Trump’s Call for “Unconditional Surrender” in Order to End the War

Before FDR blurted out in the Casablanca press conference that nothing but “Unconditional Surrender” would be accepted as an end to WW2 nobody in the entourage including Churchill had acquiesced to that idea. Indeed, it had not even been discussed.
The Military men knew that such a proposal meant that the War would now be extended as the Germans were now prompted to fight with the despairing ferocity like cornered rats.

One British Government advisor (Lord Maurice Hankey) took the time to look at the history back to 1600 (covering 15 British wars) of Unconditional Surrender as a condition for a war’s end. He found only one example and that was the Boer War and it didn’t work then and was given up when the Brits learned from the Boers that they would fight till Kingdom Come as opposed to Unconditionally surrender.

The only noteworthy example that Hankey found of Unconditional Surrender being invoked and accomplished was the Third Punic War. The Romans demanded the Carthaginians Unconditional Surrender and the Carthaginians told them to pound sand resulting in Carthage being razed to the ground once Rome finally conquered.

But Rome had planned to raze Carthage Unconditional Surrender or not.

Where did FDR come up with this idea and why blurt it out for the first time in a press conference at the end of a meeting with Churchill on the tactical and strategic priorities of WW II? Was FDR speaking for Stalin here? FDR was too much of a politician for anyone to believe he just unconsciously just blurted it out.

However, I have no problem believing that Trump is clueless about what he has put into motion by demanding Unconditional Surrender.

Eusebius of Caesarea & John Owen on Modern Israel

Eusebius of Caesarea (AD 260/265 – 30 May AD 339) in his Ecclesiastical History wrote that the OT prophecies had been fulfilled n Jesus and power and leadership in Israel had come into the hands of the Christian Messiah. Eusebius wrote;

“The historic world mission of the people of Israel had been taken from them and has been given to Christian churches.”

John Owen (1616 – 24 August 1683) in his Commentary on Hebrews could write much the same as Eusebius centuries prior to Owen,

“Upon the expiration of that term, their (Jews) right and title unto it (the land/kingdom) were cancelled and disannulled.

And thereon God in his providence sent the armies of the Romans to dispossess them; which they did accordingly, unto this day.

Nor have the present Jews any more or better title unto the land of Canaan than unto any other country in the world.

Nor shall their title be renewed there unto upon their conversion unto God.
For the limitation of their right was unto that time wherein it was typical of the heavenly inheritance: that now ceasing forever, there can be no especial title unto it revived.”
For 1800 years of Church history nobody believed this bilge regarding the importance of Khazarian/Edomite “Israel.”

Modern Israel is irrelevant…. Nationally speaking, they are dead to God. God divorced them serving His divorce papers in AD 70 with the judgment coming of Jesus Christ upon Jerusalem. There is not one whit of connection between Israel’s future and God’s eschatological clock. The idea of building a Third Temple is the stuff that blasphemy is made of. Armageddon, if it is fulfilled as the Christian Zionist fruit loops believe, will be fulfilled only has self-fulfilled prophecy; it will be wish fulfillment without any relation whatsoever to God’s revealed will.

Red Heifers … Temple sacrifice being practiced, Temple utensils being crafted for future usage … it’s all comes from the multiverse stuff that Marvel comic books created.

People who believe this stuff belong in padded rooms as clothed in restraints.

If I was leading a country that was opposed by another country filled with Zionists who believed that it was God’s will for modern Israel to expand, I’d want nuclear capability in order to defend myself against Zionist dreams of glory.

And I say that as someone who has no desire to see Mooselimbs prosper or expand or have dominion in the Middle East (or anywhere).

Review of The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler

 

By Grace Halsell

This review first appeared in The Washington Report For Middle East Affairs, June 1991

 

“A check at the Library of Congress reveals that the most prestigious library of our land had one reading copy. That one copy, however, is ‘missing from the shelf’ ” .

Since 1948, when Zionists succeeded in carving out a Jewish state from the land of the Palestinians, the question “who is a Jew” has been endlessly debated. Zionists (both Christian and Jewish) often declare that “God gave the land” of Palestine “to the Jews.” They infer that God deeded territories, in perpetuity, to a biblical tribe of Oriental Middle Eastern people. Since millions of American Christians accept a dogma that God has a Chosen Land and a Chosen People (the Jews), then the question “who is a Jew?” takes on political connotations that impinge on national and international decisions.

In his carefully researched book entitled The Thirteenth Tribe, Arthur Koestler refutes the idea of a Jewish “race.” Moreover, he says that most Jews of the contemporary world did not come from Palestine and are not even of Semitic origin. His research shows that most Jews originated in what today is the Soviet Union. And that a group of people there became Jews through conversion, on the orders of their king. “The bulk of modern Jewry is not of Palestinian, but of Caucasian origin,” Koestler writes. “Their ancestors came not from the Jordan but from the Volga, not from Canaan but from the Caucasus.” And he stresses:

“The mainstream of Jewish migrations did not flow from the Mediterranean across France and Germany to the east and then back again. The stream moved in a consistently western direction, from the Caucasus, from the Ukraine into Poland and thence into Central Europe.”

While Jews of different origin also contributed to the existing Jewish world community, “the main bulk originated from the Khazar country” in the USSR. Koestler, a Jew born in 1905 in Budapest, writes that the Khazars, who flourished from the 7th to the 11th century, were a major power. Their empire extended from the Black Sea to the Caspian and from the Caucasus to the Volga. They were located “between two major world powers: the Eastern Roman Empire in Byzantium and the triumphant followers of Muhammad.” Since the world was polarized between these two superpowers representing Christianity and Islam, the Khazar Empire, representing a Third Force,

“Could only maintain its independence by accepting neither Christianity nor Islam – for either choice would have automatically subordinated it to the authority of the Roman Emperor or the Caliph of Baghdad.”

Not wishing to be dominated by either of the two, the Khazar king “embraced the Jewish faith” in AD 740 and ordered his subjects to do the same. Judaism thus became the state religion of the Khazars. The king’s motives in adopting Judaism, Koestler stresses, were purely political. At the peak of its power, from the seventh to the tenth centuries AD, the Khazar kingdom controlled or exacted tribute from some 30 different nations and tribes inhabiting the vast territories between the Caucasus, the Aral Sea, the Ural Mountains, the town of Kiev and the Ukrainian steppes. People under Khazar suzerainty included the Bulgars, Burtas, Ghuzz, Magyars (Hungarians), the Gothic and Greek colonies of the Crimea, and the Slavonic tribes in the northwestern woodland.

According to The Jewish Encyclopedia, in the 16th century Jews numbered about one million. Koestler quotes scholars as documenting that “the majority of those who professed the Judaic faith were Khazars.” Koestler, who after the Second World War became a British citizen, and whose most famous book, Darkness at Noon, was translated into 33 languages, has one main thesis: the bulk of Eastern Jewry -and hence of world Jewry is of Khazar-Turkish, rather than Semitic, origin.

As Koestier points out, Jews of our times fall into two main divisions: Sephardim and Ashkenazim. The Sephardi, descendants of the Jews who had lived in Spain until their expulsion, with the Muslims, at the end of the 15th century, and who later settled in the countries bordering on the Mediterranean, spoke a Spanish-Hebrew dialect, Ladino. In the 1960s, the Sephardim numbered about 500,000. The Ashkenazim, at the same period, were about 11 million. Thus, “in common parlance, Jew is practically synonymous with Ashkenazi Jew.”

However, Koestler adds, the term Ashkenazim is misleading because it is generally applied to Germany, thus contributing to the legend that modem Jewry originated on the Rhine. There is, however, no other term to refer to the non-Sephardic majority of contemporary Jewry, which came after conversion to Judaism from the Khazar country. After the destruction of their empire (in the 12th or 13th century), the Jewish Khazars migrated into those regions of Eastern Europe, mainly Russia and Poland, where, at the dawn of the modem age, the greatest concentrations of Jews were found. It is “well documented,” Koestler writes, that the numerically and socially dominant element in the Jewish population of Hungary during the Middle Ages was of Khazar origin.

An Israeli scholar, A.N. Poliak, a Tel Aviv University professor of medieval Jewish history, quoted by Koestler, states that the descendants of Khazar Jews,

“those who stayed where they were (in Khazaria), those who emigrated to the United States and to other countries, and those who went to Israel – constitute now the large majority of world Jewry.”

Since Israel’s support among millions of American Christians is founded on a concept that God had bequeathed territory to a biblical “tribe” of Oriental Middle Eastern Jews, it becomes ironic to learn from Koestler’s research that most Jews today are not descended from natives of the “holy land,” or even of the Middle East. Koestler, who originally published The Thirteenth Tribe in 1976, noted that the story of the Khazar empire “begins to look like the most cruel hoax history has ever perpetrated.” The Palestinians, imprisoned and brutalized by Zionism’s “hoax,” would be the first to agree. Needless to say, the book has been difficult to find. It disappears from many library shelves. A check at the Library of Congress reveals that the most prestigious library of our land had one reading copy. That one copy, however, is “missing from the shelf.

Scripture’s Stand Against Zionism/Dispensationalism

16 ‘After this I will return
And will rebuild the tabernacle of David, which has fallen down;
I will rebuild its ruins,
And I will set it up;
17 So that the rest of mankind may seek the Lord,
Even all the Gentiles who are called by My name,
Says the Lord who does all these things.’

18 “Known to God from eternity are all His works.

Now lest we miss the point here what Scripture is teaching is that when the Gentiles came in the Church God fulfilled His promise to restore Israel. There is no future promise left that Israel is going to be restored. The Messiah has come. The nations are streaming in. God’s promise is fulfilled. God has no future promises left for Christless Israel.

The language concerning the “fallen tent of Israel” being rebuilt (Acts 15:16) communicates the restoration of the Davidic Kingdom that was at that time now becoming the Israel of God (the Church). With the ingathering of the Nations (Gentiles) David’s Kingdom has been re-established as promised in the book of Amos. The fulfillment then is anchored in Jesus Christ, the promised descendant of David who has ascended to sit on the celestial throne on the right hand of the Father.

The Christless Jews rejected their Messiah and in rejecting their Messiah they rejected any future claim to some kind of claim to a restored land, and to any future hope of being ruled by a Messiah that they still look for. They rejected all the promises of the Old Covenant because all those promises are anchored in Jesus the Christ. If the Jews will not have Christ, they cannot have any of God’s promises for all of God’s promises are only “yea, and Amen in Christ.” The Christ has come. Israel has been restored. The Davidic Kingdom is present in He who rules an eternal Kingdom.

But it is not only the Davidic Kingdom that is rebuilt from a state of despair so that now the Church is the Israel of God and the inheritor of all the promises of the OT, but it is also the case that because Jesus the Christ has provided the restoration of Israel in building up of the Church there is no longer any need for a rebuilt Temple in Jerusalem.

In John 2 Jesus refers to Himself as “The Temple,” that if destroyed will be raised again in three days. (An obvious reference to the resurrection.) Hebrews 8 reinforces the truth any anticipation of a future rebuilt Temple in the land of Christless Israel is utter nonsense.

“Now of the things which we have spoken this is the sum: We have such an high priest, who is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens; a minister of the sanctuary, and of the true tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, and not man.” Hebrews 8:1–2

Jesus Christ is the rebuilt Temple and is the Great High Priest who alone can save from sin. As such any demand or requirement that a third temple has to be rebuilt on the site were the Dome of the Rock now sits is blasphemy and treason against Jesus the Christ. To look for and support the rebuilding of a Jewish Temple is a lifting of the middle finger to Christ and His work on the Cross.

