“It really is possible to be a hard line conservative of the old school without getting sucked down a reactionary wormhole. It is possible to hold to the historic Reformed view of Romans 11 on the Jews without being in any way beholden to the liberal post-war consensus. It is possible to be an unfazed and unapologetic Burkean conservative—when some are maintaining you are not conservative at all unless you are clamoring for a Protestant Robespierre.
Not only is it possible, it is far and away the straighter path. I commend it to you, and invite folks to join us.”
Pope Dougie — He of Moscow fame
Blog Mablog – 11 August, 2025
Doug likes to think of himself as a hardline conservative. Remember, this is the man who himself testified he was not interested in being Rushdoony 2.0 but was trying to achieve being Rushdoony 0.5. Only in a world of effeminate smurfs can Dougie be considered “hardline conservative.” This is the problem with the nomenclature. As a culture we have swung so hard to the Revolutionary Left that a soft revolutionary like Wilson can think of himself as “a Hardline conservative.” I imagine that is the way the Girondins thought of themselves during the French Revolution. I supposed compared to Robespierre, the montagnard Jacques Pierre Brissot was a hard line conservative.
Dougie thinks his view of Romans 11 is standard Reformed orthodoxy but when you add his statements about the glories of his family’s relation to the Bagel bloodline combined with his “Covenant with Hagar” nonsense his is a tenuous claim. Pope Doug claiming he is in line with standard Romans 11 interpretation is like saying that lab created meat is in line with a standard 16 oz. porterhouse steak. It demands the response … “Where’s the beef?”
Pope Dougie’s next claim is that he is not beholden in any way to the liberal post-war consensus. Yet, the man has written in support of liberal post-war consensus projects like interracial marriage, the good of processed food – labeling those who resist processed food as having “food scruples’ – and coming out in favor of vaccines. The push for each and all of these are part of the post war liberal consensus that Dougie insists that he has successfully avoided. Me thinketh the lady doth protest too much.
As to Pope Doug’s claim to be a follower of Edmund Burke, Burke wrote;
“The blood of man should never be shed but to redeem the blood of man. It is well shed for our family, for our friends, for our God, for our country, for our kind. The rest is vanity; the rest is crime.”
Yet, Doug has repeatedly abominated this kind of overt Burkean Kinist language. Indeed, Doug hates Kinists. You cannot say you hate kinists while insisting at the same time you love Burke.
Doug Wilson has NOTHING to offer in the way of providing an answer to our descending Constitutional Republic. All Doug offers up is warmed over post war liberal consensus dressed up in Doug’s clever wordsmithing evening clothes.
It is past time to realize that there is no strength to remedy our current malady in the cures that Pope Doug offers. Doug calls his opponents “reactionary.” It’s the same thing Revolutionaries have always called their opponents. What the opponents of Revolutionary movements have always called their supporters is “Liberals.” Doug is a Liberal.
Or if you prefer … soft progressive.
“Liberalism is a disease whose first symptom is an inability to believe in conspiracies.” -Friedrich Wilhelm IV (1795-1861)
“Most people really have no right to an opinion on race. They have made no searching investigation into the facts, they have done no independent thinking, and they commonly show precious little concern for the fate of man or even of their own kind. For the most part, they are too sluggish to question or too cowardly to accept the consequences of breaking with prevalent opinion. They take over the views handed out to them with almost as little thought as they do their names. … But it is doubtful whether any society can long endure in which problems of such gravity are decided by citizens who have little knowledge of the facts, and where the atmosphere for a fair and full hearing of all sides of the issue is lacking. p. 478.
Belief in equality has become the one orthodoxy that it is considered positively shameful and disreputable to question, and anyone who dares to challenge it will soon have all the New Inquisition bearing down on him to cow him into submission, or even to destroy him. … No man should have freedom who cannot be depended upon to balance it with a sense of responsibility, or have rights until he has learned to measure up to the duties that they impose. Any state that ignores this lesson not only invites disaster, but ensures it. Indeed, all men who know anything at all, and who will stop to think, know that any society of some complexity, by the simple fact of its existence, is the very denial of equality. Not only is it true that free men are never equal, and that “equal” men (as under Communism) are not and cannot be free, but even more important, where men are assumed to be equal and seriously treated as if they were equal, whereas in fact they are nothing of the sort, any such thing as a society begins to break down. For in every society there has to be some measure of organization to ensure not only that the functions necessary to its existence get performed, but on the whole, get performed by those best qualified to perform them. p. 591. Destruction of a people’s consciousness of its race is one of the surest ways to prepare it for its slaughter. Has it never occurred to any of my readers that it is for precisely this reason that today all race consciousness, all recognition of the significance of racial differences and even of race itself as a reality, has been made taboo among us?” p. 595.
William Gayley Simpson, ‘Which Way Western Man?’