Roger Scruton & McAtee On Oikophobia and The Death of The West

“This disposition, in any conflict, to side with ‘them’ against ‘us,’ and the felt need to denigrate the customs, culture, and institutions that are identifiably ‘ours,’ being the opposite of xenophobia I propose to call oikophobia, by which I mean the repudiation of inheritance and home.”

Roger Scruton
1944-2000
British Conservative

The West is racked from head to toe with oikophobia. Whites may well die as a people because they have lost the ability to love their own and in losing that ability, at the same time, they have lost the ability to desire to protect their own. The only cure for this is a Biblical Kinism but because we are so far down the oikophobia wormhole Kinism is abominated by both the cultural and church gatekeepers in the West.

You want to know why the West has surrendered to mass illegal and legal migration from third world countries? The answer is oikophobia. You want to know the explanation for diving birth rates in the West? The answer is oikophobia. You want to know the reason for the increase in our divorce rates? The answer is oikophobia. You want to know why interracial marriage is increasingly acceptable when as recent as 70 years ago 31 states had laws on their books making illegal miscegenation? The answer is oikophobia. You want to know the reason for Griswold vs. Connecticut and Roe vs. Wade? The answer is oikophobia. You want to know the reason for White folks being resolved to not commit the sin of noticing? The answer is oikophobia. You want to know the reason why putatively conservative Christian denominations keep asserting egalitarian like statements? The answer is oikophobia.  It all boils down to the fact that the West and the Church in the West has embraced a intense desire to repudiate inheritance and home… they have embraced Oikophobia.

Unless Biblical Kinism is embraced once again the West will die, because the Christian faith has refused to be the Christian faith.

Two Marxist Techniques Employed In Our Ongoing Culture War

While reading Warren H. Caroll’s “The Rise and Fall of Communist Revolutions,” it dawned on me that the Biden administration was trying to re-create societally what Stalin had created in the Soviet Union in terms of a terrorized and so controlled society. Now, Biden didn’t have the means that Stalin had his disposal in order to cow people into silence but nonetheless what means Biden had Biden used to try and create a Gulag society that found people afraid to whisper opposition.

Biden’s DOJ went after parents who protested school boards. Biden’s DOJ went after those peacefully protesting Abortion clinics. Biden’s KGB (FBI) went after, arrested, and imprisoned the mildest of J6 protesters, including Grandmothers. Biden officials leaked names to the SPLC to be blackened by being put on their sacred lists of “haters.” The Biden administration began to de-bank political enemies. The Biden administration passed legislation to vastly increase the number of secret police (IRS agents). The Biden administration weaponized the FBI against the American people. The Biden administration imprisoned a chap (Douglas Mackie) for a political prank against would be Hillary voters that their own troops had also used to prank would be Trump voters.

All of it was really an attempt to Sovietize the American citizenry. It was communist like work to criminalize resistance to the Biden-Obama Marxist regime. It was a soft to not so soft form of government inspired terrorism intended to intimidate and control the citizenry so as to silence them. Forms of this touched me (SPLC list), touched my family (experiencing de-banking), and touched friends (imprisoned for peacefully protesting abortion clinics).

It failed the first time, but there will be further attempts in the near future to do the same.

The Marxists, recently, have pulled a new page from their playbook in order to try and slow the reversal of their previous gains. David Axelrod (Bagel) is now out there talking to the media accusing the non-Marxists opposition of being Stalinists;

 Axelrod: “Yeah. Let’s also remember what the Civil War was about. I mean, the statues he (Trump) wants to restore are people who are fighting to retain slavery. And that is just a historical fact. You know, this has just kind of a Soviet feel to it, a Stalinist feel to it that you just, you know, you take over cultural institutions and historical institutions and you try and rewrite history. But as you pointed out before, Anderson, this is a president who is rewriting history every day. And he believes that you can do that. You know, when crime is up, no crime is down. Things cost less, no things cost more.”

Briefly, we note that the War of Northern Aggression was not about retaining slavery. This is a Bagel lie that has predominated since that war in order to make the war virtuous. Next, we note how clever Axelrod is here. After the Cultural Marxist have succeeded in rewriting history over the last two to three generations they now complain of the Stalinist feel of Trump returning to the written history before they rewrote the history. The Stalinist left took over the institutions in the 1960s and rewrote history and now that the original history is being restored they shriek “STALINIST.”

The Bagel Axelord is a liar and he knows the game he’s playing. It is the same game over and over… rinse and repeat. That game is to accuse your opponents of what you yourself are guilty of doing.  Axelrod is a committed Stalinist and so obviously he accuses Trump of being a Stalinist.

S0, whether it is the Marxist technique of terrorizing your opponents to the end of controlling and silencing them or whether it is the Marxist technique in accusing your opponents of what you yourself are guilty of, the Marxist in the political realm continue to exercise their propaganda with incredible effectiveness.

Folks, Marxists cannot be reasoned with. They cannot be voted out of office. The only cure for dealing with Marxists is to utterly crush them and drive them out of your country. Franco knew how to deal with them. Pinochet knew how to deal with them.  

Hitler & Stalin … Who Was More Non-Christian Than The Other?

There are more than a few people currently who are invested in the project to rehabilitate Hitler and the Nazis. I find this ridiculous, though I do still salute their effort to destroy Communism.

It will be hard to rehabilitate Hitler who said things like this;

“The Slavs are to work for us. Insofar as we don’t need them, they may die. Therefore compulsory vaccination and German health services are superfluous. The fertility of the Slavs is undesirable. They may use contraceptive and practice abortion, the more the better. Education is dangerous. It is sufficient if they can count up to a hundred. At best an education is admissible which produces useful servants for us. Every educated person is a future enemy. Religion we leave to them as a matter of diversion. As to food, they are not to get more than necessary. We are the masters.”

Gerald Reitlinger
The House Built on Sand; The Conflicts of German Policy in Russia, 1939-1945 – p. 200

Note that all that Hitler recommended for his slave class Slavs in order to keep their population down and to keep them in “their place,” are the same methods being used by the Bagels to tamp down the White population. We have had contraceptives and abortion pushed on us. We no longer educate our children instead providing large dosages of propaganda. Our food, as RFK Jr. has only begun to reveal is horrid. Religion, likewise, is left to us as a diversion as very few take their professed religion seriously.
Neither Hitler nor Stalin were Christians, though there are more than a few today who are, as I said, trying to rehabilitate Hitler into being a Christian Prince. The quote above demonstrates how silly the rehabilitation effort is. Christian princes don’t speak like this.

However, Stalin was clearly, hands down – not even close – the greater danger and menace of the two as seen in the fact that the monster tortured, murdered, and slaughtered many millions more than Hitler. Also, it should be noted that the millions slaughtered by Stalin were, in overwhelming percentages, Christian. Stalin was seeking to wipe out the Christian faith. This remains the goal of the neo-Communists (Cultural Marxists). I certainly can understand how German Christian young men would sign up to fight against the anti-Christ Soviet Bolsheviks, who were trying to wipe Christianity off the face of the map.

So, Hitler was no Christian Prince but given that the option for Germans at the time was to become Communists in league with the Comintern it is understandable why Christian Germany would rally to Hitler in his stand against Jewish Communism.

Doug Wilson Insisting He Is A “Conservative” – His Audience Tries Not To Laugh

“It really is possible to be a hard line conservative of the old school without getting sucked down a reactionary wormhole. It is possible to hold to the historic Reformed view of Romans 11 on the Jews without being in any way beholden to the liberal post-war consensus. It is possible to be an unfazed and unapologetic Burkean conservative—when some are maintaining you are not conservative at all unless you are clamoring for a Protestant Robespierre.

Not only is it possible, it is far and away the straighter path. I commend it to you, and invite folks to join us.”

Pope Dougie — He of Moscow fame
Blog Mablog – 11 August, 2025

Doug likes to think of himself as a hardline conservative. Remember, this is the man who himself testified he was not interested in being Rushdoony 2.0 but was trying to achieve being Rushdoony 0.5. Only in a world of effeminate smurfs can Dougie be considered “hardline conservative.” This is the problem with the nomenclature. As a culture we have swung so hard to the Revolutionary Left that a soft revolutionary like Wilson can think of himself as “a Hardline conservative.” I imagine that is the way the Girondins thought of themselves during the French Revolution. I supposed compared to Robespierre, the montagnard Jacques Pierre Brissot was a hard line conservative.

