If Congressmen could say it in 1924 then why can’t minister’s say it in 2020?

On 08 April, 1924 Colorado 1st District US Congressman William Vaile said before Congress,

“Let me emphasize here that the restrictionists of Congress do not claim that the “Nordic” race, or even the Anglo-Saxon race, is the best race in the world. Let us concede, in all fairness that the Czech is a more sturdy laborer with a very low percentage of crime and insanity, that the Jew is the best businessman in the world, and that the Italian has a spiritual grasp and an artistic sense which have greatly enriched the world and which have, indeed, a spiritual exaltation and an artistic creative sense which the Nordic rarely attains. Nordics need not be vain about their own qualifications. It well behooves them to be humble.What we do claim is that the northern European and particularly Anglo-Saxons made this country. Oh, yes; the others helped. But … [t]hey came to this country because it was already made as an Anglo-Saxon commonwealth. They added to it, they often enriched it, but they did not make it, and they have not yet greatly changed it.We are determined that they shall not … It is a good country. It suits us. And what we assert is that we are not going to surrender it to somebody else or allow other people, no matter what their merits, to make it something different. If there is any changing to be done, we will do it ourselves.”-Cong. Rec., April 8, 1924, 5922

On 12 April, 1924 US Congressman Scott Leavitt from Montana said on the floor of Congress,

On 12 April, 1924 US Congressman Scott Leavitt from Montana said on the floor of Congress,”The instinct for national and race preserevation is not one to be condemned …. No one should be better able to understand the desire of Americans to keep America American than the gentleman from Illinois (Adolph Sabath), who is leading the attack on this measure, of the gentlemen from New York, Mr Dickstein, Mr. Jacobstein, Mr. Emanuel Celler , and Mr. Perlman. They are of the one great historic people who have maintained the identity of their race throughout the centuries because they believe sincerely that that are chosen people, with certain ideals to maintain, and knowing that the loss of racial identity means a change of ideals. That fact should make it easy for them and the majority of the most active opponents of this measure in the spoken debate to recognize and sympathize with our viewpoint, which is not so extreme as that of their own race, but only demands that the admixture of other peoples shall be only of such kind and proportions and in such quantities as will not alter racial characteristics more rapidly than they can be assimilated as to ideas of government as well as blood.”

Of course, as we know, Vaile and Leavitt and their allies prevailed in 1924 in shutting the door to excessive immigration over the objections of the opposition as lodged primarily in the Jewish contingent in Congress. They shut the door with the express goal of maintaining a set racial and ethnic identity that had been that racial and ethnic identity that characterized the predominant expression of Americans up till that time.

From Leavitt’s quote we see the main opposition in 1924 was the Jewish contingency in Congress. Interesting enough if we fast forward to 1965 we see, with the passage of the Hart-Celler Immigration Act which basically overturned the 1924 Johnson-Reed Act that once again it was the Jewish contingency in politics that was largely instrumental in snuffing out Johnson-Reed. In 1965 we see (amazingly enough) Celler doing what he could not get done in 1965. New York Congressman Celler also had help in 1965 from New York Senator Jacob Javits as well as assorted Jewish writers and organizations. To be sure others pushed as well (Teddy Kennedy, LBJ, Dean Rusk, etc) but the heavy lifting for the bill was done by the Jewish community in America.

And of course the 1965 Immigration bill has succeeded in exactly the way it was intended. At the time we were told that the 1965 Bill would have no impact on the face of America by President LBJ who said upon signing the Bill,

“This bill that we will sign today is not a revolutionary bill. It does not affect the lives of millions. It will not reshape the structure of our daily lives, or really add importantly to either our wealth or our power.”

More false words have seldom fallen from the lips of a US President. Since signing the Bill we have seen the US Population which in 1940 was 89% white descendants of Europe died down seven decades later to 67% and is still falling. Of course LBJ isn’t alive today to tell us now how Hart-Cellar didn’t affect the lives of millions. In point of fact it has, contrary to LBJ’s lies, restructured the daily lives of our children and grandchildren.

So, why did the Jewish political powers fight so hard in 1924 to stop the Johnson-Reed Immigration Act and why did they continue to fight until they successfully overturned it with Hart-Cellar in 1965? Well, we don’t have to guess because one of the Jewish literati pulled back the curtain to answer that question.

Jewish journalist Charles E. Silberman in his 1985 book, “A Certain People; American Jews and their Lives Today” explained why Jews have always supported multiculturalism; “American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief, one firmly rooted in history, that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, for example, approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse ‘gay rights’ and to take liberal stance on most other so-called social issues.”

The thinking here is that as Jews have always felt persecuted they have taken refuge in seeking to turn social orders wherein they live into majority minority social orders. The thinking is that if no one ethnic group can be ascendant Jews cannot be themselves singled out for abuse. It is merely a form of the old coda of “divide and conquer.”

That this disposition continues is seen in the words of Barbara Lerner Spectre Founder of the European Institute of Jewish Studies in Sweden;

• “Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role.”
  
  Of course all of the above is bad form to even notice. This push has so insulated itself from criticism that to even observe its existence is considered criminal and somehow a violation of some kind of law against holocaustianity, and that despite the fact that there is nothing above that is even close to being outlandish, bigoted or libelous. In point of fact it is merely stating the glaringly obvious. Were it not the case that we have been busy stabbing out our eyes so that we can’t see all that’s been said here, all that’s been said here would be considered very pedestrian. A real bore-fest.
  
  There is nothing un-Christian in the least to love one’s own people and to desire to protect them from the wicked designs of others who love their own people to the point of seeking harm against Christian’s loving their people.