Party Politics & The Pervert Vote

As people are increasingly defined and controlled by their sexual lusts it will be the political party that caters to the fulfillment of those perverted lusts who will come to control the apparatus of the State. Politicians who offer to make perversion consequence free will be the Politicians elected to run the immorality state BUT as they offer sexual freedom as the promissory bait in exchange for votes what they are really selling is the hook of Political tyrannical control.

Constituents who can not control their passions are Constituents who will need to be controlled by the State as passions, once set free in the sexual domain, will not be able to stay within their boundaries in other domains.

Another reality that arises out of this political yielding to those controlled by their sexual lusts is the moving to the left of the Overton window. Sodomy, for example, is now openly embraced by both major parties. In my lifetime, a candidate who was outed for being sexually unfaithful to his wife, having gotten divorced could never be elected to any significant seat. However, now, with the political yielding to those controlled by their sexual lusts adultery and divorce are “ho-hum.” Sodomy among conservative Republicans is also “ho-hum” as seen in the fact that nobody arched an eyebrow by Trump’s nomination of a sodomite who has kidnapped children to be Secretary of the Treasury. And while Republicans aren’t yet ready to start nominating open Trannies to posts (like Biden did) it is just a matter of time before Trannieism is mainstreamed in Republican politics. It won’t be long before you see Republicans saying; “Oh, you can vote for her(m). She/He is a conservative Trannie.”

The fact that I am correct in all this is seen in recent Presidential politics. It was fairly well known that Barry Sotero (Barack Obama) was light in the loafers. They didn’t call him “Bathhouse Barry” for no reason. Still, all this was denied and it was realized that if it were true he could never be open about it and still be elected. However, with the coming of Donald Trump, the deal was sealed. Here was a man who had children by three different women and whose current wife’s porn shots were prominently displayed on the N.Y. Post front page and yet Trump was elected not once, but twice — and that on the back of Evangelicals voting for him. (In fairness to Evangelicals, all they had to vote for were criminals …. so better the criminal you like then the criminal you don’t like.) The point here is that perverted sexuality or sexual habits just don’t make much of a difference in presidential electoral politics. That is a vast shift occurring in my short lifetime.

Really, we are entering a time that could rightly be called a “Sexocracy.” It is a time where sexual normalcy, as defined by biblical standards, will be considered prudish and intolerant. It will be a time whereupon the sexual perverts having been let out of the closet, the sexually normal will be pushed into the closet so that heterosexuality will eventually become that “love that dare not name its name.”

All this to say that the arc of history, protestations to the contrary, are not working in the direction of traditional Western mores. We can expect a continued expansion of our perverted Sexocracy.

But… God is not mocked. Whatsoever a nation seweth, that it shall also reap.

Reading List On Christian Political Theory

Rev. Bret L. McAtee,

I did a quick perusal on your blog but didn’t see anything, do you have anywhere a reading list for Christian political theory?

Dear Casey,

Here are a few books I’ve read that come immediately to mind;

Institutes of Biblical Law –Rushdoony
Law & Revolution (Two Volumes) — Harold Berman
Fountainhead of Federalism: Heinrich Bullinger & the Covenantal Tradition – McCoy/Baker
Lex Rex — Samuel Rutherford
The Law — Frederic Bastiat
The Hebrew Republic: The Matrix for America’s Civil Government — E. C. Wines
Reflections on the Revolution in France – Edmund Burke
Democracy in America — Alexis de Tocqueville
The One & The Many — Rushdoony
The One, the Three and the Many — Colin Gunton
Considerations on France — Joseph de Maistre
The Dispossessed Majority — Wilmot Robertson
Suicide of the West: An Essay on the Meaning & Destiny of Liberalism — James Burnham

Leviathan & It’s Enemies — Samuel T. Francis
Christianity & Civilization (III Volumes) — James Jordan / Gary North
Millennialism and Social Theory — Dr. Gary North

I would also add something on how Bagels are a canker that eat away at Christian political order.

Election 2024 — A Brief Reprieve?

Do you suppose the Democratic party has learned anything from their defeat in 2024?Do you think that they will now reverse themselves touching their conviction that the planet is going to implode from climate change? Do you think that they will give up on the whole utter nonsense of “The Green New Deal?” Do you think that Democratic Governors will cease appointing sexual freaks like Rachel Levine to key posts in their administrations? Do you think that some Democrat will now arise who will say loudly and boldly, “Sex change operations for children at hospitals receiving state funding will no longer be a thing?” or “We are no longer housing males who pretend to be females with the female population in our prisons?” Will some Democrat say, “The whole concept of required DEI hiring as policy was not well thought out from the beginning.” Will Democrats give up on the policy of equity where they discriminate against able bodies cis-gendered whites in favor of crippled, lesbian, minorities?” Will some prominent white Democrat come out and say; “I love white people,” or “we must pursue policy that will strengthen and advantage our core population so that the whole country can prosper?” Will some Democrat apologize for the statement that “white supremacy groups are the greatest extant domestic terrorist threat to our country?” Will any Democrat, after the drubbing of 2024, now pursue a policy that finds the health of the traditional family as a cornerstone?” Will some Democrat come out and say, “Our push for sodomite marriage was not beneficial to our country?”

