Harris is NWO Evil Incarnate … But I Still Can’t Vote For Donald John Trump

Most of my adult life, I have heard every four years that “this is the most important election of our lifetime,” and theoretically it could have been true with each election. Now they are saying it again but this time I might actually agree that this is the most important election in our lifetime.

As important as it is, and as much as I want to vote for Trump because of my deep fears of how a Harris election would mean a complete takeover of these united States by the NWO, my conscience will not allow it. Yes, I’ve heard and even rehearsed all the arguments for voting for Trump but my conscience will not have it. In the end the following things remain true about Trump and despite how much a foolish hope would protest to the contrary, I can’t let that foolish hope deny the cold hard facts. Here is what the facts are;

1.) Like all US politicians Trump has a love affair with Israel. He has supported the genocidal Israeli attacks against the Palestinians coming after October 07, 2023 — as well as the broadening of that war by Israel. (For a different take on saintly Israel, see Alison Weir’s “Against Our Better Judgment.”) This support includes the photo op that all serious US politicians have to endure and that is being seeing praying with the little beanie cap and shawl at the Wailing Wall.

2) Trump also recently recited prayers, while wearing a yarmulke and a shawl, over the grave of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, who some of the “Orthodox” Zionist Jews believed to be the messiah. Spend a little time investigating the Chabad Lubavitch movement and discover why, beyond the obvious that this is a huge problem.

3.) Trump has said in a recent speech, “we are going to remove the Jew-haters.” On the surface this might be understandable but as what constitutes a “Jew-hater” today is often defined as anybody who disagrees with the prevalent Jewish narrative on anything, this becomes Trump statement becomes a real concern.

4.) Trump has lobbied for the sodomite vote. Recently, his wife Melania held a second fund raising banquet with the “Log-Cabin” republicans. Trump also has kept sodomite Rick Grenfell as a close advisor over the years. Who can forget the iconic photo of Trump in a previous presidential campaign marching around the stage holding a LGBTQ flag?

5.) Trump in his past has been tight with Jeffrey Epstein and the Clintons. His association in the past with the left political class includes writing checks to support previous campaigns of Heels Up Harris.

6.) Trump refuses a national ban on abortion, instead basically saying, “the states should be allowed to decided for themselves if the torture and murder of the unborn is acceptable.” Trump has said he wants to require insurance companies to pay for IVF surgeries. IVF is a significant contributor to the abortion industry as many eggs that are fertilized are later murdered because there is no longer  a need for them.

7.) Trump is a sexual pervert. His famous statement about meeting beautiful women, “I just grab them by the pussy” remains. His three marriages and children with three different women reveals a man who cannot control his passions. A man that cannot be loyal to his wedding vows is not a man who we should automatically conclude will be loyal to his vows to his country. I saw an old interview with him from 2016 where the issue was raised about all his divorces. The interviewer was making the point that previously that would have been enough to guarantee he could never be elected President. Trump responded that he thought there were issues so important to the country that his divorces wouldn’t matter. Turns out he was right. It still matters to me.

8.)  Trump spent like a drunken soldier during his 1st term with no fiscal discipline. Trump inflated the money supply and embraces Keynesian economics — the economics of socialism. Trump had no concern to balance a budget that has expanded exponentially.

9.)  Trump killed numerous people with his “Operation Warp Speed.” These people include, in my orbit, one Uncle, one Cousin, and several friends. In the context of the Covid lie Trump failed to oppose the ridiculous lockdowns, and foolish facemasks mandates which destroyed countless small businesses. Trump gave the mass murderers Fauci, Birx, Collins and others the keys to the kingdom and this after being warned early on to not follow their counsel by a top flight epidemiologist like Stanford’s Jay Bhattacharya and that early in the crisis.

10.) Trump has said that he will ban transgender surgeries for children, but he added “without parental consent.” The codicil, “without parental consent” means that a single Mom could decide to physically abuse her child and the law would say that’s acceptable. Does the law allow parents to physically abuse their children in other ways?

