Category: Marxism/Cultural Marxism

The Designed Decline of the White Christian & The White Christians Embrace

But the real problem in the West is not plunging birth rates so much as it is the desire by the New World Order elite to pursue an International arrangement that imports the third world into the West with the express purpose of eliminating all Christian opposition, and indeed, all Christians. This is a truth that Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban articulated in the soon to be released documentary film, “Deconstruction.” The New World Order elites understand something that Anglo-European are slow to admit that is that the war against white people is merely a proxy war with the purpose of eliminating and crushing Christianity. It is merely a fact of history, easily understood by the New World Order elites that White people have been the civilizational carriers of Biblical Christianity. This is not to say that White Western Civilization has been perfect. It is to say that it has been superior to all other Civilizations by God’s grace alone. The fact that the Anglo-European white world is so slow to resist this destruction of themselves and their faith is demonstrated by their willingness to be like sheep led to the slaughter.

This desire to rid the West of white people and the Christian faith is not new. Dr. R. L. Dabney wrote about this same drive at the end of the 20th century;

“If indeed they (the South’s Conquerors) can mix the blood of the heroes of Manassas with this vile stream from the fens of Africa, then they will never again have occasion to tremble before the righteous resistance of Virginia freemen; but will have a race supple and vile enough to fill that position of political subjection, which they desire to fix on the South.

R. L. Dabney
A Defense of Virginia & the South

Toby Sumpter Defines What “Anti-Semitism” Is … McAtee Demurs

“1. It is anti-semitic to stubbornly refuse to acknowledge the uncanny number of Bagels who have made breakthroughs in science, technology, and medicine and have done remarkably good things for the human race.”

 

Toby Sumpter

Author of Blog — No Legs, Still Walking

 

Bret responds,

Sure … as long as we also don’t stubbornly refuse to acknowledge the uncanny number of of Bagels who have persecuted and killed Christians throughout the ages and who have been a remarkable evil unto the human race

TS writes,

2. It is anti-semitic to consider the Bagels as a race to be uniquely malevolent, that is, uniquely responsible for the evils done in the world.

Bret responds,

So we are supposed to acknowledge the remarkable good Bagels have done for the human race but we are not supposed to read history and note how Bagels are uniquely malevolent and uniquely responsible for many many evils done in the world.

Kind of like genociding Palestinians in Gaza?

TS writes,

3. It is anti-semitic to refuse to allow Jews the basic human right of self-preservation, self-determination as a people and a nation, and the right of self-defense.

Bret responds,

What was it called when the West and Bagels refused to allow the Palestinian people the basic human right of self-preservation, self-determination as a people and a nation and the right of self-defense?

See the books by Steven Sizer and Allison Weir.

Does Old Toby even know about the Deir Yassin Massacre (April 1948)? Or the other various massacres by the IDF visited upon the Palestinian people?

TS writes,

4. It is anti-semitic to refuse to acknowledge certain social, cultural, and political commonalities that will often exist between Bagels and Christians who take the Old Testament seriously.

Bret responds,

LOL … what Bagels take the OT seriously Toby? Didn’t Jesus Himself make the point that the Bagels did not take the OT seriously? Toby… have you ever heard of the Talmud? Ever read any of it? Have you heard of the Kabbalah Toby? What universe are you occupying Toby?

TS writes,

5. It is anti-semitic to refuse any assistance or alliance with Israel in those areas of common conviction solely based on the fact that they are Bagels.

Bret responds,

BUT it is not anti-Semitic to refuse any assistance or alliance with Israel in those areas of common conviction unless they quit impoverishing us as a nation.

See

Toby writes,

6. It is anti-semitic to refuse to acknowledge that Bagels are in any way uniquely poised to receive the gospel because of their Old Testament heritage or as “natural branches” cut off from the Old Covenant that may be more easily grafted back into the New Covenant in Christ.

Bret responds,

Misinterpretation of Romans 11 which was fulfilled by AD 70. Romans 11 was future to those who received the letter at the time but it is past to us.

I refuse to acknowledge that Bagels are in any way uniquely poised to receive the gospel because of their OT heritage or their being “natural branches.”

In point of fact the Scripture is clear that God has divorced National Israel and while individual Bagels may indeed be redeemed, Israel as a nation has been cut off never to produce fruit again. Israel was cursed for rejecting their Messiah and had until AD 70 before the divorce papers were served to the nation of Israel.

Toby Sumpter, following Doug Wilson has no idea what Anti-Semitism is or is not.

One can disagree with all these points Toby made and still not be an Anti-Semite.

The Ideas Of Calvin Seminary’s Coming Stob Lecture Guest Needs Diagonalized

“No poles of two ideas are 100% true, there is always a middle paradox or diagonal answer.”

Christopher Watkin
Biblical Critical Theory – pg. 17-18
Christianity Astray — Book of the Year

So, if this is true as an idea it means it is not 100% true and that in it, when combined with the idea that of two ideas one must be 100% true we can find a middle paradox or diagonal answer that also by definition cannot be 100% true and likewise must be met with its opposite idea yielding another idea that likewise can not be 100% true add infinitum.

Can you say … dialectical?

