Dr. Darryl Hart opines,
So the state, as you have it, ministers justice and grace and does so only on the basis of God’s word. That sounds like a lot of ministry of the word going on. Maybe you mistyped. Been known to happen.
Obviously, as you no doubt already know, it was indeed a typo. My you are full of sarcasm aren’t you?
This is really simple Darryl. Follow closely.
The ministry of justice according to God’s word is common grace to those to whom it is ministered. The ministry of word and sacrament is special grace to God’s people. See, that was easy. We managed to keep a distinction while at the same time seeing that God is directly sovereign over both.
Please don’t try this at home. This is only safe with the experts.
Dr. Darryl Hart,
Also, if I understand you correctly, there is a defacto state church now, and defacto state administering justice according to God’s word. Or is it the case that something really is different between Geneva in 1560 and Lansing, Mich. in 2008. I know I am dangerously stupid, but your lessons sure are hard to follow. Maybe that’s because neither the state nor the church administer logic.
Yes there is a defacto state Church now. It is the State Church of humanism as promulgated in the State Schools. The defacto justice that the state is administering is the justice of the God Demos according to Demos’ positivist law.
See, not hard to follow Darryl. Why, it’s so simple that even you can play along.
I’ll pass on teaching logic to you. Some things are to difficult … even for the mighty.
Shame that there seems to be a double standard at Greenbaggins. Hopefully Dr. Hart has the honor to respond to you here.
Is this what got “moderated” over at GB? Funny.
Presbyterians will tolerate everything except for when an outsider answers an insider in kind.
American Presbyterians didn’t invent the double standard, but they did perfect it.
Yes, that is what was moderated.
Dr Hart is like this consistently here: http://connversation.wordpress.com/ and here: http://aboulet.com/.
Sorry, I clicked “submit” instead of “preview”. I know that the sites I noted are run by followers of Peter Enns. Even though I don’t agree with them on issues of ANE documents and their reliability they do ask some honest questions about who we should vote for and why. Dr Hart has taken his attitude there and has been challenged on it. I agree with Dr Hart when he engages them on “inspiration” but disagree with him on R2Kt. To hurry this up Dr Hart is challenged on this here: http://aboulet.com/2008/09/27/david-congdon-a-primer-on-missional-theology/#comments.
Gadbois isn’t going to challenge Dr Hart because of who he is. Is Gadbois unashamedly seeking approval over there?
http://greenbaggins.wordpress.com/2008/06/02/lane-leads-wtj-follows/