Category: Culture

“It’s possible that the value into perpetuity of electing an African-American will outweigh the harm of one president’s policies over 8 years.”

Abraham Piper (Son Of John Piper)
Design Guru for Desiring God website

I must be from another planet because I am not even in the same universe of how people are thinking.

Here is a Piper who wants to seriously suggest that a President, if he stays on the throne of the imperial presidency for eight years, will have a greater value into perpetuity then the demerit that will be the case as he rules over the death of over 10 million unborn human beings, and this presumably all because of the level of melanin in his skin.

And that is just one policy. Never mind all the damage of the other brainless policies that we are going to get from a Marxist Obama administration. I’m sorry but this is not thinking that originates from the mind but rather it is thinking that originates from the sphincter.

And while we are at it, let me say that I have no interest in unifying around the President-elect, unless some kind of basis is offered upon which my unifying can stand. Now, I will pray for this man, I will hope for the best in his policy decisions, I will be respectful to the office, but I will not unify with the President simply because the man is black. Have people lost their collective senses?

If we really were a color blind society none of us would care that we elected a black guy. But because America still deals with racial issues, and still suffers from this unexplainable white guilt, there is a large expectation out there that Americans have some obligation to unify because a black man has been elected. Well, unifying be damned. I am not going to drink the kool-aid of Marxism just because the bartender pouring the drinks is some black guy.

Americans are soon going to realize that they elected the wrong Black guy. If they wanted somebody with a higher melanin level in the White House they should have gone with J.C. Watts, Ward Connerly, Walter Williams, Thomas Sowell, Clarence Thomas or any number of non Marxist black people. As it stands the failures of the policies that Barack Hussein Obama is going to pursue may set back race relations in this country 30 years as white people may over-react to the failures that we are going to see. We are seeing this kind of Phenomenon in Europe with the rise of the British National Party and other like National parties committed to preserving the historic ethnicity and culture of the country where these parties are rising.

For my part, as it concerns the Presidency, the melanin level in skin is irrelevant. As a man thinketh in his heart so he is. The problem in an Obama presidency will not be the color of his skin but the color of his thinking, and Obama’s thinking is as black as night.

Actually Obama is the worst thing that could have happened to the black community as he embodies all their worst pathologies. From the killing of their seed to the embrace of victim status that deserves to be compensated Obama will only exacerbate the problem of race relations in this country.

By the time Obama is done being President the race relations in this country will be more tense then they have been for a generation. People don’t see that now, because now is the time to “feel the love.”

The stupidity of all this makes my head ache.

Over at Bayly Blog Tim Bayly asked,

What made the black community embrace Obama as their own?

His promise to enrich them at the expense of the middle class. This is what has prompted the Black community to vote in the 90% plus realm for Democrats for time immemorial. The black community remain slaves … only their slave owners are no longer Plantation owners but the Democratic party. The black community is not going to bite the hand that feeds them. In Obama they were able to put one of their own in charge of the machine that funds their dysfunctional communities.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt2yGzHfy7s

Apparently, the FBI doesn’t fit the bill of what B. Hussein Obama wants. Apparently the Border Patrol doesn’t fit the bill of what B. Hussein Obama wants. Apparently the Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) doesn’t fit the bill of B. Hussein Obama wants.

Can you say SS? Can you say KGB? Can you say Cheka? Brown-shirts anybody?

Please, somebody leave me a comment and tell me that I am hearing or interpreting wrongly.

Where is America’s head up that people can’t see the dangers of what this guy is talking about?

“…our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same … Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset … Contrary to the charges in some quarters, S.500 will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and economically deprived nations of Africa and Asia. In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think.”

Senator Ted Kennedy
Supporting the 1965 Immigration Act

S.500 has put us in the position that by 2040 whites of European heritage will no longer make up a 50% plus majority of the American population. In 1960 five short years before S.500 was passed whites of European heritage were nearly 90 percent of the population. Everything that Teddy “Chappaquidick” Kennedy said was wrong.

