Every social order is a confessional social order. This is to say that the social order in question will adhere to and publicly confession a belief system that is the oil that lubricates the gears of the social order system in question. This is inescapably true of all social orders. All social orders are reflections of that social order’s public confession and the social order’s public confession will always be hopelessly religious.

Because the preceding is true then it is necessary to say that when a social-order changes it is because the public confession of that social order has first changed. This pushes us then to note that when we talk about “the secular West,” we are even at that point confessing one aspect of the West’s religious public confession which is that Christianity will not be allowed to be our public confession. However, by using the word “secularization” to describe that change we are really talking about both a public de-confessionalizing of Christianity in favor of a public re-confessionalizing of some other faith system that will be the lubricant for our social order existence. This is just another way of saying that all social orders are hopelessly religious and when a social order changes it does not change into a non-religious public confession social order but rather it changes to a new religious public confession social order. The fact that the word religion itself means “to bind” goes a long way in establishing all this. Religion as a social-order confession binds a people together.

The fact that in the West our social order confession has changed so that the West has been de-confessionalized away from Christianity and re-confessionalized to Holocaustianity is captured by a quote from British Textual Critic Robert Faurisson

“The six million constitute a lay religion with its own dogma, commandments, decrees, prophets, high priests and Saints: Saint Anne (Frank), Saint Simon (Wiesenthal), Saint Elie (Wiesel). It has its holy places, its rituals, and its pilgrimages. It has its temples and its relics (bars of soap, piles of shoes, etc.), its martyrs, heroes, miracles, and miraculous survivors (millions of them), its golden legend and its righteous people. Auschwitz is its Golgotha; Hitler is its Satan. It dictates its law to the nations. Its heart beats in Jerusalem, at the Yad Vashem monument … Although it is largely an avatar of the Hebraic religion, the new religion is quite recent and has exhibited meteroic growth … Paradoxically, the only religion to prosper today is the ‘Holocaust’ religion — ruling (so to speak) supreme and having those skeptics who are openly active cast out from the rest of mankind. It labels them ‘deniers’, whilst they call themselves ‘revisionists.’

Robert Faurisson
The Secular Religion of the ‘Holocaust,’ A Tainted Product of Consumer Society

With the changing of religion in the West to Holocaustianity the social-order public confession has also changed with the result even that if someone is to be a believer and practitioner in Christianity they must reinterpret that Christianity through the grid of Holocaustianity in order to operate peacefully with the new social order public confession.

One only needs to reflect a moment to realize the obvious truth of all this. There was a time in this country where violating public blasphemy laws by taking the name of Jesus Christ in vain would get one arrested. Similarly, there was a time in this country when much of the nation was shut down on Sundays in order to “honor the Sabbath to keep it Holy.” These realities were derivative of the social-order public confession that was Christianity. However, today in many European lands it is against the law to question the Holocaust. Further any noting of the faults or history of a certain tribe are sure to find one being labeled a “Anti-Semite,” and thus likely experiencing cancel culture. This all  indicates that the new social-order public confession is Holocaustianity and  that the previous social-order public confession that was Christianity is now passé.

We see thus that for any social order there must be a public confession and that social-order public confession operates along religious lines to bind the social order together. This then has the implication that all notions of social-order authority is derivative of the confession and religion from which that social-order descends.  We also see thus far that the idea that the West embraces pluralism is a myth. Ask David Irving or Ernst Zundel or Robert Faurisson if pluralism existed in the social-orders of which they were members.

Pluralism is the cover that is used to hide the de-confessionalization and re-confessionalization process. Pluralism is invoked in order to hide from the citizens of a social order that they are being placed against a new religious context that will require a new social order public confession. Invoking pluralism allows the change process to be incremental and un-noticeable until to late. Once the de-confessionalization and re-confessionalization process is completed suddenly the citizen will discover that pluralism is not to be allowed. We are seeing that today in the West with the ever increasing speech codes.

All of this underscores what the presuppositionalists have been saying for decades now and that is “there is no such thing as neutrality.” Social-orders like people with either gather with Christ or they will scatter. Social-orders like people are either for Christ or they are against Christ.  There is no neutrality.

Let me emphasize again here the nub of the matter. There is no secularization process that the West is experiencing. None in the least. What the West has experienced over the last 75 years or so has been the constant drip of social-order de-confessionalization and social-order re-confessionaliziation. Put more simply, Christianity as the public religion of the West has been replaced with the religion of Holocaustianity.

Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

Hat Tip — Pactum Institute / R. J. Rushdoony

Doug Wilson — the self professed archetype of all things conservative in the Reformed Church today, writes an article titled “From the Pit” in which he makes some good points and some not so good points. It is because Wilson is now seen by many as the touchstone for all things Biblical  Christianity that I constantly return to tweaking Doug.

I must say, before I start, that I find Doug to be a funny man. His writing is clearly a gift from God. He has a marvelous way of turning a phrase. I think because of that people may well lose Rev. Wilson’s bad argumentation in all that cleverness. There are a only a few things I take exception with Doug in this article.

Doug Wilson writes

When young white straight men are continually harangued for their whiteness, and their straightness, and their men-ness, and are constantly told that they are the cancer of the cosmos, and that the world would be a better place if they all just went and filled up a bucket and stuck their collective head in it . . . well, certain things tend to follow. One of the things that happens is that these young men get angry, and do not see that this is a trick. It is a trap. It is a stratagem, a subterfuge, an inveiglement, a ploy, a gambit. Don’t do it. It is a machination; it is a ambuscade.

McAtee responds,

First, lets be clear that it is not young white straight men that are harangued for their whiteness and their straightness and their men-ness. Doug misses a HUGE reality here. The enemy that Doug rightly locates (CRT /  commies) are only penultimately interested in whiteness, straightness and men-ness. Ultimately the commies are interested in destroying whiteness, straightness and men-ness is because those categories are normatively where the Biblical Christians can be found. (This is not to say that there are not POC who fall into the categories of straightness and men-ness. It is only to say that if you’re going to after the straightness and men-ness category most the people you are going to find in it by sheer numbers is white men.) If the commie enemy could wipe out the Biblical Christians without naming whiteness, straightness and men-ness you can be sure that they would do so in a skinny minute.

Now the reason this is a HUGE whiff on Doug’s part since Doug wants to suggest that since the commies are going after whiteness, straightness, and men-ness that therefore this is not an Christian antithesis issue. However, this attack on whiteness, straightness, and men-ness is a antithesis issue and so the response of white, straight, Christian men is proper when they push back against that bilge by defending all white, straight, Christian men. This includes the bilge pumped out by Wilson himself when he attacks white Christian men who support Biblical Kinism. When Wilson attacks Biblical Kinism (is there any other kind?) he is at that moment joining league with the very commies he rightly denounces in his column.

Young men (and we old men) should be angry. Just as angry as we get when we read how the Commies went after Christians in Russia (Lenin), China (Mao), Zimbabwe (Mugabe) Ethiopia (Mengitsu), Cuba (Castro) etc. If white straight Christian men are not angry then there is something wrong with their Christianity.

Let white boy summer roll into white boy Autumn, Winter, and Spring.

Doug Writes,

Because they do not see the trap, they react in the other direction. Told that whiteness is a cancerous disease, they react into the just-as-silly idea that whiteness is somehow a virtue. But no. They are not being tricked into denying their whiteness. They are being maneuvered into adopting the structure of their way of understanding the antithesis. They are being tempted to push the vertical line over in order to make it horizontal. If the lines are horizontal, it doesn’t matter at the end of the day which side of that line you are standing on—the whole thing is fruitless and stupid. As Sartre once put it in a moment of lucidity, without an infinite reference point, every finite point is absurd.

McAtee responds,

Here Doug is just wrong. I run in these crowds and I can tell you that the disposition is not the embrace of the silly idea that whiteness is a virtue just on that basis. No, what is happening instead is that Christian white men are having their “When the Saxons Began to Hate” moment. Young Christian White men (and some of us not so young) are beginning to hate because they love Christ and hate what Christ hates. Very few of Christian white men are wearing their whiteness like a chip on their shoulder. Instead, they are realizing, properly so, that by God’s grace alone they are the inheritors of a glorious history of which they do not need to be ashamed. As existing among Biblical Christians this snap back isn’t about thinking there is automatic virtue in being white. These guys we are talking about believe in total depravity and original sin. These guys we are talking about merely desire to say … “My Fathers, though sinners, were used of God and though being dead still speak to me and I’ll be damned if I am going to be ashamed of them simply because the commies — POC or White — pour slime all over them.”

