Category: Politics

Mark Sanford should resign because he is to stupid to be a Governor of a State. I mean think about this for a minute. Here is a Governor of a State who actually thought that, without getting busted, he could take a state vehicle to the Atlanta airport and hop on a plane for another Continent and pass through customs and spend six days lounging around Buenos Aires with “The Girl from Ipanema,” and then get back on a plane and go through customs again and tell his staff that if anybody questions his whereabouts to just tell them that he “just went for a hike on the Appalachian trail.” I mean he obviously concluded that he could do all that without getting busted. Word has it that next month he planned to fly to the Arctic circle to hook up with a hot Inuit babe he met while at a UN conference on the plight of baby seals.

Nobody this stupid should be allowed to govern a car, never mind a whole state. I’d rather be governed by the mother of Le-a then be governed by Mark Sanford. Her story makes more sense then Sanford’s.

The stupidity of all this really has to be an issue. I mean if Sanford wanted to cavort with strange flesh besides his wife he certainly could have been far more clever about it then taking off for freaking Argentina. What US Public official, not suffering from insanity, goes to Argentina to get laid? Not even any of Joseph Kennedy’s sons were that hormonal. I mean at least Idaho Senator Larry Craig realized that you didn’t have to leave the airport Men’s Bathroom to get a little action.

Mark Sanford should resign because if a man would break his vows to his wife there is no reason to think he will not break his vows to the state. Mark Sanford should resign because if a man will treat his sons the way that Sanford’s has treated his it is unspeakable to think how he would treat the citizens that he is supposed to be serving. Mark Sanford should resign because he obviously has no self control. Do you want somebody governing a state that is being governed by their genitalia?

Man, I hope that Argentina woman was worth it, because at age 49 this trip to meet up with his little Lolita is going to be the memory he carries with him the rest of his life and that memory will have to be his satisfaction for the rest of his life since nothing in his career from here on out will be giving him any satisfaction.

Sin never makes sense.

Never.

But sometimes it makes a little less sense then other times.

This is one of those times.

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin says the U.S. under President Obama is headed toward socialism.

I’ve always contended that Palin isn’t particularly bright. This is like looking at a chicken in the oven and saying, “the chicken in the oven is headed towards the slaughterhouse.”

“I am shocked and outraged by the murder of Dr. George Tiller as he attended church services this morning. However profound our differences as Americans over difficult issues such as abortion, they cannot be resolved by heinous acts of violence.”

President B. Hussein Obama

“Differences over difficult issues as abortion cannot be resolved by heinous acts of violence.”

You suppose he’s referring to the heinous acts of violence to the tune of 50 million unborn dead and tortured since 1973?

“Does anyone believe that (Sotomayor) is a racist?”

Peggy Noonan

Good night Peggy … the woman is a member of La Raza whose motto is “All for the Race, None for the rest.” She is a freaking member of this group Peggy. Peggy … Sotomayor is a member of a group whose motto is the call for Hispanic racial supremacy to such a degree that nothing is left for other races.

Noonan represents the reason why there is no hope in the Republican party. She is the poster child on why Sam Francis called the Republican party “the stupid party.” I mean how stupid is it for this high brow Republican to act like it is immature to point out Sotomayor’s in your face hatred for white people.

People like Noonan will guarantee that La Raza’s motto will come to pass. Peggy, do you realize that Sotomayor would not even be empaneled to be a juror if she revealed that she was a member of La Raza and that she believed that Latina women can reach better judicial decisions then white males. If she would be rejected to sit as a juror on a trial why should she sit on the Supreme Court.

Does anyone believe that Peggy Noonan is politically savvy?

“Nowhere do these questions come up more powerfully than on the issue of abortion.

As I considered the controversy surrounding my visit here, I was reminded of an encounter I had during my Senate campaign, one that I describe in a book I wrote called “The Audacity of Hope.” A few days after I won the Democratic nomination, I received an e-mail from a doctor who told me that while he voted for me in the primary, he had a serious concern that might prevent him from voting for me in the general election. He described himself as a Christian who was strongly pro-life, but that’s not what was preventing him from voting for me.

What bothered the doctor was an entry that my campaign staff had posted on my Web site — an entry that said I would fight “right-wing ideologues who want to take away a woman’s right to choose.” The doctor said that he had assumed I was a reasonable person, but that if I truly believed that every pro-life individual was simply an ideologue who wanted to inflict suffering on women, then I was not very reasonable. He wrote, “I do not ask at this point that you oppose abortion, only that you speak about this issue in fair-minded words.”

Fair-minded words.

After I read the doctor’s letter, I wrote back to him and thanked him. I didn’t change my position, but I did tell my staff to change the words on my Web site. And I said a prayer that night that I might extend the same presumption of good faith to others that the doctor had extended to me. Because when we do that — when we open our hearts and our minds to those who may not think like we do or believe what we do — that’s when we discover at least the possibility of common ground.

That’s when we begin to say, “Maybe we won’t agree on abortion, but we can still agree that this is a heart-wrenching decision for any woman to make, with both moral and spiritual dimensions. So let’s work together to reduce the number of women seeking abortions by reducing unintended pregnancies, and making adoption more available, and providing care and support for women who do carry their child to term. Let’s honor the conscience of those who disagree with abortion, and draft a sensible conscience clause, and make sure that all of our health care policies are grounded in clear ethics and sound science, as well as respect for the equality of women.”

Understand — I do not suggest that the debate surrounding abortion can or should go away. No matter how much we may want to fudge it — indeed, while we know that the views of most Americans on the subject are complex and even contradictory — the fact is that at some level, the views of the two camps are irreconcilable. Each side will continue to make its case to the public with passion and conviction. But surely we can do so without reducing those with differing views to caricature.

Open hearts. Open minds. Fair-minded words.”

1.) The Doctor is an idiot and isn’t pro-life as his vote for Obama reveals. A person can say they are pro-life all they want but by their deeds you shall know them. A vote for Obama tells us the Doctor Obama is citing was pro-murder. (Neither is he a Christian for the same reason.)

2.) The Doctor was more upset about Obama using the phrase “right wing ideologues” then he was about torturing, maiming, and murdering babies.

3.) Why should this be a “heart wrenching decision” for women if it is not the removal and destruction of life? Why should we try to reduce unwanted pregnancies or increase adoption options if abortion is akin to pulling a tooth out? Why all this angst about abortion if it doesn’t end life? The fact that the left keeps speaking this way indicates that they know that abortion is murder and that they have to do something to communicate that they are not in reality supporting mass murder.

4.) There is no possibility of common ground when it comes to the in-uterine murder of babies.

5.) Let’s remember that the man saying this is the man who has repeatedly voted to deny life support to babies that are born alive as a result of a botched abortion. This man is heinous and wicked to an immeasurable degree and yet Americans are going to listen to this man lecture us on ethics? What are people thinking?

6.) It is impossible to come up with a caricature that isn’t befitting for those who have turned this country into a land where we must wear waders in order to slog through the rivers of blood that abortionists like Obama have created.