Rich Lusk on Luther … McAtee on Rich Lusk

“Martin Luther did not operate with modern racial categories as we know them. Again, his opposition to the Jews stemmed from their theology and resultant practices, not their genetics or physical lineage. He was not a proto-Hitler arguing that Jews were an inferior race. He saw the Jewish religion (Judaism) as a false religion and, because Jews rarely converted in his day, a threat to the Christian society in which he lived.”

Rich Lusk
Heretical Federal Vision Clergy 

1.) Did Luther or did he not loathe the Bagels? If he loathed the Bagels then he was operating with modern racial categories.

2.) Why would Lusk make this kind of hard and fast distinction between a people’s genetic lineage and their theology and resultant practices? Now, to be sure, not all individual Bagels would be or will be Christ haters. Doubtless many individual Bagels love the Christ of the Bible. Praise God for them. But speaking in generalities, it is often the case that when one is speaking of genetic lines that there is overlay between genetic lineage, and theology and resultant practices. This is why, for example, Reformed Theologian Dr. Robert Godfrey could once speak about Dutch Calvinists being suspicious.

3.) Given what Luther says in his book, “The Bagels and Their Lies,” I’m pretty sure Luther, while perhaps not agreeing w/ Hitler about the Bagels being an inferior race would have had little problem with SOME of the actions that Hitler took regarding the Bagels. Luther also would have agreed with Hitler on the necessity of putting an immediate end to Kristallnacht, for example.

4.) And Bagels remain a threat to what is left of the Christian society in which we once lived and they understand that Biblical Christians are a threat to the world they have created.

Someone tell Rich Lusk that he does not understand either Luther or the times in which we are living.

Back When The White Man Understood That Being & Staying White Was Desirable

“The fundamental reason for the adoption of the White Australia policy is the preservation of a British-Australian nationality.

They knew that racial unity, though not necessarily racial homogeneity, was essential for national unity, for true national life. The union of a people depends on common loyalty to common ideals, and on a common belief as to the best course in general to pursue to attain these ideals.

‘A united race,’ said Mr. Alfred Deakin [Second Prime Minister of Australia] in 1901, speaking on the subject of a White Australia;

‘means not only that its members can intermarry and associate without degradation on either side, but implies one inspired by the same ideals, and an aspiration towards the same ideals, of a people possessing the same general cast of character, tone of thought, the same constitutional training and traditions-a people qualified to live under this constitution, the broadest and most liberal perhaps the world has yet seen reduced to writing; a people qualified to use without abusing it, and to develop themselves under it to the full height and extent of their capacity.’

 In the words of Sir Henry Parkes [Premier of New South Wales] it was;

‘a question of policy of the first magnitude to cement society together by the same principles of faith and jurisprudence, the same influence of language and religion, and the same national habits of life.'”

History of the White Australia Policy
Myra Willard · 1923

It’s About The “Nation,” Stupid … Amfest & American Christianity At A Cross-Roads

This past week at the Amfest, put together but TPUSA (Charlie Kirk’s organization) it was made clear that there are exists a serious and obvious split in the organization. This same split is being played out Institutionally across our cultural landscape. The scope and depth of this split is not one that is going to be papered over and it’s presence may result in the Republican party getting soundly trounced in the mid-term elections.

We see this split already being manifested in the “conservative, ” institutional “Reformed” “church”. Indeed, it has been present for several years already but it seems to be coming to a head just at the time when we see Ben Shapiro, Mark Levin, Steve Deace, and Doug Wilson frothing at the mouth against Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon who likewise have plenty of froth about their lips.

Some would say the debate is about the answer to the question; “What is an American?” We might refine this by saying that the debate deals with the question; “What is a nation?,” or even more precise, “Is reality a complete social construct?” That the debate seen at the TPUSA event has entered into the church has already played out on several stages but there is another Act in this play brewing as the debate coughs up charges being brought up against Rev. Sam Ketcham for being a “wacist.”

Just to be clear here the split that is entering into not only our politics and churches but also our workplaces and families is a split that has been a long time coming. It was guaranteed to eventually enter into our lives by the seeds that were planted with the 1965 Hart-Cellar immigration act. The broad split we are seeing now began as a hairline fracture and has grown and grown over the decades following the Hart-Cellar immigration act.

As this split gets fleshed out it becomes apparent that this split is primarily defined as a contest between those who believe in the post-modern worldview where men can define their own reality however they want it vs. those who believe that reality comes to us ready made. It is a split between the egalitarians and those who believe in social hierarchy … between those who believe that reality is patriarchal vs. those who believe that men and women can be interchangeable cogs … between those who believe that a nation is defined only by the propositions its citizens adhere to vs. those who believe that a nation not only is defined by a shared worldview but also, just as important, by a bond of blood and soil…. between paleo-conservatives of the Sam Francis type vs. the neoconservatives of the Ben Shapiro type … between the New World Order types vs. the “My country right or wrong but still my country” types… between “Kinism is acceptable for Jews vs. Kinism is acceptable for white people,” …  between those who believe a nation is about the Gross Domestic Product vs. those who believe that a nation is defined not by economics but by people-hood … between those who believe that the idea of borders is a quaint custom vs. those who believe that borders are sacred … between those who remember the history of the contest between Jews and Christians vs. those who say including this definer proves I a anti-Semitic … between those who support Trump and those who would more likely support a 1968 George Wallace … between those who worship in a circus/rock concert atmosphere vs. those who believe in the regulative principle for worship … between those who believe in a polytheistic social order where all the gods are invited into the public square vs. those who believe we should be a distinctly Christian nation … between those who believe that salvation coming to all races means that all races can and should marry vs those who believe that salvation coming to all people doesn’t mean God intends for the world to become a coffee colored brown … between those who have a vision of a Christianized New World Babel Order vs. those who insist that any version, including a putatively Christian one, is an abomination before God.

This is a battle that has been fought before … and lost before. In the 1930s there arose a movement called “The America First” movement led by people like Charles Lindbergh, Gen. Robert E. Wood, Newspaper magnate Robert R. McCormick, “Father” Charles Coughlin, Garet Garrett, John T. Flynn and many others. Like the current pro-America wing of the MAGA movement the America First Movement of the 1930s was routinely accused of Fascism and was made up of anti-communists, former military men, and prominent journalists. Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon are to the modern incarnation of the America First movement now what Garret Garrett and John T. Flynn was to the America First committee was in 1939.

The 1930s version of the American First committee lost out with the rise of WW II. Nobody could sell isolationism in the head winds of the successful propaganda that “America experienced a dirty under-handed Jap sneak attack,” and so the America First Committee died as WW II gained life. I am confident in saying if this version of America First does not win out there will be no future replay because defeat in this contest means the end of America as a White Anglo Saxon Christian nation.

Something else that has to be understood here is that the war described above is not the only war that the America Firsters are fighting. The war described above is a internecine war. Illustratively speaking this war is the war between the Colonial Patriots vs. the Colonial Tories. Once winning that war with the Colonial Tories the Colonial Patriots still had to fight the Red Coats and win. We are fighting a two front war. The first front is against the “neoconservatives.” Our reward for winning against the Socialist neocons is the opportunity to fight against the Communist Democrat One worlders.

So, it is a two front war. A two front war where the only difference between the neocons and the Democrats is the difference that existed between the Montagnards and the Jacobins during the French Revolution. One side is kind of hard left while the other side is the “Two Daddys can adopt babies” hard left.

Frankly, the odds are against us defeating the deep pockets of the Ben Shapiros, Mark Levins, and Doug Wilsons of the contest. These people have access to almost inexhaustible wealth given their Israeli connections. Plus, the leadership of the Old Right is suspect. The things that fall out of the mouths of the likes of Tucker Carlson, J. D. Vance, and Steve Bannon at times makes one wonder if they are really controlled opposition themselves.

In my world, the really sad thing about all this is to see how the “conservative” churches are falling on this contest. Almost without exception the “conservative Churches” are either on the side of the neocons or they refuse to support the conservative cause, thus creating a vacuum for the Communist cause to enter. On the issues surrounding this civil war, the Church, generally speaking, is a rotten place to get one’s bearings. The modern church has, exceptions notwithstanding, cast their lot in favor of the “let’s put all the races into a blender just as long as individuals say they’re ‘Christian.'” Race, for the Doug Wilson expression of the Reformed and Evangelical church, is merely a social construct that has no real meaning just as long as “everyone loves them some Jesus.”

So which way America? You are at a fork in the road and you must decide whether or not, not only your nation but also your Christianity will be in line with Old Narnia or whether your nation will be in line with the Coke commercial of the 1970s singing …

“I’d like to buy the world a home
And furnish it with love
Grow apple trees and honey bees
And snow white turtle doves.

Chorus:

I’d like to teach the world to sing
In perfect harmony
I’d like to buy the world a Coke
And keep it company
That’s the real thing.”

 

 

Doug Wilson @ TPUSA Conference Justifying Israel’s Sinking Of The USS Liberty

“All I’m doing is asking questions, you know, like Candace does recklessly connecting dots. The USS Liberty was an Intelligence gathering ship. LBJ wa President. Israel was in the middle of a hot 1967 war. How confident are you personally that there was no American Deep State in 1967? How confident are you that we weren’t playing both sides and feeding intel to Egypt? How confident are you that America can be only double crossed and can never be the double crosser?

You confidence in the essential goodness of the CIA is endearing. I want to close by saying – and this is crucial – that debates about foreign policy and America’s relationship to Israel and what happened to the USS Liberty are totally inbounds and inbounds at a conference like this.”

Doug Wilson

TPUSA Conference

So, if Doug want’s to ask questions, I figure I can ask questions also.

Recently, some of Doug’s Lieutenants were given an all expense paid trip to Israel. Should we not consider it possible that this “free” trip was part of the pay off to Doug for spreading Israeli disinformation?

Doug keeps building there in Idaho. Is all that money necessary to build coming from Israelis slush funds?

I mean … I’m not coming to any conclusions, nor am I making accusations … all I’m doing is asking questions here.

Secondly, Doug is telling us here that Israel wasn’t really at fault for trying to sink the USS Liberty because someone somewhere in the Deep State was committing treason against President LBJ’s orders to aid and assist Israel? What evidence does Doug have for this?

I mean, when those today have seen malfeasance in the FED Gov’t they bring forth evidence of some kind. Where is Doug’s evidence that the Deep State disobeyed LBJ? Where are the chaps testifying with hoods over their face to protect their identity? Where is the Eric Snowden of the USS Liberty Deep State? Or is Doug just spinning all of this out of his more than ample arse?

If Doug wants to spin all this … it’s all good. However, at the very least let him bring forth at least a little bit of evidence to hang his conspiracy theory on. I mean, even Candace did that when insisting that the First Lady of France is really a Dude. I mean even those that believe the Michelle Obama is really Michael Obama have some evidence (I’ve seen it). Where is Doug’s flimsy but yet “anything’s possible” evidence?

Understand that Doug’s whole argument here is pointing us towards believing that the attempted sinking of the USS Liberty by the Israelis’ was completely justified. Doug is suggesting that the murder of US Sailors may indeed have been a heroic act by our US President.

Doug Wilson @ TPUS Conference … A Few Objections

Jew hate is serious sin. What do I mean by (Jews being) a high performance people? Jews are a talented and high performance people. And Jewish mothers are always pleased to introduce you to, “my son the doctor.” But they are also, like the rest of us, sons of Adam making them ‘dirty rotten sinners.’ So, if they are over represented among the Bolsheviks and media moguls, just remember that they are also over represented among Nobel prize winners and patent holders. Professing Christians are who are backsliding into Jew hate (and it is backsliding) are angry because the Jews don’t believe in Jesus. Jews are the enemy it is thought but Jesus commanded his followers to love our enemies which you are manifestly not doing.

Last thing – and you may consider this a little bonus round item; I mention it only because I think it was brought up at this conference earlier. This bonus topic is the USS Liberty attacked by Israeli planes in 1967 killing 34 Americans. I am making no assertions here. All I am doing is noticing. All I’m doing is asking questions, you know, like Candace does recklessly connecting dots. The Liberty was an Intelligence gathering ship. LBJ wa President. Israel was in the middle of a hot 1967 war. How confident are you personally that there was no American Deep State in 1967? How confident are you that we weren’t playing both sides and feeding intel to Egypt? How confident are you that America can be only double crossed and can never be the double crosser?

You confidence in the essential goodness of the CIA is endearing. I want to close by saying – and this is crucial – that debates about foreign policy and America’s relationship to Israel and what happened to the USS Liberty are totally inbounds and inbounds at a conference like this.”

Doug Wilson

TPUSA Conference

Let’s take this one bite at a time;

I.) Jews are a high performance people etc.

 

Doug Wilson seems to have in his Bagel and Lox brain that all because Bagels are winners of Nobel Prizes and patents that somehow makes up for their high performance in being Mass murderers. The fact that Bagels run the Porn industry is balanced out, in Dougie’s mind, by the fact that Bagels get a large number of patents. Dougie reasons that because Bagels are Doctors and Lawyers and stuff that balances out the fact that the Bagels have corrupted our Western Christian Civilization from their ownership of the Media.

Now, we are just asking questions in what follows and not making any accusations in the least but one has to wonder,

“Has Doug Wilson been paid off to by the Bagels in order to herald the wonders of belonging to the Bagels? Is Doug a hired shill in order to do for this generation what Scofield, Chafer, and Lindsey did for the previous three generations? What is the going rate in today’s inflation, Doug, for 30 pieces of silver? ”

“Has Doug Wilson’s Bagel grandchildren worked in him a Bagel Kinism?”

Honestly, as far as I am concerned Doug Wilson is just the latest incarnation of John Hagee. Doug Wilson is John Hagee. Think about it. They both carry the extra weight. They both expect people to worship the ground the walk on. They both are willing to prioritize the Bagels over their own nation.

Also, here, one wonders if our genius Doug realizes that a Nobel prize by itself is not an indicative of positive morality. If history had turned out differently I have no doubt that Dr. Mengele would have won his share of Nobel prizes. Doug has category errors everywhere.

Also, I think we’d all agree that any national group of people who seized control of financial systems would also tend to have a high rate of success in all reputable industry. He doesn’t seem to understand the argument. All kinds of Bagels have won Academy awards. No one would seriously argue that holding up an Academy award proves the winner is not diddling some minor. In the same way, holding up the Nobel peace prize does not prove that the winner isn’t into child pornography.

II.) “Professing Christians are who are backsliding into Jew hate (and it is backsliding) are angry because the Jews don’t believe in Jesus.”

Doug Wilson

TPUSA

1.) First, Doug NEVER defines Jew hate in this presentation. Remember, the current definition of Jew hate in this cultural climate is “anybody who disagrees with a Jew.”

2.) Am I Angry because the Jews don’t believe in Jesus? Well, of course I pray for them to believe in Jesus. I hope they will believe in Jesus. I pity them if they don’t believe in Jesus. However, to be honest, the Jews I hate right now, I hate, for two reasons;

a.) Because they have said that Jesus is eternally boiling in excrement and continue to seek to roll Jesus the Christ off His throne.

b.) Because they are trying to kill me and my people. If they would cease seeking to roll Christ off His throne and would cease trying to kill me and my kin, I’m absolutely confident that any anger I have against the Bagels would diminish quite a bit.

 

 

III.) “Jews are the enemy it is thought but Jesus commanded his followers to love our enemies which you are manifestly not doing. So why should Jews listen to Jesus if you don’t.”

Doug Wilson

TPUSA presentation

1.) Why would Doug think that it is a lack of love to tell the Jews we have good evidence that they are behind any number of world crimes. This is like saying that it is not loving to the defendant to inform him of the crimes he is being charged with. It is not a lack of love to someone to face them with the truth about their malfeasance and the fact that they don’t like being presented with the charges against them also does not prove that the person bringing the charges are guilty of a lack of love or are guilty of bringing false charges. I wouldn’t expect a guilty person to accust the prosecuting attorney of being “unloving.”

2.) Loving your enemies does not mean ignoring their crimes. If it is found out that the babysitter I hire is abusing my children it is not a lack of love if I fire their arse and refuse to give them a good job referral for their next potential employer. It is not hatred to tell the truth about the Bagels. It is not hatred to say…. “Hey, Mr. & Mrs. Bagel, we would like to talk to you about 2000 years of Church history wherein we find you attacking the Church and Christianity over and over again.”

3.) In point of fact it would be a lack of love to the Bagels if we let them go on in their malfeasance without confronting them with their crimes. And the Bagels answering “Nuh Huh,” to those crimes does not prove that we are being hateful Dougie.

The Bible not only tells us to love our enemies but it assumes we will love our friends. Doug however, would have us love our enemies by hating our friends. It is a hatred to Christian civilization to not press charges against the Jews for their crimes against Christianity, and Jews don’t get a pass for their crimes by screaming…. “Oy, Oy, Oy, you Christians are so hateful to us.”

4.) Jews should listen even if we don’t because God commands all men everywhere to repent. Jews don’t get a pass on listening to God all because they say that other people weren’t listening either.

Someone tell Doug “Judas” Wilson that “Friendship with the world is enmity toward God.”