Currently, it is all the buzz to mock and laugh at those who are trying to tell us that there is no there, there in the Jeffrey Epstein saga. The attempt to tell the American population who know what time it is that Jeffrey Epstein had no “list” of clients. If there is no list of clients then why is Ghislaine Noelle Marion Maxwell in prison? I mean, if there is no clients list then how can it be proven that Ghislaine was procuring underage talent for the high profile perverts like Bill Gates, Kevin Spacey, Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and countless others? If there was no client list why did Epstein “kill himself?” If there was nothing smelly about Epstein then why was Alex Acosta, “told to back off [Jeffrey] Epstein” when he was a Department of Justice prosecutor “because he (Epstein) belonged to intelligence.”
Of course what is happening now with Trump, Bondi, Patel and Bongino’s announcement that there is nothing further to pursue in terms of Epstein is just gas-lighting in its most concentrated form.
However, we did not get to this place of immense distrust of our leadership overnight. This has been a very long time coming. This pathological lying by government officials to their constituents has been going on before the citizenry ever came to know it. In the last 40 year or so, those who still remember how to read have feasted on revisionist history books that expose the lies we have been told by our federal government for scores of decades. One of those books, I finished a couple days ago. That books was “Stalin’s War” by Sean McMeekin, and it is just one more book that brings all the receipts on how often we have been lied to by the American government. Lie after lie. One could as easily pick up any number of books on different time periods in US history to discover how much and how often the American citizenry has been lied to. One could read M. Stanton Evan’s, “Stalin’s Agents,” or his “Blacklisted by History,” to see how often the American public was lied to. One could pick up and read Herbert Hoover’s “The Theme is Freedom,” and discover the repeated lies. One could read the work of Jim MacGregor as partnering with either John O’Dowd or Gerry Docherty. One could read Michael Collins Piper’s “Final Judgment,” to see the lies piled upon lies told to us, by the federal government on the JFK assassination. Stinnet and D’Angelo have written books detailing how FDR, Stimson, and Marshall knew the Japs were coming and left the door open for them to come in the Pearl Harbor debacle. You can read Tolstoy about the lies told to us about the forced repatriation of Soviet citizens during WW II. You can read James Bacque chronicle the lies about Allied murder of unarmed German prisoners after WW II in his book “Other Losses.”
For decades our government could get away with these lies (and I’ve only scratched the surface of what I have read) but with the democratization of information that has arrived with the internet more and more people are finding out about these lies and having found out about these past lies they are not having anything to do with the current lies. I guess you could call it a national resolve to no longer be gaslit. To be sure, there are always going to be a large percentage people who think FOX, CNN, MSNBC etc. are “telling us the truth,” but more and more of us have dropped out of that echo chamber and have chosen instead to do our own research.
Now, to be sure, it is not only the federal government that has excelled at this kind of lying. The institutional church likewise have lied like troopers over the decades to its rank and file. Gary North’s “Finger’s Crossed” spends somewhere around a 1000 pages chronicling the lies told by the Presbyterian clergy and their denomination. When read in combination with Machen’s “Christianity & Liberalism,” one sees that not only the FEDS but also the Church has routinely lied to those whom it is supposed to be penultimately serving.
In this context… a context that had building and bubbling for decades and decades arises the Epstein perv saga. Epstein, clearly was serving a high clientele list of pervs. Further, the hints at the existence of these pervs have been around for decades. Retired FBI agent Ted Gunderson in the early 80s was out warning about pervs in high places. During the Reagan administration a huge story broke, that was later killed, about the connection between Boys Town and pervs in the Reagan White House procuring boys. This was known as the Franklin scandal. We were finally all assured that it was a carefully crafted fake story. However, this kind of story keeps popping up. We all remember the perv case of the aptly named Congressman, Anthony Wiener. Wiener was caught sexting minor. Who knows what he wasn’t caught doing. All this sexual perv dynamic came up again in the 2016 election with the whole Ping Pong Pizza episode and the strange accusations against the Podesta brothers. Have you looked at the paintings that decorated their homes? Then there was the creepy Spirit cooker Marina Abramovic who was also a big story during that election cycle.
Folks, our elites are not right in the head.
Now, combine all this with the fact that we know that children are being sex trafficked on a scale that is beyond our ability to comprehend and it is not a stretch to believe that we are being ruled by perverts.
And now we are being told that Jeffrey Epstein was just some poor Jew that was clearly connected to the Mossad and Ehud Barak who while in the sexual blackmail business did not have a client’s list.
Yeah … just like the Lusitania was not carrying military ordinance for the Brits during World War I but was savagely, without cause, sunk by the disgusting German U-boat.
Oh… that was another lie told by the FEDS.
“Wherever the lie triumphs, it must hate every element of the truth that still remains. Atheism cannot tolerate the truth because it cannot be tolerated by the truth. It recognizes a mortal enemy in every belief. It puts up with the least hint of that religion only that keeps silent, that bends its neck, [and] that submits to the rules and regulations of unbelief.” pp. 199, 184.
Groen van Prinsterer, ‘Unbelief and Revolution’
“Democracy in operation is concerned, not with everyone’s opinion—that is merely its technical modern form—but only with the organized opinion of those whose opinions can be made politically effective. … There was, therefore, that characteristic so common to all democratic processes, the casting of an issue in terms of emotional viewpoints presumed to be held by the masses; that is, by that part of the masses whose opinions mattered. p. 482.
Lawrence R. Brown, ‘The Might of the West’
The current administration is literally turning into a sitcom. Scene: Bondi, Rubio, and Trump at a table in front of reporters. Take one:
Bondi: Oh, the question specifically about the Epstein list? Well I answered it, about the *file*, and if the list were real it would have been in the file, with my answer not using the term file and implying that I was talking about the list that they asked about and not about the unmentioned file. Wink, wink. Mossad agent? Never heard about that. And that one minute video gap, nothing happened, totally nothing.
Trump: Why are you goys asking such a question of her after our wonderful President came to visit me yesterday, came all the way from Tel Aviv. Now lets forget this Epstein deal and start talking about amnesty! Except for Elon, who has to go back to South Africa, but all his Indian tech buddies can stay! And those beautiful little Spanish jabbering farm and restaurant workers, we need them too. Don’t you just love hearing Spanish in the streets? I talk about it to Melania all the time…
Trump, former reality TV star, is now turning Washington, DC into a SNL clip.
Only dissidents dare call it out for what it is: an insult to common sense. It’s humiliating to the public to expect them to believe this inane tripe … designedly so.
“Within an established totalitarian regime, the purpose of propaganda is not to persuade, much less to inform, but rather to humiliate. From this point of view, propaganda should not approximate the truth as closely as possible: on the contrary, it should do as much violence to it as possible. For by endlessly asserting what is patently untrue, by making such untruth ubiquitous and unavoidable, and finally by insisting that everyone publicly acquiesce in it, the regime displays its power and reduces individuals to nullities. Who can retain his self-respect when, far from defending what he knows to be true, he has to applaud what he knows to be false – not occasionally, as we all do, but for the whole of his adult life? p. 93. For slaves, who must participate in their own enslavement by signaling to others the happiness of their own condition, are so humiliated that they are unlikely to rebel.” pp. 55-6.
Anthony Daniels, ‘The Wilder Shores of Marx: Journeys in A Vanishing World’