Marxism/Cultural Marxism – Page 2

Daily Kinist Quotes (DKQ)

Given the continued lobotomized lunacy of the NAPARC/CREC/SBS churches on the subject of Kinism (i.e. – racial realism, familialism, ethno-nationalism, White Christian Nationalism, etc.) I thought I would begin posting daily Kinist quotes (DKQ) in order to demonstrate how utterly braindead these “churches” are that are excommunicating, and deposing ministers over the Kinist issue as well as passing sundry language that is born of egalitarian, neo-Marxist thinking. We have established already at Iron Ink that the Church is now advocating for the very same thing that Marxists have advocated for throughout history. I have posted the Marxist quotes more than a few times. Marxists “intellectuals” would be very comfortable with the course that these denominations are pursuing. In point of fact these denominations would have to say on this point, if they were honest and consistent, that the Marxist were right when it comes to affirming a policy that pursues the elimination of nations and races.

I’ve already posted myriads of these quotes in a post here;

So Say We All … A Protest To Dr. Sproul 2.0’s Comments

I posted all these before two Anthology volumes were published that contain myriads upon myriads more quotes saying much the same thing that you will find in the above link. The volumes, “Who Is My Neighbor” and “A Survey of Racialism in Christian Sacred Tradition,” reveals that the current denominations are violating the principle of Vincent of Lerins which taught, that true Christian faith must be what has been believed “everywhere, always, and by all.” The Anabaptists, who were renown levelers, would be exceptions but the Reformed don’t consider them Christian.

As I have said before, so I say again now, this issue is to our time what the issue of the eternality of Christ was in the contest between Arius and Athanasius in the 4th century, what the contest was between Augustine and Pelagius was in the 5th century, and what the contest was between Luther and Eck was in the 16th century. If we get this issue of egalitarianism wrong here the Church of Jesus Christ will not get back on track until we finally do go back and get it right. The Reformed throughout the centuries have always fought against levelling and the erasure of God ordained distinctions because they knew that such levelling was both born of and led to levelling the distinction between God and man. Levelling the creature-creature distinctions can’t happen without levelling the Creator-creature distinction.

With all that said, I will, day by day, bring you at least one, but often a few, quotes daily demonstrating where the Church Fathers have been on this subject over the centuries. By doing so, you will see how out of step the contemporary Church (we use the word “church” only by way of courtesy) is.

“Each town should support its own poor and should not allow strange beggars to come in, WHATEVER THEY MAY CALL THEMSELVES, pilgrims or mendicant monks, (or immigrants – BLMc). Every town could feed its own poor; and if it were too small, the people in the neighboring villages should be called upon to contribute. As it is, they have to support knaves and vagabonds under the name of beggars….”

Martin Luther

Address to the Nobility of the German People

Now ask yourself, if Luther argued that strangers (whatever they may call themselves) should not be allowed into towns how much more is it the case that strangers (whatever they call themselves) should not be allowed into family lines via marriage?

Also, this quote shoots holes into the idea that we have to treat illegal immigrants in the same way as neighbor as we do deal with fellow Americans. One can argue that Christians must treat all men as neighbors but if one argues that way they must introduce the idea of gradation of neighbors. After all, if everyone is your neighbor, no one is your neighbor.

“What, there is to be no serf because Christ has redeemed us all? What is this? This means that Christian liberty is turned into liberty of the flesh? Did not Abraham and other patriarchs and prophets own serfs? Read what St. Paul has to say about servants, who at that time were all in bondage. Therefore this article is directly opposed to the Gospel and it is rapacious, for everyone who is a bondman to remove himself from his master. A bondman can very well be a Christian and have Christian freedom, just as a prisoner or a sick person can be a Christian, and yet is not free. This article proposes to free all men, and turn the spiritual kingdom of Christ into a worldly one, which is impossible. For a worldly kingdom cannot exist where there is no class distinction, where some are free, some are prisoners, some are masters, and some are vassals, etc. As St. Paul says in Gal. 3:28, that in Christ both master and vassal are one.”

Martin Luther

Admonishment to Peace on the 12 Articles of the Swabian (Anabaptist) Farmers

Works Vol. 46 – p. 39

Pretty sure that this counts as a quote that supports Southern slavery.

From The Mailbag — Tearing Down The Simulation/Matrix

Dear Pastor;

“How do we overthrow the system that is serving as our Simulation/Matrix.”

Hello Evan,

Thank you for the question.

The answer is manifold.

First, folks like Ben Mordecai have to realize that we are living in a Matrix. We will never overcome the Matrix (The Simulation) by thinking that working within the context of the Matrix — by the rules of the simulation — we will overcome the simulation. So, there is the work of awakening people to the fact that they really are living in a simulation/Matrix.

Second, we overthrow the the Simulation by doing all we can to unplug from it. Many people are doing that by prioritizing family life, by raising their children in the fear of the Lord and so not sending them to the Simulation Education boxes. If we cannot raise our children aware of the need, for the cause of Christ, to themselves see the Matrix for what it is there will be no overthrowing the Matrix/Simulation.

Unplugging means also building parallel but not isolated sub-cultures. People have talked about developing a currency that could be used on a local basis. (This is not my strength but I have read some of those floating this idea.) People have talked about building businesses that especially but not solely cater to the needs of a Christian community. By doing so, we could increasingly unplug from the Simulation/Matrix.

Unplugging also means understanding the doctrine of interposition. If, by God’s grace alone, our numbers become sufficient, at some point larger attacks on the Simulation/Matrix will have to be considered. Since, we will not have the support of Magistrates (who are now serving Baal) we will have to operate via the doctrine of interposition as headed by Clergy/Elder magistrates — if we can find any. Much like Elijah interposed himself against Ahab and His priests on Mt. Carmel, so at some point Christian Elders/Clergy will have to rise up to stand against the prophets of Baal as serving our current Ahabs.

Unplugging also means we have to start connecting the teaching of our Catechisms and Confessions with Worldview teaching. Being in the ministry almost 40 years now I have discovered that even people well catechized often end up being normies living in the Matrix/Simulation. In my estimation only a people thoroughly training in Christian Worldview training as combined with the teaching of the Confessions and Catechisms will ever get out of the Simulation/Matrix that we are now living in.

Unplugging also means (and people aren’t going to like this one) departing from the NAPARC/CREC/SBC churches. Certainly, there are some congregations in NAPARC that are healthy, but considered generally, NAPARC/CREC/SBC congregations are the problem. NAPARC/CREC/SBC churches, generally speaking (which is different than Universally speaking) are supporting the Simulation/Matrix system that needs to be torn down brick by brick. In attending and supporting these denominations we are working against the need to get out of the Matrix/Simulation. If we want to tear down the Simulation/Matrix we simply must quit supporting these derelict institutions with their derelict ministers. (Hey guys … if the shoe doesn’t fit don’t wear it.)

Unplugging means a return to God’s Law-Word as the standard by which we live, move and have our being. The Simulation/Matrix we are living in exists because God’s Law-Word (especially in its politicus usus) is being set aside for humanist Law-Word. We see this in postmodernism which teaches, at best, that law-words are community relative. We see this in Legal-Positivism which teaches the Rousseauian idea of the General Will in one form or another. We see this in Natural Law theory that posits that fallen man is not so fallen as to no longer have the ability to even want to live by God’s law. The Simulation/Matrix we are living in will not be torn down until there is a return to the foundation upon which real reality can be built.

We remember the words of Christ that some things only go out by prayer and fasting. I take this to mean that we have to understand that tearing down the Matrix/Simulation is first and foremost a spiritual endeavor and by that I mean we have to see that that which is animating the Simulation/Matrix is principalities and forces. Before unplugging can be successful we have to understand that the Simulation/Matrix is an expression of this present evil age as animated by the Prince of the power of the air. Because of this we must be instant in connecting the dots between the corporeal realities and the spiritual realities that animate them and then we must pray God that He might let us land just one Samson like blow (think Pillars and Philistines) in order to bring the whole Simulation/Matrix down on their heads.