Now some in the Church have said that this is good. The world is coming to us and so we have the opportunity to evangelize — so the argument goes. Now, if the Church were genuinely evangelizing our immigration nation I would embrace this reasoning but what is happening instead is that the Church is being evangelized by the different faith systems that are washing up on America’s shores. The result of our immigration nation has not been the extension of Biblical Christianity into these various cultures but rather the result has been the extension of multiculturalism, and multi-faithism (sometimes referred to as postmodernism). What’s more that multiculturalism and multifaithism is increasingly coming into the Church and being defined as Christianity.

A nation, like a family, is not defined merely or only by propositions. A nation is defined by shared faith, shared family ties, and shared attachment to the land. In the immigration policy we are pursuing we are becoming an alien nation, festooned with alien faiths, populated by alien families. The result of such a policy can only be eventual balkanization where theological, social and cultural homogeneity will be replaced with tribal enclaves each characterized by their own unique theological, social, and cultural homogeneity. In short the immigration policy we are pursuing now will eventually result in the war of all against all.

In my opinion we have no will to change course and so the die is cast.

Tune in tomorrow for some more cheery news that will make you happy and carefree.

There is always a great deal of talk about the terrible theocracy that some Christians allegedly conspire to form on the dead carcass of our present form of government. As such a great deal of energy is spent by Christians on the defensive, providing an apologetic against such trifle. Perhaps it is time to go on the offensive and locate and expose the terrible theocracy that is about to form on the dead carcass of our present form of government.

Theocracy is defined as government by the rule of God as mediated by priest-craft. Typically when we think of modern day Theocracies we think of countries like Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Qatar. Would we ever think of the federalized United States being a Theocracy?

We are currently on the cusp of turning this country into an explicit theocracy where the God is the State with the priest-craft being those who are the representatives of the State. As proof for this I offer the reality that in classical theology it is always the right of a God to own everything (The earth is the Lord’s and the fullness thereof) and His prerogative to distribute what He owns as He pleases (God gives them their food in due season). Clearly, we are about to empower legislators and an executive that believes that the State owns everything and as such has the prerogative to re-distribute what the State (god) owns as it (he) pleases. It is the pagan left that is turning this country into an explicit theocracy.

Also in classical theology children belong to the god. This is why in pagan theology it was not uncommon to see people render up their children to god by way of sacrifice. There can be little doubt that the State (god) has for decades believed that children belong to the State. The State, as god, has so much believed this that it has taken it upon itself to insist that its priest-craft (representatives) alone are qualified to teach the state’s children. If the pagan left is re-empowered in this election cycle we can be sure that it will pursue further legislation to force all people to bring the state’s children to the State temples in order that they may be catechized into the state religion that teaches that “in the state they live and move and have their being.” It is the pagan left that is turning this country into an explicit theocracy.

One more piece of evidence is seen in the fact that in ancient theology there were blasphemy laws prohibiting certain speech — sometimes on penalty of death. If the pagan left is re-empowered in this election cycle we already know that the priest-craft of the State is going to pursue legislation that prohibits certain kind of speech (think “fairness doctrine” and newly empowered “hate speech” legislation). The State as god through its pagan priest-craft is going to make sure that neither the god (state) or its priest-craft is spoken against. It is the pagan left that is turning this country into an explicit theocracy.

For our purposes here one thing that is true of the God in classical theology is His desire for justice. In classical theology God defines what justice is and is wrathful against injustice. Once again with the empowerment of the pagan left we are going to see a state that is taking the place of god. It will be the State that defines what justice is, with its mad pursuit of egalitarian notions of social justice, and further it will be the state, as god, through its priest-craft, who will be wrathful against injustice as it defines injustice. It is the pagan left that is turning this country into a explicit theocracy.

The pagan left, which so earnestly desires its own form of theocracy, screams against the bogey man of Christian theocracy, but only so that it may more artfully pursue its own pagan theocratic plans. Pagan theocracy advances its theocratic aspirations by offering themselves as those who desire to deliver America from the clutches of evil Christian theocracy.

Should American voters really desire to escape Theocracy they need to realize that the pagan left is the greatest threat to explicit theocracy that they are currently facing.