Scary Kinism Defined & Examples Given — (Part V)

Kinism believes;

 

XVII.) That inequality has developed both along individual and racial lines, and that every race has its areas of superiority. That we should not be ashamed of those gifts God saw fit to bestow upon us, but enjoy them.

 

Distinct races, nations, and families vis-a-vis other distinct races, nations, and families because of the reality that they are distinct each have different superiorities and inferiorities that run through their reality. Not all of the races are an eye. Nor are all the races an ear.

Because it is God that causes us to differ we should not be made to feel guilt over our superiorities and we should be constantly asking for God’s grace to overcome our inferiorities.

God gifts all peoples who look to Him. We should pray that God would be pleased to allow us to use the giftedness He has appointed us to glorify His name.

Of course, Luciferian egalitarianism (but I repeat myself) would flatten out all these varied superiorities so that eventually all races would be reduced to the lowest common denominator and so would all be the same in our shared inferiorities. All the races would become equally inept.

 

XVIII.) That envy is a desire for equality taking the form of hatred of the superior. That the envious man begrudges others of their advantages, and rather than seeking to acquire those advantages for himself, instead seeks to destroy them so that all will be equal in their poverty of advantages. That envy motivates many minorities, and that separation is the only effective way to deal with it.

Envy desires to pull down the superior quite without desiring to become the superior itself. It is satisfied just with seeing the superior in the same squalor and dust in which it dwells. Further, the envy of the inferior can not be quenched even with the aid and assistance of the superior because all that aid and assistance does for the inferior is to remind them that they are inferior. Consequently, only the destruction of the house of the superior will satisfy the envy of the superior.

Marxist ideology has made a career of inflaming a not insignificant number of minorities with envy as well as many lower-class whites. As no lifting up of that minority class and their white brethren who are infected with envy is possible, given that envy only grows with being helped by the superior the only answer seems to be some kind of separation.

The idea of advancing social-order separation should come as a well-received prospect from many who are afflicted with envy since the white man is now considered a pariah by much of the minority community as seen in just one quote. Many more could be duplicated that reveals how evil the white man is per the minority community who live within our shared borders.

“The Reformed and evangelical tradition(s) has repeatedly, across centuries, found itself in collusion with the worst embodiments of white supremacy in America even while presuming its orthodoxy at each juncture.”

Rev. Duke Kwon
PCA Minister

What could be better news for minorities inflamed with the Marxist ethic and their white Marxist brethren than arrangements that would find them finally done with the racist white man? Separation seems to be an answer that would be well-greeted by all parties.

XIX.)  That man, as a creature, is necessarily limited. That because he is limited, his responsibility to others is also limited. That human responsibility is Biblically regulated by relationship, such that we have a greater responsibility to our own family, race, town, state, region, and country, than we do to “the other”. That Christians should favor the native and the normal over the alien and the novel.

Equal universal love for everybody is at the same time a lack of unique particular love for anybody. Even the Pixar animated film “The Incredibles” understood that simple concept. Scripture calls us to Honor our Father and Mother and in doing so teaches that we are to prioritize them over other adults who are not our Father and Mother. The idea that I am to prioritize my own Father and Mother does not mean I hate every other adult who is not my Father and Mother. The idea that I am responsible to love everyone the same is an idea only a Marxist could love.

The implication of this is the truth that by helping everybody equally I may be hurting those I am called to help specifically. If I earn a paycheck week by week and spend it on the needy neighborhood children the consequence is that the children of my household who I am called to be specifically responsible for will become needy. Similarly, the elimination of borders here in the name of loving the world ends up being a bolus of hatred for our own people as seen in the economic impact, the breakdown of social infrastructure, and the increase of crime. This kind of love is a knife at the throat of our own children and our own countrymen –black, red, white, or brown.

That this has become so controversial is suggestive that are further down the road of Marxism than any of us would like to admit.

 

 

XX.) That placing burdens on people they cannot bear inevitably induces guilt. That a guilty man is an easily controlled man. That a man with impossible burdens will seek a more powerful entity to bear those burdens for him. That the most powerful earthly entity is the state. That the agents of the New World Order have a vested interest in inducing guilt as a means of control.

With the insistence that we must love everyone the same, there is failure since that is impossible. With failure comes false guilt. With false guilt comes contrivances to carry that false guilt. One contrivance is to enlist the state to carry the false guilt with the tacit agreement that the state will help carry the false guilt in exchange for the one carrying the false guilt to look to the state as the God who provides atonement. The dirty secret is that the state then keeps piling false guilt on the citizenry. The most recent false guilt is how we are guilty of not being WOKE.

This is integral to kinism because kinism sees the state being the primary agent which is advancing the 3multis, as well as polyglot marriages and transracial adoptions via false guilt.

 

Author: jetbrane

I am a Pastor of a small Church in Mid-Michigan who delights in my family, my congregation and my calling. I am postmillennial in my eschatology. Paedo-Calvinist Covenantal in my Christianity Reformed in my Soteriology Presuppositional in my apologetics Familialist in my family theology Agrarian in my regional community social order belief Christianity creates culture and so Christendom in my national social order belief Mythic-Poetic / Grammatical Historical in my Hermeneutic Pre-modern, Medieval, & Feudal before Enlightenment, modernity, & postmodern Reconstructionist / Theonomic in my Worldview One part paleo-conservative / one part micro Libertarian in my politics Systematic and Biblical theology need one another but Systematics has pride of place Some of my favorite authors, Augustine, Turretin, Calvin, Tolkien, Chesterton, Nock, Tozer, Dabney, Bavinck, Wodehouse, Rushdoony, Bahnsen, Schaeffer, C. Van Til, H. Van Til, G. H. Clark, C. Dawson, H. Berman, R. Nash, C. G. Singer, R. Kipling, G. North, J. Edwards, S. Foote, F. Hayek, O. Guiness, J. Witte, M. Rothbard, Clyde Wilson, Mencken, Lasch, Postman, Gatto, T. Boston, Thomas Brooks, Terry Brooks, C. Hodge, J. Calhoun, Llyod-Jones, T. Sowell, A. McClaren, M. Muggeridge, C. F. H. Henry, F. Swarz, M. Henry, G. Marten, P. Schaff, T. S. Elliott, K. Van Hoozer, K. Gentry, etc. My passion is to write in such a way that the Lord Christ might be pleased. It is my hope that people will be challenged to reconsider what are considered the givens of the current culture. Your biggest help to me dear reader will be to often remind me that God is Sovereign and that all that is, is because it pleases him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *