Remember that Rev. Jeffery said above that there is not the slightest shred of biblical justification for any government to legislate against the free movement of law-abiding citizens from one country to another. I have already given more than a shred by invoking the 8th commandment.
Another fact that shreds Rev. Jeffery’s “not a shred” argument is the 6th commandment which requires us to not only “not murder,” but also that,
“I am not to dishonour, hate, injure, or kill my neighbour by thoughts, words, or gestures, and much less by deeds, whether personally or through another … ”
And yet the kind of immigration that Rev. Jeffrey is calling for is a case of dishonoring, hating and injuring our own family and neighbors by supporting a policy that will create a permanent economic underclass. The kind of policy that Rev. Jeffrey is calling for will result in eliminating the middle class while creating a have vs. have not social order. The support for this statement can be found in Harvard Economist George Borjas analysis in this article,
http://cis.org/node/4573
Rev. Jeffrey and the Theopolis institute are confusing sojourning with integration. Biblical sojourning was segregated. This handy chart reveals that there were different categories for non resident and that the non resident remained distinct from the resident member of the Nation.
http://www.biblestudytools.com/encyclopedias/isbe/stranger-and-sojourner-in-the-old-testament.html
These Old Testament distinctions are completely disregarded by Rev. Jeffrey and the Theopolis Institute. This is a ham-handed handling of Scripture on the part of Rev. Jeffrey and the Theopolis Institute and makes for a distinct misrepresentation of truth and reality.
And you didn’t even mention several other passages and lines of reasoning.
Acts 17:26:
From one man he made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands.
There is also the Fifth Commandment and multitudes of Israelite laws designed to protect the tribal lands. In Israel, it wasn’t even good enough that the borders should be secured from strangers. Within their own borders, the lands of the different tribes were secured (though not quite as strictly) amongst each other. There is also the fact that the nations will continue to be distinctive even into the New Heavens and Earth. This is all stuff you’ve gone over before, but this idea that there is “no evidence” or even counter-evidence to strong national boundaries in Scripture is, quite frankly, absurd. It makes me wonder if those who make this argument are even reading the same Bible I am.
I was hoping you’d pick up and run with that article, Bret. Good to see your careful analysis in light of the rather sweeping claims so often made about these issues.