“One moves swiftly and imperceptibly from a world in which affirmative action can’t be ended because its beneficiaries are to weak to a world in which it can’t be ended because its beneficiaries are to strong.”
Christopher Caldwell
Reflections on the Revolution in Europe — Immigration, Islam, and the West – p.326
Affirmative action was a foolish policy from the very beginning because,
1.) As Caldwell’s quote above implies, once affirmative action as a policy is pursued, it is nearly impossible to discontinue since special interest groups form around such a policy in order to protect it and to defend it. Such affirmative action special interests groups become roadblocks to ending affirmative action. Such an example of this is seen in the state of California which still has affirmative action programs designed to foster the hiring of non-whites even though non-whites now form a demographic majority in California.
2.) Affirmative action is a subsidy program. Whenever the government subsidizes something they get more of what they are subsidizing. In this case what they are subsidizing are people who are less qualified filling positions that would have otherwise been filled by more qualified people. A continued pursuit of such a policy leads inevitably to a culture that is less competitive with the world than it might otherwise be.
3.) Affirmative action creates and makes race pimping a profitable enterprise. Since affirmative action assumes the inequity of those receiving affirmative action a class of people arise who have it in their interest to professionally lobby in such a way that the putative inferior status of those receiving affirmative action can never be erased. Affirmative action policy creates men like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton who exist in order to ensure that the perception is that the recipients of affirmative action never cease in being victims that need affirmative action.
4.) Affirmative action communicates to the recipients of affirmative action that they can not compete without the scales being weighted and rigged in their direction. Affirmative action then creates a psychology in the recipient class that perpetuates the very inequity that it was created in order to remove.
5.) Affirmative action communicates to the majority population that those who receive affirmative action are indeed inferior. What else are they to believe given that the premise behind affirmative action is that the recipients of it advance not on the merits of their ability but rather because their inability doesn’t allow them to compete on a level playing field. In this case affirmative action perpetuates the perception of the inequity that it is seeking to address to the point where even if affirmative action was answering the problem of inequity nobody in the non victim class would believe it since the ongoing necessity of affirmative action continues to testify to the inferiority of those who it is extended to.
Bret,
I’ve seen the following… at least I think this is what I’ve seen.
The affirmative action combined with the state providing well-fare at a higher rate to un-wed mothers with children have produced a far weaker social infrastructure within the black community. There are few, as a portion of the whole, complete families. Instead you find multiple “baby mama’s” with multiple “daddys” as a family unit. They rarely have a father within the “functioning” family unit.
This is the end of their(state) “doctrines”… the family and thereby the church and the society at large have been decimated due to removing the “social ladder” or perhaps better stated “economical ladder” to be climbed. By handing jobs and money to those not deserving (don’t read that the support wasn’t possibly needed), what has been created instead of improvment is decimation within nearly all facets of that community. Thereby weakening our whole society and thereby country and more importantly the Church as she has been substituted with the state.
Here again we see that when the law of the Father is ignored life… all of life… goes sideways. When the family is not the family and the Church is not the Church and the State becomes all to all… (you can fill in your own finishing thought)
Bob
If I could play devil’s advocate here, what do you say to people who believe that without Affirmative Action minorities wouldn’t have had much of a chance to get hired to quality jobs?
I would say they would be hard pressed to “prove” that and I would recommend that they read Clarence Thomas’ biography.