Continued Observations on the Protestant Regnant Folly’s Nazi Fever

1.) For those not in the know, recently there was a rather successful conference held by the Ogden, Utah chaps. However, since this rather successful conference was sanctioned by the Reformed powers that be the Reformed powers that be hit the overdrive button to find fault and “boy howdy” did they ever uncover a fault in the conference. It seems that there was a book vendor at the conference that was selling books not approved of by the powers that be. They were selling books that had the speech of Adolf Hitler in them and books that were trying to cast National Socialism in a positive light. That was bad enough for the Reformed cognoscenti but the coup-de-grace was when this same publishing house passed out, with every purchase, a little flyer that listed other businesses that this publishing house supported.

First, as to the books being sold, it is not being more than suggested that this vendor proves that there are Nazis in the Christian Nationalism movement and, worse yet, those Nazis are coming into the Reformed church. It’s the whole guilt by association thing. The Ogden lads have admitted their mistake of not looking more closely at the vendors they were hosting. Suave and Conn both said that their desire was to only have vendors who were explicitly Christian. The book vendor in question admits they are not explicitly Christian but rather are pro-white. Personally, I’m not a big censorship kind of guy. I don’t have a problem with a book vendor selling books that put forth ideas I don’t agree with. Second, these kind of Christian conferences happen all the time and there are books being sold that are far worse than anything being sold by Antelope Hill. I’ve been to several Christian conferences selling books by chaps promoting R2K ideas and I am here to tell you that the heresy that is R2K is right now far more dangerous to the church than Nazism is and yet nobody (except me) is screaming about how R2K heresy is being pushed at Christian conferences. So, as for me and my house, we see this aspect as a tempest in a teapot. I don’t agree with the philosophy of some of the books they were selling and with other of the books they were selling I do agree with. I highly recommend their “The Sword of Christ,” by Giles Corey. Tell you what. I’ll propose a deal. If all Christian conferences will get rid of all R2K literature at their conferences then I will support all Christian conferences getting rid of any material that seeks to allow National Socialism to explain itself in a different light than the post-war consensus narrative has anchored it in.

Now the second leg of this matter is another thing. The flyer being handed out by Antelope Hill should not have been handed out. As reported by the Ogden chaps, that flyer had some rank pagan businesses on it as well as a rather risque men’s magazine. One doesn’t expect that one is going to find at a Christian conference a vendor handing out a flyer that lists businesses that are explicitly anti-Christ. As Christians we have to be aware that the pro-white community has a good deal of Odinism and other non-Christian pagan ideas that is actually oppositional to Christian Nationalism.

2.) Having said all that, we must realize that the attempt by many who are raging at the Ogden chaps is just at attempt to control what can and cannot be said in the Reformed world. The Ogden blokes do not have the Reformed Institutional Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval and so they must be destroyed no matter what. Not only do the Ogden chaps have to deal with the “official Reformed world” nipping at their heels they also have to deal with the unofficial and barely Reformed world of Doug Wilson and the CREC nipping at their heels. Ogden seems to be carving out a place for themselves and those who are currently the “King of the Hill” don’t want any unapproved competition.

3.) Back to Hitler

In this context the whole “Hitler was a Christian Prince,” and “What we need is a Protestant Hitler” as uttered by good Christian me has arisen again. In my estimation the whole purpose of such statements is to be an Edgelord while attempting to move the Overton Window increasingly to the right. I get it that these statements make all just the right people go crazy. I admit I love seeing the angst in those who froth at the mouth at such statements. I also understand that such statements are intended to force people to once again question the post-war consensus and to quit forcing history into simple equations like, “Hitler = evil,” and “Allies = good.”

