Category: Uncategorized

Wherein R2K and a certain Austrian Corporal Agree.

“The war will run its course, and then I will see it as my life’s work to sort out the problem with the Churches. Only then will the German nation be safe. I do not care in the slightest about articles of faith, but I’m not having clerics sticking their noses in worldly affairs. This organised lie has to be broken in such a way that the state becomes the absolute master.”
 Adolph Hitler

German Chancellor on December 13, 1941

1.) There are those who try to style Hitler out to be some kind of Christian and/or hero that we should really admire since he stood up against the Bolsheviks. We can certainly admit that the evil of Hitler was to be preferred to the evil of Stalin and maybe even the evil of FDR and Churchill but to say that Hitler was “Christian” or a “Hero” is just nonsense. The man says here, “I do not care in the slightest about the articles of faith.” To not care in the slightest about the articles of faith makes one a anti-Christ.  Hitler was nobody for Christians to esteem and the last thing we want is any form of German National Socialism to be resurrected anywhere in the West. Did you see the word “Socialism?”

Of course my convictions run deep here because a German National Socialism policy here would mean the required murder of my Cerebral Palsy Grand-daughter by the National Socialist State.

2.) If a modern Hitler showed up at Westminster-Cal. @ Escondido and said in a chapel service; “I’m not having clerics sticking their noses in worldly affairs,” the chapel may well collapse from the resounding reverberations from the Amens coming from the faculty. A modern Hitler is just the kind of Magistrate that the R2K chaps could get behind.

3.) Another reason we see to eschew those who want to praise Hitler is the fact that he says here that the state is to be the absolute Master. Typical Fascism. Everything inside the State. Nothing outside the State. Biblical Christians worth their salt want nothing to do with that kind of mindset. Biblical Christians do not concur that the State is to be the absolute Master. Biblical Christians insist that God has ordained different jurisdictions of authority where sovereignty is entrusted to different covenantal heads as that sovereignty is handled consistent with God’s revealed Law-Word. Magistrates handle swords. Fathers handle rods. Pastors/Elders handle keys. The state is not the absolute Master.

You want to be R2K? Then live with the idea that should a Hitler come along with this mindset you are his lackeys.

Presuppositions of the New Post-Christian Morality;

“The new post-Christian morality is manifested in every aspect of the WASP lives. We don’t protect our borders because the stranger is purer and better than our own people. And since the alien is better than the white citizens, he is allowed to murder, rape, and steal when he enters his new country. In my own anti-nation called the United States of America (it should be called the United States of Satan) elderly white people — I meet them all the time — cannot afford to pay for their health care unless they increase their incomes by applying for the welfare benefits that the aliens receive. But the older whites won’t apply for welfare because they don’t want to be a drain on their nation’s resources. The liberal Jacobins depend on the innate honor of the white people that they have sworn to exterminate. There is no reasoning with such monsters of the deep, who hate their own with the passionate hatred of their satanic master. From out of the depths, the depths of a WASP heart, we respond to the liberals’ satanic universalism of hate with a love of our own people, the people of our familial hearth fire. And surely that love will teach us to hate where we ought to hate and fight without ceasing against the liberals who hate their own in the name of a universalist theology forged in hell. Our short mortal lives will count for nothing if we don’t practice the charity that begins at home.”

R. Franklin Edisto

Presuppositions of the New Post-Christian WOKE Morality;

1. All evil and suffering comes from environmental factors.

This is contrary to Biblical Christianity which teaches as from Scripture that evil and suffering come not from environmental factors but are the consequence of man having a sinful nature. The idea that the environment is man’s problem was the position of the arch-heretic Pelagius against which Augustine so manfully battled.

2. The third world cultures and peoples are full of such.

The problem with the third world is most definitely not their refusal to own that their evil arises from a sin nature. Instead, per WOKENESS the third world with its minority populations have been held back by environmental factors impressed upon them by the evil white man.

3. Evil perpetuates evil

Nothing can change in the third world as long as the environment remains unchanged. Men will not and can not change without a change of the environment. The evil example must be removed.

4. What we did to them in the past caused this evil.

The White man is the one who is responsible for the evil in the third world since it is the White man who via colonialism and missionary efforts created the evil environment that explains the evil and suffering of the third world.

5. We must thus not do what we did in the past, no matter the cost or the seeming sanity thereof. We must break the loop.

This means we must commit ethno-national suicide in order to atone for our past “sins.” Breaking the loop means the disappearance of borders, the extinction of previously white/European nations, and the forced transfer of wealth from the industrious white man to the comparatively supine cultural Marxist inspired minority.

6. When they do evil, it’s our fault, as we have created Frankenstein’s monster.

All of this creates a “noble savage” reality where minorities can do no wrong that is not the fault of the evil white man. Like the white woman charity worker in Haiti who was gang raped by Haitians concluding that it was the oppression by white people that drove the rage of her rapists so the WOKE post-Christian white man insists that all evil of minorities inflicted against him is the consequence of the post-Christian white man’s previous evil. A kind of conviction that karma is what is happening has infected the post-Christian white man’s thinking.

7. We can be the atonement as whites. We can recycle the suffering of Jesus incarnation in the white race so that that in being torn apart a better way is thus taught and modeled for the minority population.

Just as Jesus sufferings brought atonement to the elect so the sufferings of the white man can bring about atonement both for the past sins of the white man and for the present evil and suffering of minorities. Therefore the white man must die so that the minority population might live and find atonement and release from sin. The White man becomes the new Jesus providing an atonement for the suffering of untold millions of suffering and miserable minorities — a suffering a misery brought on by the white man’s historic “sins” against minorities.

8. Because there are no differences in people, there is hope. Whites were converted by the moral appeal of Christianity, so these third worlders will see our living example and convert.

One day all men will live in peace and harmony because the white WOKE man with his post-Christian morality laid down his racial life so that minorities might live and convert to Woke-tianity.

9. This is the WOKE version of Christianity, a different ethic of love that is torn apart by the whirling wheel of the world, and yet in happily dying changes the world for the better by the witness of this WOKE martyrdom.

Only by dying and going into extinction can the white man bring the blessings of peace, harmony, and understanding to the anticipated Utopian world. This WOKE form of Christianity thus becomes a suicidal death cult for the white race attended with the conviction that as a consequence the world will be healed by the sin inflicted upon it by the original sin that was and has been the existence of white people.

10. The white race must be martyred in passivity to win the world to Christ.

The only possible alternative to this is that the white race instead of being martyred become a slave class — hewers of wood and drawers of water — and only that if their numbers are kept severely reduced.

Rev. Sacha Walicord Goes After R2K

Someone else is finally saying it. Start @ 19 minute mark.

https://www.sermonaudio.com/solo/walkerurc/sermons/81422154334656/

Key quote;

“Christ is the mediator of this covenant of grace and here is something we need to hear — especially have to hear in the United Reformed Churches, as increasingly our people are being confused with a false understanding of exactly this topic. You have to understand that the Law and the Gospel are not opposites. They are in full harmony as Paul in vs. 21 reiterates … He asks exactly the question that has been plaguing the United Reformed Churches and the Orthodox Presbyterian Church for a along time; ‘Is the law then contrary to the promises of God? Certainly not’ he says. How much clearer do we want it? How crafty does it get with our enmity against the law of God? How deception can preachers become in luring our people away from the truth – away from a wonderful benefit of the covenant of grace, (of God’s dictated order of life) and changing the Gospel into something else?

And Paul continues, ‘If a law had been given that could give life then righteousness would indeed be by the law.’ Now this describes exactly the trap in which many of the contemporary Reformed have fallen. They do rightly understand that we have been saved through faith in Jesus Christ but they go ahead and say, “Since it is the promise and not the law that saves we have to abandon the law’ and they become anti-nomians. They become enemies of the law – discarding the law altogether. They portray the Law and the Gospel as contrarians – as competitors and they pit the two, as it were, against each other, just like the Marcions of old did with their heresy. That’s in its core the fasle understanding and the false doctrine — the so-called Radical Two Kingdom doctrine, which is being heavily promoted by a seminary on the west coast and by many of its graduates almost cult like — even in our Federation and we have to begin of calling this out this as what it is. It is not the Gospel of Jesus Christ. But it is another Gospel.

There I said it with all the possible repercussions and consequences. It (R2K) is another Gospel.

Because that is clearly not what the Bible teaches and that is not Gospel that Paul preaches who driven by the Holy Spirit says just the opposite.

Dr. Rev. Sacha Walicord

John Calvin on the Legitimacy of Slavery

“Here a question arises, Is perpetual servitude so displeasing to God, that it ought not to be deemed lawful? To this the answer is easy, — Abraham and other fathers had servants or slaves according to the common and prevailing custom, and it was not deemed wrong in them. Before the Law was given, there was nothing to forbid one who had servants or maids to exercise power over them through life; and then the Law, mentioned here, was not given indiscriminately and generally, but it was a peculiar privilege in favor of the chosen people. Hence it is without reason that any one infers that it is not lawful to exercise power over servants and maids; for, on the contrary, we may reason thus, That since God permitted the fathers to retain servants and maids, it is a thing lawful; and further, as God permitted the Jews also, under the Law, to bear rule over aliens, and to keep them perpetually as servants, it follows that this cannot be disapproved. And still a clearer evidence may be adduced; for since the Gentiles have been called to the hope of salvation, no change has in this respect been made. For the Apostles did not constrain masters to liberate their servants, but only exhorted them to use kindness towards them, and to treat them humanely as their fellow-servants. (Ephesians 6:9; Colossians 4:1) If, then, servitude were unlawful, the Apostles would have never tolerated it; but they would have boldly denounced such a profane practice had it been so. Now, as they commanded masters only to be humane towards their servants, and not to treat them violently and reproachfully, it follows that what was not denied was permitted, that is, to retain their own servants. We also see that Paul sent back Onesimus to Philemon. (Philemon 1:12) Philemon was not only one of the faithful, but a pastor of the Church. He ought, then, to have been an example to others. His servant had fled away from him; Paul sent him back, and commended him to his master, and besought his master to forgive his theft. We hence see that the thing in itself is not unlawful.”

John Calvin
Calvin’s Commentary on Jeremiah 34:8-17