The Legacy/Advocacy Media is NOT Your Friend

Now, since the rise of cable networks and even more so with the rise of talk radio reaching a crescendo with the blogosphere and the internet in general the cultural Marxist’s stranglehold on information output is seriously challenged. This accounts for the hyperventilating done by the left against people like Qnon. In point of fact, the advocacy media is far more subversive than people like Qanon but Qanon is a threat because a significant minority was listening to Qanon. People like Qanon, Alex Jones, and others threatened the monopoly the Cultural Marxist left has on information. (Disclaimer — I’ve never imbibed either Jones or Qanon though I am familiar with alternative information sourcing.)

You can be sure that the advocacy media will with continued shrillness warn about the danger of “our norms being challenged” by dangerous “disinformation outlets.” They hyperventilate about “our norms being challenged” because they are the ones who have been setting the norms for decades. Actually, what is being challenged are the norms of the Cultural Marxists.

This explains why you see people exhausting themselves warning about the dangers of “racists,” “nationalism,” and “transphobia.” These are the tools of triumph for the Cultural Marxist left and anybody who supports biblical doctrines of nationalism, and sexual normalcy will be attacked by the Cultural Marxist left media. One of the founding credos of Communism was the destruction of nations,

1.) ”What will be the attitude of communism to existing nationalities?

The nationalities of the peoples associating themselves in accordance with the principle of community will be compelled to mingle with each other as a result of this association and hereby to dissolve themselves, just as the various estate and class distinctions must disappear through the abolition of their basis, private property.”

~ Frederick Engels in “The Principles of Communism”, 1847

2.) “The equality of races and nations is one of the most important elements of the moral strength and might of the Soviet state. Soviet anthropology develops the one correct concept, that all the races of mankind are biologically equal. The genuinely materialist conception of the origin of man and of races serves the struggle against racism, against all idealist, mystic conceptions of man, his past, present and future.”

—Mikhail Nesturkh, Soviet anthropologist, 1959
“The Origin of Man” (Moscow)Mikhail Nesturkh, Soviet anthropologist, 1959:

3.) “The aim of socialism is not only to abolish the present division of mankind into small states and end all national isolation; not only to bring the nations closer together but to merge them….”

Vladimir Lenin
The Rights of Nations to Self Determination — pg. 76

4.) “… Just as mankind can achieve the abolition of classes only by passing through the dictatorship of the proletariat, so mankind can achieve the inevitable merging of nations only by passing through the transition period of complete liberation of all oppressed nations, i.e., their right to secede. “

Vladimir Lenin 
The Rights of Nations to Self Determination 

5.) “Even the natural differences within species, like racial differences…, can and must be done away with historically.” 

6.) “Full-scale Communist construction constitutes a new stage in the development of national relations in the U.S.S.R., in which the nations will draw still closer together until complete unity is achieved…. However, the obliteration of national distinctions and especially of language distinctions is a considerably longer process than the obliteration of class distinctions.”

Nikita Khrushchev

and with the advent of Cultural Marxism, that meme has been retained and as combined with another element of the Cultural Marxist’s “new proletariat” being the sexual pervert and their lobby.

That is the world we live in and now we are at the point that the pulpit in America is taking up these same shrill denunciations of “nationalism,” and “racism,” and anybody who dares assigns perversion to perverted sexuality. Even if your pulpit is NOT denouncing these realities the silence of your pulpit on these matters is contributing to the attack on Biblical Christianity.

It is a difficult conclusion for Christians to arrive at that the news they so casually consume belongs to the enemy of their souls. All the “news” the Christian listens to as coming from the legacy/advocacy media should be understood as being to them what the reports of “Toyko Rose” were to the troops in the South Pacific during WW II. Actually, as I said at the outset, this has been true for decades whether one wants to consider Walter Cronkite, Edward R. Murrow, Walter Lippman, or any number of leading light journalists of yesteryear.

Christian, the major media outlets are not your friend and their disinformation is impacting negatively your understanding of basic Christianity. It is past time to give up on it and find other sources for your information.