Full disclosure here …. my conclusions on this matter are Stalin was the worst of all, followed by Churchill and FDR. Hitler, while being no Christian Prince was probably no more or less evil than Churchill and FDR.  Any deep dive into the various sources (both revisionist and court historians) reveal this to be true. Also here it should be said that I don’t believe the six million number, though I don’t pretend to know what the actual number was. I fully understand why the Germans elected Hitler. I think Hitler and his actions were the inevitable outcome of the Versaille treaty. I think the “knife in the back” theory surrounding WWI has legs. I think that one can only understand the Germans and Hitler in light of the disaster that was the Weimar Republic and Magnus Hirschfeld with his Institut für Sexualwissenschaft, not to mention the growing Communist menace in Germany during the same time. If Christians today had been living in that Germany they may likely have found themselves concluding that a vote for Hitler was the way out.

However, having said all that, I don’t believe that it is wise or prudent to be going around saying that “Hitler was a Christian Prince,” or that “What we need is a Protestant Hitler.” First, that Hitler was most certainly not a Christian Prince is seen, if in nothing else, his embrace of the Aktion-T4 program. This program was state sponsored euthanasia of those deemed so crippled or broken that they were not worthy of life. Estimates suggest that between 100K and 250K blond aired, blue eyed Germans were murdered by the State. Now, like all else in the reporting of the Nazi actions there are exaggerations about this program but despite the exaggerations of the Commies pursued to pile guilt on the West, the program really existed and Hitler knew about this. There is no ability hear, as there is with the so called “final solution” to say “Hitler never knew.” He knew and approved and finally called the program off in 1941 when being met with resistance by the German people. Look, if we are going to be honest about all of this history and finally give up on the Communist inspired “history” that we call the “post-war consensus” then we need to admit ourselves where the problems were. The Aktion T-4 program was a problem. A problem that is once again being embraced right now in the West with the MAiDs program in Canada and the embarrassing euthanasia laws in the Netherlands. All this to say that like FDR, and Churchill, Hitler was no Christian Prince. (Stalin did go to Seminary though for awhile so maybe he is the Christian Prince we need?)

Next the phrase, “We need a Protestant Hitler.” Well, if Hitler was Protestant he wouldn’t be Hitler and a Protestant would never be Hitler. So, that’s kind of a silly statement.

However, by biggest problem with these slogans is not that it makes the Libtards go ape crazy. I love that. My problem is not the idea contained in the phrases is that we need to get rid of the liberal post war consensus that is driving us into the New World Order that intends to eliminate all nations, ethnicities and races. My problem is not that I disagree on the overall agenda of the people using the phrase. My problem here with these phrases, beyond what I’ve already limned out is that they are counterproductive to the number ONE goal of rescuing our people. Our goal here isn’t to rehabilitate Hitler. A non-Jewish interpretation of the 20th century may well come but for now our number one goal is delivering the Christian White man from being replaced and/or genocided. Most of our people have been propagandized for four generations now into the Jewish myth that is the post-war/civil rights historical myth.  Because that is so, I ask how wise is it to throw these people into the deep end of the pool by invoking Hitler? The knee-jerk reaction, because of generations of Jewish media propaganda, is for our people to recoil from such statements. I am contending that it is better to demonstrate how it is that White Christians are being incrementally eliminated across the globe so as to rally them around a pro White and Christian message. It is better to demonstrate that the purpose of migration movements in the last 40 years are so is to the end of canceling white people than it is to rehabilitate Hitler. It is better to demonstrate that Critical Race theory and WOKEis and Cultural Marxism, political correctness, and diversity, inclusion and equity, are all about snuffing out the Christian white man over against rehabilitating Hitler. It is better to talk about books like “White Girl Bleed A Lot” and “Don’t Make the Black Kids Angry,” than it is to try and rehabilitate Hitler if we want to rescue the Christian White man from genocide. It is better to point out the decline of the total percentage of white people in the world today compared to 50 years ago than it is to rehabilitate Hitler if we believe that there is an agenda to snuff out the Christian White man. It is better to point out how these united States have dropped from 88% white Christian to 63% white since the Hart Cellar act than it is to rehabilitate Hitler if we are burdened for our White brothers and sisters in Christ. It is better to point out how it is the case that according to United Nations definitions the white man is being genocided than it is to rehabilitate Hitler if we want to save kith and kin.

Genocide is defined in Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948) as,

“any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part 1 ; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.”

Our #1 goal is to stop the New World order with its necessary agenda to delimit and destroy the White Christian Man. It is true that the post-war consensus has lied about the 20th century and those lies will one day, I pray, be exposed as the lies they are, but right now prudence and wisdom requires that our first priority is to insure a future for our white Christian children and grandchildren. The White man cannot continue to be a light to the nations if he continues to be extinguished.

Examining D. Gnostic Hart’s Claim that Christian Nationalism is Worse Than Communism

“The CN position then is that magistrate enforces laws prohibiting envy. And you thought Communists were bad.”

Dr. Darryl Gnostic Hart

Hart has to attempt these absurd arguments because his position has him defending the idea that the Magistrate is to NOT criminalize blasphemy, not criminalize violation of Lord’s Day, not criminalize adultery, not criminalize idolatry. In point of fact the only 2 of the 10 commandments that it is possible that Hart would criminalize is Murder and theft.

R2K, of which Hart is a practitioner of, has explicitly said that the Magistrate has no responsibility to the first table of God’s law. The reason that R2K makes this move is that if the Magistrate had any responsibility to the first table of God’s law that would be the end of R2K’s cherished principled pluralism, and necessary political polytheism. R2K, in order to get off the ground, MUST teach that the Magistrate has no responsibility to the 1st table of God’s law.

Consider also, the implications of this for R2K as Hart’s position. What Hart has to argue here is that God’s Natural Law teaches that offense against the 1st table of God’s revealed law, is not to be criminalize and enforced by the Magistrate. Hence, for R2K, God’s Natural Law contradicts and limits God’s revealed Law.

However, as we have seen, once the camel’s nose is under the tent the camel begins to own the tent because now most R2K chaps insist that the Magistrate has no responsibility to criminalize and adjudicate the second table violation of adultery.”

Of course the whole “Communists” thing as written by Hart is a classical example of the logical fallacy called “red herring.” Hart knows this but when you have a weak hand you play all the cards you can. As there are exactly ZERO case laws where God tells His people what the punishment is for envy, it is clear that the Magistrate is not responsible to adjudicate or criminalize envy, though envy certainly remains a dreadful sin.

Hart in the quote above exposes his antinomian bona-fides. That is natural enough since R2K is, by definition, public square antinomianism.
R2K really is heretical theology that is not particularly Christian.

Recommended must read here — Martin Foulner’s “Theonomy & The Westminster Confession.”

Dr. Alan Strange’s Strange Jeremiad … A Response

“Something has happened, particularly in the post-covid world and I’ve been dealing quite a bit with this. There is a general populism, anti-establishmentarianism, anti-elitism, anti-intellectualism that is taking aim at our churches and your leadership, our governments and every sort of thing and it’s a lot of people on the right joining into this… this is something on the far right. And it particularly pertains to us. It is confessional Reformed churches of all sorts of churches that need to address this kind of thing Mr. Chairman. So, I think we are in a moment where other churches have been dealing with these matters.. and they (ARP, PCA, OPC, RPCNA) have kind of given this to us on a plate….
 
This (CN & Kinism) is something very much on the right. Let’s not deceive ourselves. This (ARP statement on race) is something that in God’s providence falls to us and I think we need to see it and we need to seize the occasion and stand with our fellow churches that have gone before us in NAPARC.”
 
Dr. Alan Strange
President Mid-America Seminary
Begging URCNA to Adopt Ben Glaser’s Napkin notes

1.) Let’s consider what the something is that has happened that President Strange so strongly laments. The something that has happened is that the Boomer world (of which Strange is a member) no longer exists. The Boomer world was a world of tightly controlled information that allowed massive amounts of propaganda to become “group think.” That tightly controlled information matrix shaped and conditioned the Boomer mind. What happened post-covid is that the lid was blown off the managerial group think because it became easily reported and detectable the amount of mass deception that had occurred to create the covid scam. Once people clued in to that deception all other previous deceptions began to be exposed. The greatest of these deceptions — and a deception that accounts for people on the right becoming anti-establishmentarian and anti-elite was the deception that has been dubbed “the post-war consensus.” (Personally, I prefer “the post-enlightenment consensus.) Strange, being a sold member of the Boomer era cannot wrap his mind around the intellectual shift that has occurred in those a generation or two younger than he is.2.) The anti-establishmentarian mindset that Strange complains of is the consequence of increasing numbers of people learning what some of us have known for decades and that is the absolute corruption and fraud of the establishment — including that in the Church. People are increasing anti-establishment because they have come face to face with the contribution of the visible church to the the lie that was the post-war consensus. Strange’s posturing, advocating, and thumping against the Ordo Amoris and Christian Nationalism only reinforces the very anti-establishment mind set that he so earnestly wars against. Strange, in this speech, and in other speeches he has done provides the very foundation of anti-establishment that he so earnestly laments.

3.) Much the same could be said of the anti-elitism that is in the air that Strange complains of. Ironically, Strange is exhibit A for the reason people are becoming anti-elite. There is Strange with all his education, and all his status, begging people to become as elitist as he is. One would think that by now the Church officials would get a clue that the only reason people are edging towards anti-elitism is because the elite are so damn frequently wrong.

4.) Next up is Strange’s wringing his hands of “anti-intellectualism.” This accusation is especially choice if only because the anti-intellectuals right now are the very elites who are accusing everyone else as being “anti-intellectual.” It is the very marrow of anti-intellectualism to ignore all that has been written by Reformed Fathers of the past on the subject of Race and Christian Nationalism. Blokes like Strange keep making pronouncement as if they are Moses on Mt. Sinai, but the pronouncements they make are against centuries and centuries of church theologians and intellectuals. Come, come, Dr. Strange, who are the real anti-intellectuals here? Physician heal thyself.

5.) Yes, all this is indeed a “general populism.” But where else is there to turn when the putative “thought-leaders” are so abysmally clueless because they are stuck in a propaganda fog that is now being blown away by the winds of reality?

6.) Strange is correct when he suggests that those of us who are done with the classical liberal worldview that he is trying to establish are “taking aim at our churches and your leadership, our governments and every sort of thing…” As counter-revolutionaries we plan to restore Biblical Christianity and if that takes tearing down your house in order to once again honor Christ as King over every nation we have no problem doing so. Strange mentions “taking aim at your leadership.” I’m here to tell you that somebody needs to do a mercy killing by taking aim at the current inept and bogus leadership. Not since the Reformation as the clergy been so utterly torpid and jejune, while at the same time being intoxicated with their own sub-Christian authority. Dr. Strange, you would grow to be an old man by listening to all my stories about clergy abuse. It’s about time someone took aim at the current leadership.

7.) Next up, Dr. Strange claims all this challenge is coming “from the right.” Allow me to suggest that only a man on the left would ever suggest that what the right is seeking to accomplish is somehow sinister. Strange, strangely says not only that all which he denounces is from the right but he goes on to say it is from “the far right.” Allow me to suggest that Dr. Strange would absolutely loosen his bowels if he ever really came face to face with someone on the “far right.” As it is, he is safe because what is being proposed from me and my mates is not from the right or even the far right. What is being proposed is merely Biblical Christianity.

8.) Next Strange dares refer to how God’s providence has brought to them this historically unique moment. While I recognize God’s providence in all things, I would say that this is an example of God using Satan to accomplish yet unknown divine ends. Strange’s dirge noting God’s providence is more akin to God’s providence that gave Paul a thorn in the flesh. Yes, it was from God but it was all still born of Satan’s messenger. What Strange and his Jacobin hordes are promoting is nothing but that which is baked in sulfur and frosted with the coals of hell. If Strange’s vision (and NAPARC’s) is successful Biblical Christianity will go into abeyance until God is pleased to let Strange’s generation die in the wilderness.

9.) What else can all this NAPARC folly be except an example of how “God is turning us over,” for our folly? And, we deserve it! We in the West have sown the wind and now God has been pleased to force us to reap the whirlwind. We have no reason to complain. We have only to cover our mouths and say, “All the ways of the Lord are just.”

Yet, there are a few … a remnant, who are prophets in the wilderness lifting their voices so as to be shut down by the elites and by the establishment. We will continue to cheerfully take up our crosses, find ourselves experiencing the joy of battle, and press on for the crown rights of King Jesus … even as over the visible”conservative” “Reformed” “churches.”

Rev. Larry Ball Raises The Warning …. McAtee Gooses the Warning

The Reformed and Evangelical Church has been asleep for nearly 100 years. It is an interesting fact that before 1962 homosexuality was considered a criminal offense in all 50 states. Since then, the Nursing Father has become a malevolent murderer, and yet our denomination rushes ahead almost with rage to declare Christian Nationalism as the greatest and last danger to face modern man.

I don’t write this with any malice or malevolence. I appreciate all the hard work the Committee has done. I think they tried to be fair and confessional. I just think there is a major problem in the middle. It’s an American problem and now it is a Christian problem. The Religious polytheism endorsed by the Committee is a prescription for the death of a nation. It may take a few generations, but it is coming. If Christ is not ruler over all, then he is not a ruler at all.”

Rev. Larry Ball
Aquilla Report

Rev. Ball is a good man. He is polite and cautious in his statements. These are qualities that I have not yet developed. At my age I don’t suppose these qualities will be cultivated. People trapped in a 5 alarm fire aren’t in need of politeness or cautiousness.

You see, I don’t think the PCA Ad-Interim committed on Race tried to be fair or confessional. If they had tried to be fair or confessional they would not have ignored Q. 108 of the WLC. Unlike Rev. Ball, I also am convinced that we are not waiting for our nation to be dead. It is dead already. The NAPARC (CREC, CRC, SBC) pronouncements on CN/Kinism are merely a reflection of that death. All this egalitarianism is not leading to death. It is announcing that the church and nation are dead.

As far as I’m concerned, the NAPARC churches, taken as a whole (no doubt exceptions exist in individual congregations) are ICHABOD …. the glory has departed. They have been weighed in the balances and found wanting…. MENE MENE TEKEL UPHARSIN. They are full of dead men’s bones, fit for neither carrion nor ghouls. They make Mordor look like taking a trip to Disneyland. Flee now or witness your children / grandchildren whither and die.

In this same vein over on X Dr. Stephen Wolfe is declaring this generation of Presbyterians to be “the dumbest generation of Presbyterians ever.” That saying a good deal given how dumb previous generations of Presbyterians have been.

Understand that all of this white hot rage by Presbyterian clergy towards white people who are trying to salvage their civilization happens at a time when

1.) Ireland is burning to the ground because the Irish understand the attempt being made by their own Government to replace the white Irish.

2.) In the US the fraud and mayhem committed by the non-white community against the white community continues to balloon.

3.) The stranger and the alien continue to take over communities in the US such as Frisco, Texas, Dearborne, Michigan, Lewiston/Auburn, Maine, and Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota… to name only a few.

Yet despite the death of the West and the replacement of the WASP, the NAPARC denominations are most animated by the incredible danger of the white Christian desiring to remain white and Christian.

Look, there is nothing in Scripture that requires a people, in order to be considered Christian, to commit ethnocide in order to establish their sanctified bona fides.

If there remain any clergy/Elders out there, or any laity with any influence the time for passivity has passed. The time for protecting yourself by being silent has passed. If you won’t nail your colors to the mast now it will be too late. Quit with your timidity. Now is the time to stand.