Dougie thinks his view of Romans 11 is standard Reformed orthodoxy but when you add his statements about the glories of his family’s relation to the Bagel bloodline combined with his “Covenant with Hagar” nonsense his is a tenuous claim. Pope Doug claiming he is in line with standard Romans 11 interpretation is like saying that lab created meat is in line with a standard 16 oz. porterhouse steak. It demands the response … “Where’s the beef?”

Pope Dougie’s next claim is that he is not beholden in any way to the liberal post-war consensus. Yet, the man has written in support of liberal post-war consensus projects like interracial marriage, the good of processed food – labeling those who resist processed food as having “food scruples’ – and coming out in favor of vaccines. The push for each and all of these are part of the post war liberal consensus that Dougie insists that he has successfully avoided. Me thinketh the lady doth protest too much.

As to Pope Doug’s claim to be a follower of Edmund Burke, Burke wrote;

“The blood of man should never be shed but to redeem the blood of man. It is well shed for our family, for our friends, for our God, for our country, for our kind. The rest is vanity; the rest is crime.”

Yet, Doug has repeatedly abominated this kind of overt Burkean Kinist language. Indeed, Doug hates Kinists. You cannot say you hate kinists while insisting at the same time you love Burke.

Doug Wilson has NOTHING to offer in the way of providing an answer to our descending Constitutional Republic. All Doug offers up is warmed over post war liberal consensus dressed up in Doug’s clever wordsmithing evening clothes.

It is past time to realize that there is no strength to remedy our current malady in the cures that Pope Doug offers. Doug calls his opponents “reactionary.” It’s the same thing Revolutionaries have always called their opponents. What the opponents of Revolutionary movements have always called their supporters is “Liberals.” Doug is a Liberal.

Or if you prefer … soft progressive.

Calvinism … Then & Now

“Calvinism denied that the Kingdom of God is to be equated with the church. Instead, wherever God reigns, there is the Kingdom—and God should reign everywhere. Hence, man can serve God everywhere, and the Kingdom of God includes every area of life, and every institution which obeys his commandments. Thus, church, civil government, school, agriculture, art, business, every realm under God’s law is an area of Kingdom activity.”

“All who are content with a humanistic law system and do not strive to replace it with Biblical law are guilty of idolatry. They have forsaken the covenant of their God, and they are asking us to serve other gods. They must be called out of their idolatry into the service of the living God.”

~R.J. Rushdoony

1.) Militant Amillennialism, (R2K) however insists that the Kingdom of God is an exact synonym with the Church. As such, no Institutional realities outside the Church can be part of the Kingdom of God according to Militant Amillennialism. Further, any Reformed Christian who disagrees with them on this are not to be tolerated. Keep in mind that when consistent this means that Militant Amillennialism does not allow for Christian being used in an adjectival sense. Because nothing can be part of the Kingdom of God except the Church there is no such thing as Christian Magistrates, Christian family, Christian education, Christian law, Christian Nations or even Christendom. According to Militant Amillennialism all of this reflects category mistakes in thinking.

2.) As such, per the quote above, it is indeed the case that all Militant Amillennialism (as well as any other expression of “Christianity” that agree with them in this matter) is indeed guilty of Idolatry and as they are guilty of idolatry no Biblical Christian should be found in a Church where the Church itself promotes this or where this idea is promoted by the clergy of the Church. Idolatry is, after all, heresy.

3.) Note that where it is believed that the Church alone is an exact synonym for “The Kingdom of God,” there you are going to find an entitlement mentality. If, as a clergy member, you alone are a servant of “the Kingdom of God,” then you alone are special the way nobody else in any other calling is special. You alone, as a servant of the Kingdom of God, are thus separated and exalted from the rest of the poor schlubs who labor in the comparatively insignificant “common realm.” As such, you dare not correct the “Kingdom of God” clergy about anything they speak on since they have a relationship to God that is unique to the back of the bus crew.

This explains why you find such arrogance among the R2K types. In their theology they’re just better than the rest of us. Now, that idea is likely often left unstated and the R2K clergy may not even be epistemologically self-conscious about their hoity toity ways, but it only takes a little amount of time interacting with them before you realize that these people believe they are riding in the front of the bus and all the folks riding in the back of the bus should just “hush.”