Category: Uncategorized

Is The Great Replacement Theory True? — Part I

I am going to post III short videos from three random sources in order to demonstrate that the idea of the Great Replacement theory is not some tin foil hat conspiracy theory.

For those of you who don’t know the Great Replacement theory is the theory that says there is an agenda that exists to sublimate and replace white people across the Globe (especially in their homelands in the West) with non-Caucasian third world people.

The truth that is not being told in this Great Replacement theory is that the underlying reason the Talmudists and non-Caucasian third worlders’ desire to rid themselves of white people is the hatred of the Talmudists and non-Caucasian third worlders of Jesus Christ. It is Jesus Christ who, by grace alone, has raised up the White man to spread Christian civilization. By destroying the White Man, the enemies of Christ fully expect to overthrow the Kingship of Jesus.

Of course, countless white grazers co-operate with this Great Replacement agenda, having been convinced that it is the loving and noble thing to do to support the elimination of their existence. Why, the love of Christ requires us to self-immolate as a people. The love of Christ requires us to sacrifice our children’s inheritance to the Christ-hater. Loving Christ means throwing ourselves and our descendants on the Bonfire of the racial vanity.

Here is part I

Anthony Bourdain: “In 70 years there will be no white people anymore” (bitchute.com)

Revolutionary Impulse Towards Global Amalgamation

One pursuit that has always been consistent as found among the Revolutionary guild is the dream of eliminating distinctions among races, ethnicities, and peoples. This is not merely my opinion. In a moment I will provide an avalanche of quotes that will prove this to be the case. What I want to do now is tee these quotes up by pointing out the reality that it is the clergy and the church now who are hot in pursuit of the same thing. It is a preponderance in the clergy who are telling us that God loves inter-racial marriage and there is nothing in the slightest wrong with that. Indeed, it is to be preferred in order to break down pre-existing barriers. Churches now that are people group integrated are Churches that are automatically superior to churches that are not people group integrated.

Already some will experience the vapors but what I’ve written above. But all I am pointing out is that this mindset that praises the pursuit of ethno-cide of all ethnicities has always been the pursuit of the Marxist Revolutionary and inasmuch as we in the Church are pursuing the same end in that much we declare ourselves to be functional Marxists.

This is not a condemnation of those Christians who have married inter-racially. Obviously, the grace of God is not defeated by those normatively unwise marriages nor by our contribution to the pursuit of eliminating distinct racial-ethnic lines of both husband and wife. In heaven, because of God’s grace, there will be many many children of mixed-race marriages.

We should note also that were we living in normal times where people understood, as their ancestors did, the necessity to normatively, regularly, and routinely marry among their own people the problem of people not doing that would not be as acute. However, we live in an age where one has to be lobotomized in order not to see the agenda that exists to encourage the One World Order necessity of the whole world being melange-ed into a mutt existence. We see this push for miscegenation in the college catalogs that come to our doors. We see this push for miscegenation on the billboards dotted across the nation. We see this push for miscegenation in the ads that come in the magazines we read. We see this push for miscegenation repeatedly in the films and TV shows with which we indoctrinate ourselves. And as said earlier, we see it now praised in the Churches we attend. If you’re Asian and not dating a black chick there is something wrong with you. If you’re a white woman and refuse to date a sub-continent Indian then you are obviously a bigot. If you go even further and suggest dating like this is not a good idea and marrying like this is even a worse idea you are worse than a plague.

As we said at the beginning though that has always been the plan of the Revolutionary. Throughout history, the Marxist Revolutionary has touted the elimination of races, ethnicities, and people-groups in favor of literally bleeding all colors into one.

So, if you dear reader are in favor of this melanginization — this muttifying of all mankind, then your allegiance to the cause of Marxism is no longer in doubt. You are a functional Marxist. Remember it is not possible to arrive at the muttifying of all mankind without the muttifying that happens in each miscegenated marriage. So, you get no relief from the reality that you are a Marxist by saying, “Well, in this one case I think it is alright, but everywhere else is a problem.”

The quotes below demonstrate that the Marxist agenda has always been to do what the Church now favors. Of course, the reality of these quotes won’t make much difference to people. The quotes will just be ignored. Some will even go so far as to say … “Well, the Marxists didn’t get everything wrong and this is something they got right.”

Read it and weep;

1.) “Princes and nations will disappear without violence from the earth, the human race will become one family and the world the abode of reasonable men.”