So, Doug, we participants in White Boy Summer, are not haters in the commie sense of that word. We have plenty of comrades who are POC. We are not throwing them under the bus that wants to take us to the gulag. We are just hating that which is evil. Neither have we drawn the antithesis in the wrong place. We understand just fine — thank you very much — that the enemy is not non-white people but instead the enemy is the Commie — “Red, Black, White, Yellow, or Brown.” We also understand however that for reasons that have been examined elsewhere POC have largely, though not exhaustively been enlisted in the Cultural Marxist’s long march through the institutions.

The question is Doug; “Do you understand who the enemy is. Have you drawn the antithesis in the proper place? Do you understand that white, straight Christian men are being attacked primarily because they are Christian?”

When we speak of God’s Transcendence we find the Scripture dripping with the idea and teaching that God is transcendent. Far beyond what was read this morning we find the idea of God’s transcendence dancing throughout the Scripture.

Allow me to give you just a small tour of some of the passages that we see that testify to this attribute of the God to whom we are called to serve.

It is He who sits above the circle of the earth,
And its inhabitants are like grasshoppers,

Who stretches out the heavens like a curtain

And spreads them out like a tent to live in. Isaiah 40:22

8 “For my thoughts are not your thoughts,
    neither are your ways my ways,”
declares the Lord.
9 “As the heavens are higher than the earth,
    so are my ways higher than your ways
    and my thoughts than your thoughts. Isaiah 55:8-9

I Chronicles 29:11 Yours, Lord, is the greatness, the power, the glory, the victory, and the majesty, indeed everything that is in the heavens and on the earth; Yours is the dominion, Lord, and You exalt Yourself as head over all.

Solomon confesses that God transcends containment by the temple

II Chronicles 2:6 But who is able to build a house for Him, since the heavens and the highest heavens cannot contain Him?

I Kings 8:27 “But will God indeed dwell on the earth? Behold, heaven and the [a]highest heaven cannot contain You, how much less this house which I have built!

Job 11:7 “Can you discover the depths of God?
Can you discover the limits of the Almighty?
8 They are as high as [a]the heavens; what can you do?
Deeper than [b]Sheol; what can you know?

Elihu declares the Lord to be beyond reach

The Almighty—we cannot find Him;
He is exalted in power
And He will not violate justice and abundant righteousness. Job 37:23

Psalms

145:3 Great is the Lord, and greatly to be praised;
And His greatness is [a]unsearchable.

113:4 The Lord is high above all nations,
His glory above the heavens.

97:9 For You, Lord, are most high above all the earth;
You are exalted far above all gods.
148:13 Let them praise the name of the Lord,
For His name alone is exalted;
His glory is above the earth and heaven.

Stephen reciting Solomon’s testimony

Acts 7:49‘Heaven is My throne,
And earth is My footstool.
What house will you build for Me? says the Lord,
Or what is the place of My rest?

Acts 17:24 God, who made the world and everything in it, since He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands.

Jesus Christ is above all, in the place of highest honor and authority thus as God is of course Transcendent. We see this in

Ephesians 1:20 which He worked in Christ when He raised Him from the dead and seated Him at His right hand in the heavenly places, 21 far above all principality[a] and [b]power and [c]might and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this age but also in that which is to come.

Hebrews 7:26 For such a High Priest was fitting for us, who is holy, [a]harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and has become higher than the heavens;

So, there you have it… the repeated testimony of God’s authoritative word is that God is Transcendent. Of course none of this denies the truth that God is also God immanent. Scripture asks the rhetorical question, “Am I God far off and not also a God nearby saith the Lord.” This speaks of God’s immanence – that He is closer to us then our next breath.

That God is also immanent is declared by God Himself in Isaiah 57:15

For this is what the high and exalted One says—
he who lives forever, whose name is holy:
“I live in a high and holy place,
but also with the one who is contrite and lowly in spirit,
to revive the spirit of the lowly
and to revive the heart of the contrite.

He who is the blessed and only [e]Potentate, the King of kings and Lord of lords, 16 who alone has immortality, dwelling in unapproachable light, whom no man has seen or can see, to whom be honor and everlasting power. Amen. I Timothy 6:15

But this morning we consider the reality of God’s Transcendence. Luther would speak of God being so Transcendent that Luther could speak of God as “God hidden.” We speak this way, consistent with Scripture in order to warn against the idea that God is merely man said loudly. We speak this way, consistent with Scripture in order to eliminate the idea that somehow man can arrive at a place where he can say with finality that He knows God completely.