11.) Trump, at one point during his presidency, said that the law should read that one first seizes the guns of alleged unstable people and then make them go through a legal process to get them back. This is the denial of due process. This is guilty until proven innocent instead of our tradition of “innocent until proven guilty.” Do you want the FEDS to have that kind of authority?

Further on the Second Amendment issue Trump abandoned his previous support for removing firearm silencers from Title II controls of the National Firearms Act of 1934. Add to that his support for red-flag laws resulting in gun seizures as well as his support for a ban on “bump stocks.”

12.)  A Sikh being allowed to pray at the Trump controlled 2024 Republican National Convention.

13.) Trump is on record as saying “We need more legal immigrants,” and that he is going to bring in a “lot more people.” This could be argued to be worse than illegal immigration since it would be impossible to remove legal immigrants. This would contribute to the already established white replacement.

14.)  Trump surrounded himself with neo-cons & idiots his 1st term. Trump says he has learned his lesson now on this score but his choice of J. D. Vance testifies otherwise.

15.) Trump’s headstrong support of Israel that found him moving the US embassy to Jerusalem. Will this kind of support find us giving Israel a green light to set the Middle-East on fire if he becomes President again?

I understand people’s fears. I understand that Heels Up Harris is one part Jezebel and one part Athaliah and one part Evita Peron and is the walking version of “The Devil wears high heels.” Electing Harris would be a even worse outcome than electing Trump. However, as a Christian I can’t … I won’t navigate into the sea swallowing Charybdis in order to avoid the man eating Scylla.

Perhaps, ironically enough, I support all the things that people think Trump symbolizes and as such, generally speaking, I support the people who support Trump. However, my conclusion is that Trump isn’t what he has been sold as being Trump isn’t what people take, hope, and want him to be. He, like all politicians, is a product created in order to lure the consumer into being convinced that he meets a felt need.

As such, because of all this, I am not voting for Trump and I am praying earnestly that Harris doesn’t win, because I think a Harris victory would be a even worse outcome than a Trump victory. I am caught between the devil and the deep blue sea and I’m not giving my consent to either.

I am not voting for DJT and I don’t think right thinking Christians should either. However, I will not break fellowship with Christians do vote for DJT because I understand their fears. I hope they will not break fellowship with me.

One final word here to contradict the “we must vote for the lesser of two evils” argument. Please understand it is that reasoning that has led us to the place we now are. This reasoning results in the Overton window being pushed further and further to the left with each generation because when the “lesser of two evils” does win what happens is that the gains made when the greater of two evils won are consolidated and established as the new conservative position. The results then are when the greater of the two evils wins again the push to the left continues only to be consolidated again when the “lesser to two evils next wins.” The theory about the necessity to vote for the “lesser of two evils” has normalized the gains of the greater of the two evils.

I know people are will intended but what I see with a Trump vote is a people who cannot master their fears and trust in God to deliver. There is also evidence I think of being pushed along by the crowd. There is safety in numbers and it is a good feeling to be part of a team effort. Naturally, enough, most folks don’t have a broad view of political history. Understanding the politics of the French Revolution would go a long way in understanding our politics and understanding what happened to our political landscape with the rise of the Republican party and the war of Northern Aggression would help a great deal.

In the end, as I have said countless times, we will not be delivered from our current dilemma by voting harder with every election cycle. The Federal Government is never willingly going to devolve power back to the States and the States are never going to willingly devolve power back to the counties. As such voting is not going to solve our problems.

The best I can pray for is that God will use Trump like He once used Cyrus, but if Cyrus was running for office I could never vote for the man.

The Lord God omnipotent reigns.

Covenantal Continuity Between OT Israel & NT Church

The Beloved of God

A. Israel Is Beloved of God
Exodus 15:13/Dueteronomy 33:3/Ezra 3:11
B. Disobedient Israel Is Not Beloved of God
Leviticus 26:28, 30/Jerimiah 12:8/Jerimiah 16:5/Hosea 9:15/Amos 9:7/Mathhew
3:7/Phillipians 3:2/1 Thessalonians 2:14-16/Titus 1:10
C. The Christians Are Beloved of God
Romans 9:25/Ephesians 5:1/Colossians 3:12/1 John 3:1

The Children of God

A. Israelites Are the Children of God
Exodus 4:22/Deuteronomy 14:1/Isaiah 1:2, 4/Isaish 63:8/ Jeremiah 31:9/Hosea 11:1
B. Disobedient Israelites Are Not the Children of God
Deuteronomy 32:5/John 8:39, 42, 44
C. The Christians Are the Children of God
John 1:12/John 11:52/Romans 8:14, 16/2 Corinthians 6:18/Galatians 3:26/Galatians
4:5, 6, 7/Philipians 2:15/1 John 3:1

The Field of God

A. Israel Is the Field of God
Jeremiah 12:10
B. The Christians Are the Field of God
1 Corinthians 3:9

The Flock of God and of the Messiah

A. Israel Is the Flock of God and of the Messiah
Psalms 78:52/Psalms 80:1/Isaiah 40:11/Jeremiah 23:1, 2, 3/Jeremiah 31:10/ Ezekiel
34:12, 15, 16/ Micah 5:4/ Zechariah 10:3
B. The Christians Are the Flock of God and of the Messiah
John 10:14, 16/Hebrews 13:20/1 Peter 2:25/ 1 Peter 5:2, 3

The House of God

A. Israel Is the House of God
Numbers 12:7
B. The Christians Are the House of God
1 Timothy 3:15/Hebrews 3:2, 5, 6/Hebrews 10:21/1 Peter 4:17

The Kingdom of God

A. Israel Is the Kingdom of God
Exodus 19:6/1 Chronicles 17:14/ 1 Chronicles 28:5
B. Disobedient Israel Is Not the Kingdom of God
Matthew 8:11, 12/Matthew 21:43
C. The Christians Are the Kingdom of God
Romans 14:17/1 Corinthians 4:20/Colossians 4:11/Revelation 1:6

The People of God

A. Israelites Are the People of God
Exodus 6:7/Deuteronomy 27:9/2 Samuel 7:23/Jeremiah 11:4
B. Disobedient Israelites Are Not the People of God
Hosea 1:9/Jeremiah 5:10
C. The Christians Are the People of God
Romans 9:25/2 Corinthians 6:16/Ephesians 4:12/ Ephesians 5:3/2 Thessalonians 1:10/
Titus 2:14

The Priests of God

A. The Israelites Are the Priests of God
Exodus 19:6
B. Disobedient Israelites Are Not the Priests of God
1 Samuel 2:28, 30/Lamantations 4:13,16/Ezekiel 44:10, 13/Hosea 4:6/Malachi 2:2, 4,
8, 9
C. The Christians Are the Priests of God
1 Peter 2:5, 9/Revelation 1:6/Revelation 5:10

The Vineyard of God

A. Israel Is the Vineyard of God
Isaiah 5:3, 4, 5, 7/ Jeremiah 12:10
B. The Christians Are the Vineyard of God
Luke 20:16

The Wife (or Bride) of God

A. Israel Is the Wife (or Bride) of God
Isaiah 54:5, 6/Jeremiah 12:10
B. Disobedient Israel is Not the Wife (or Bride) of God
Jeremiah 3:8/Hosea 2:2
C. The Christians Are the Wife (or Bride) God
2 Corinthians 11:2/Ephesians 5:31, 2

The Children of Abraham

A. The Israelites Are the Children of Abraham
2 Chronicles 20:7/Psalms 105:6/Isaiah 41:8
B. Disobedient Israelites Are Not the Children of Abraham
John 8:39/Romans 9:6, 7/Galations 4:25, 30
C. The Christians Are the Children of Abraham
Romans 4:11, 16/Galatians 3:7, 29/Galatians 4:23, 28, 31

The Chosen People

A. The Israelites Are the Chosen People
Deuteronomy 7:7/Deuteronomy 10:15/ Deuteronomy 14:2/Isaiah 43:20, 21
B. Disobedient Israelites Are Not the Chosen People
Deuteronomy 31:17/ 2 Kings 17:20/ 2 Chronicles 25:7/Psalms 78:59/Jeremiah
6:30/Jeremiah 7:29/ Jeremiah 14:10
C. The Christians Are the Chosen People
Colossians 3:12/1 Peter 2:9

The Circumcised

A. The Israelites Are the Circumcised
Genesis 17:10, 13/ Judges 15:18
B. Disobedient Israelites Are Not the Circumcised
Jeremiah 9:25/Romans 2:25, 28/Philippians 3:2
C. The Christians Are the Circumcised
Romans 2:29/Philippians 3:3/Colossians 2:11

Israel

A. Israel Is Israel
B. Disobedient Israelites Are Not Israelites
Numbers 15:30, 31/Deuteromy 18:19/Acts 3:23/Romans 9:6
C. The Christians Are Israel
John 11:50, 51, 52/1 Corinthians 10:1/Galatians 6:15, 16/Ephesians 2:12, 19

Jerusalem

A. Jerusalem Is the City and Mother of Israel
Psalms 149:2/Isaiah 12:6/Isaiah 49:18, 20, 22/Isaiah 51:18/Lamentations 4:2
B. Jerusalem Is The City and Mother of Christian
Galatians 4:26/Hebrews 12:22

The Jews

A. Israelites Are Jews
Ezra 5:1/Jeremiah 34:8, 9/ Zechariah 8:22, 23
B. Disobedient Israelites Are Not Jews
Romans 2:28/Revalation 2:9/Revalation 3:9
C. Christians Are Jews
Romans 2:29

The New Covenant

A. The New Covenant Is With Israel
Jeremiah 31:31, 33
B. The New Covenant Is with the Christians
Luke 22:20/1 Corinthians 11:25/2 Corinthians 3:6/Hebrews 8:6, 8, 10

An Olive Tree

A. Israel Is An Olive Tree
Jeremiah 11:16/ Hosea 14:6
B. The Christians Are An Olive Tree
Romans 11:24

Section 2

Old Testament Verses Referring to Israel Which Are Quoted
in the New Testament As Referring to the Christians

Quote # 1: Leviticus 26:11, 12/Ezra 37:27/2 Corinthians 6:16
Quote # 2: Deuteronomy 30:12-14/Romans 10:6-8
Quote # 3: Deuteronomy 31:6/Hebrews 13:5
Quote # 4: Deuteronomy 32:36/Psalms 135:14/Hebrews 10:30
Quote # 5: Psalms 22:22/Hebrews 2:12
Quote # 6: Psalms 44:22/Romans 8:36
Quote # 7: Psalms 95:7-11/Hebrews 3:7-11
Quote # 8: Psalms 130:8/ Titus 2:14
Quote # 9: Isaiah 28:16/Romans 10:11/Ephesisans 2:20/ 1 Peter 2:6
Quote # 10: Isaiah 49:8/2 Corinthians 6:2
Quote # 11: Isaiah 52:7/Romans 10:15
Quote # 12: Isaiah 54:1/Galatians 4:27
Quote # 13: Jeremiah 31:31-34/Hebrews 8:8-12
Quote # 14: Hosea 1:10 & 2:23/Romans 9:25-26/1 Peter 2:10
Quote # 15: Hosea 13:14/1 Corinthians 15:55
Quote # 16: Joel 2:32/Romans 10:13

Section 3

Old Testament Ethical Commands to Israel Which Are Quoted
In the New Testament As Applying to the Church

Quote # 1: Exodus 16:18/2 Corinthians 8:15
Quote # 2: Leviticus 11:45 & 19:2/1 Peter 1:16
Quote # 3: Deuteronomy 5:16/Ephesians 6:2-3
Quote # 4: Deuteronomy 17:7, 19:19, 22:24 & 24:7/1 Corinthians 5:13
Quote # 5: Deuteronomy 19:15/2 Corinthians 13:1/1 Timothy 5:19
Quote # 6: Isaiah 35:3/Hebrews 12:12
Quote # 7: Isaiah 48:20 & 52:11/2 Corinthians 6:17

With Apologies to Merle Haggard

I wish families were still wholesome and it was back when churches weren’t ghey
Back before Byrd and before the Feminist putsch won the day
Before Larry Norman and “Outlaw” when a man didn’t lisp and talked plain
Is the best of the free life behind us now and are the sane times
really forever insane?

Are we sinners supressin’ so as to be cast into hell?
With no repentance in sight — no relief from this sulfur born spell?
I wish a boy and a girl would still last a lifetime like they should
Is the best of the sane life behind us now or are the sane times really over for good?

I wish Colleges were still Christian and a church was a good place to be.
It was back before Keller decided to train to be “clergy”
Before AI sermons, when a pastor could still preach, and still would
Is the best of the sane life behind us now or are the sane times really over for good?

I wish Moscow was still Orthodox and Credenda was a good piece of mail
It was back before Doug Wilson hit the Federal Vision trail
Before R2K, and Van Drunen when the Church could own their King and still would
Is the best of the sane life behind us now or are the sane times really over for good?

Stop chasing the zeitgeist like a dog in heavy heat
Standup with the Father’s and be done with our Reformed “elite”
Let’s make a Church and a Family that’ll still last a life like they should…
The best of the sane life is still yet to come and the sane times ain’t really over for good.

Returning To Natural Law … Again

For the purposes of illustration, the Thomistic Natural Law disciple sees himself as a farmer harvesting facts. He harvests his facts much like a farmer might harvest his corn. On his way to town with his wagons full of his corn (facts) another Natural Law farmer stops him and says… “Nice crop of sorghum you have there.” The first Natural Law farmer, now befuddled by this comment, insists, “my fact harvest is one of corn and not sorghum.” When he finally gets to town to sell his harvest the Natural Law middle man purchaser says to our Natural Law corn harvester, “Nice harvest of perch you have there. What lake did you pull all them out of?”

You see the Thomistic Natural Law disciple sees facts as a farmer sees a crop. The problem here is that there is no fact apart from a interpretation of fact, and as such corn as a fact to one Natural Law advocate may well indeed be seen. understood, and counted as counter-factual to another Natural Law advocate. One Natural Law advocate’s corn is another Natural Law advocate’s fish.

You see facts, unlike crops, while indisputably objectively real, are refashioned according to the subjective mind to fallen men harvesting the facts. The classic analogy of this truth is in found in the fossil. The fossil is an indisputable objective fact but if that fossil is presented to a evolutionary Darwinian scientist he will look at the fossil and might  say something like, “We see here proof that evolution is true as this fossil so wonderfully demonstrates.” Standing next to our evolutionary Darwinian scientist we have a Biblical Christian scientist who next looks at the fossil fact and says, “Ah, here we see the proof that the world was created in six days — all good.” A third scientist present, being a nihilist, looks at the fossil and say’s something like, “This is nothing but a rock and it means nothing.”

The point here is that the Thomistic Natural Law advocate cannot collect facts like a farmer harvests his crop. Facts, while objectively true, are reinterpreted by the unbeliever so that they might not testify to the reality of the God upon whom all facts depend upon for meaning. As God gives meaning to facts, the one who hates God and His Christ has an agenda to not let facts say what they inescapably say. The problem is not with the facts — they remain objectively objective. The problem is with fallen man who is determined to not read the facts for what they are since a reading of the facts for what they are will inevitable lead them to the one who gives all facts their meaning, and that they cannot have.