-Adam Weishaupt, quoted in Paul Johnson, Intellectuals (London: Orion Books Limited, 1993), p. 32.

2.) Capitalism developed the ever more inhuman polarization of the sexes. The cult of making distinctions, which serves only for oppression, is now being swept away by awareness of resemblance and identity.

M. Walser

Uber die neusten Stimmungen im Westen
In: Kursbuch, Bd. 20, 1970, S. 19-41.

3.) ”What will be the attitude of communism to existing nationalities?

The nationalities of the peoples associating themselves in accordance with the principle of community will be compelled to mingle with each other as a result of this association and hereby to dissolve themselves, just as the various estate and class distinctions must disappear through the abolition of their basis, private property.”

~ Frederick Engels in “The Principles of Communism”, 1847

4.) “The equality of races and nations is one of the most important elements of the moral strength and might of the Soviet state. Soviet anthropology develops the one correct concept, that all the races of mankind are biologically equal. The genuinely materialist conception of the origin of man and of races serves the struggle against racism, against all idealist, mystic conceptions of man, his past, present and future.”

—Mikhail Nesturkh, Soviet anthropologist, 1959

“The Origin of Man” (Moscow)Mikhail Nesturkh, Soviet anthropologist, 1959:

5.) “The aim of socialism is not only to abolish the present division of mankind into small states and end all national isolation; not only to bring the nations closer together but to merge them….”

Vladimir Lenin

The Rights of Nations to Self Determination — pg. 76

6.) “… Just as mankind can achieve the abolition of classes only by passing through the dictatorship of the proletariat, so mankind can achieve the inevitable merging of nations only by passing through the transition period of complete liberation of all oppressed nations, i.e., their right to secede. “

Vladimir Lenin

The Rights of Nations to Self Determination

7.) “Hess had taught Marx that socialism was inseparable from internationalism. Marx writes in his Communist Manifesto that the proletariat has no fatherland. In his Red Catechism, Hess mocks the fatherland notion of the Germans, and he would have done the same with the fatherland notion of any other European nation. Hess criticized the Erfurt program of the German Social-Democrat Party for its unconditional recognition of the national principle. But Hess is an internationalist with a difference: Jewish patriotism must remain. He writes,

‘Whoever denies Jewish nationalism is not only an apostate, a renegade in the religious sense but a traitor to his people and to his family. Should it prove true that the emancipation of the Jews is incompatible with Jewish nationalism, then the Jew must sacrifice emancipation… The Jew must be, above all, a Jewish patriot.’

I agree with Hess’ patriotic ideas to the extent that what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. I am for every kind of patriotism – that of the Jews, the Arabs, the Germans, the Russians, the Americans. Patriotism is a virtue if it means the endeavor to promote economically, politically, spiritually, and religiously the welfare of one’s own nation, provided that it is done in friendship and cooperation with other nations.”

~Richard Wurmbrand, Marx & Satan, pp.54-55

8.) This from Igor Shafareivich’s “Socialist Phenomenon,” Shafareivich is commenting on that which is characteristic of all International Socialist expressions,

a.) The national question: ‘National differences and antagonistic interests among various peoples are already vanishing more and more and more thanks to the development of the bourgeoisie, to freedom of commerce, to the world market, to uniformity in the mode of production and in the corresponding conditions of life. The supremacy of the proletariat will accelerate the disappearances of differences.’

9.) “Even the natural differences within species, like racial differences…, can and must be done away with historically.”

K. Marx’s Collected Works V:103,

As cited in S.F. Bloom’s The World of Nations: A
Study of the National Implications in the Work of Karl Marx, Columbia University Press, New York, 1941, pp. 11 & 15-19:

10.) Nikita Krushchev

“Full-scale Communist construction constitutes a new stage in the development of national relations in the U.S.S.R., in which the nations will draw still closer together until complete unity is achieved…. However, the obliteration of national distinctions and especially of language distinctions is a considerably longer process than the obliteration of class distinctions.”

The fact that all this has come into the Church is seen by the two quotes we finish with. The Church somehow thinks it can baptize this Marxism and Christianize it.

11.) “The more Christianity spreads, the more these racial, ethnic, and national distinctions will be erased because no culture will be left untouched by the Gospel. When all (cultures) are affected, they will be one culture — Christendom.”