Keep in mind that the whole purpose of the Temple was to provide a place for God’s presence and where sacrifice for sin could be made. Scripture makes it clear that Jesus the Christ tabernacled among us, communicating that the Lord Christ was and is the presence of God. Scripture makes it clear that with the sacrifice of Christ there is no necessity for the sacrifices that take place in a temple.

Hebrews 10:11 And every priest stands daily at his service, offering repeatedly the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. 12 But when Christ[b] had offered for all time a single sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God, 13 waiting from that time until his enemies should be made a footstool for his feet. 14 For by a single offering he has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified.

What’s more, Scripture further teaches that the body of Christ — the Church — is the Temple with Christ as the cornerstone.

 

Eph. 2:20 And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone; 21 In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord: 22In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.

So, we see from this brief overview that God’s Word does not allow for the errant thinking and eisegesis that comes with Christian Zionism and Dispensationalism. Those movements, while perhaps well intended, are anti-Christ. They are in contradiction to the clear teaching of God’s Word. Scripture focuses us on the Lord Jesus Christ who is the fulfillment of all God’s promises. Scripture teaches us that to look for more fulfilled promises for Christless Israel or to look for a future Temple is to war against God.

In the end, Jews may gather back in Israel, and they may yet build a third temple but all that will be is more stink of blasphemy in the nostrils of God. It will not mean a damn thing in terms of fulfilled prophecy.

 

 

.

Modern Israel Is Not What the Christian Zionists Say It Is

To believe that the modern state of Israel is the fulfillment of prophecy, as the Dispensationalists and Christian Zionists do, is to sever the line of Scripture leading to Jesus. Jesus repeatedly speaks as such.

“Therefore, I tell you, the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to [another] people who will produce the fruit of it.”   Mt. 21:43

Of course, Christ is referring to the Church here in Mt. 21. There are not promises left to chthonic Israel and as such the current modern state of Israel cannot be the fulfillment of prophecy because Christless Israel has been stripped by God.

Luke 13:7 Then said he unto the dresser of his vineyard, Behold, these three years I come seeking fruit on this fig tree, and find none: cut it down; why cumbereth it the ground? 8 And he answering said unto him, Lord, let it alone this year also, till I shall dig about it, and dung it: 9 And if it bear fruit, well: and if not, then after that thou shalt cut it down.

Israel did not bear fruit and so it was cut down. Chthonic Israel is deleted. There are no promises to a modern Christless Jewish people.

And when He saw a fig tree by the wayside, He came to it and found nothing thereon, but leaves only. And He said unto it, “Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever.” And immediately the fig tree withered away. (Mt. 21:19)

This is because all the promises were ever only for the Jew who was one inwardly, who knew the circumcision of the heart, by the Spirit. Never by the letter (Romans 2:29).

The New Testament crowns the Church as the new Israel of God and declares that it is the inheritor of all the OT promises, and the land the Church inherits is the whole world (Eph. 6:2-3, Mt. 5:5) and not some desert dirt in the Middle East. Dispensationalists and Christian Zionists who insist that chthonic Israel has some kind of divine claim to the land are in violation of the whole testimony of Scripture.

We owe those people, who Paul says are the children of the slave woman (Galatians 4) nothing but the command that they repent. It is idiotic to think that God will not bless us if we fail to bless the sons of Hagar.

These are not God’s chosen people. They are, as the Scripture teaches, the synagogue of Satan. They are those who say that they are Jews but are not, but are liars (Rev. 3:9). “Christian” support for Zionism based on Jews being owed the inheritance of Father Abraham because they are the sons of Hagar traced through Ishmael is crushed under the weight of a proper hermeneutic.

All this Dispensational and Christian Zionism has poisoned the minds of many in the Christian Church and has turned the Christian Church into an outpost for non-Christian blasphemous thinking.