Rev. Joseph Spurgeon Insistence That All Local Churches Must be Willing to be Polyglot – Part I

Rev. Joseph Spurgeon writes (Hereafter RJS)

“Michael Spangler (whose ordination was revoked by his former Presbyterian denomination) and his followers argue that the error of Peter in Galatians 2 was only about Judaizing and therefore has nothing to do with ethnicity. They argue that because the underlying heresy was justification by works, Paul’s rebuke has no application to modern attempts to divide Christians along racial or ethnic lines.

But this misses the point entirely.”

Bret responds,

1.) Note how RJS seeks to poison the well by going out of his way to mention that Spangler’s was ordination was revoked without also telling us that on this point Spangler’s denomination formed a Kangaroo court in order to revoke his ordination.

2.) We should remember here that Spurgeon is not only arguing against Spangler but he is arguing against long recognized reformed theologian Dr. John Frame who wrote,

“Scripture, as I read it, does not require societies, or even churches, to be integrated racially. Jews and Gentiles were brought together by God’s grace into one body. They were expected to love one another and to accept one another as brothers in the faith. But the Jewish Christians continued to maintain a distinct culture, and house churches were not required to include members of both groups.”

John Frame,
“Racism, Sexism, Marxism”

3.) That the Church may indeed be divided along ethnic lines is clearly taught in Scripture in Revelation 21,

22 But I saw no temple in it, for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple. 23 The city had no need of the sun or of the moon to shine [l]in it, for the [m]glory of God illuminated it. The Lamb is its light. 24 And the nations [n]of those who are saved shall walk in its light, and the kings of the earth bring their glory and honor [o]into it.

Here we see that it is the nations by nations that come into the new Jerusalem. The church is constituted as a nation of nations. One body… any member nations.

RJS writes,

No one denies that the Judaizers were teaching a false gospel. The question is how Peter participated in that error. Peter did not deny justification by faith with his mouth. Peter did not begin preaching salvation by circumcision. Peter’s sin was his conduct. He withdrew from Gentile believers and separated himself from them.

Why did Paul rebuke him so publicly?

Because Peter’s actions communicated something false about the nature of Christ’s church. His separation suggested that faith in Christ was not enough for full fellowship among God’s people. A dividing wall had been rebuilt where Christ had torn one down.

Bret responds,

Pretend that Peter and Paul had been eating with a bunch of converted Jews who were no longer trying to keep the ceremonial law in order to be justified, before the Judaizers arrived. Pretend that Peter pulled away when the Judaizers showed up and Paul spoke harshly to Peter for pulling away from the Jewish non ceremonial law table arrangements.  The issue for Paul was NOT ethnicity. Paul would have been just as upset with Peter if Peter had pulled away from eating with converted Jews  by the self righteous Judaizers. Spurgeon has misunderstood Galatians 2.

RJS,

In his article on race realism, Spangler spends much of his time defending propositions that are not actually in dispute. Churches are often homogeneous. Churches are often shaped by language, nation, culture, and providence.

Different peoples have different histories, customs, and strengths. None of that proves his point.

The issue is not whether churches are often homogeneous. The issue is whether race and ancestry may become a principle of ecclesiastical separation.

A church that happens to be predominantly one ethnicity is one thing. A church that is intentionally organized around ethnicity, and which directs otherwise qualified Christians elsewhere because of their race, is something very different.

Bret responds

Quoting from a source that wishes to remain anonymous,

What Spangler et al are pushing back against is NOT the occasional exception or visitor but what is tantamount to ethnic invasion and replacement attempting to seek legitimacy in local churches whose foremost duty is to its own people and their God-given covenants of blood and kin.

Once again, Spurgeon is engaging in categorical conflation. A right to the general church doesn’t mean a right to all individual chapters and iterations of said church. An ancillary situation brings this into greater clarity: a stranger may be invited to family worship but cannot demand admittance. National and ethnic considerations clearly intersect with church worship. A Japanese Christian could not simply fly to Germany and demand membership and voting rights in a German church. He could visit or become a non-voting member who submits himself to the local customs and habits but his foreign expression of being mediated by his racial and cultural identity make him incompatible with the duties and privileges of full membership.