21st Century “Christian Reconstructionist Theologian”

12.) “We hear much about “identity politics” today. Christianity beat the movement to that concept by many centuries. Our identity is not ours to choose, however. Our identity is not determined by our genetics or our economic status. No, the Christian message about identity is an easy one: Christ is all and in all. He is our identity. His sacrifice redeems us, His intercession assures us, and as we live in recognition of His centrality in all things, the human-derived divisions that plague all of mankind are put aside. We come to one table, as one people, and the only lens we need for that is the one that shows us the Lord of glory, Jesus.”

21st Century Baptist High Profile “Apologist”

As long as this continues the Church is Ichabod. If you’re in a church that supports this leave now before the Marxists convince your children of the need to “bleed into one.”

A Small Look at Transcendentalism

“Standing on the bare ground — my head bathed in the blithe air and uplifted into infinite space — all mean egotism vanishes. I become a transparent eyeball; I am nothing; I see all; the currents of the Universal Being circulate through me; I am part or parcel of God.”

Ralph Waldo Emerson
American Transcendentalist
Nature — Chapter 1

As a worldview the Rationalism of the Enlightenment had lost its steam by the early 19th century. Starting from the epistemological assumptions of Rationalism the Scottish Philosopher Hume had “proven” that it is not possible to know anything with certainty. This exhaustion of Rationalism resulted in a pendulum swing to the irrational in the Worldview called Romanticism in Europe and called Transcendentalism stateside.
Epistemology was moving from the right reason and natural law of deistic Rationalism to a becoming one with the pantheistic oversoul of Romanticism.

In the States Romanticism nudged the Christian-Rationalist conglomerate off center stage and yet not without being changed slightly by the interaction with the Christian-Rationalist conglomerate worldview. This resulted in Transcendentalism here in the States. Epistemologically, the Transcendentalists released man from his slavery to right reason and natural law as well as any idea of supernatural revelation and replaced all that with a mystical and intuitive epistemology where man knows because he becomes one with the oversoul. Ontologically, the Transcendentalists reinterpreted the Rationalist-Christian conglomerate view of nature from a Deistic mechanistic and static view of nature which operates on the Newtonian like basis of immutable and indestructible reality to a pantheistic view of nature that insists that nature is a living organic thing wherein union is to be pursued so that a oneness with the cosmic mind is to be attained. Man, nature, and any idea of god are the same.

In Christianity there is a move from the mindset of Old School Presbyterianism to the second great awakening revivalism. In the University setting there is a swing from logic to poetry. In the field of politics there is a swing from each man finding his proper place in the natural order of things to each man being together one with the cosmos and as such a new drive toward the brotherhood of all men. This, ideologically speaking at least, in turn, set the stage for the mad dash at all costs to free the slaves since Transcendentalism taught that the slave and the non-slave were alike one and as one were together God. The Civil war is thus seen as a worldview conflict where the North is animated by the worldview fire of Transcendentalism seeking to crush the older Christian-Rationalist conglomerate world and life view of the antebellum South.

If the watchword of the 18th century colonies was Jefferson’s “pursuit of happiness,” the watchword of the 19th century in the states was freedom. However, this freedom was defined not in the context of a Christian worldview but in the context of an absent God, with freedom thus being absolutized and achieved by the god-State filling the absent God vacuum. If freedom is needed it will be the state that provides the freedom. As such the 19th century in the States is an era of incredible “reform.” from the reform resulting in the death of 700K Americans to “free the slave,” to the reform of the eventual banning of alcohol, and the pursuit of women’s suffrage to reform brought into the realm of education — all these reforms were pursued in the name of the sovereign individual securing freedom.

The ironic thing about freedom absolutized as under the rubric of Transcendentalism is that the more people were “freed” the more they were brought into chains. The freeing of the black man is an example of this. What is called “the Civil War,” did not free the black man so much as it enslaved the white man along with the black man to the tyranny of the God-State. The black man did not lose his Plantation master. The black man along with the white man became slaves to their Plantation Master in Washington DC. Slavery thus was not eliminated. Slavery was expanded. The same is true of the liberated woman. Feminism did not free women. It brought them into greater bondage to the state. The state became the new and more oppressive husband to women. Eventually, the oppressive god-state would even rip children from liberated women’s wombs. But it all started in taking authority away from the husband in the home by giving women the vote.