A thousand times NO. As God is transcendent man the creature can only make but small beginnings in knowing God. The result of this admission is a proper submission of the creature before the creator. The creature, given that God is Transcendent will always be in the place of being awed by God and overwhelmed by what he has yet to learn of God.

When we speak of God’s transcendence we understand that Transcendence is a theological term that, when referring to the Christian God, states that God is outside of the universe and is independent of it and its properties. God is thus “other,” and “different” from His creation. He is independent and different from His creatures (Isaiah 55:8-9). He transcends His creation. He is beyond it and not limited by it or to it. God as the creator is sui generis … one of a kind.

There is thus in the truth of the creator God’s transcendence the immediate need for the creature to fall on his face before His majesty … His splendor … His opulence.

Immediately, I hope that we begin to see that this God … the Transcendent God is a God that Western man has long ago forgotten. It is the God that is not spoken of in Churches where we casually and haughtily come into His presence with our hyper relaxed worship atmosphere. When the Priests of all came into the Transcendent God’s presence they did so with a holy dread. When we come into the Transcendent God’s presence we come so lightly with such disregard.

And while we would not push away moderns from our gatherings because of our lifting unnecessary barriers of clothing and habits that might communicate awe and respect of God transcendent we should still strive as a people to capture God’s Transcendence in our Worship. I long for getting just a little of Isaiah’s worship which wrung from him the cry “Woe is me for I am undone,” in our Worship. This was Isaiah’s response to coming face to face with God’s transcendence.

When we talk about God’s transcendence of course we are not talking about His remoteness as if He is far removed from us distance wise … as if He exists beyond our solar system. When we talk about God’s transcendence we are talking about the nature and quality of God’s being. His person … His being is exalted. Isaiah spoke of His being as being “High and Lifted up.” There we find the language of Transcendence.

God is Transcendent because unlike us He has un-created being. We are created beings and as such we are earth bound in our creaturliness. But God is spoken of as Transcendent precisely because He knows no and has no creaturely limitations. Moses had some understanding of that which we speak of now. It is this that was part of the reason that Moses trembled in God’s presence. It is this Transcendence that stands as the foundation of God naming Himself “I am that I am” – Meaning that He is defined only in the context of Himself. As transcendent He is the source of all definition and so is beyond definition and is the transcendent “I am that I am.”

This same Transcendence our Lord Christ claimed for Himself when He took to Himself the name “I am.” This transcendence came leaking through and frightened the three disciples out of their whits on the Mount of Transfiguration. It is this Transcendence that found those that came out to arrest him, instead falling at His feet.

Here we find the record and reality of God’s transcendence in the Scripture and yet that transcendence sits upon us and the modern church so lightly. We sing playful songs while we stoke up the smoke machine and glitz with the light show. We bring in ballet dancers such as Tim Keller did thus removing the Word from its central place. We put men in the pulpit who admit that they have attraction for other men and who even speak of “gay culture” being brought into the Kingdom of God. All of this are merely the symptoms of a people … a church who have lost a sense of God’s transcendence.

The modern church has no gravitas precisely because it no longer seeks to come to terms with God’s Transcendence. Having lost God’s transcendence we have become weightless ourselves. We leave no footprints for the generations to follow because God sits so lightly upon us.

The irreverence of the modern person in the pew is shocking. The lack of any sense of God’s Transcendence colors nearly everything the modern Church does.

In our prayer lives then we should be begging for a kind of Reformation that bespeaks once again the great and awesome reality of God’s transcendence. Indeed, without God’s transcendence once again coming to the fore in the minds of God’s people I think I can authoritatively say that we will never see Reformation. The Reformation we need, needs to be characterized by this sense of God’s transcendence that leaves us so awestruck that our thinking becomes leavened with where God leverages His transcendence – that is in His Law Word.

Away then with all expressions of Christianity and Revival that would play upon our emotions while leaving us absent of this sense of God’s Transcendence. Away then with any Reformation that leaves our thinking unaffected by God’s transcendence so that we think we can have Reformation and our humanistic authority at the same time.

If we should ever learn this Transcendence of God we will experience what Scripture sometimes refers to as the Dread of God. Even this idea runs contrary to what the modern church offers. The modern church demands that people leave church feeling good about themselves. The modern churchmen is forever asking, “What did I get out of the service,” and the last thing they want to get out of the service is the dread of God. But I tell you, when we understand increasingly God’s transcendence it is the dread of God that will be our company. We will not be chirping about “our best life now” or about our “purpose driven life.” Instead a vision of God’s transcendence will shatter our little worlds with the dread of God.

Already, I hear the catcalls from the internet cheap seats. What is it with you McAtee that your always so negative … so pessimistic. I get that frequently.

To which I respond that I can not offer you the healing found in Jesus Christ until I first diagnose and then treat your disease. Your disease is that your God is weightless. You have lost His transcendence. You are unfamiliar with the Holy dread of God and before you can be of any use to the Kingdom you must face this reality of God’s Transcendence and become familiar with it.

He whom God will heal He first wounds. And so I seek to wound you with the reality of God written large … of God who sits upon the rim of the earth … of God Transcendent.

When I speak of this dread of God as our response to His transcendence I speak as the Scripture speaks.

In Genesis 31 God is defined as the fear of or the dread of Isaac.

In Genesis 38 after encountering God in the account referred to as Jacob’s ladder Jacob said “How dreadful is this place!”

And Peter cried out … “Depart from me Lord for I am an unclean man.” (Luke 5:8)

John the Revelator falls down as dead when he comes face to face with the Transcendent Lord Christ.

Here you see it. This dread of God. Men coming face to face with the Transcendence of God … the awfulness of God … the absolute otherness of God… what some of our Christian poets have called the “mysterium tremendium” – the tremendous mystery.

Upon this happening the creature sees himself in light of the reality of God and he experiences a dread that will drive from him any future dread of anything else he might ever come up against.

The man who has come face to face with the transcendence of God and has found solution in the cross provision of Jesus Christ is a man who knowing real dread will never dread anything else again.

Where is the Holy dread of God in the Church today. Where is the man who dreads dishonoring God transcendent? Where is that man? Where is that Church? Let loose the dread of God that comes with coming to terms with the transcendence of God and the effect will be a Gideon’s army that will sweep away all that opposes it.

Now, we might ask should we have to live forever in this dread knowing God’s transcendence. Well, the answer is yes and no. The answer is “no” in the sense that no man can live in that state 24-7. Further, the Christian who has come face to face with that initial dread knows that He has peace with God in the Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ lets us know that God is no longer a terror to us.

But the answer is “Yes,” in the sense that the God we serve remains Creator and we remain creatures. For that reason there should forever be an episodic sense when we become familiar anew with the distance between God as Creator and ourselves as Creature… a periodic outburst, perhaps only to ourselves, admitting and confessing the sense of God as transcendent … that God will always be other and never be man said loudly.

God’s Transcendence means that we can’t guess at God. Man cannot, by his philosophical musings or his artistic intuition arrive at God. Instead this Transcendent God must make Himself known before we can have any beginning idea of who He is. God, because Transcendent is inscrutable… His ways past tracing out if we were left to ourselves to try and trace out His Transcendent ways. It is why first, Isaiah, and then Paul could write,

“For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways,” for “as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts” (Is 55:8-9). 

 “Oh, the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable his judgments, and his paths beyond tracing out! Who has known the mind of the Lord?” (Rom 11:33-34).

What are the consequences then to owning a Christianity absent the Transcendence of God? I have already hinted at this but let us speak plainly and explicitly.

1.) Limited and small views of God are dishonoring to God with the result that the god man considers is not the God we find in the Scriptures.

God minus this incommunicable attribute of transcendence is not the God of the Bible and so the service of God minus transcendence is service as unto an idol. Those who serve such a God as thus idolaters.

2.) Limited and small views of God make for small and insignificant men. Man can only be as great as the God he knows, worships, and serves. If man’s God is absent transcendence then man will always be a prisoner to the little times in which he lives since a man will never transcend his times apart from a God who is transcendent. Another way of saying this is that without God transcendent man is a prisoner to his times. He will merely be a reflection of whatever fallen culture he inhabits.

If you desire greatness … and what man doesn’t, then you must discover the humbleness that comes with reckoning with the transcendence of God. If you desire to be one of God’s mighty men doing deeds of renown that are spoken of generations later in poems and narratives then find and see and reckon with the transcendence of God and then your own littleness.

There is nothing wrong with the desire to have conquered kingdoms, slain dragons, and rescued damsels in distress. Men are made for such things. The wrongness is seeking to do them apart from swearing one’s allegiance to the totally transcendent God thus desiring a greatness for yourself apart from making the name of God great. You will never make your name great … never do truly awesome deeds until you first come face to face with God’s transcendence.

May God grant His Church a return to the God who sits upon the rim of the earth.