Presuppositions of the New Post-Christian Morality;

“The new post-Christian morality is manifested in every aspect of the WASP lives. We don’t protect our borders because the stranger is purer and better than our own people. And since the alien is better than the white citizens, he is allowed to murder, rape, and steal when he enters his new country. In my own anti-nation called the United States of America (it should be called the United States of Satan) elderly white people — I meet them all the time — cannot afford to pay for their health care unless they increase their incomes by applying for the welfare benefits that the aliens receive. But the older whites won’t apply for welfare because they don’t want to be a drain on their nation’s resources. The liberal Jacobins depend on the innate honor of the white people that they have sworn to exterminate. There is no reasoning with such monsters of the deep, who hate their own with the passionate hatred of their satanic master. From out of the depths, the depths of a WASP heart, we respond to the liberals’ satanic universalism of hate with a love of our own people, the people of our familial hearth fire. And surely that love will teach us to hate where we ought to hate and fight without ceasing against the liberals who hate their own in the name of a universalist theology forged in hell. Our short mortal lives will count for nothing if we don’t practice the charity that begins at home.”

R. Franklin Edisto

Presuppositions of the New Post-Christian WOKE Morality;

1. All evil and suffering comes from environmental factors.

This is contrary to Biblical Christianity which teaches as from Scripture that evil and suffering come not from environmental factors but are the consequence of man having a sinful nature. The idea that the environment is man’s problem was the position of the arch-heretic Pelagius against which Augustine so manfully battled.

2. The third world cultures and peoples are full of such.

The problem with the third world is most definitely not their refusal to own that their evil arises from a sin nature. Instead, per WOKENESS the third world with its minority populations have been held back by environmental factors impressed upon them by the evil white man.

3. Evil perpetuates evil

Nothing can change in the third world as long as the environment remains unchanged. Men will not and can not change without a change of the environment. The evil example must be removed.

4. What we did to them in the past caused this evil.

The White man is the one who is responsible for the evil in the third world since it is the White man who via colonialism and missionary efforts created the evil environment that explains the evil and suffering of the third world.

5. We must thus not do what we did in the past, no matter the cost or the seeming sanity thereof. We must break the loop.

This means we must commit ethno-national suicide in order to atone for our past “sins.” Breaking the loop means the disappearance of borders, the extinction of previously white/European nations, and the forced transfer of wealth from the industrious white man to the comparatively supine cultural Marxist inspired minority.

6. When they do evil, it’s our fault, as we have created Frankenstein’s monster.

All of this creates a “noble savage” reality where minorities can do no wrong that is not the fault of the evil white man. Like the white woman charity worker in Haiti who was gang raped by Haitians concluding that it was the oppression by white people that drove the rage of her rapists so the WOKE post-Christian white man insists that all evil of minorities inflicted against him is the consequence of the post-Christian white man’s previous evil. A kind of conviction that karma is what is happening has infected the post-Christian white man’s thinking.

7. We can be the atonement as whites. We can recycle the suffering of Jesus incarnation in the white race so that that in being torn apart a better way is thus taught and modeled for the minority population.

Just as Jesus sufferings brought atonement to the elect so the sufferings of the white man can bring about atonement both for the past sins of the white man and for the present evil and suffering of minorities. Therefore the white man must die so that the minority population might live and find atonement and release from sin. The White man becomes the new Jesus providing an atonement for the suffering of untold millions of suffering and miserable minorities — a suffering a misery brought on by the white man’s historic “sins” against minorities.

8. Because there are no differences in people, there is hope. Whites were converted by the moral appeal of Christianity, so these third worlders will see our living example and convert.

One day all men will live in peace and harmony because the white WOKE man with his post-Christian morality laid down his racial life so that minorities might live and convert to Woke-tianity.

9. This is the WOKE version of Christianity, a different ethic of love that is torn apart by the whirling wheel of the world, and yet in happily dying changes the world for the better by the witness of this WOKE martyrdom.

Only by dying and going into extinction can the white man bring the blessings of peace, harmony, and understanding to the anticipated Utopian world. This WOKE form of Christianity thus becomes a suicidal death cult for the white race attended with the conviction that as a consequence the world will be healed by the sin inflicted upon it by the original sin that was and has been the existence of white people.

10. The white race must be martyred in passivity to win the world to Christ.

The only possible alternative to this is that the white race instead of being martyred become a slave class — hewers of wood and drawers of water — and only that if their numbers are kept severely reduced.

Rev. Sacha Walicord Goes After R2K

Someone else is finally saying it. Start @ 19 minute mark.

https://www.sermonaudio.com/solo/walkerurc/sermons/81422154334656/

Key quote;

“Christ is the mediator of this covenant of grace and here is something we need to hear — especially have to hear in the United Reformed Churches, as increasingly our people are being confused with a false understanding of exactly this topic. You have to understand that the Law and the Gospel are not opposites. They are in full harmony as Paul in vs. 21 reiterates … He asks exactly the question that has been plaguing the United Reformed Churches and the Orthodox Presbyterian Church for a along time; ‘Is the law then contrary to the promises of God? Certainly not’ he says. How much clearer do we want it? How crafty does it get with our enmity against the law of God? How deception can preachers become in luring our people away from the truth – away from a wonderful benefit of the covenant of grace, (of God’s dictated order of life) and changing the Gospel into something else?

And Paul continues, ‘If a law had been given that could give life then righteousness would indeed be by the law.’ Now this describes exactly the trap in which many of the contemporary Reformed have fallen. They do rightly understand that we have been saved through faith in Jesus Christ but they go ahead and say, “Since it is the promise and not the law that saves we have to abandon the law’ and they become anti-nomians. They become enemies of the law – discarding the law altogether. They portray the Law and the Gospel as contrarians – as competitors and they pit the two, as it were, against each other, just like the Marcions of old did with their heresy. That’s in its core the fasle understanding and the false doctrine — the so-called Radical Two Kingdom doctrine, which is being heavily promoted by a seminary on the west coast and by many of its graduates almost cult like — even in our Federation and we have to begin of calling this out this as what it is. It is not the Gospel of Jesus Christ. But it is another Gospel.

There I said it with all the possible repercussions and consequences. It (R2K) is another Gospel.

Because that is clearly not what the Bible teaches and that is not Gospel that Paul preaches who driven by the Holy Spirit says just the opposite.

Dr. Rev. Sacha Walicord

Wherein A. W. Pink Face-Plants David Van Drunen on the Noahic Covenant

“ [the Noahic Covenant] concerns ordinary cultural activities (rather than special acts of worship or religious devotion), it embraces the human race in common (rather than a holy people that are distinguished from the rest of the human race), it ensures the preservation of the natural and social order (rather than the redemption of this order), and it is established temporarily (rather than permanently)”

~ David Van Drunen, LGTK, p. 79.

——————–

A.W. Pink commenting on Scofield’s view of the Noahic covenant as a common covenant pertaining simply to temporal matters:

“It seems pitiable that at this late date it should be necessary to labor a point which ought to be obvious to all God’s people. And obvious it would be, at least when pointed out to them, were it not that so many have had dust thrown into their eyes by carnal “dispensationalists” and hucksters of “prophecy.” Alas, that I myself once had my own vision dimmed by them, and even now I often have to exert myself in order to refuse to look at things through their colored spectacles. That there were temporal benefits bestowed upon Noah and his seed in Jehovah’s covenant grant is just as sure as that Noah built a tangible altar and offered real sacrifices thereon. But to confine those benefits to the temporal, and ignore (or deny) their spiritual import, is as excuseless as would be a failure to discern Christ and His sacrifice in what Noah presented and which was a “sweet savour” unto God.

Yet so dull of spiritual comprehension are many of God’s own people, so prejudiced and stupefied are they by the opiates which false teachers have ministered to them, we must perforce proceed slowly, and take nothing for granted. Therefore, before we seek to point out the various typical, mystical, and spiritual features of the Noahic covenant, we must first establish the fact that something more than the temporary interests of this earth or the material well-being of its inhabitants was involved in what God said to our patriarch in Genesis 9. Nor is this at all a difficult matter.”

Pink
Divine Covenants