RJS writes,

Spangler appeals repeatedly to prudence. He argues that separation may be justified by social tensions, cultural differences, immigration, national concerns, or the preservation of a people. But the Judaizers also had prudential arguments. They wanted peace between Jews and Gentiles. They wanted continuity with ancient customs. They wanted to avoid scandal among conservative Jews. They wanted to preserve a distinct people.
Paul did not deny that tensions existed. He did not deny that practical concerns were real. He asked a different question: Was Peter’s conduct in step with the truth of the gospel?

Bret responds,

This is an untrue observation on Spurgeon’s part.

The prudential reasons that Spangler has for distinct bodies of people never excludes the doctrine of Justification by faith alone from any of the distinct bodies that might form, whereas the putatively prudential reason the Judaizers had for distinct bodies was the denial and elimination of the doctrine of justification by faith alone. That can hardly be considered a valid prudential reason. Spurgeon error here is monumental.

I would also doubt that the Judaizers ever wanted peace with Christians, except on the terms of denying the faith. Nothing Spangler writes denies the faith.

RJS writes

That is still the question.

A nation may have concerns about preserving its culture, customs, language, and people. Families certainly have an interest in preserving their own heritage and lineage. But the church is not a nation, and it is not an ethnic association. The church is the assembly of those united to Christ by faith.

Bret responds

The church universal certainly is not a single nation but the church is a nation of nations. We see that throughout scripture. We have already mentioned the Revelation 21 passage earlier. Here we quote from NT theologian Martin Wyngaarden,

“More than a dozen excellent commentaries could be mentioned that all interpret Israel as thus inclusive of Jew and Gentile, in this verse, — the Gentile adherents thus being merged with the covenant people of Israel, though each nationality remains distinct.”

“For, though Israel is frequently called Jehovah’s People, the work of his hands, his inheritance, yet these three epithets severally are applied not only to Israel, but also to Assyria and to Egypt: “Blessed be Egypt, my people, and Assyria, the work of my hands, and Israel, mine inheritance.” 19:25.

Thus the highest description of Jehovah’s covenant people is applied to Egypt, — “my people,” — showing that the Gentiles will share the covenant blessings, not less than Israel. Yet the several nationalities are here kept distinct, even when Gentiles share, in the covenant blessing, on a level of equality with Israel. Egypt, Assyria, and Israel are not nationally merged. And the same principles, that nationalities are not obliterated, by membership in the covenant, applies, of course, also in the New Testament dispensation.”

Martin Wyngaarden
The Future of the Kingdom in Prophecy and Fulfillment: A Study of the Scope of “Spiritualization” in Scripture — pp. 101-102.

Spurgeon isn’t escaping this “nationing” of the church. Spurgeon merely desires each individual church to be able to be a polyglot national church.

The missing context to a whites’ only church, that RJS seems to miss is that it should be normative on a national scale that immigration is so vanishingly small that in a white country whites only is the default. The current social order of racial and ethnic leveling and forced integration is itself illegitimate and so forces white churches into making choices that they should not have to make in the first place.

RJS writes,

The New Testament recognizes nations, tribes, tongues, and peoples. It does not make ancestry a term of communion.

Bret responds,

Again, Spurgeon misses the point. The Church universal is a nation of nations but not all local churches must turn themselves into outposts of the United Nations.

We repeat what Frame offered earlier,

“Scripture, as I read it, does not require societies, or even churches, to be integrated racially. Jews and Gentiles were brought together by God’s grace into one body. They were expected to love one another and to accept one another as brothers in the faith. But the Jewish Christians continued to maintain a distinct culture, and house churches were not required to include members of both groups.”

John Frame,
“Racism, Sexism, Marxism”