To the contrary, I suspect that the Democratic party is now so much the vehicle of the New World Order Cultural Marxist left that it will double down on the agenda that Democrats have been pursuing since the rise of the Clintons and the Obamas. I think this radical Cultural Marxism is in their bloodstream and as a party they will not be able to shift. Instead, what I anticipate is that they will now try to cloak their extremism. 2028 front running candidates like Gavin Newsom and Gretchen Whitmer will still run from the left while still desperately seeking to present themselves as moderate.

What has happened is that the Democrats have become Darth Vader’s embodiment of “The Empire” and we should be certain that they are even now plotting to “strike back.” The unfortunate reality here is that the coalition that defeated the Democratic Empire in 2024 may well not be stable enough to consistently defeat the Empire. This is due to the fact that in way of principle many of the Rebel forces hold to the same ideas of the Empire, even if those principles have not worked themselves out to their logical conclusions. For example, Rick Grenfell and Peter Thiel who are both part of the rebel forces are themselves sodomites. Tulsi Gabbard is Buddhist. Vivek Ramaswamy is Hindu. RFK Jr., Trump, and Matt Gaetz are all sexual Draculas. The Rebel forces are littered with Zionists from the new Sec. Def. to Huckabee as the new Ambassador to Israel. Still, we can continue to hope that God still draws straight lines with crooked sticks. But we shouldn’t count on in this case.

All of this reminds us that the Church must continue to be salt and light – and that to the Rebel forces as much as the Empire stormtroopers. The Church must lift up Jesus Christ as King of Kings and Lord of Lords who alone can deliver men from those sins that they are so tenaciously clinging to thinking that in those sins they will find meaning and fulfillment when in point of fact those very sins explains their unbearable guilt, their constant misery and continuing alienation from themselves, others, and from God.

Having said that we must admit that the Church itself, in many if not most of its expressions, is the Church of the Empire. It will not be a reforming agent until it is first Reformed. I have concluded that will not likely happen without abandoning the current infrastructure of conservative denominations. These denominations are maintained by men who have embraced Cultural Marxist leftist principles and so is of no use in terms of being salt and light. It is not a certainty but it is a pretty safe bet that our political parties will not reform the Church until the Church becomes again Reformed itself so it can be an agent of Reformation.

So, it looks we have been given a window of opportunity to get our house in order before we could see the Empire striking back.

Let us pray that we put the time we have to good use.

Stolen Election 2020

In 2008 George W. Bush was an extremely unpopular two term President. His approval ratings were all time lows. John McCain became the Republican nominee and was saddled with an economy (remember the 2008 Wall Street Market crash) that was horrid. In that election cycle that heavily favored the “out of power” party due to  a severe decline in the economy that almost always ends with the incumbents being thrown out of office, Barack Hussein Obama received 69,498,516 votes with 52.9% of total votes cast.

In 2012 Obama runs again for President and with the power of incumbency combined with a stable economy and a weak opponent (Mittens Romney) Obama garners; 65,915,795 votes with 51.1% of votes cast. Incumbents almost always are re-elected with the power of the White House behind them.

The recipe for throwing out incumbents is one or more of the following;

1.) A serious downturn in the economy

2.) A major foreign policy blunder
3.) Exposed significant corruption

Obama’s first term had avoided all of these and so he was re-elected with a comfortable margin over the weak neo-conservative candidate Mitt Romney.

In 20216 Hillary Clinton runs as Obama’s heir apparent. She has a good economy to run on. She faces a man who is considered one of the weakest candidates in Republican history ranking right up there with Wendell Willkie according to some. Despite having the power of incumbency (She was Obama’s Sec. State) and despite a decent, if not spectacular economy, Hillary is deeply unpopular and loses to Donald John Trump garnering 46.1% of the vote which translates to 65,853,514 votes.

In 2020 Trump runs for re-election. The nation is in turmoil from a manufactured pandemic. Prior to the pandemic though Trump was atop an economy that was better than any economy since Ronald Reagan’s second term. Trump runs against geriatric Joe Biden, who even in 2020 was showing signs of dementia. Remember the Democrats had not allowed Joe to lose the Iowa Democratic primary that year by reporting that the results could not be known for over two weeks due to a technological problems. By the time the results of Iowa election came in they were both disputed and any bump that might have been given to the winning candidate was no longer possible. Biden then finished 5th in New Hampshire but because of the support of James Clyburn he wins South Carolina and goes on to be the Democratic nominee. Biden runs a campaign from his basement, seldom doing campaign events due to fears of Covid. Despite his lackluster campaigning Biden wins a staggering 81,283,501 votes. The incumbent Donald Trump earns more votes (74,223,975) for a sitting President than had ever occurred previously in history.

Keep in mind that all this happens in the context of changed election laws in states allegedly precipitated by the pandemic. Biden received more votes from the Black community than was even cast for Barack Obama. Biden receives more votes for President than any man in US History.

Now in 2024 Trump runs again against Kamala Harris. It is true that Harris was running with a bad economy even though she had the power of incumbency behind her. As we know Kamala, as a black female, loses and in her loss she receives fewer black votes than Biden did. Trump receives fewer votes (roughly 600,000 fewer coming in at 73,663,351) than he did when he lost to Biden in 2020.

All of this to demonstrate, via vote totals, that it is beyond the ability to reckon that Biden was not elected by a well organized cheating campaign aided and abetted by the scamdemic. Clearly, the DEMS cheated again in 2024 but less efficiently so since several states had tightened up their election laws after 2020. The cheating of the DEMS is seen in 2024, by way of just one example, all the free media they received from the Lugenpress reporting “objective news.”

I would bet my retirement that the DEMS stole election 2020 and nobody will ever convince me otherwise. The DEMS cheated in a host of different ways. One of the major ways was exposed on the documentary 2000 mules. The DEMS used the fake Covid scamdemic to change election laws which allowed them to steal an election.

Further, I would bet that the DEMS tried to steal election 2024 but they couldn’t overcome the wave for Trump given how some states had tightened up election laws.

Texas State Congressman James Talarico Says Something Really Stupid

“Christian Nationalists are not interested in Christian values. They are only interested in legislating Christian dominance. Christian Nationalism (CN) is putting prayer in schools and taking free lunches out. CN is teaching the bible in schools but refusing to give teachers a pay raise. CN is forcing schools to post the ten commandments while nominating a candidate for President who has violated almost all of them. It is not about Jesus. It is about power.”

James Talarico
Texas State Congressman

1.) If Christian Nationalists are not interested in Christian values then they are not, by definition, Christian Nationalists.

2.) What could possibly be wrong with legislating Christian dominance? Is it only Christianity when one legislates the dominance of other non Christian religions?

3.) I am a Christian Nationalist. I am not interested in putting prayer in schools but I am interested in taking “free” lunches out. In point of fact, what I am really interested in is legislating a dominance that results in closing down completely government schools.

4.) There is no such thing as a free lunch. Somebody, somewhere is paying for that lunch.

5.) I am a Christian Nationalist. As a Christian Nationalist I am opposed to the humanist hacks they call “teachers” to teach the Bible in government schools. Can you imagine how badly they would do so? I am also opposed to giving teachers a school raise. In point of fact, in my Christian Nationalist world all government school teachers would be out of work since all government schools would be shut down. I would shut down government school since, as a Christian Nationalist, wanting dominance, I do not want humanists being dominant over children as seen in their teaching the children that humanism should be dominant in their thinking.

6.) If schools are shut down then the idea of posting the ten commandments is now big deal. However, if government schools are not shut down, why shouldn’t the ten commandments be posted since the refusal to post them demonstrates the States desire to have its religion be dominant.

7.) This chap was adamantly opposed to posting the 10 commandments in Texas schools and he contributed to killing the bill in Texas.

8.) In desiring to post the ten commandments while nominating Trump who has violated all of them, Christians are involved in contradiction for sure. However, all because someone supports something wrong (nominating Trump) doesn’t mean it is wrong for them to support a good thing (posting the ten commandments.) It merely means they are inconsistent. Talarico’s inconsistencies are all over this stupid quote. Does that mean everything the man does is wrong?

9.) What ever could be possibly wrong with wielding power? So what if it is about power? When one embraces Christ are they at that point no longer to have authority or power? Should they not have the power of Fathers or Husbands? Should they not have the power of employer or politician?

10.) Why is it that the idea of embracing Jesus automatically means the idea of giving up power? I don’t doubt that for some Jesus is used as a mask to grab power but that doesn’t mean that automatically Christianity and power are incompatible.