Or we could just ignore all this like good little amillennialists and live in the Simulation/Matrix telling ourselves that this is the way God intends for it to be until He returns.

Editor Gregory Reynolds and Author Aaron Mize Join To Piss On Scripture

“In this light, the modern habit of translating these texts into the language of ‘leadership’ or ‘male authority’ is a reversion to the very power structures the gospel overturns.”

Rev. Aaron Mize
Ordained Servant Magazine
OPC

Note, the implicit declaration here that power structures are inherently evil. Power structures are overturned so that no power structures (supposedly) remain. Power is automatically evil. Patriarchy and hierarchy are automatically evil because they are power structures.

The dirty secret here is that power structures are an inescapable category. As such if, as Mize desires, we get rid of the power structures of patriarchy and hierarchy what fills the vacuum is matriarchy and egalitarianism as the new power structures. So, hierarchy doesn’t go away but is replaced by egalitarianism that serves as a mask for a rampant Matriarchy. If men do not rule (patriarchy) then women will rule (matriarchy). Somebody has to have the authority folks. If we are going to denounce patriarchy then all that is left to fill the void is matriarchy but as we can’t be obvious we will call it egalitarianism instead.

Next, if the Gospel overturns the power structures of hierarchy that Rev. Mize insists that it overturns then pray tell why all that language in the Westminster Larger Catechism (Q. 124-130) about the duties and sins of superiors, and inferiors? Mize’s own Confession, that he swore to uphold, teaches that hierarchy is Biblical and yet here is Mize insisting that Christ came to overturn these sinful power structures.

And what about the Editor, Gregory Reynolds, who let this bilge be printed? Greg Reynolds is older than I am, for Pete’s sake, and he let this get into the magazine he edits? As far as I am concerned Gregory Reynolds should be ash-canned for letting Mize’s garbage be printed.

Rev. Aaron Mize & His Gaia Worship

“Scripture never presents patriarchy as the created or redeemed norm. It is a feature of the fallen world Christ overturns, not a structure he institutes.”

Rev. Aaron Mize

Ordained Servant Article

OPC Denomination

1.) Not as the created norm? Is this why we are told that Eve was to be a “Helpmeet” to Adam? Is this why Adam was the one who gave Eve her name? (Naming was a sign of authority.) Is this why, after the fall, Eve is told that “Adam shall rule over you”? Is this why Sarah called Abraham “Lord?”

2.) Not as the redeemed norm? Is this why Paul tells Titus that women in the Church are to be submissive to their own husbands? Is this why Paul teaches that women are to be “silent in the church?”

3.) Note that what Mize is teaching here is that a woman who is fulfilling the Biblical and traditional role as wife, mother, and homekeeper, who is submitting to her husband as he love his wife is in sin because, as Mize writes, this kind of patriarchy and hierarchy is a feature of the fallen world Christ overturns. If a woman is living in a world Christ has overturned, as seen in her role as wife, mother, and homekeeper, what can she be living in except sin?

4.) Patriarchy … is not a structure that Christ institutes? Is this why Christ chose 12 male disciples? Is this why the Church chose 7 male deacons? Is this why all those who wrote every book of the Bible were men? Is this why all family heads in the OT were male? Is this why the Aaronic Priesthood was all male?

It beggars the imagination that any clergy in any putative Reformed church could write the sentence, “Patriarchy is a feature of the fallen world Christ overturns, not a structure he institutes.”

The OPC Embraces Explicit Egalitarianism — Rev. Mize & The Ordained Servant

“The Fatherhood of God is not an archetype of hierarchy but the source of communion. To imitate that Fatherhood is not to rule but to give life. The Church’s task therefore is not to restore a patriarchal system in the world but to embody the new humanity.”

