His claims ripen to the point of the mob killing Him before He miraculously walks away. In the passage from Luke 19, occurring at the end of His Messianic ministry, Jesus lets His claim to Kingship ripen to the point of fevered pitch exaltation by the mob. In each case His Messianic credentials are being established in the mind of the Jews as a people.

Klass Schilder put it this way in his, “Christ In His Sufferings;”

Now at Bethany, His kingly, not His prophetic claims, are the important issue. He is to enter Jerusalem today, and Jerusalem is peculiarly His city. He wants to make His debut as a King to as many people as He can possibly attract to one place. At Nazareth He had called a mass meeting to witness the beginning of His official career. Now He assembles the multitudes again, this time appearing in His official calling as a King. And He does this in order that at that last stage, His priestly “decease,” at once the height and depth of His official life, the whole world may, through the Word, witness the fulfillment of His calling.

Jesus creates and encourages the fevered pitch cries of “Hosanna, blessed is the King who comes in the name of the Lord” that He hears as descending into Jerusalem, just as He created and encouraged the push to toss Him from a cliff when He said at the beginning of His ministry; ““Today this scripture is fulfilled in your hearing.” In each case He is in control of what is happening. He is creating each scenario in service to His Messianic claims of Prophet and King.

In the latter case Jesus fulfills the royal requirement that the beast He enters into Jerusalem upon is one “whereon yet never a man sat.” The fact that He has His disciples fetch such an animal is not accidental. He was aware that by entering into Jerusalem in just such a fashion He was entering as King.

All of this was a demonstration of Jesus fulfilling prophecy;

Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion!Shout aloud, O daughter of Jerusalem!Behold, your king is coming to you;righteous and having salvation is he,humble and mounted on a donkey,on a colt, the foal of a donkey. I will cut off the chariot from Ephraim and the war horse from Jerusalem;and the battle bow shall be cut off,and he shall speak peace to the nations;his rule shall be from sea to sea,and from the River to the ends of the earth.

Zechariah 9:9-10

The mention of a donkey in the Zechariah text fits the description of a king who would be “righteous and having salvation, gentle.” Rather than riding to conquer, this king would enter in peace. And so Jesus rides into Jerusalem in such a manner and in doing so the people understand the claim that Jesus is making.

In the ancient Middle Eastern world, leaders rode horses if they rode to war, but donkeys if they came in peace. We see this in I Kings 1:33 where it is said that Solomon is upon a donkey when he was recognized as the new King of Israel. We see other instances of leaders in the OT riding Donkeys as well as in Judges 5:10, 10:4, 12:14, and II Sam. 16:2.

Now add to this the way that Jesus impresses the animal for service — as King exercising His right of confiscation — and one has underscored that Jesus is purposefully making a claim to Kingship. This privilege of confiscation had been heard from the mouth of Samuel as he designated Saul as the first King of Israel.

So there is divine harmony in the replies of the mob participants that are heard surrounding the claims of Jesus to His three offices of “Prophet,” “Priest,” and “King,” at the different points of His ministry. There in Luke 4 the reply of the Jewish mob to Jesus’ claim to be God’s mouthpiece (prophet) is to kill Jesus by tossing Him off a cliff. There in Luke 19 the reply of the Jewish mob to Jesus claim to be God’s great Saviour-King is “Hosanna, blessed is the King who comes in the name of the Lord,” and finally in Luke we find;

18 But the whole crowd shouted, “Away with this man! Release Barabbas to us!” 19 (Barabbas had been thrown into prison for an insurrection in the city, and for murder.)

20 Wanting to release Jesus, Pilate appealed to them again. 21 But they kept shouting, “Crucify him! Crucify him!”

22 For the third time he spoke to them: “Why? What crime has this man committed? I have found in him no grounds for the death penalty. Therefore I will have him punished and then release him.”

23 But with loud shouts they insistently demanded that he be crucified, and their shouts prevailed. 24 So Pilate decided to grant their demand. 25 He released the man who had been thrown into prison for insurrection and murder, the one they asked for, and surrendered Jesus to their will.

Luke 23:18-25

Again, Jesus the Christ is in control of the situation. We know from Scripture that He could have called an Angelic host to deliver Him from the intent of His enemies and yet Jesus goes as a lamb to the slaughter to the Cross in  order to fulfill His Messianic office of our Great High Priest.

So, at every key point of the work of Christ in respect to His offices of Prophet, Priest, and King, we see the Lord Christ as seemingly a victim of  circumstances but behind it all we know that He is choreographing every mob response and all of it is serving the end of glorifying His Father, fulfilling the eternal covenant of Redemption, and of saving a particular people and peoples throughout time. There is in all of these events a divine artistic architecture that can only be seen when seeing these events in total and when seen in relation to one another.

Quoting Schilder again;

The first time Jesus took a roundabout way He did so in order to catch the people in their own nets. Nazareth had countenanced Him for thirty years. That long they had accorded Him “grace and favor.” Then He made His first public sermon and attached a pure application to it. Thereupon the hosannas of the citizenry were metamorphosed into the bitterest of curses: crucify Him, crucify Him! And this time He invites the masses to choke the roads so that the whole world may be witness to the fact that the people first shout hosanna, and then, a few days later, when He refuses to become what flesh would have Him be, raise the other cry: crucify Him!

We might say in conclusion that just as there was not one parcel in the life of Christ that was not providentially orchestrated and therefore purposeful so in our own lives as those united to Jesus Christ there is not one iota in our life that is not providentially orchestrated. It is true that we are not the master of our situations as the Lord Jesus Christ was the master of each of His situations but it remains the case that as we are united to Jesus Christ in His death, resurrection, and ascension so our lives are orchestrated under His providence as we serve as prophets, priests, and kings under sovereign God.

There is great encouragement in that truth.

 

 

 

Worldview & Advent; Epistemology And The Nativity

Matthew 1:18 Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost. 19 Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a public example, was minded to put her away privily. 20 But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost. 21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name Jesus: for he shall save his people from their sins. 22 Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, 23 Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.24 Then Joseph being raised from sleep did as the angel of the Lord had bidden him, and took unto him his wife: 25 And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name Jesus.

We seldom pause to consider the Worldview implications during the Advent season. A Worldview consists of a series of sundry givens or presuppositions or starting points that all men use to access in order to interpret their world and the nature of reality. Those sundry givens or presuppositions or starting points vary from man to man and peoples to peoples depending on their a-priori allegiances touching their view of God and religion.

The Christmas nativity narrative asks us not only to believe a certain account but it demands that we embrace its Worldview in order to understand that account.

The first thing it asks of us is to take its account of the birth of Christ as authoritative. The inspired narrative requires the reader to ask the question; “How do I know that I know that this account is true.” This is the epistemological question that all men must answer, whether self-consciously or not. The answer that the narrative requires in order to answer that question is; “Because God’s revelation tells me.” If Joseph and Mary had owned a worldview that answered the question, “How do I know what I know,” (epistemology) with some version of autonomous right reason, or by mystical intuition, they may well have disbelieved what was reported to them by way of revelation.

As it were we see from the text above that what happened was a test for their epistemology. Mary initially questioned God’s revelation and Joseph reasoned that “women don’t get pregnant without intimacy with a man and as Mary and I have not come together, it is impossible that Mary should be pregnant except that she has been intimate with someone else.” Joseph’s initial epistemology lives on today. There are many who come to the Scriptures with a worldview that does not allow for supernatural revelation. Indeed, their worldview presupposes that the supernatural can’t happen and with that epistemology in place they reinterpret the above passage in such ways as to lock out a supernatural revelation epistemology explanation for the virgin birth. Some will insist that the passage does not teach “a virgin shall be with child,” but rather only that “a maiden shall be with child” thus eliminating the supernatural revelation epistemology that the Advent narrative requires. Others will sidestep the issue by saying something clever like, “The virgin birth is what the early Church believed and so that is the record that we are left with.” Such reasoning veils the fact that the person giving this clever answer himself does not believe the revelation that bespeaks the supernatural surrounding the virgin conception.  The really bold ones like Nels F. S. Ferre (Once Professor of Theology at Andover-Newton Theological School), will just come out and deny the virgin conception by saying that the father of Jesus was a German soldier in the Roman army. Finally there are those who will embrace the virgin conception on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, while denying it on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays — splitting Sundays down the middle.

So what the Advent narrative gives us by way of revelational epistemology is the requirement that he who reads the text must believe in the Supernatural. If one brings to the text above a Worldview that premises that the Supernatural is impossible one will not and can not believe this account and they will seek to twist it so as to make it fit into their anti-supernatural worldview.

So this Advent narrative not only requires us to believe the immediate text it requires us to have a worldview where we answer the epistemological question, “How to we know what we know” with the rousing answer of “only by way of Revelation and any good and necessary consequences arising from the text.”

Unless we own that epistemology we will not only not believe the virgin conception but we also will not believe six days creation, resurrection, atonement for sin, resurrection, ascension, floating axe-heads, Jesus walking on water, healing the sick, and raising the dead.

Joseph and Mary believed the Revelation. In this context it is also interesting that Matthew and Luke will repeatedly cite earlier revelation to support this fulfillment of revelation. For example Matthew above in vs. 23 cites Isaiah 7:14 to prove the epistemological legitimacy of all that happened.

During this Advent season may we be reminded that our authority for knowing what we know and how we know must be anchored in Scripture. Certainly, Scripture doesn’t answer in detail all the particulars of life’s questions but Scripture does provides the necessary precondition of intelligibility in order to arrive at any true truth. Because Scripture is God’s Word we can trust the nativity record. Because Scripture is God’s Word we have a sure and certain answer to the question of “how to we know what we know.”

In a postmodern world do not underestimate the importance of a Christian worldview and a revelational epistemology.

Prayer:

Benevolent and Sovereign God,

We bless your name for the coming of the Lord Christ and we bless your name that we have a firm foundation for our faith as anchored in your Revelation. Deliver us from all false epistemologies that will not presuppose either the reality of the supernatural nor the certainty of your revelation. Grant us grace to see how a Christian epistemology is wrapped up with our believing the virgin conception and the coming of Christ. Grant us your favor to continue to be sanctified in our thinking so that we have a Worldview that is pleasing to you in every way. Thank you for the godly examples of Father Joseph and Mother Mary. Grant unto us a faith that resembles theirs. 

In Christ’s name alone we beseech thee

Amen