Around The Horn

“Shhh…. Don’t Mention That He Is A Arab Muslim”

The guy who shot up Fort Hood yesterday is a Arab and is a member of the Islamic faith — a well known “religion of peace.” However, please note that even though we’ve now been told that he was shouting “Allahu Akbar” (“God is Great”), there still hasn’t been anybody questioning the wisdom of allowing Muslims into the US military or even into US society. If one wonders about the brutality of a Islamified Western culture I encourage them to go take a walk into certain sections of London or Paris. Ask Dutch film-maker Theo Van Gogh about Islamic brutality in the West. Ask Salmon Rushdie about Islamic brutality in the West. Ask Aasiya Hassan of the Buffalo New York area about Islamic brutality in the West.

Because of the West’s mad desire for ethnocide, seen in its embrace of multiculturalism, Europe will be an Islamic continent by the end of this century. Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the “religion of peace” shooter at Fort Hood, is a warning to America and that warning is, “Muslims will not fit into Western culture.” Now, this is obvious to anybody who has half a stroke impaired brain in their head but the multiculturalist leftists are so bound and determined to sanitize the Christian influence of the West and of America that they will go to any lengths, including blinding themselves about the nature of Islam, in order to completely and irreversibly de-Christianize the West. Actually, if such a thing as poetic justice existed both the Maj. Nidal Malik Hasans of the West and the John Kerry’s of the West would be given Arizona and be told to “be fruitful and multiply, if you can.” The leftists and the Muslims certainly deserve one another.

For those not in the know, “Allauh Akbar” is what members of the “religion of peace” often shout just before they blow themselves up, along with a host of their enemies. It is what the members of the “religion of peace” shout when they read the Koran as it tells them to kill the infidel. It is what they say after eating their after dinner mints.

There might be another explanation for why Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan slipped his noodle. It seems the poor man got a double whammy for life. Not only was he a Muslim (his first life whammy) but he also was a shrink by trade. Personally, if I had to guess between a Muslim and a Shrink as to who was more demented I would be hard pressed to reach a conclusion. I can’t imagine any living soul combining those two dementia’s into one living being.

“Well, You Are Forced To Have Car Insurance Aren’t You?”

Back in his State of the Union Address President Obama gave us an analogy between the prospects of a mandated by the Federal Government health care and a mandated by the State auto insurance.

“Unless everybody does their part, many of the insurance reforms we seek, especially requiring insurance companies to cover preexisting conditions, just can’t be achieved, That’s why under my plan, individuals will be required to carry basic health insurance — just as most states require you to carry auto insurance.”

Just recently the Senator who filled Obama’s Senate seat said in response to a question,

CNSNews.com: “So, in general, if a person doesn’t want health insurance, do you think they should be required by the government to actually have to get it?”

Senator Burris: “Under state law, we have every one required to have automobile insurance. Now, think about that. And so under this here, we’re providing in the legislation where every one would be able to acquire health insurance. If they don’t get it, then that would–certainly they’re trying to provide some type of a provision for them in case they’re sick so that they will be covered and they won’t be a burden on the system. So, that’s the same thing proportionally to automobile insurance. I mean, it’s comparable.”

Now, pushing this analogy between required auto insurance and required health insurance is only one of a host of reasons why I think these people shouldn’t be leading a live in facility for the mentally challenged let alone leading this country. People like Obama and Burris put the capital “S” in STUPID.

The analogy doesn’t work,

1.) It is not true that every one has to have auto insurance. Only people who have the privilege of owning and driving automobiles have to have auto insurance.

2.) Therefore for the Obama/Burris analogy to fit, the reasoning must be that only people who have the privilege of owning and moving around in their bodies have to have health insurance. Do they really want to make a comparison between the mandate to have auto insurance if you drive a car and the mandate to have health insurance if you breathe? Is the state really saying that, “just as we won’t allow you to drive a car around if you will not get auto insurance, so we will not allow you to live if you will not get health insurance?” Or similarly, “just as if we catch you driving a car without auto insurance we will severely penalize you by taking away your privilege to drive, so if we catch you walking around without life insurance we will severely penalize you by taking away your privilege to be alive?”

I don’t care what Ivy League school these people were “educated” in, they are all as dumb or dumber than a box of Barbara Boxers.

A Horse Is A Horse, Of Course, Of Course …

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091105/ap_on_re_us/us_horse_molester

This guy is serving jail time for getting to cozy with a horse on more than one occasion. The article says the perp is being jailed for “abuse to the creature.” So, what passes for abuse to a horse is not abuse in the slightest when the same “coziness” is pursued by two men.

But perhaps the difference is, is that two men can give consent to their mutual abuse while poor Sugar (the name of the horse that is being assaulted) can’t give consent, even though she is 21 years old.

I’m not sure, given the legal logic that is used today, why this guy is being jailed. He didn’t hurt anyone. It’s just people’s opinion that his sexual preference is aberrant, and besides, where are all the calls for the compassion and understanding we must have for this man?

Author: jetbrane

I am a Pastor of a small Church in Mid-Michigan who delights in my family, my congregation and my calling. I am postmillennial in my eschatology. Paedo-Calvinist Covenantal in my Christianity Reformed in my Soteriology Presuppositional in my apologetics Familialist in my family theology Agrarian in my regional community social order belief Christianity creates culture and so Christendom in my national social order belief Mythic-Poetic / Grammatical Historical in my Hermeneutic Pre-modern, Medieval, & Feudal before Enlightenment, modernity, & postmodern Reconstructionist / Theonomic in my Worldview One part paleo-conservative / one part micro Libertarian in my politics Systematic and Biblical theology need one another but Systematics has pride of place Some of my favorite authors, Augustine, Turretin, Calvin, Tolkien, Chesterton, Nock, Tozer, Dabney, Bavinck, Wodehouse, Rushdoony, Bahnsen, Schaeffer, C. Van Til, H. Van Til, G. H. Clark, C. Dawson, H. Berman, R. Nash, C. G. Singer, R. Kipling, G. North, J. Edwards, S. Foote, F. Hayek, O. Guiness, J. Witte, M. Rothbard, Clyde Wilson, Mencken, Lasch, Postman, Gatto, T. Boston, Thomas Brooks, Terry Brooks, C. Hodge, J. Calhoun, Llyod-Jones, T. Sowell, A. McClaren, M. Muggeridge, C. F. H. Henry, F. Swarz, M. Henry, G. Marten, P. Schaff, T. S. Elliott, K. Van Hoozer, K. Gentry, etc. My passion is to write in such a way that the Lord Christ might be pleased. It is my hope that people will be challenged to reconsider what are considered the givens of the current culture. Your biggest help to me dear reader will be to often remind me that God is Sovereign and that all that is, is because it pleases him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *