What we are trying to do during this Advent Season is give a broad sweep of the Old Testament in order to identify just exactly what our spiritual Fathers & Mothers were looking for in the promised coming Deliverer. Indeed, the reading of the Old Testament is a reading of the expectation for this one God promised who would set the world aright.

Our hope is here that by understanding their expectation as formed by God’s revelation we will have a better idea of who it is we worship… Jesus the Christ.

This is a goal of the Christian life… to know Him and to make Him known. Too often we worship a Jesus of our own crafting. By understanding the sweep of Scripture we can help avoid worshiping a Jesus of our own making and worship the same Jesus they were anticipating due to God’s Revelation.

Last week we began to look at the Pentateuch and we noted several truths in regards of whom the OT Saints were looking.

1.) Gen 3 teaches us that this coming promised one would be a man of violence. He would come to crush the head of the enemy. He Himself, upon His arrival said He had come to bring a sword thus confirming that the Jesus we serve is more a 11^th century Crusader than he is a 21^st century Dr. Phil.

2.) Gen. 12 taught us that this coming promised one would be blessing to all the nations. The coming one was not intended to be a provincial deliverer. He would come not to just bless Israel but to bless all the nations as nations. The deliverance this promised one would bring would be a deliverance that would be as wide as the curse is found. Here we begin to see the eschatological optimism that should be characteristic of all of those who believe in the Messiah. The coming deliverer that they expected would be a deliverer who would rescue all the nations. Christmas time then is, in part, a time when we should remember that the Christ who finally came in the first advent is a Christ who leads the nations in His victory train, blessing them each and all as He rules over them.

3.) We might also say that Gen. 12 teaches us that genealogy is important. This promised one would rise up out of the seed of the Hebrews. So, anyone who would make the claim of deliverer must be able to trace his genealogical descent back to Abraham.

4.) But it gets more specific then that as we looked at last week. This deliverer they were anticipating would come from the royal line of Judah. Gen. 49 teaches that the expected one who will set the world right will be the lion of the tribe of Judah and that line will be a royal line.

The idea of a man of violence who crushes His enemies as coming from a royal line is encapsulated in Numbers 24,

A star shall come forth from Jacob, And a scepter shall rise from Israel, And crush through the forehead of Moab, And tear down all the sons of Sheth. And Edom shall be a possession, Seir, it enemies, also shall be a possession; While Israel performs valiantly. One from Jacob shall have dominion, And shall destroy the remnant from the city” (Numbers 24:16-19).

5.) In Exodus we see a type of the deliverer who is to come in Moses. He will stand in as God’s representative and do battle with God’s enemies. As a type of the coming deliverer Moses will provide Exodus out of the bondage of sin and will set God’s people free. Moses also gives us a type of the coming deliverer inasmuch as Moses is a Prophet… a spokesman for God… God’s mouthpiece. Moses teaches us that the coming deliverer, first promised in Genesis 3, will be a Prophet

“The LORD your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among you, from your countrymen, you shall listen to him” (Dt. 18:15)

But Moses also, as a type, teaches us that the coming deliverer would be Priest speaking to God for the people. A Priest is person who mediates between God and his people so that God will receive them into his special holy presence to grant them his blessing.

11 Then Moses pleaded with [d]the Lord his God, and said: “Lord, why does Your wrath burn hot against Your people whom You have brought out of the land of Egypt with great power and with a mighty hand? 12 Why should the Egyptians speak, and say, ‘He brought them out to harm them, to kill them in the mountains, and to consume them from the face of the earth’? Turn from Your fierce wrath, and relent from this harm to Your people. 13 Remember Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, Your servants, to whom You swore by Your own self, and said to them, ‘I will multiply your descendants as the stars of heaven; and all this land that I have spoken of I give to your descendants, and they shall inherit it forever.’ ” 14 So the Lord relented from the harm which He said He would do to His people.

So, having only moved through Numbers we learn that the promised head crusher of Gen. 3:15 would be a man of violence, who would be from a traceable Hebrew line … a traceable Kingly line, and would speak as both a Prophet and a Priest. We have learned that He would be a blessing to all the Nations.

Already, in this sweeping overview, we see in place the idea that the coming promised deliverer that our Old Testament brethren expected would have to be a Prophet, Priest, and King. Christmas time is a time when we remind ourselves that the deliverer they expected would be a Prophet, Priest, and King and if it is the case that we would be their children then we should learn Jesus as Prophet, Priest, and King. We should seek to understand those categories. We should seek to worship Christ in those capacities. In order to be Christmas tide Christians, we should be able to articulate how it is that Jesus the Christ was and remains to His people a Prophet, a Priest, and a King. We should be able to explain why each office is instrumental in the accomplishing of His assigned tasks. We might even be able to find the idea of Christ as Prophet, Priest, and King as a deliverer for the Nations in the birth narrative of Jesus the Christ.

Here we see the tattered remnants of Christendom making merry during this Christmas season, but how many Christians making merry can give just a 101 explanation of Jesus Christ as the Great High King, as the mouthpiece of God, as our Great High Priest?

Before we leave the Pentateuch let us see one more glimpse of what was to be expected of this deliverer.

As the promised one would come as a King we would expect Him to come with the King’s law. He Himself testifies that this is so when in his first advent He says that not one jot nor tittle will pass away. That law the King would come championing. The high respect for the Law that the expected one would have is wrapped up in His role as King. As you recall the King in Scripture was required to

write for himself a copy of this law in a book, (Dt. 17:18).

That same law that the King came to honor commanded the conduct that God’s people would be characterized by. This law if honored would mean God’s blessing and if dishonored would mean God’s heavy discipline upon His people. The deliverer was expected to be a deliverer who would honor God’s law. This honoring of the law extended to His being the great sacrifice anticipated in that law system. Thus the sacrificial system provided yet another picture of the expected deliverer who would later be called the lamb of God. Here we begin to see, what perhaps might be thought of as a contradictory picture. The expected one would be a warrior King, the mouthpiece of God, the Great High Priest, a champion and deliverer of God’s people and yet he would be the brazen Serpent in the book of Numbers 21:25ff lifted up that all might look to and be healed. This champion would be the lamb of God taking away the sins of all who would look and live.

So, we have added to our previous expectation of the 1^st Advent of the deliverer that He would champion God’s law as King and would himself be the final sacrifice since the blood of bulls and goats could never completely take away sin.

This is the deliverer they were looking for on that first Christmas. It’s doubtful that they understood all they were looking for. Do we understand after the first Advent the one who we worship on this Christmas?

Well, that is the Pentateuch and Christmas. A great deal more might be said but with these first five books of the Bible we begin to see the expectations of the deliverer that the Saints of the OT had.

When we move out from the Pentateuch into the books of History we receive more information about the expected one.

Joshua, and Judges are heavy on the theme of the expected one being a deliverer. Israel disobeys God’s law and then come under the foot of some tyrant. Israel cries out and God sends a deliverer to rescue them from their bondage. This is the theme that we looked briefly in Exodus. These deliverers are types of the coming Messiah who will crush the head of the serpent and so provide exodus for God’s people from oppression.

Canaan, in the history of Redemption, is a type of serpent infested land and Joshua and the subsequent Judges are serpent head crushers. They are deliverers and so provide a type of Christ.

Joshua, Judges, and Ruth focus on the the land Promise in Gen. 12. Modern Christians don’t see the land promise any more of much significance but it is my conviction that the Land promise has been expanded so that the Messiah and His people inherit all the Earth as His own. Allow me to steal from what will be emphasized in a subsequent sermon in this series and that is the reality that all the earth will become the Deliverers so that the land promise in the OT is the antitype to the type of all of the earth as the Great King’s possession.

For the earth will be filled With the knowledge of the glory of the LORD, As the waters cover the sea. Habakkuk 2:14

All the ends of the world Shall remember and turn to the LORD, And all the families of the nations Shall worship before You. Psalm 22:7

So, we learn here that the coming deliverer King has a Kingdom and that Kingdom covers the Earth.

This belief distinguishes us from the amillennialists who believe that Christ’s Kingdom is primarily a spiritual Kingdom. As those with a biblical eschatology we believe that the spiritual Kingdom incarnates itself corporeally so that Christ as a Spiritual King is a King over real real estate and peoples. This is the Jesus who arrived at the first Advent and it is this Jesus whom we worship.

Let us say just a wee bit more about the books of History and what they tell us of the King they were expecting.

Perhaps the most important thing about the Messiah-Deliverer that we learn from the Davidic Kingdom is the Promise given to David by God that he would always have a seed to rule from His throne.

David before becoming King is promissory of becoming the anti type deliverer as he has in his resume serpent head crushing.

Just as Moses before him had faced the Serpent clad Pharaoh so David faces the serpent attired Goliath. The armor that Goliath wore could well have been covered with serpent skin. David, as an anti-type of the Serpent head crusher to come literally crushes the head of Goliath.

Eventually God makes covenant with David’s house so that we learn that the coming deliverer will have to have the papers to show he belongs to David’s house.

“The LORD also declares to you that the LORD will make a house for you. When your days are complete and you lie down with your fathers, I will raise up your descendant after you, who will come forth from you, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build a house for My name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever. I will be a father to him and he will be a son to Me; when he commits iniquity, I will correct him with the rod of men and the strokes of the sons of men, but My loving kindness shall not depart from him, as I took it away from Saul, whom I removed from before you. And your house and your kingdom shall endure before Me forever; your throne shall be established forever” (2 Samuel 7:11b-16).

Later Jesus will become known as the “son of David” (cf. Luke 1:32; 2:4; 18:38).

In the short term the promise had to do with David’s sons and subsequent seed. Men who committed iniquity. Men like Solomon, Rehoboam and the Kingly line of Judah. But this promise includes the word “forever” and so gives the reader expectation that the future deliverer will be, as we have established a King.


During this period many if not most of the Psalms were written and they provide much insight into the first advent of this coming deliverer.

Psalm 2 

In this Psalm we learn that the coming deliverer will crush the wicked who oppose his righteous rule by refusing to Kiss the Son. The Nations are told to worship God’s installed King now or face the wrath of that coming King and so perish in the way.

And yet Psalm 22 gives us that paradox of a suffering deliverer on the Cross.

Psalm 22 Here we hear the words of Christ on the Cross; “My God, my God, why has Thou forsaken me?” thus identifying the Savior with the One whose sufferings are described in this Psalm.

Here the seeming contradiction is accentuated regarding the person of the promised deliverer. On one hand we have this Authoritative King. While, on the other hand, we have the promised deliverer as a suffering servant.

Psalm 45 is written for the celebration of the deliverer King’s wedding. As such it centers on the splendor and majesty of the coming King (vss. 3-6), and upon the fact that His throne is eternal (v. 6). An eternal throne? An eternal throne implies an eternal King and here we get a hint that the Deliverer will be very God of very God as well as very man of very man.

There in Psalm 45 the bride of the king loves righteousness and hates wickedness (a picture of the church?) and has been chosen by Him as His bride. The splendor and beauty of the bride is described as she has been prepared for her presentation to the King.

Psalm 72 Portrays for us the reign of the righteous King, who judges the people with righteousness and justice and who is the protector of the afflicted. He is the one who will bring deliverance to His people.

Psalm 110 speaks of the installation of the Messiah at the right hand of God, who will rule over His enemies. Not only is He to rule as king, but He is also an eternal priest after the order of Melchizedek (v. 4). He will come to the earth to destroy His enemies.

So, we see expanded what we found in the Pentateuch. We see the deliverer promised as a coming King who will crush the head of the serpent and His wicked people. We see the deliverer as one who will protect and avenge the righteous afflicted. We see a descendant of King David whose reign had no end.

The is He who they were looking for in the 1^st Advent. This is who has even now been installed on His Holy Hill. This is the one who is crushing the wicked and will continue to crush the wicked as the wicked attack His people. This is the one whose law Word must be championed as the Great Eschatological King so that it sways over all the nations.

And this is the one we worship during this Advent season. He is not a Jesus of our own making. He is this Jesus and we ourselves must learn this King and not replace Him w/ a Jesus of our own making lest we perish in the way.

And the LORD God said to the serpent, “Because you have done this, Cursed are you more than all cattle, And more than every beast of the field; On your belly shall you go, And dust shall you eat All the days of your life; And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her seed; He shall bruise you on the head, And you shall bruise him on the heel” (Genesis 3:14-15).


As we enter into Advent we are reminded that the essence of Advent is the idea of waiting, and anticipating, and hope for a coming deliverer… A coming Messiah. In Advent, we try to put ourselves in the place of the faithful waiting Hebrew looking for the coming of the Messiah to heal the world’s sin, to crush the protagonist, and to provide salvation and we do this in hopes of understanding the role and purpose of the Messiah better.

We remember that all this waiting and anticipating is because of the reality of Sin. Here in the Genesis passage God’s perfect world has been despoiled and defaced by sin. God pronounces judgment but in that judgment, God promises a coming deliverer and the wait for the deliverer begins. The look for the first coming… the first Advent begins.

That first Advent, we know, was about the coming of the King to pay the penalty of sin and in so doing crushing the head of the Serpent. In the first Advent, the inauguration of the King and Kingdom occurs but now we live in the season where we wait for the consummation of the present Kingdom when what we have in bloom will be to us the full flower.

Now we are in the period of waiting for the Return of the King.

Waiting and anticipating did not diminish Israel as it waited for the Coming of the King and it does not diminish us. Waiting and anticipating does not diminish us any more than waiting and anticipating diminishes a woman with child looking forward to the arrival of her child. In point of fact, the waiting and anticipating make the final day all the sweeter. So, there is the bittersweet in the Advent season. We are reminded of the wait but we are also reminded of the glory of that day when the wait is completed.

During this Advent season … this season of our own waiting and anticipating, I thought we would spend a little time looking at Israel’s waiting and anticipating for the first Advent of the promised deliverer.

That sense of waiting and anticipation begins in this passage. As we said sin has entered into God’s creation and His image-bearers have been defaced. Man has fallen but if man is to be restored it is must be God who performs the restoration. The door that will end the waiting must be opened from God from the outside via His timing and His sending of a deliverer.

This has been promised in the text.

15 And I will put enmity
    between you and the woman,
    and between your offspring[a] and hers;
he will crush[b] your head,
    and you will strike his heel.”

This is the kicking off of the first Advent. God has promised a deliverer and now fallen but redeemed man must wait for this offspring who will crush the head of the serpent. As we know living on the other side of the first Advent we yet remain in the waiting and anticipating mode as we await the Second Advent of our Lord Christ.