Book of the year? Does not that idea, which cannot be 100% true, since there are people who are on the other pole whose idea is this book is the trash of the year die of the need for diagonalization?

Calvin Seminary is having this guy speak at their Stob lecture series and he will be saying all kinds of stuff that clearly cannot be, by his own standard, 100% true and will be in need of some diagonalization.

If I were there, and if there was a Q & A time I would file to the microphone and simply ask;

“Are your ideas 100% true and if they are 100% true does that not make them therefore not true since there are people like me who say your ideas are not true?”

Dr. Watkin, aren’t your ideas presented this evening in need of diagonalization?

Michigan Chief Deputy Superintendent Dr. Sue Carnell’s Refusal To Affirm That There Are Only Two Genders

Recently, Michigan Chief Deputy Superintendent Dr. Sue Carnell refused to affirm when before a Michigan legislative committee that there are only two genders. Carnell, when asked; “How many genders are there,” responded by saying that “different people have different beliefs on that.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/michigan-education-official-dodges-question-on-how-many-genders-there-are/vi-AA1QDnQV#details

This gender confusion ideology is not just a political fad—it is a mechanism for erasing objective truth. A society that becomes uncertain as to whether there are two genders or more than two and which cannot define what a man is or what a woman is will eventually lose all capacity to define anything. The erasure of the ability to clearly define male and female is the pursuit, via the backdoor, of achieving egalitarianism in meaning. If the clearest example of a meaningful distinction can not be asserted then no other meaningful distinction can be asserted with the result that meaning is egalitarian … that is all meaning potentially means the same thing.

This Gender confusion is the deliberate erasure of the foundations of family, faith, morality, and culture. The Cultural Marxist Left understands this. That’s why they push it so aggressively in schools. If you can destabilize a child’s sense of meaning of identity, you can reshape their beliefs on the meaning of everything else.

There is also another purpose to the madness of gender confusion and trannie-ism. If the State can force people to accept this lie then it can force them to accept any brutality descending from the State in terms of truth matters. Indeed, the more absurd the lie the State can push the better because the more it breaks down the idea of absolute truth the more it becomes the arbiter of all meaning. When this linguistic deception continues apace people will become cynical about all truth claims when they are forced to accept a truth claim that is obviously not true. So, this kind of lie serves the purpose of conditioning the people to be receptive of any and all propaganda claims coming from the State.

The only way to push back is to take up Solzhenitsyn’s motto of “live not by lies.”

By way of addendum, we would add that Natural Law clearly teaches that there are only two genders yet because Michigan Chief Deputy Superintendent Dr. Sue Carnell suppresses the truth in unrighteousness she will not state that there are only two genders.

So, we see here again, that Natural Law clearly teaches that there are only two Genders (a painfully obvious truth) but because fallen man suppresses the truth in unrighteousness fallen man wants to say that there are many genders as there are Baskin-Robbins ice cream flavors.

Natural Law is no reliable source for organizing a social order.

You might be a Cultural Marxist if you believe (A Sampler)

1.) In the Fatherhood of God over all men
2.) In the Brotherhood of all men
3.) That God loves everybody
4.) That it is sin to “judge”
5.) That Galatians 3:28 proves that distinctions end after asking Jesus into your heart
6.) That Israel remains God’s chosen people
7.) That it is only fair that competing gods get equal time with the God of the Bible when it comes to the public square.
8.) That “I feel” is synonymous with “I Think.”
9.) That there is no distinction between objective and subjective Truth
10.) That from nothing, something comes
11.) That we should listen to the Language police
12.) That the Jews of 2025 are genetically connected to the “Jews” occupying the Jewish nation we call Israel.
13.) That sending your children to Government (Public) schools is a good idea saying, “Well, I turned out fine. I’m sure they will as well.”
14.) That women should vote.
15.) That women should be participants in running cultural Institutions besides the home.
16.) That the Federal Government has any power over the states besides those expressly delegated and enumerated to the Federal Government by the State as stipulated in the US Constitution.
17.) That the US should get rid of the Electoral College
18.) That legal immigration from third world countries is “just fine.”
19.) That anybody has a “right,” as coming from God, to healthcare, a good paying job, or to vote.
20.) That there exists more than two genders or that it is possible to “transition” from one gender to another.
21.) That ICE is mean.
22.) That the embrace of the Ordo Amoris is heresy in the Church that needs to be stamped out.
23.) That either elected Republicans or Democrats are interested in anything more than being re-elected and/or financially profiting from their position.
24.) That both Republicans and Democrats don’t form a Uniparty controlled by players who wield the real power as behind the throne.
25.) That the names Franz Boas, Saul Alinsky, Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Wilhelm Reich or Herbert Marcuse are insignificant for where we are at in this cultural moment.
26.) In a Oppressor vs. Oppressed theory of social power.
27.)  That race isn’t real or is only about melanin levels or is only a social construct.
28.) Biblical patriarchy is unseemly and think that women should lead just as much as men and in the same way.
29.) That climate change threatens humanity.
30.) That the Universities are not a threat to Western Civilization.
31.) That the words “antisemite,” “racist,” “bigot,” “homophobe” “misogynist” any longer have any significance in terms of defining people.