Rev. Aaron Mize
Ordained Servant Magazine
Orthodox Presbyterian Church

Often the egalitarians and complementarians will insist that I Cor. 11 does not mean what it says;

I Corinthians 11:3 But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

They will insist that the Greek word for head here (κεφαλὴ / kephalē) means “source” and not head. First, this interpretation was seldom if ever argued before the rise of feminism in the Church. Second, this Greek word is universally translated as “Head” in every other NT passage. Third, if we argue that this word means “source” then we run into the problem that Paul is saying that source of Christ is God and that in turn would run us into some major theological problems.

When we note that the head of Christ is God we remember that Christ is the title that our Savior held and in His role as the incarnated anointed one (Christ) God indeed was the head of Chris in the sense that we find in Phil. 2:5-8. The Son in his economic role as the incarnate Christ was always about the doing of the Father’s will, thus demonstrating the Father’s headship over Christ in his economic subordination.

This submitting of Christ to the Father during his economic subordination serves as the model for man’s submission to Christ and the woman’s submission to man. Christ’s economic subordination reflects the divine order and harmony within the Godhead, providing a pattern for human relationships.

So, Aaron Mize, in his written words above is in contradiction to the clear revelation of Scripture. Further, the OPC Ordained Servant inasmuch as it published this tripe is also in contradiction to the clear revelation of Scripture. Heads need to roll over this contradiction of Scripture.

What Mize and the OPC Ordained servant has given us with the opening quote is the affirmation of egalitarianism in its worst expression. Not only does Rev. Mize (we say “Rev.” only by way of courtesy) desire to jettison patriarchy, he even insists that hierarchy must be evacuated. Mize desires to give us a “new humanity,” as only envisioned by Albigensians, Cathars, Bogomils, Anabaptists, and Marxists.

By all that is Holy has the Conservative Reformed church fallen so far that it is now putting people in the pulpit, and further publishing them in denominational magazines wherein what is promoted is the very antithesis of Biblical Christianity?

Keep in mind dear reader, that what Mize has promoted here with the right hand in the Reformed Church is perfectly consistent with what is being promoted with the left hand in the Reformed Church as it continues its witch hunt to stamp out white Kinism. (Ironically enough, the Reformed church seems perfectly fine with Black, Korean, and Hmong Kinism.) The egalitarianism required to advance the bilge that Rev. Mize is advancing above is the same egalitarianism that is being championed to drum godly ministers out of the putatively conservative Reformed Churches. I guess the cynic could say; “Well, at least they are being consistent.”

They tell me that the Rev. Aaron Mize article, “In Defense of Union Not Patriarchy,” has been pulled from the OPC Ordained Servant website. clearly this is due to the heat that the effeminate Mize’s article created.

However, this does not mean that the OPC is out of the woods here.

1.) Mize wrote the article and hasn’t himself recanted/repented.

2.) Editors and/or Publishers let this article be published. They need to recant (preferably repent in ashes and dust).

3.) There needs to be an apology written in the Ordained Servant.

4.) Actually, people need to be brought up on charges here — (Mize and those who made the decision to run the article) unless their is a full throated repentance.

5.) Without a full throated repentance you can count on the fact that this kind of bilge will be repeated.

This is how this agenda is advanced. First you push the envelope and then you retreat if needs be. However, if you retreat its always a temporary retreat with the intent to push forward again at some later date.

This is the practitioning of the Hegelian dialectic.

If the OPC doesn’t demand repentance … and if it doesn’t fire or bring up people on charges due to this article running, you can bet the farm that this article will return in some other form at a later date.

These people are not to be trusted.

Post-script

From Dan Brannan on the subject of this Mize article;

I think it was my session (in Idaho) that got the article pulled. Now people are mounting a case to have charges brought against Mize.

Nonetheless, I have told the session that …

It’s absurd that he wrote it, absurd that they printed it, absurd that it falls to laymen pitching a fit to redress it, and absurd that he holds a position above greeter.