We get hints that Eve was convinced that the first Advent was at hand when she brings forth her son Cain. Listen to her language.

Gen. 4:4 Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, and said, “I have acquired a man from the Lord.”

Several commentators have offered here that Eve here is acknowledging God’s hand in the birth of the child and she sees Cain’s birth as the fulfillment of the promise of God that her seed would crush the serpent’s head. Thus, Eve may have thought her first son would be the promised Messiah and put her hope in him.

If this is correct Eve thinks that God has fulfilled His promise already but as we all know Cain is anything but a Deliverer but instead accentuates the tragedy of the fall and so the wait continues.

This wait continues on throughout the rest of the Old Testament. And that wait is what we are going to trace out the rest of this Advent season. As the Scripture unfolds we get a fuller and fuller idea of what and who Israel is waiting for. Who is this Deliverer? How will we know He had come? The Old Covenant answers that question and as it answers that question we get a fuller and fuller idea of who it is we now worship as at the right hand of the Father. So in this series of Advent sermons, we come to know Jesus the Christ… the Deliverer better.

Along the way, we will see that there was an ebb and flow … a waxing and waning to Israel’s expectation of the first Advent. We will see times where Israel’s hope seems to be almost snuffed out and yet by God’s grace continues to flicker. By seeing this my hope is that we will adore even more the greatness of the first coming of the King.

Indeed, much of the New Testament – especially the Gospels – is a declaration of how the Old Testament anticipated future realities that were found in Christ. The Gospel resound with the declaration that the King has come and the Advent has arrived.

This morning we are going to look at the Pentateuch … the first five books of the Bible to see some of how God limns out what is to be expected of this Deliverer when He arrives on the scene. We hope to hit the high points because to be exhaustive would find us here for quite some time. In doing this we hope that we can see some of the major themes of the Old Testament. In short, we will be looking at the forest for the next few weeks and not the trees. We do so in order to see what Israel looked for in the promised one who would crush the Serpents head. In doing so it is hoped we will understand who we worship as very God of very God even better. In so doing we hope to understand Christmas even better.

As we have seen from this morning’s text God’s pronouncement of the curse upon the Serpent begins to give us explanation of who it is Israel is waiting for.

And the first thing we know about this coming seed is that He is a destroyer of the entity of who would destroy God’s creation. This tells us that Israel is waiting for a Warrior King. This coming Deliverer will not fit on a sentimental Hallmark greeting card. He is more Conan the Barbarian than he is a Lennox Figurine. He comes as a destroyer of the destroyer and the destruction will be bloody. Who could have guessed from this first prophecy that it is the Deliverer who will be spilling His blood to crush the head of the Serpent?

In this promise that the coming Deliverer will be a head crusher, there is the promise that in the crushing of the head of the enemy will be the salvation of God’s people. Only as the Serpent is destroyed will salvation be found. This theme continues throughout Scripture. For example in Romans 16;

20 The God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet.

As a brief aside we should note that it is likely the case that not a little of our mythology of slaying Dragons and so saving the fair maiden comes from this idea. The English Mythology of St. George slaying the Dragon. The whole idea of Beowulf and the destruction of Grendel. Much of our ancient mythology of a noble Knight slaying a beast Dragon bent on destroying mankind likely comes from the idea that the Messiah- Deliverer will crush the head of the Serpent. This is one reason why Christianity is a man’s religion. Christ is the Alpha Male who comes to rescue the Church (the fair maiden) and so sets all things aright. A pity then that Christ has been turned into a pajama boy inter-sexual hermaphrodite by the modern Church.

It is this promise of a Deliverer that makes bearable the judgment passed on Adam and Eve. Yes, there will be pain in childbirth but it will be through the bearing of children that the Warrior King will arrive. Yes, Adam will till the earth by the sweat of His brow but in the tilling of the earth, He will be constantly be reminded of the coming Deliverer who will deliver Him from His labors.

As the Advent story continues to unfold it is quickly seen that neither Cain nor Abel will be the promised Deliverer. Already Adam and Eve are learning that the destruction that they wrought will not be so easily fixed. Another man child arrives… Seth.

Seth may have offered hope again that He was the Deliverer but when we get to Genesis 6 we see that Seth and his line is not the answer as they dilute their seed by having carnal relations with women who were opposed to God and His people. Indeed in Chapters 6-9 wee see that the whole human race has been so corrupted that God resolves to start over again with a second Adam … Noah. Perhaps Noah is the promised Messiah? Noah is the head of the Human Race…. He is put into a new garden as it were but we quickly learn that just as Adam fell by the fruit of the tree so Noah shows himself no Messiah by his partaking of the fruit of the vine which in turn leads to an unseemly event by Ham (Gen. 9:20-27).

In Gen. 11, which we’ve considered the last couple of weeks mankind is once again at a flood point already. But instead of being visited with a flood God visits mankind and in blessing and judgment confuses their language. But we note that in the context of all this the seed promise first mentioned in Genesis 3… the promised serpent crushing seed… is now re-articulated to another Man … Abraham.

Now the Lord said to Abram, “Go forth from your country, And from your relatives And from your father’s house. To the land which I will show you; And I will make you a great nation, And I will bless you, And make your name great; And so you shall be a blessing; And I will bless those who bless you, And the one who curses you I will curse. And in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed” (Genesis 12:1-3).

We now learn that this Messiah who is being waited for is not only going to crush the Serpent’s head but he is going to a Messiah who has global implications. This Messiah who is being waited for is going to be a blessing to all the Nations. Here we find the beginning of the post millennial hope. The Messiah …the Warrior King who will crush the serpent’s head will be a blessing for all the Nations.

This Global champion who crushes the head of the Serpent will be the seed of Abraham (Gen. 13:15, 22:18) refers to Christ as we are taught in Galatians 3:16.

16 Now to Abraham and his Seed were the promises made. He does not say, “And to seeds,” as of many, but as of one, “And to your Seed,” who is Christ.

Abraham knows that the promised head crusher will come through his line and yet as I said at the outset hope waxes and wanes. Abraham is an old man with an old wife and yet despite God’s promise is without issue. He decides that He will help God along in God’s Messiah promise business and at his wife’s insistence take the wife’s maid to have this promised male issue. Abraham threatens the line by pawning Sarah off as a sister but God protects His promise.

Then the promised son finally arrives and God tells Abraham to sacrifice the seed (Gen. 22). From that incident, God’s people looking back realize more about the story of the Deliverer. We see through this type that like Isaac the coming Deliverer upon whom the hopes of the nations is placed will Himself become a sacrifice. God Himself will put forth His only Son who is obedient to the Father to the point of death in order to heal the wound inflicted in the Garden. The later suffering servant passages in the prophets underscores this aspect of the Messiah. So, divine irony is introduced as to who the Deliverer will be. Yes, he will be a head crusher but not without suffering in the battle. However, this is consistent with the promise in Genesis 3. His own heel will be struck by the servant.

If we next consider Jacob we see that he is in the line of the Messiah. Jacob has his name changed and we see that if the seed is going to come from this line it is going to because of God’s great grace to make it so. Jacob’s name means “deceiver,” and he is hardly the kind of man you’d expect the promised line to come through. Yet, God’s promises come clearly to Jacob and we learn about the Messiah to come in an incident where Jacob sleeps and dreams. Jacob has a dream of a ladder ascending to heaven which we will later learn points forward to Christ, as our Lord’s words in John 1:51 will later indicate.

51 And He said to him, “Most assuredly, I say to you, hereafter[a] you shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of Man.”

This teaches us that if one is to deal with Heaven one must do so as through the son of man. There is no other name by which men must be saved. This teaches us that Jesus is the one upon whom heaven.

We learn through the promised line of Jacob and His sons that if a rescue of mankind is going to be accomplished it will have to be accomplished by God because the seed of the woman never looks very good. Humanly speaking, Jacob’s sons were even more of a wreck than Jacob so far as their ability to fulfill God’s purposes and promises to Abraham.

Reuben lay with Jacob’s concubine (Genesis 35:22). Joseph’s brothers were violent men. They dealt severely with the men of Shechem, action which caused Jacob to fear for the safety of his family (Genesis 34). These same men nearly killed Joseph and did sell him into slavery, with no compassion on either their own brother or father (Genesis 37). And Judah was willing to have inter into a sexual union with a woman he thought to be a cult prostitute (Genesis 38). These are not the kind of men which inspire confidence, especially in regard to the fulfillment of God’s gracious promises. Nevertheless, it was of Judah that Jacob prophesied:

“Judah, your brothers shall praise you; Your hand shall be on the neck of your enemies; Your father’s sons shall bow down to you. Judah is a lion’s whelp; From the prey, my son, you have gone up. He couches, he lies down as a lion, As a lion, who dares rouse him up? The scepter shall not depart from Judah, Nor the ruler’s staff from between his feet, Until Shiloh comes, And to him shall be the obedience of the peoples” (Genesis 49:10-12).

Here we learn that the specific line that the Messiah will come through is the line of Judah and later Revelation in the NT tells us that Jesus was from Judah through both Mary and Joseph’s lineage.

This promised line from whom the Messiah-Deliverer will come goes down into Egypt to escape hardship and famine but while in Egypt the line is attacked by a Pharaoh knew not Joseph so that once again the promise of the deliverer begins to wane. There is genocide in the offering as Pharaoh seeks to snuff out the seed (Ex. 1:15-16, 22). And yet in another divine Irony God plays a trick on Pharaoh and has the one who will deliver Israel raised in Pharaoh’s own courts by his own daughter.

Moses Himself becomes a picture of the future deliverer as God uses him to first reign blow after blow upon the Pharaoh Serpent and then to finally crush the Serpent Pharaoh’s head at the Red Sea. Through Moses Israel is delivered from this bondage and to the careful reader, it is learned that Christ will deliver his people from the bondage of sin and will set them free.

We will pick up the narrative next week.

“For a Christian to discriminate against non-Christians (in being hired for a job) — for any reason — apart from their ability to do that job would be a blight on the Gospel because what you are basically telling people is that Christianity is not really about the person and work of Christ but its really about whether or not you are a member of my tribe. (1) If we all behaved that way of course in a Muslim majority country like Indonesia Christians would have difficulty finding jobs and then in a Christian majority country non-Christians would be left out in the cold. (2) What we are telling non-Christians in that instance — far more important whether non-Christians can get a job — is that unless you join us you’re not privileged in this society and that is grossly, I think, to confuse the Gospel with a particular culture. (3) That will set the evangelistic enterprise back who knows how far. (4) This is always the problem.(5) When Christians are persecuted they are at their best and then Christians; the success of the Gospel is so great the salt and light is kind of scattered so widely that you begin to have Christian influence and then people start wanting Christianity to be privileged. And that is always — I believe we can justify this historically — is when Christianity itself gets into trouble and the salt begins to lose its savor.”(6)

Dr. M. Scott Horton
Online Roundtable Discussion
ZCRC(IMUS) Reformed Conference 2020

1a.) This is a non-sequitur. If I have two people applying for a job and they are both ably gifted to handle the job then why wouldn’t I discriminate in favor of the Christian? I know what ethics he will be bringing to the job which means as an employer I know he won’t steal from me. I know that the non-Christian if he is consistent with his worldview will do everything he can to take advantage of me as his employer. So, if I choose to discriminate in favor of the Christian in my hiring practices I am not communicating that Christianity is about anything besides the person and work of Jesus Christ. I am communicating that when it comes to employees, I prefer the ethos of the consistent Christian to the consistent non-Christian.

1b.) What is so bad about preferring one’s own tribe? There is, in R2K, this baked-in Alienism that seems to insist that we must discriminate in favor of the stranger and the alien. There is nothing evil about preferring someone who is from your own Christian tribe over and against someone who is a member of a religious tribe who is at war with the God of the Bible.

2a.) Let Horton go over to Riyadh University in Saudi Arabia and tell them he is a Christian who wants to teach comparative religions and just see how quickly the man is hired. He is certainly qualified to teach such a course. Why wouldn’t the Sauds hire him? Could it be because he says he is a Christian? (Whether he really is or not is not for me to say.)

2b.) Non-Christians seeking employment in a genuinely Christian country if there are Christians who are qualified to do the work should be left out in the cold. In point of fact, non-Christians should be employed only until the non-Christian can train a Christian to do his job and once the Christian was trained to do the job the non-Christian should be released from that employment and so once again be left out in the cold. One wonders why Christian employers should profit non-Christians at the expense of their brothers in Christ who may well need employment? If I am to do good to all men but especially to those of the household of faith it would seem that the preferring of the Christian over the non-Christian is required by God’s Word.

3a.) It is not possible to not have Christianity identified with a particular culture or cultures. Horton and his R2K ilk keep wanting to have their Christianity culturally unembodied as if Christianity is this ethereal like substance that just kind of wafts around culture without influencing culture. Of course, this mindset is driven by their R2K presuppositions that demand that it is not possible for a culture to be Christian since that would be a confusion of categories. So, if it is not possible for a culture to be Christian then per Horton’s theology (we are being respectful) it is terrible for any particular culture to be identified with Christianity. In point of fact, it would be un-Christian for any particular culture to be identified as Christian and twice so for a Christianity to be identified with a culture.

3b.) Just for the record, it is my conviction that R2K is that which is grossly confused on Christianity.

5a) If Dr. Horton genuinely believed that Christians are at their best when persecuted then he would go to Yemen or Saudi Arabia and preach Christ. Dr. Horton doesn’t do that and so I can only conclude that Dr. Horton doesn’t really believe the nonsense statement that Christians are at their best when persecuted.

5b.) People wanting Christianity to be privileged? You mean like privileging Christian families, Christian patriarchy, Christian ethics, Christian understandings of law and justice, or Christian education over “It takes a village to raise a child” families, pagan matriarchy, pagan ethics which allow for baby murder, or pagan understandings of law and justice which allow men to use women restrooms or Muslim education? Yeah… Christianity wanting to be privileged in a social order is a terrible thing, Mike.

6.) I’m just as confident that I can demonstrate historically that when Christianity is not privileged paganism is privileged and then social order really deteriorates.

Dr. Michael Horton is not a wise man. Not in the least.

And yet he is teaching a whole generation of ministers to be as unwise as he is.

God save us.

“They shall recline on jeweled couches face to face, and there shall wait on them immortal youths with bowls and ewers and a cup of purest wine (that will neither pain their heads nor take away their reason); with fruits of their own choice and flesh of fowls that they relish. And theirs shall be the dark-eyed houris [white maidens], chaste as hidden pearls: a guerdon for their deeds… We created the houris [white maidens] and made them virgins, loving companions for those on the right hand…”

Sura 56 verses 12- 39
Penguin translation by NJ Dawood

Throughout history, the white woman has been valued as at the top of the hierarchy of beauty. The painting, “The Slave Market” is an 1866 painting by the French artist Jean-Leon Gerome captures some of this reality. That painting depicts an unspecific Middle Eastern or North African setting where a Mussleman inspects the teeth of a white nude, female slave, doubtless captured as booty from some Muslim raid on a Christian caravan or city.

So desirous was white women that a key attraction for Muslims to sack and seize Constantinople was the prospect of taking white women as booty as recorded by the historian Raymond Ibrahim as he quotes historians previous. For over a thousand years it has not been uncommon for minorities to have one thing on his mind. Where can I find white women?

Indeed white women were so valued by Muslims during the Crusade era that the consequent inter-breeding found future Muslim emirs to be genetically largely white men.

Below is a quote from Sword & Scimitar making this same point.

“When Caliph Al-Walid in Damascus saw the great plunder harvested, he was delighted by ‘the resources of all the people of Spain… it’s riches and the beauty of its young girls.’ Because ‘the Umayyads’ particularly valued blond or red-haired Franc or Galician women as sexual slaves,’ which were harder to acquire from better fortified Byzantium, ‘al-Andalus became a center for the trade and distribution of slaves.’ In exchange for peace, north Christians sometimes even had to make annual tributes ‘not of money, or horses, or arms, but of a hundred damsels (all to be distinguished for beauty) to ornament the harems.’

To maintain the slave emporium reputation of Cordoba, merchants ‘would put ointment on slave girls of darker complexion to whiten their faces; brunettes were placed for hours in a solution to make them blond (‘golden’); ointments were placed on the face and body of black slave to make them ‘prettier.’ As for the sexual objectification of European infidels – which, as seen, meant portraying them as promiscuous by nature – slavers played up the fantasy in order to facilitate sales. According to a twelfth-century document: “the merchant tells the slave girls to act in a coquettish manner with the old men and with the timid men among the potential buyers to make them crazy with desire… [and] he dresses them all in transparent clothes.’

Forced or indoctrinated into being promiscuous, some of the hapless women appear to have done their job well. Due Cordoba’s status as a slave epicenter – practically every Muslim emir was born to a pale concubine – large numbers of sex slaves and forced prostitutes were always on public display trading their wares. Ibn Hazm may have had them in mind, and not the average cloistered female Muslim, when he wrote that women ‘have nothing else to fill their minds, except loving union [sex] and what brings it about, flirting and how it is done, intimacy and the various ways of achieving it. This is their sole occupation and they were created for nothing else.’

Something of this fantasy – where half-naked women lounge about in caliphal harems pining for their turn to see and please their masters – eventually passed into the West’s popular imagination. But it is more a product of fiction along the lines of the Arabian Nights than reality. Consider the life and times of Abd al-Rahman III (r. 929-961),. the Caliph most associated with al-Andalus’s ‘golden age.’ According to Muslim records, he once ‘threw himself upon’ on of his Christian concubine’s ‘face to kiss and bite her, and she got disgusted by this and turned away’; this ‘so provoked his anger that he ordered the eunuchs to seize her and put a candle to her face, burning and destroying her beauty.’ Similarly, when Abu Imran the executioner was summoned, he found his master ‘in the company of a girl, beautiful like an oryx, who was being held by his eunuchs in a corner of the room, who was asking for mercy.’ The caliph gave none: ‘Take that whore, Abu Imran, and cut her neck,’ the executioner obliged: ‘With one blow I made her head fly.’ The caliph gifted Imran with her jeweled necklace, adding, ‘May Allah bless it to you.’ When a nineteen-year-old Christian slave boy rejected his repeated sexual advances, Abd al-Rahman III had him slowly tortured and beheaded.”

Raymond Ibrahim
Sword & Scimitar – p. 172-173

I’ve been spending some time pondering what makes otherwise sane people do insane things like believe almost any level of civil government. I’m sure I’m the oddball but I grew up being taught that governments routinely lie. Then, when I attended college we had reinforced that very same truth. It was like a catechism.

Q.) What is it that civil governments do?

A.) Civil governments routinely dissemble, deceive, and lie.

Q.) What should be our attitude towards civil governments?

A.) Our attitude towards civil government should always be one of skepticism and distrust.

Civil governments lie like fish drink water, like vacuum cleaners suck, and like Schoenberg composed dissonance “music.”

My instructors both in my youth and undergrad had themselves taken an objective look at civil governments through the centuries and agreed with Lord Acton that “power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”

Now, at one time in my youthful naivete I had believed, before going into the ministry, that there may be some kind of exception for ecclesiastical governments but I was quickly dissuaded of that illusion upon preparing for the ministry, and then once entering into the ministry. Ecclesiastical government seldom has any more integrity than civil governments and is not to be given the benefit of the doubt in terms of trusting their ability to arrive at justice or in trusting their word as their bond.

The fallenness of man is ubiquitous and never more clearly seen then when fallen man comes together to congeal in governments. Sooner trust governments to lie to you then trusting a scorpion to sting.

So, given the above is true and obviously true upon any brief examination of almost any civil government why would people, in numbers exponential, live and act as if their civil government is telling them the truth? In brief, why are people walking around with cloth on their faces just on the basis that some idiot government apparatchik has listened to some idiot government scientist hack?

It is past disturbing to one’s equilibrium to go outside of one’s house. Even going to the mailbox finds one apt to bump into someone outside walking their dog alone while wearing a face diaper. If one ventures out to the grocery store it is like walking onto the set of “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest.” I fully expect to see Jack Nicholson in the bread and buns aisle and nurse Ratchet as a pharmacy check out gal. One is immediately hit by the fact that people believe the shizer they hear from their civil governments. They believe these “public servants,” who without being bejeweled by their office and title wouldn’t be trusted to guard the public latrine from theft.

Cloth face diapers are freakin’ everywhere. You turn on a football game and there the players are crashing into each other. Grunting and grinding they plow into one another – sweating and spewing as they are locked face to face in mortal gridiron combat. But by God you can bet that once they return to the sidelines the first thing they do is put on a cloth face diaper. Wouldn’t want to be exposed you know.

At one time they were actually telling people that if they copulated with strangers met on online dating sites they would be wise to wear a cloth face diaper while in the throes of their passion. After all, every precaution must be taken against passing on this scourge.

And people believe this shizer?

The unspeakable strangeness of it all finds the sane among us in danger of joining the public throng insane who are wearing the cloth face diapers as a symbol of their creeping insanity.

I know it won’t do any good at this point. Nor would’ve it done any good in March 2020 but this is my short plea for people to show their faces again. I mean, your face may not be much but it is a damn site better than any fancy high fashion face diaper you can use to cover yourself.

Of course I wonder what is it that makes people and whole social orders go bat-iguana crazy all at one time. Obviously, part of it is that people actually believe the American version of Joseph Goebbels’s Ministry of Propaganda. It should come as no surprise that people who have no time to scratch below the surface of popular information as dispensed by our Lugenpresse outlets, given their harried pace, end up believing Baskin-Robbins bullshit information flavor of the day.

Secondly, most people not being aware of the way worldviews work do not realize that information of any variety (including the Holy of Holy “science” information) is warped by the theology and worldview that is driving it. Facts are only as good as the narrative in which they are nestled in and the narrative itself is only as good as the theology and worldview that is driving it. Wearing cloth face diapers makes perfect sense in a bogus scientific narrative driven by a Marxist control the population worldview.

Thirdly, for many people, it is just a matter of not wanting to “rock the boat.” They figure at this point that a cloth face diaper is not that big of a deal and so they will comply. Of course these people fail to realize the nature of civil government to just be encouraged in more draconian behavior every time one scintilla of liberty is conceded to the civil government. Civil governments exist in order to expand and fill the globe. They have no instinct to restrict themselves and so you can bet that succeeding at putting the populace in cloth face diapers is foreplay unto injecting into them every god forsaken vaccine that can be thought. People, God bless their hearts, refuse to believe that cloth face diapers are promissory of a whole constellation of evil skulduggery that has long been contemplated and prepared for the populations of the West.

However, the largest reason for people wearing cloth face diapers I believe is the fact that people are, at heart, lemmings. They fear more than anything not fitting in. They fear standing out as different. They fear zigging when the rest of the population is zagging. It explains why Adam ate the forbidden fruit, knowing that Eve had done wrong. He didn’t want to be different. It explains why the poor fool in WW I went over the top of those damnable trenches at the sound of whistles in order to attack. “Everybody else was running into machine gun fire so why shouldn’t I?” It explains why modern art as created by pushing paint balls out of some skank’s vagina sells. Everybody else thinks its profound so I should think it is profound as well.

People, exceptions notwithstanding, are hopeless conformists and all the more so when the conformity called for is driven by desperate sinful behavior. I mean what else can explain covering one’s body with tatts or putting holes in one’s earlobes the circumference of basketball rims, or sticking sharp objects in the most tenderest of body orifices or fitting one’s self with a cloth face diaper except that “everybody else is doing it.”

Personally, it is pushing me to the edge. I’ve been exposed to mental hospitals that were far superior in group sanity than what I’m being forced to live in, in this current social order. I’ve had my daughters and grandchildren yelled at for not wearing cloth face diapers. I have had people try to lecture me on how wrong I am on refusing to comply to the insanity. If dirty looks were paint one could paint the Louvre with all the dirty looks I’ve been given for not wearing a cloth face diaper at some kind of public facility.

And, I fully know the corporate insanity is only going to get worse before it gets better.