1828 Webster’s Dictionary, Rush & Otto, and Dr. Peter Hammond on Polyglot Marriage

ADUL’TERY, noun [Latin adulterium. See Adulterate.]

1. Violation of the marriage bed; a crime, or a civil injury, which introduces, or may introduce, into a family, a spurious offspring.

ADUL’TERATE, verb transitive [Latin adultero, from adulter, mixed, or an adulterer; ad and alter, other.]

To corrupt, debase, or make impure by an admixture of baser materials; as, to adulterate liquors, or the coin of a country.

ADUL’TERATE, verb intransitive To commit adultery. obsolete

ADUL’TERATE, adjective Tainted with adultery; debased by foreign mixture.

ADUL’TERATED, participle passive Corrupted; debased by a mixture with something of less value.

1828 Webster’s Dictionary

____

 

[Otto] I don’t really know what the church today sermonizes against. Once we… when we really come to it, all sins seem to have shriveled down to racism.

[Rushdoony] Yes.

[Otto Scott] Beyond that there is no sin…

[Rushdoony] Yes. That is very good. That is about the only sin that is left. And that is an odd thing to choose as a sin, because one of the characteristics of people all over the world has been a preference for their own. People prefer their own families. They prefer their own nationality or their own race, which is entirely legitimate as long as they don’t abuse and mistreat others.

I believe that the world has seen more racism in this century than ever before precisely because we are trying to equalize everything and we are trying to obscure the differences and say they don’t exist. And when you do that, you are going to create a situation where there will be a bootlegged and resentful recognition of differences.

[Scott] Well, you drive underground what doesn’t belong underground. The business of justice, the business of treating people fairly, the business of equality before law and meritocracy, so to speak, of making opportunities open to all, the whole idea of a civilized society is based on the idea of mutual respect. But respect is one thing. A denial of reality is something else. If in order to get along or to placate we have to pretend that everyone has the same intellect and intelligence, the same ability then we have downgraded all intelligence and all ability.

[Rushdoony] Yes.

[Scott] It is usually a question of let’s you and he be equal. Not you and I.

[Rushdoony] Yes. Well, by obscuring the fact of differences, what we have done is to create a climate in which any awareness of reality is gone.

[Scott] Well, it is dishonest.

[Rushdoony] Yes. You are not living in a real world if you don’t recognize differences and say he is better than I am. He is of another color. And he or she is not as good as I am in this particular field where I am good.

R.J. Rushdoony & Otto Scott
Pocket College
From the Easy Chair — Envy [00:24:42]  

In a Sermon by the missionary to the persecuted Church, Dr. Peter Hammond of Rhodesia and now South Africa said in a 2017 sermon;

“Considering how much the Scriptures teach concerning marriage and the many passages forbidding cross-cultural and inter-racial marriage with unbelievers and being unequally yoked it is extra-ordinary that there is so little teaching and preaching on this important matter. Marriage does not just involve two individuals. It involves two families and we need to honor our parents and seek the guidance of our church leaders when we marry. Those who become unequally yoked are being short sighted and they are being selfish. They are neither considering their ancestors nor their descendants nor are they placing God’s Word above their emotions. The first minister I had challenge me on this was (Black-African) Rev .  F. Tibsi, Zulu minister of ???. I heard him preach ‘those who marry outside their race are not honoring their parents, nor are they loving their neighbors as themselves, nor are they loving their children who will belong to neither the race of their Mother or their Father,’ and I thought, ‘this Zulu minister is being more honest than many of the white cowards I had discussed this with.

The Bible teaches that God seeks godly offspring (Malachi 2:15). (Here Hammond cites Genesis 24, 26, 18, Deuteronomy 7:3f and Joshua 23, Ezra 9, Nehemiah 13.) The law of God warns believers from following that which is popular and when you think how much this (inter-racial marriage) has been promoted in the adverts, on the billboards, in the films, in the textbooks, in the churches — when you see how this is so promoted by the world you know it is evil.

(Here Hammond quotes from the Book of Common Prayer on the Marriage Ceremony.)

‘I REQUIRE and charge you both, as ye will answer at the dreadful day of judgment when the secrets of all hearts shall be disclosed, that if either of you know any impediment, why ye may not be lawfully joined together in Matrimony, ye do now confess it. For be ye well assured, that if any persons are joined together otherwise than as God’s Word doth allow, their marriage is not lawful.’

And for 1950 years that was considered in the Church of England to have ruled out the possibility of marrying across racial lines.

But now, at the latter part of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st century along with legalizing homosexuality, homosexual marriages, homosexual ministers, along with pornography, abortion, and all other men’s evil we have at last discovered that the for the last 1950 years has been wrong but we in this enlightened age have discovered what real marriage is and when the bible says, ‘you shouldn’t marry people of other races,’ it is not talking about that it is actually saying we should not marry a person of another faith even though many of those actually turn out to be frauds as well. Isn’t it interesting, many people believe the spirit of the age on this matter when you know they are lying about everything else.

https://www.sermonaudio.com/saplayer/playpopup.asp?SID=72017429140

Start at 35:39 time stamp.

Then there is this;

https://archive.fo/aUwpv

Two Templates Through Which One Might Read Russia-Ukraine

Template #1

Vladimir is an old styled Russian Nationalist who believes in Russia. He understands that Russia is in danger. Birthrates are well below replacement rates. Further, the NWO via NATO keeps hemming Russia in by absorbing or threatening to absorb former countries in the historic sphere of Russian influence. In 2008 Putin’s Russia made NATO’s ability to swallow Georgia impossible by military action. In 2008 NATO passed the Bucharest declaration putting Georgia and Ukraine on path for NATO membership. Putin demanded that the promise from our American President, that NATO would NOT move toward them be honored. The answer was “no,” so Putin invaded Georgia as he had threatened to do.

Now, in 2022, on the 8th year anniversary of the coup that replaced Russian simpatico Yanukovych for a Western sympathetic replacement Putin finally sets matters right by rolling in to Ukraine. NATO poked the bear with Ukraine and again Putin responded as he stated he would. Like him or not, he keeps his word.

In doing so Putin is merely practicing what these united States would be doing by kicking hostile actors out of Mexico or Cuba (wink), thus following the long established Monroe Doctrine. This would all be in keeping with old fashioned real politick. In this template Putin’s actions would find a sympathetic ear from many Biblical Christians in the West who see the West as the current incarnation of New World Order evil and who are hopeful that Putin might be a world leader who might be counted on to oppose the designs of the Great Reset of the NWO. This understanding  sees Eastern Ukraine east of the Dnipro river as being largely Russian in terms of population and so lies in Mother Russia’s orbit.  As such Putin has every right to protect his people against the designs of the Globalist West.

Template #2

Vladimir Putin is a puppet of the New World Order schema. Remember that in order for the Great Reset to go forward the US has to be weakened and leveled so that it can be a satellite of the NWO. In this schema Putin’s actions (as possibly combined with China in a seizure of Taiwan) have the effect of weakening the US thus leveling it so as to fit it in a NWO globalist schema. From a NWO perspective conflict here also has the advantage of continuing to reduce the white global population as white Russians and white Ukrainians kill one another in conflict. This template finds anything that weakens the US as a global power as well as reducing the percentage of white people on the planet to be desirous so that a NWO can more easily arise. In this scenario Putin and Biden are doing the devil’s work. (This scheme finds Biden also being a puppet of the NWO.)

A Word From Eugene Genovese On The Irrationality of Academia

“Today we face the dangerous irrationality of a self-styled postmodernism. It is more dangerous than the pretense of ethical neutrality in social science and historical scholarship because, despite all pretense, it quickly passes into nihilism. Normally, cynicism and fanaticism combat each other and represent, as it were, opposing heresies. Yet, marvelous today, they now march in lockstep. we are being told that since objectivity rests only with a God who does not exist, we should scorn it as the ideology of the oppressors.
 
 

Those who denounce objectivity as a fraud in the service of oppression are offering flagrant mendacity as a Higher Law. And since just about everyone, except non-Hispanic, heterosexual, white males, is today a victim of oppression, we are invited to present our subjectivity — our ‘feelings,’ which usually appear as hatreds — as a substitute for a non-existent truth. I make no apology for the harshness of these remarks. In accordance with the fashion of parading one’s feelings as a contribution to every discussion of every subject, I shall admit to being outraged at hearing endless whines about oppression from American intellectuals — black as well as white, female as well as male. For since they (we) rank among the top one or two percent of the world’s most privileged people, the whines, may fairly be judged as obscene. But then, I suppose, I am merely revealing my own status as an oppressor by invoking an untenable standard of statistical objectivity, when I should be demonstrating my sensitivity to the precious feeling of the insulted and injured. Unfortunately, never having met a human being who did not feel insulted and injured in this vale of tears, my capacity for compassion has been badly stunted. Atheist that I am, I learned that much from Christian teaching on original sin and human depravity, which has been confirmed by all historical experience of which I am aware, even if it is no longer in fashion in mainstream Christian churches.”

Eugene Genovese
The Southern Front; History and Politics in the Culture War

 

New World Order Monism

“The plan was this:  ‘Let us make a name’ (Gen. 11:4), or, a ‘shem’ meaning let us define ourselves, fix and establish our authority so that we are what we declare ourselves to be. Instead of being defined by the image of God (Gen. 1:26-28), man now held that he would be his own creature and creation and would define himself. If man becomes a self-definer, he, then, like a god, names or defines himself. If man becomes a self-definer, he, then, like a god, names or defines everything else. He can then define God, or define Him out of existence, supposedly.

The reason for this resolve was, ‘lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth’ (Gen. 11:4). A basic doctrine of theology is the unity of the Godhead. No god can be truly a god if he is divided within himself. Every humanistic attempt to replace God with a one-world humanistic order leads to efforts to bring all mankind under a common civil government.  This is a theological necessity: the ultimate power cannot be a divided power. Every effort is made to compel human unity in the name of the new faith.”

R. J. Rushdoony 
Genesis — p. 110

1.) When man redefine God or defines him out of existence the inevitable result is the maxim, “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Man apart from God will always build community-order systems that will be define as tyrannical. Men apart from the God of the Bible — whether husbands tyrannizing wives, parents tyrannizing children, teachers tyrannizing students, magistrates tyrannizing citizenry — will always exercise their non God ordained power as usurper and tyrants. Always. It may take time to go from bad to worse but it is inevitable.

2.) The humanistic attempt to replace God with a one-world order leads not only to the efforts we are now seeing to bring all mankind under a common civil government. Such humanistic attempts also seek to bring all mankind under a commonality that includes a universal shared faith, a universal shared race/ethnicity, and a universal shared culture. A unipolar world with a unipolar government (common civil government) cannot successfully exist apart from a unipolar faith, unipolar race/ethnicity and unipolar culture. Even our “new” multiplicity of gender is in service of creating a unipolar gender where the former hard bipolar distinctions of male and female disappear.

3.) Man without God thus seeks a uniformitarian existence where all distinctions are bled out of life. Man becomes Borg. He is a cog in the humanistic globalist machine. He is a worker bee in a hive. Humanist NWO learns that resistance is futile. He will be assimilated.

4.) Since the Endarkenment we have seen this attempt at the commodification of men into a uniform product. During the French Revolution all titles distinguishing rank were lost and everybody addressed one another as “Citoyen.” The Phrygian cap worn by all Revolutionaries — male or female — was the fashion expression that communicated the uniformitarian oneness. In the Revolution of 1918 in Russia it was the universal address of “comrade” that bespoke fallen man’s self-understanding that he shared in the oneness of the humanistic godhood. In 1949 forward in the Chinese Revolution it was the Mao suit that was the fashion statement that communicated that ultimate power cannot be a divided power.

Man without God creates a social-order monism that is an attempt to create a immanent uniformitarian and humanist godhood. We are seeing it everywhere around us.

Wilson on R. J. Rushdoony … Wilson as Wm. F. Buckley

“The basic argument of the book is that Christian Reconstructionism isn’t dead. It has been renewed. It has been simplified. A lot of the rough edges have been removed. A lot of the really controversial claims of the first generation have been either downplayed or denied and as Doug Wilson put it in an interview I did with him; ‘What is being so successful now in North Idaho is not so much Christian Reconstruction 2.0 but Christian Reconstruction 0.5.'”

Gathered from Canon Calls Interview with Crawford Gribben
Author — Survival and Resistance in Evangelical America; Christian Reconstruction in the Pacific Northwest

Canon Calls: Christian Reconstruction in the Pacific Northwest / Crawford Gribben on Apple Podcasts

This makes a point that I’ve been screaming about for some time. Wilson, in his usual attempted clever fashion, admits that he is not advancing Rushdoony. Wilson admits that he has watered down Rushdoony and sanded off the supposed rough edges so as to make Christian Reconstruction more palatable.

But more palatable to whom? What other answer can there be to that but to say that Wilson has made it more palatable to the left. Those on the right side of the left who would never have embraced Rushdoony have been gathered in by Wilson’s watered down version. If Wilson is Rushdoony 0.5 it means he is closer to Mitt Romney than he is to Rush.

The way that I’ve tried to say this in the past is that Wilson is not on the right but rather Wilson is on the right side of the Left.

By reducing the potency of Christian Reconstructionism to 0.5 Wilson is offering up an unstable product. The only way Reconstructionism’s potency could be cut is by denying the anti-thesis and by adding elements foreign to the original expression.

If Wilson is successful in his Rushdoony 0.5 pursuit he will have done for the Christian church what William F. Buckley did for the conservative movement. Wilson, like Buckley, will have successfully locked out that expression of Christianity that the Church most desperately needs in order to foment Reformation. Just as Buckley tamed conservatism by his work of being the gatekeeper of what he thought constituted safe conservatism so Wilson is taming the Church by his work of being gatekeeper of what he thinks is safe Christianity.