The Gospel Reinterpreted Through Babel Lenses

Let’s just pretend that Babel could reinterpret the Gospel. What would that look like?

1.) Humanists would use Jesus language in order to dress up their Jacobinism.

2.) It would mean that Korean Presbyterys and Classis’ that dot these united States would have to be disestablished because their existence is not sufficiently Gospel Babelistic.

3.) It would mean the Hmong Church in Lansing could no longer be Hmong because their existence is not sufficiently Gospel Babelistic.

4.) It would mean that the new favorite hymn would be “We Are The World.”

5.) It would mean affirmative action hiring programs in the Church and quotas for membership in order to codify Gospel Babelism.

6.) It would mean that the adoption of babies ethnically different from their parents would grant special status to the parents in the Gospel Babelistic Church. Those parents would be known as the REAL lovers of Jesus.

7.) It would mean that high profile Pastors who are forever babbling that Race doesn’t matter would take special pride when, “that which doesn’t matter,” is the very thing that matters when they chortle over their Churches and families.

Author: jetbrane

I am a Pastor of a small Church in Mid-Michigan who delights in my family, my congregation and my calling. I am postmillennial in my eschatology. Paedo-Calvinist Covenantal in my Christianity Reformed in my Soteriology Presuppositional in my apologetics Familialist in my family theology Agrarian in my regional community social order belief Christianity creates culture and so Christendom in my national social order belief Mythic-Poetic / Grammatical Historical in my Hermeneutic Pre-modern, Medieval, & Feudal before Enlightenment, modernity, & postmodern Reconstructionist / Theonomic in my Worldview One part paleo-conservative / one part micro Libertarian in my politics Systematic and Biblical theology need one another but Systematics has pride of place Some of my favorite authors, Augustine, Turretin, Calvin, Tolkien, Chesterton, Nock, Tozer, Dabney, Bavinck, Wodehouse, Rushdoony, Bahnsen, Schaeffer, C. Van Til, H. Van Til, G. H. Clark, C. Dawson, H. Berman, R. Nash, C. G. Singer, R. Kipling, G. North, J. Edwards, S. Foote, F. Hayek, O. Guiness, J. Witte, M. Rothbard, Clyde Wilson, Mencken, Lasch, Postman, Gatto, T. Boston, Thomas Brooks, Terry Brooks, C. Hodge, J. Calhoun, Llyod-Jones, T. Sowell, A. McClaren, M. Muggeridge, C. F. H. Henry, F. Swarz, M. Henry, G. Marten, P. Schaff, T. S. Elliott, K. Van Hoozer, K. Gentry, etc. My passion is to write in such a way that the Lord Christ might be pleased. It is my hope that people will be challenged to reconsider what are considered the givens of the current culture. Your biggest help to me dear reader will be to often remind me that God is Sovereign and that all that is, is because it pleases him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *