Rutgers University Lowers the Standard for English Courses … and the Implications Following

The English department at Rutgers University declared that proper English grammar is racist and will be making changes in it’s English standards so as to stand with Black Lives Matters.

News Report

This means that if one is a in State on Campus student at Rutgers University you will be paying 35K to attend Rutgers so you can learn to speak and write like an Australopithecus aborigine.

This action begs the question; “Who is being the “racist” here? (I really don’t like using that word but as it has, in this case, become short-hand for treating minorities as something less simply because they are minorities, I will succumb to using the Marxist word “racist.”) The pursuit of this policy demonstrates what is widely known as the low expectations of soft bigotry. This policy assumes that minorities are not capable of learning the Queen’s English and as such we will dumb the language down in the course work at freaking Rutgers in order that minorities can feel good about their accomplishment of passing their English courses and creative writing courses.

This is also an example of how socialism works. Socialism always leads to the least common denominator level. Rutgers has assumed that minorities are genetically too stupid to learn proper English and so Rutgers is going to dumb all non-minorities down to the level of the ignorant minorities (per Rutgers’ obvious belief) who allegedly can’t learn the English language as well as the white man. The consequence of this is that everybody becomes as stupid as the stupidest minority’s inability. It won’t be long until Rutgers’ student vocabulary is going to be reduced to, “sheeeeeit, Motha fuku,” and other like linguistic expertise.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrTSYhGtaqw&fbclid=IwAR2297wM9Dhk2gnvssHCuJ4ysa0XZpn4FEjnWnJL2Z32iDyLe2B1rn4nr1g

If we want to continue to push the envelope we would note that this is the policy one gets when one puts minority students into University settings who are not capable of the University regimen. We have, via SAT affirmative action, added a few hundred SAT points to minority SAT scores for the simple reason that minorities are identified as minorities when taking the test. The result of these added SAT points is that minorities are allowed into University settings where they can’t compete. Once it becomes obvious that the minority member can’t compete at the level of present standards held up before the other students the consequences are one of three. Either the University can,

1.) Do the same that was done for the minority test taker when they took the SAT and just arbitrarily add points to the test that minorities take at University.

2.) Let the minorities flunk out. This is not really an option for the Universities because if Universities allowed minorities to flunk out because they couldn’t do the work, the consequence for the University would be lawsuits brought against the University for “racism.”

3.) The University can reduce the standard for all the students so that the incapable minority student who shouldn’t be at the University to begin with, can compete.

There is something else that needs to be said here. Not only is it the case that unqualified minorities are pushed along in the SAT tests by adding points to their SAT score simply because they are minorities but minorities are also pushed along (as we are seeing at Rutgers) so that they can graduate. All along the way, minorities are pushed along with the result that minority “professionals,” are hacks in the fields they are working. Naturally, there are exceptions. There are minorities who don’t have to be pushed along and really are qualified but notwithstanding that reality, our current system, as can now be clearly seen thanks to Rutgers University, is filling the ranks of white collar professionals (Doctors, Lawyers, Shrinks, Teachers, Ministers, etc.) with minorities who are not qualified to be in the occupation that they are quite literally…. practicing.

When you study this stuff out and realize what is going on, you have to be nuts to want to go to a professional who is a minority member.

Now, of course, some will read this and scream that I have just written a “racist” screed. But if there is “racism” here it is the racism of my opponents who continue with the soft bigotry of low expectations which in turn results in the constant embrace of socialism which in turn lowers the standards, not only for English, but for varying professions that are being staffed by some of those who are only in those professions because the standard was dropped so that they could be there.

If I am guilty of anything, it is not “racism,” but rather I have committed even a worse sin than that. I have committed the sin of noticing.

Author: jetbrane

I am a Pastor of a small Church in Mid-Michigan who delights in my family, my congregation and my calling. I am postmillennial in my eschatology. Paedo-Calvinist Covenantal in my Christianity Reformed in my Soteriology Presuppositional in my apologetics Familialist in my family theology Agrarian in my regional community social order belief Christianity creates culture and so Christendom in my national social order belief Mythic-Poetic / Grammatical Historical in my Hermeneutic Pre-modern, Medieval, & Feudal before Enlightenment, modernity, & postmodern Reconstructionist / Theonomic in my Worldview One part paleo-conservative / one part micro Libertarian in my politics Systematic and Biblical theology need one another but Systematics has pride of place Some of my favorite authors, Augustine, Turretin, Calvin, Tolkien, Chesterton, Nock, Tozer, Dabney, Bavinck, Wodehouse, Rushdoony, Bahnsen, Schaeffer, C. Van Til, H. Van Til, G. H. Clark, C. Dawson, H. Berman, R. Nash, C. G. Singer, R. Kipling, G. North, J. Edwards, S. Foote, F. Hayek, O. Guiness, J. Witte, M. Rothbard, Clyde Wilson, Mencken, Lasch, Postman, Gatto, T. Boston, Thomas Brooks, Terry Brooks, C. Hodge, J. Calhoun, Llyod-Jones, T. Sowell, A. McClaren, M. Muggeridge, C. F. H. Henry, F. Swarz, M. Henry, G. Marten, P. Schaff, T. S. Elliott, K. Van Hoozer, K. Gentry, etc. My passion is to write in such a way that the Lord Christ might be pleased. It is my hope that people will be challenged to reconsider what are considered the givens of the current culture. Your biggest help to me dear reader will be to often remind me that God is Sovereign and that all that is, is because it pleases him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *