We Are A Conquered People

The below was written in 1377 by Ibn-Khaldun who was a Tunisian statesman, historian, and jurist. It is an early sociological analysis of the fascination that power holds for those who have been conquered and so are submitting to their overlords.

When you read this think about how we’ve been conquered by the anti-Christ cultural Marxists as seen in our films, worship, and music. Look at the music and media that are dominating this country. Look at the manner of how our youth act and talk. Think about how our womenfolk are increasingly acting like trollops as if that is virtuous and our menfolk increasingly acting like Betas as if that were masculine. Because of all that I believe the below quote is quite insightful.

“Those who are conquered always want to imitate the conqueror in his main characteristics — in his clothing, his crafts, and all his distinctive traits and customs. This is because the mind always sees perfection in the person who occupies a superior rank and to whom one is subordinate. He is thought to be perfect because the repose in which he is held is deeply felt, perhaps because it is falsely supposed by the subordinate person that it is not the natural consequence of defeat but is the result of the perfection of the conqueror. If this false supposition is fixed in the mind, it becomes a firm belief. The mind then adopts all the mannerisms of the conqueror and tries to be as similar as possible to him. This is imitation… This attraction goes so far that a nation dominated by another neighbor will try very hard to become like it and imitate it.”

The West has become dominated. The fact of that is seen in its willingness to turn a blind eye to the removal of its Western white history as seen in the ongoing removal of its statuary. The West has become dominated. The fact of that is seen in its willingness to let non-western ideas and non-western people successfully bully the American who still retains some principles that made America, “America.” The West has become dominated. The fact of that is seen in our declining birth rates and the unwillingness to accept the fact that our enemies are pursuing the Christian white man’s replacement.

Oddly enough the West has come to the point precisely because of its victories in the past. Because of the false guilt ginned up by our enemies and owned by the weak and insipid many Westerners believe that their system is worthless. It is as if the only desirable conquests were those in which the native minority triumphs over his Western conqueror. Harkening back to the Greek influence on Roman culture, many Westerners seemingly no longer want anything other than to be conquered by the cultures of the minority non-Christian peoples they once subdued.

This encapsulates the Rousseauian ideal of the noble savage. Westerners are convinced that the savage, the derelict, the ne’er do well precisely because he is a savage, derelict and ne’er do well has more nobility than he as a Westerner could ever hope to have and the only way to gain nobility is to become like the third-worlder in customs, mannerisms, and culture.

As such we ink our skin like the savages of old thinking that by doing so we will gain in our “coolness factor.” (And what else is being cool except a new version of being noble?) As such we pierce our body parts like the pagan South Sea Islanders of old thinking that by piercing our bodies we are cleansing our souls. As such we fornicate like the savages we once conquered even going as far as bringing it into the Church.

Civilizations wax and wane. This appears to be our waning time.

d’Aubigne on Principles

Principles, it is said, have no modesty. It is their nature to rule and they steadily assert their privilege. Do they encounter other principles in their paths that would dispute their empire, they give battle immediately. A principle never rests until it has gained the victory, and it cannot be otherwise – with it to reign is to live. If it does not reign supreme it dies.

J. H. Merle d’Aubigne
History of the Reformation of the 16th Century

McAtee Queries Piper

“Jesus strikes the note that the dominant (not the only) way Christians will show the supreme value of our treasure in heaven is by being so freed from the love of this world and so satisfied with the hope of glory that we are able to love our enemies and not return evil for evil, even as we expect to be wronged in this world.”

Dr. John Piper
Should Christians Be Encouraged to Arm Themselves? — 
2015

Bret responds,

a.) Why would Dr. Piper suppose that self defense means that those defending themselves no longer have as their supreme value our treasure in heaven? All because we take the 6th commandment seriously does it, therefore, mean that we are not freed from the love of this world?

b.) Why would Dr. Piper think, that firing a weapon in defense of the judicially innocent against the wicked, who would unjustly and without biblical warrant take the life of children and women, be an example of returning evil for evil?

c.) Why would Dr. Piper think that because we expect to be wronged in this world therefore we should do everything we can to facilitate being wronged in this world? When Dr. Piper is wrongly accused of some heinous crime he committed while doing counseling does he not defend himself against such accusations because he expects to be wronged in this world?

d.) I would insist, in keeping with the 6th commandment, that when we return fire upon evil men seeking to take the lives of the judicially innocent we are at that point most certainly not returning evil for evil but are returning good for evil.

Barth on Genesis & Unhistorical History

“When the Bible speaks of the creation of man it does not refer to history as such. The relationship between object and subject that obtains in ordinary history does not obtain in the Genesis account. So we have to speak of unhistorical history.”

Karl Barth
From CVT — The New Modernism — pg. 407

Now the obvious question is; ‘Why does it not obtain?’

And the answer per Barth and all neo-orthodox is because Genesis is Geschichte and not Historie. One must understand that when reading the modern liberal Geschichte is non-temporal saga history that is not history as we normally understand it.

I Get By With A Little Help From My Friends … Enter Rev. Sacha Walicord

File Under; There remain 7000 who have not bowed the knee to Baal.
Also; This is pointed at R2K.

“The Greek term used for ‘all nations’ in the Great Commission (I mention this because there is so much hostility against optimism.) The term used (in Matt. 28) is ‘ethne.’ The word that you use in the English word ‘ethnic.’ It is, by no means, to be understood, in the sense of a few individuals from every nation. but in the sense of cultures. This term is used in the Greek language regularly to denote masses or aggregates of people bound together by a cultural identity. So instead of all nations, it would probably be good to read ‘all cultures.’ All of them. Christ’s claim here is extremely counter-cultural. It is not individualistic. It is not geared towards some individuals here or there. No, he is speaking about aggregates, about cultures, about masses of people bound together by a common culture. He is also not only speaking about governments or states. No, He is throwing, He is spreading His net far broader … cultures. Not some of them but all of them. With ‘all nations,’ He means the conversion and the discipling of the whole human race and all of its cultural and social endeavors and not just to getting a few individual decisions for Jesus, here and there and the third place. Christ hereby directly contradicts the common pessimism and defeatism that we see among so many Christians today.

I am telling you, it is the worst disease that we are facing right now in our churches — pessimism — constant pessimism as if optimism would be somewhat unholy … somewhat un-pious. It reminds me of the old ladies in my homeland who are Roman Catholics. They think that they always have to look sad because it is somehow more pious if you are sad. And if you are pessimistic you are humbler.

‘Oh, everything is so bad.’

‘Oh, come soon Lord Jesus.’

Of course, that is a comfortable way out isn’t it? Because the moment that my eschatology looks disastrous like this I stop fighting. I stop witnessing. I stop the mission’s endeavor. I stop everything. I have a wonderful cop out all the while feeling extra holy too.

Whose old man wouldn’t like that? And that is why it is so popular in our circles. Always to talk hell into the world. Always to look very sad and very very tortured.

And as soon as somebody sticks his head out and says, ‘NO, we have got to fight for Jesus Christ,’ they say, ‘O you’re a triumphalist.’ Call it what you want. It is biblical because if Jesus Christ sits on the throne then I am a justified triumphalist, because — and I ask you again — who rules in heaven and on earth? Not Satan. Not politicians but Jesus Christ.

You have to explain to me how it can be that with the coming of Jesus Christ things start going suddenly downhill. Everything goes bad? Why wouldn’t it have been better if he never was enthroned if everything was better before His coming?

NO! He sits there because He was enthroned and before He leaves this world He gives us this Great Commission and says, ‘go fight, don’t wimp out.’

And we say, ‘No, Lord, we don’t want to sound presumptuous because we are so humble — we are so pessimistic. We think it is really holy Lord. You don’t understand.’

And God says, ‘NO! Fight! Be a man. Act like men, not like babies. The church in our day and age acts like babies. Like such flimmer flammers. Like a bunch of whiners.

And it is not only that they’re (the church) so pessimistic, it’s also that when someone is optimistic he must be shot down. You can deny the trinity and get away with it rather than being optimistic because then you are a triumphalist, you’re presumptuous, and we have become so comfortable in our defeatism.

Christ contradicts here the very truncated missions endeavor of much of contemporary evangelicalism that only focuses, at best, at the conversion of scattered individuals and ignores cultures completely. We are so pessimistic we do not expect the Gospel to have any cultural implications. That is the sin of pietism. Of escapism. Of ‘running-away-ism.”

Rev. Sacha Walicord
Pastor — Walker URC

Note: I quibble only with his definition of nations = cultures preferring to see instead that nations are common cultures because they are common blood. See definition of ethne in Thayers.