On the last Panetta Announcement we were informed women would war
(We were assured that woman would manage and our power would be even more)
They would battle till broken and crippled, while our men carried the shame
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “In war ye shall list only male names”
1.) A 6’5″ 220 pound Marine is injured in combat. Is his 130 pound female colleague going to carry or even drag him out of danger?
Consider that the average American female soldier is five inches shorter than her male counterpart. She has half the upper-body strength and 37 percent less muscle mass. Women also have 25 to 30 percent less aerobic capacity, which reduces their endurance.
2.) A female soldier is captured. Her cries of anguish while being repeatedly raped by the enemy is heard by her male colleagues across enemy lines. Will the male soldiers successfully repress the normal male urge to protect the woman or will they cast caution aside and go to their deaths in a vain but noble attempt to rescue the maiden in distress?
Israel is the only nation with real-world experience putting women in combat. Having gained that experience, Israel has banned women from combat units since 1950. Israel’s lessons were hard-won; the feminists in Congress have yet to learn them.
The first lesson is that men could be taught to kill strangers, but they would not stop caring for women. That is as it should be: civilized countries want to create soldiers, not savages. During the 1948 War of Liberation Israeli men would abandon their missions to come to the aid of women in distress, thereby endangering their missions, their units and themselves.
3.) And what of this normal male urge to protect the female? What will this mean in the context of battle? In the context of training?
In his insightful essay “Women Can’t Fight,” James Webb retells the story of how a naval-academy first-classman was reprimanded by his company commander during the first week of the academic year, the week that was traditionally the most rigorous week of the academic year for plebes. His offense? He had “upset” a female plebe. He had repeatedly corrected her table manners to no effect. In frustration, the upperclassman had ordered her to eat her next meal with oversized utensils, which was an extremely mild reproach. Her response was to burst into tears. Her female roommate hastened to the company commander and protested her friend’s punishment because it would be embarrassing. The upperclassman was ordered to stop harassing the girl.
4.) How will women be treated by Muslims when taken as POW’s when the Muslim believes that the Woman is a lower being? Will the insult of a having a woman killing Muslim men lead to tortures unknown once women are captured?
When the Muslim opposition discovered that they were fighting women in battle with Israel, the Arabs spontaneously chose to fight to the death. The very thought of being defeated by a band of women was so shameful to them that it made them implacable. They would not surrender to women. Every encounter became bitter and protracted.
5.) Are women, who are on the whole physically weaker then men, going to reduce the fighting capacity of front line units?
Consider that women assigned to artillery units are often too weak to lift the ammunition. These are tasks that are expected for these military occupational specialties so, clearly, standards are being dumbed down to accommodate women.
Also consider a study of military personnel who have reached the rank of colonel revealed that 5 to 6 percent of men had permanent orthopedic damage due to the rigors of military life. The number for women was thirty percent. As a Nation are we good with abusing women like this?
6.) Will surprise attacks on front line units find troops not being alert because those troops are having sex? At the very least jealousies between troops could easily wreck front line combat units as they have their morale deteriorated because of competing competition for the female troops affections.
All of this is just another example of the Jacobin insistence that reality must conform to their preconceived worldview. This progressive worldview insists, quite despite the evidence, that men and women are the same and are interchangeable cogs where no difference is discovered when one is replaced with the other. All of this is in worship of the philosophy of Egalitarianism. Egalitarianism teaches that sex roles are mere social constructs that can be changed at will and that men and women are not really different. And so, many women will be sacrificed to support this lie and our Military will exchange male testosterone for Female Breasts.
In closing, make no mistake. This is not an agenda being pushed by people who do not know the above stated facts. Oh sure, there are always the useful idiots who are the true believers in such lunacy. However, the NWO oligarchy, who are at the top of the Bureaucratic food chain, full well know that women can neither be men nor fight like men. The push for equality is merely a tool towards a larger goal and higher end. Equality is being used as a tool to eliminate Biblical Christianity and the Historic West. All of this is about overturning a Christian social order and dethroning God in favor of humanistic dark chaos and old night and the enthronement of soul-less misogynist misanthropic humanistic man.
But the God’s of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return.
A great deal of the statistics and accounts are drawn from,
http://www.weirdrepublic.com/episode123.htm
All very good points. As for number six, it is already going on behind the front lines, so there really is no reason why it wouldn’t spill over onto the front lines. I’ve heard several accounts of navy vessels hosting prostitution rings since women were allowed to serve on-board.
As a slight aside: Given that the republic is dead and tyrants with an unquenchable thirst to disarm the American people now fully control the upper reaches of government, isn’t it about time we welcomed such egalitarian “progression” of the U.S. military? The weaker and more pathetic the military is at this point, the better.
So to the progressives I say this: please, continue the experiment. By all means, continue trying to warp reality to fit your twisted ideology. Those of us who may one day be forced to meet your hoards on the battlefield in defense of life and liberty itself will be grateful for the advantage.
Joel,
Yes, I thought of that insight as a potential longterm advantage. Yet I can’t help but still weep for all the men and women who are being destroyed by this horrid Christ Hating theology. So, I am both sad and encouraged by this turn of events. Saddened because this is all going to lead to death and mayhem of people created in the image of God. Encouraged by knowing that a weakened military means a weakened Empire project as pursued by the United Babylon States of America.
While I agree with Joel’s point that such a policy would weaken the State as a military force, it would create a very real difficulty for the men opposing the State to have to kill the women whom the State sent into battle against them.
Joshua,
There are certain realities that might make it easier to overcome.
Obama would probably answer that the concerns of points 2,3,&6 are ameliorated if all the male soldiers are gay.
You know … I’ve been thinking about that.
Are they going to have to have Male Hetero Barracks, Female Hetero Barracks, Male Homo Barracks, and Female Lesbian Barracks?
But what do they do then with all the Bisexuals?
I guess all that Barracks building will be good for the Economy.