Two Other Comments On Wolfe’s Book By Dr. Schlebush & Dr. DeYoung

I.) “Given the fact that mainstream theologians have for so long used the gnostic premise of the supremacy of the spiritual over the material to justify the Neo-Marxist levelling of all social distinctions and natural hierarchies, Stephen Wolfe’s recently released book, The Case for Christian Nationalism is certainly a most welcome publication.”

Dr. Adi Schlebusch  

Rev. McAtee chimes in;

One thing that Wolfe does is he distinguishes his Natural Law from R2K Natural Law and that is a good thing though it does bring up the question of how Christians can have different Natural Law theories if we are all supposed to be ruled in our social order by a obvious to all Natural law. Wolfe’s Natural law theory reveals that R2K Natural law theory certainly is thoroughly Gnostic as it pertains to the common realm.

One thing is for sure is that the Grand-daddy of Christian Natural Law theory, Thomas Aquinas, would have gagged to death if he could’ve known what David Van Drunen, D. G. Hart, R. Scott Clark, T. G. Gordon, and the rest of the R2K cadre shirt tail hangers have done to his Natural law.

So, while we do not agree in the least with Wolfe’s Natural law theory we do say that it is far far less bad than R2K.

II.) “Christ’s chief concern in this age is with the church. While many institutions contribute to earthly life and human flourishing, Jesus didn’t promise to build any institution other than the church (Matt. 16:18). The impression one gets from The Case for Christian Nationalism is that the church plays merely a supportive spiritual role as part of a larger project that involves the civil realm ordering people to their complete good. Wolfe’s vision is nation-centric rather than church-centric.”

Rev. Dr. Kevin DeYoung (KD)

Online Article

 

1.) The problem here is not so much the ecclesiocentrism that KD is pushing as it is the fact that KD seems to think that Jesus building of His Church is somehow isolated in effect from the broader work of building His Kingdom.

2.) While KD is correct that Jesus did promise to build His church that statement can’t be isolated from Jesus last commission to “Disciple the nations.” How KD can cherry pick Christ’s promise to build the church while ignoring Christ’s command to disciple the nations is quite … curious.

3.) Consistent w/ #1 this sounds like KD is suggesting that Church and Kingdom are exactly synonymous so that Jesus is concerned solely with the Church. If this is what KD is going after than we strenuously object. While the Church is indeed Jesus primary concern it is a primary concern that impacts every other Kingdom as a fire warms the whole house. If that is true then KD’s severing of Church from other human institutions, which likewise belong to the Kingdom, is significantly inaccurate.

3.) KD misses the reality that when the Church is right then all else follows. As such it can’t help be the primary building block in a much large project. When the Church is ordered right. The nation, the family, and all other human institutions will likewise then be ordered right.

4.) KD’s comments suggest a dualism and hints that he is drinking at the waters of R2K, but any man who played the straight man for Tim Keller for so many years is someone who should be automatically viewed with suspicion.

Author: jetbrane

I am a Pastor of a small Church in Mid-Michigan who delights in my family, my congregation and my calling. I am postmillennial in my eschatology. Paedo-Calvinist Covenantal in my Christianity Reformed in my Soteriology Presuppositional in my apologetics Familialist in my family theology Agrarian in my regional community social order belief Christianity creates culture and so Christendom in my national social order belief Mythic-Poetic / Grammatical Historical in my Hermeneutic Pre-modern, Medieval, & Feudal before Enlightenment, modernity, & postmodern Reconstructionist / Theonomic in my Worldview One part paleo-conservative / one part micro Libertarian in my politics Systematic and Biblical theology need one another but Systematics has pride of place Some of my favorite authors, Augustine, Turretin, Calvin, Tolkien, Chesterton, Nock, Tozer, Dabney, Bavinck, Wodehouse, Rushdoony, Bahnsen, Schaeffer, C. Van Til, H. Van Til, G. H. Clark, C. Dawson, H. Berman, R. Nash, C. G. Singer, R. Kipling, G. North, J. Edwards, S. Foote, F. Hayek, O. Guiness, J. Witte, M. Rothbard, Clyde Wilson, Mencken, Lasch, Postman, Gatto, T. Boston, Thomas Brooks, Terry Brooks, C. Hodge, J. Calhoun, Llyod-Jones, T. Sowell, A. McClaren, M. Muggeridge, C. F. H. Henry, F. Swarz, M. Henry, G. Marten, P. Schaff, T. S. Elliott, K. Van Hoozer, K. Gentry, etc. My passion is to write in such a way that the Lord Christ might be pleased. It is my hope that people will be challenged to reconsider what are considered the givens of the current culture. Your biggest help to me dear reader will be to often remind me that God is Sovereign and that all that is, is because it pleases him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *