Dear Pastor,

Generally, I agree with a great deal of what you write. However, you seem more certain that the Wuhan virus is ALL a ploy now than you did several months ago. I’m not doubting that all of this was initiated for a purpose and was no accident; but which of us can determine for sure the degree of danger it poses to a large segment of the population that doesn’t enjoy optimum health and vigor. Are they simply collateral damage?

Ron

Dear Ron,

Thank you for writing. Of course I am more certain now than I was when the Chicken Little WHO and CDC started screaming “the sky is falling, the sky is falling.” The reason I am more certain is that there is more evidence in now from other reputable sources that insist that if this thing is not a complete hoax it is plenty far enough in the hoax tank.

Take Yale epidemiology professor Dr. Harvey Risch for example who said Tuesday that he believes the President Trump-touted drug, hydroxychloroquine, could save up to 100,000 lives if used properly to treat the Wuhan virus.

This guy is a freaking Yale epidemiology professor and yet he is ignored because his narrative doesn’t match the New World Order medical narrative. Just as the Standford researcher, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a professor of medicine at Stanford Medicine was roundly ignored and even condemned by the New World Order Medical community when his research was communicated in a Wall Street Journal column and in other interview outlets was contrary to the officially approved medical narrative not a month outside of when this nonsense started. Bhattacharya showed conclusively then that the facts did not match the hyperventilating of the NWO crowd and for that he was torched.

Dr.’s Bartlett, Buttar, and Sherry Tenpenny among countless others have also offered alternative views on the Wuhan virus and they are shutdown and dismissed by the New World Order Doctors like Fauci, and Birx and their media retard sycophants.

Oh… and did we mention the non-reliability factor of the testing? False positives and false negatives abound to the point that the test results means you might have it and you might not have it. With dependability like that how could we go wrong?

Next there is the documented reality that hospitals are incentivized to amp up their reporting of the number of Wuhan cases since more money from the FEDS is following increased diagnosis of Wuhan virus. The more Wuhan patients the more money from the FEDS. Now Hospitals will say, “we would never do that.” Yeah, and the FEDS would never purposely give Airmen from Tuskegee syphilis either.

Then there is the issue of the grossly irresponsible ways the media has covered this story. For this I will quote from a recent Heather MacDonald speech at Hillsdale College,

By now it is impossible to attribute the media’s failure to publicize the facts about the coronavirus to mere oversight.

Every story that does not mention, preferably at the top, the vast over-representation of nursing home deaths in the coronavirus death count—above 50 percent in many countries and 80 percent in several of our states—is a story that is deliberately concealing the truth. Casual readers and viewers have been left with the false impression that everyone is equally at risk, and thus that draconian measures are justified.

Now take into account all the unnecessary field hospitals that were built across the country for patients that never materialized when this thing first started. We were told the world was coming to the end and in terms of hospital occupancy it was a nothing-burger. In point of fact Hospitals ended up laying personnel off because they had ramped up so much for Wuhan to the point of turning away routine business.

Should we next mention how Governors from Michigan (Whitmer), New York (Cuomo), New Jersey (Murphy), Pennsylvania (Wolf), and others placed active infected Wuhan patients in nursing homes with the result (intended or unintended?) of the killing of numerous octogenarians. Why aren’t these Governors being brought up on murder charges of some nature?

So yeah, Ron, I think it is largely a hoax. Oh, sure, some kind of something might exist out there but it was never what it was made out to be and I think these NWO medical bastards knew that from jump. If I don’t believe that I have to believe they are stupid and incompetent and I don’t believe anyone could be this stupid.

Further, I believe it has a three-fold reason. The first is always in play. The first is that this is going to make some people vaccine rich beyond their wildest dreams. (Cue up Bill and Melinda Gates and Dr. Fauci for starters.) The second is about cobbling together the New World Order. Names like Henry Kissinger, Madelyn Albright, and others are on record saying that this medical crisis needs to result in a more unified global cooperation. (The globalism aspect is also the reason for the masks.) The third reason is domestic politics. The Globalists in the US desire to get rid of populist Trump and as it pertains to domestic politics the Democrats combined with the “Never Trumpers” are riding this Wuhan scamdemic to the end of the line.

Again, I do think it is a hoax in order to turn the world into the elite haves and the cattle have nots.

And I’m plenty pissed about it.

According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, mask-wearing is:

“A form of disguise or concealment usually worn over or in front of the face to hide the identity of a person and by its own features to establish another being.”

The mask completes the work of the Globalists to turn man into a cog so that all cogs are seen as mere replacement for other cogs. Look at crowds as they are each and all masked. What you gaze upon is a sea of undifferentiated human cogs. The individual and the personal is lost in a sea of sameness. Masking is the perfect egalitarian move.

Even more than the French Revolution Phrygian cap or the Chinese Maoist Revolutionary Mao Suit, the mask communicates the apex of the egalitarian drone. With the wide wearing of the mask an occult transformation has occurred. Man in the image of God has become the Borg in the image of the Sovereign State.

Mask wearing then, when not necessary, is anti-Christ and Pastors who keep writing hallmark tropes on how one is showing Jesus love are doing anti-Christ work. They fail to realize not only what has been said above but they fail to realize that the mask is merely conditioning for one more step into the breech of Government tyranny. Masks prepare the way for mandatory vaccines. These vaccines, like the masks, are violations of the 6th commandment. Ministers who support this stuff are ministering Lucifer more than they are ministering Christ.

If you are a member of a Church which is taking this whole Wuhan virus thing seriously you need to get out of that Church as fast as you can. You are in a Statist Church who worships according to the dictates of Caesar and not the dictates of God.

Dear Pastor,

I have a friend who has a question on cessationism. Here is my question. (Actually it’s his question.) He wanted to know how it is that I make the distinction between a prophet called by God to speak for God to monarchs and to Israel and to the church — as well as to write scripture — which I was saying I thought was one kind of prophet, yet I then also wanted to distinguish the idea of prophecy as it’s described by Paul when he says that there are some who have a gift of prophecy. My friend is wanting to know how I know that Paul was not referring to the idea of ongoing prophecy. I’m clear that there is no ongoing prophecy or new revelation since the closing of the Cannon, but I’m wondering about how to clarify Paul’s meaning of prophecy And it’s ongoing application for the church today?

Clifford

Dear Clifford,

Thank you for the question. Let me know if I don’t give you enough information or if I have not answered the question.

First we would note that the word “Prophet” has a narrow and a broad meaning. Narrowly considered the word Prophet means fore-teller. This is one who predicts or sees the future. This would have been one dynamic of most of the Biblical prophets through the OT and NT until the closing of the cannon. There is a broader meaning of the word that means “Forth-teller.” A prophet by this definition is one who speaks forth the word of God in their speech. The Heidelberg catechism (and Biblical Christianity as a whole) holds that all Christians are Prophets in this broad sense of the Word.

Second, in terms of ongoing prophecy, I would say to your friend that there was ongoing prophecy until the close of the canon. The way we can know that is from Scripture. I Corinthians 13:8 teaches,

“Love never fails. But whether there are prophecies, they will fail; whether there are tongues, they will cease; whether there is knowledge, it will vanish away.”

Prophecies, in the sense of fore-telling the future (narrow sense of the idea of prophecy) will come to an end. Tongues will cease. Knowledge (in the sense of charismatic ‘word of knowledge’) will vanish away.

Finally I would point him to Hebrews 1

1 God, who at various times and in various ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, 2 has in these last days spoken to us by His Son….

There is no further need for the various ways that God previously spoke since God has spoke finally (in these last days) by His Son.

And where do we find the Son speaking?

In the Scriptures.

Scripture teaches cessationism and any desire for God to continue to speak only dilutes the importance of His speaking in Scripture for if God continues to give verbal revelation then the verbal revelation that He has given in Scripture is reduced in import. Why look to old Revelation when one has newer Revelation to access?

“A revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is; it is the act whereby one part of the population imposes its will upon the other part by means of rifles, bayonets and cannon –authoritarian means, if such there be at all; and if the victorious party does not want to have fought in vain, it must maintain this rule by means of the terror which its arms inspire in the reactionaries. Would the Paris Commune have lasted a single day if it had not made use of this authority of the armed people against the bourgeois? Should we not, on the contrary, reproach it for not having used it freely enough?”

Vladimir Lenin

Note that in the Leninist model Terror must be instilled in the population. There can never be too much terror in a Communist Revolution. It is how the wolf Marxists keep the sheep population at bay. When Bella Kohn’s Communist government failed in 1919 Kun reputedly said that the reason the government failed was that there was not enough blood spilled… not enough terror pursued.

One of Kun’s co-Revolutionary’s confirms Kohn’s conviction,

Tibor Szamuely  was Deputy People’s Commissar of War and People’s Commissar of Public Education during the short lived 1919 Hungarian Communist Government. Szamuely wrote,

“Now the power is in our hands. Who wants the old reign to come back, they should be hanged quickly. The one of this kind must be neck-bitten. The victory of Hungarian proletariat till this time required no serious numbers of victims. But now there is the need of bloodshed. We mustn’t be afraid of blood, the blood is like steel: strengthens the hearth and strengthens the proletarian class. Blood will make us gigantean. […] We will exterminate the whole bourgeoisie, if we have to.”

Revolution, in the Communist model, is accomplished by Terror and force of arms and right now the Terror that is being used is the mask. The mask terrorizes the population and fills people with fear. The mask has the same effect as the threat of being visited by the secret police. The mask makes you conscious of your fear all the time and even when you are not wearing a mask and only seeing others wearing a mask you are reminded that terror is stalking you. The mask is the shedding of blood while keeping the sheep alive.

If you are voluntarily wearing a mask you are contributing to the terrorism of your fellow citizen.

And that action, you dumbass clergy, is the very opposite of loving Jesus.

First there was Ella followed by Lee
So began the heirs of clan McAtee
Then followed Edward followed by Bret
The Marxists began to see the growing ominous threat

Next were birthed William and then Gwenevere
And now the enemy became familiar with fear
Followed soon Louis and Ben
The Marxist could see their ultimate end

Next came our two maidens so fair
Winry and Aurelia — “the Marxist’s despair”
And next the wicked meet “the Hammer” and Al
And departs from the villains all remaining morale

And clan McAtee is far from yet done
More arrows will follow to slay Marxist hun
More warriors and shield maidens to fill McAtee ranks
More babies for which the world will one day give thanks