Now, this tendency and determination to reinterpret God’s interpretation of facts becomes more and more radical and extreme the further a individual and/or culture rebels against God. In such cases Natural Law will be appealed to as teaching, for example, that there are a multitude number of genders and not merely two. When a rabid antithesis develops between God and man or between God and a society any Natural Law appealed too will be invoked in order to overthrow the kinds of conclusions coming from the Natural Law to which Aquinas appealed as existing independently of presupposing the reality of the God of the Bible.

Thomistic Natural Law once worked in the West as a epistemological foundation because the denizens in the West largely were operating already with Christian presupposition and having Christians presuppositions a consensus could be arrived at in terms of what Natural Law taught. However, this consensus of what Natural Law taught — absent of a Biblical presuppositional foundation — ended up having the lifespan of cut flowers in a vase. The consensus remained beautiful for a season but however the consensus, like cut flowers, eventually died because the cut flowers were not rooted in the soil of Biblical presuppositionalism.

When handled by someone who is not submitted to the God of the Bible and His Christ, facts are not like crops and men are not like farmers harvesting a crop of unquestioned and indisputable facts. Honestly, nothing should be more obvious in the climate we are living in currently.

Still, at the same time that postmodernism is going wild we now have a strong movement to return to the modernism that was built upon the foundation of Natural Law. A modernism that eventually was found empty and brought us to postmodernism. This new impulse of modernism with its Natural Law advocacy has found strange bedmates with the coupling of the R2K fanboys together with the Classical 2K followers of Stephen Wolfe. These two schools of thoughts fight like two cats knotted at the tail and cast over a clothesline when it comes to their varied conclusions on just exactly what Natural Law teaches and yet together they man the ramparts against any onslaught by Theonomists who, contrary to Thomistic Natural Law theories, appeal to the law and the testimony.  Both Van Drunen’s R2K and Stephen Wolfe’s Classical 2K believe that fallen man can use right reason and natural law, independent of presupposing the God of the Bible, to come to true truth.

This agreement between Wolfe and Van Drunen, both of whom insist they are Reformed, strikes the garden variety Theonomist as a denial of the noetic effects of the fall playing havoc with the whole idea of the stout Reformed doctrine of “total depravity.”

Don’t get me wrong. I am glad for many of Wolfe’s conclusions via his usage of Thomistic Natural Law. I have even defended Wolfe on my Iron Rhetoric podcasts from many of the “Reformed” who oppose Christian Nationalism. My point here is, in part, that the Natural Law that was the epistemological foundation of the Enlightenment project, in the end, is not going to win the day. Thomistic Natural Law is not going to rescue the West because at its heart it is a humanistic doctrine that finds man being the interpretive center of his own world. 

Linguistic Deception

Until the days of Magnus Hirschfield men who copulated with one another were tagged with the biblical word “sodomite.” Eventually, the word “sodomite” was changed out for the preferred word “homosexual,” with the intent to sanitize somewhat the bestial nature of the predilection. Eventually though, even that word was found to be too base and disgusting and so the word “gay,” was lighted upon in order to neutralize the detestable behavior so as to be found acceptable.

However, even that was not sufficient for the social engineers in our midst. Even co-opting a word that once meant “merry” and “happy” didn’t go far enough in mainstreaming a behavior that once found God destroying cities because of the prevalence of said behavior. No, another bridge had to be crossed in order that a mentally unbalanced group could be seen to be “normal” and that bridge to normativity was used language as a weapon to marginalize and diminish those who insisted that sodomy as hiding under any word was insane, sinful, abnormality.  And so the word “Homophobic” was birthed.

The advantage of coining the word “homophobic” to describe those who point out the twistedness of sodomite behavior was a genius linguistic move. In the ability now to label and complain about “homophobes” the table was now successfully turned and it was those who thought normally who were now the ones who were seen as social deviants and derelicts. Now the problem in society was not the sodomites, homosexuals, and gays. No, the problem in society are the homophobic who must be either re-educated or become social outcasts themselves. It is the homophobic who are the haters and who constitute a social disease that must be eliminated.

Then there is the reality that the word “homophobic” doesn’t even describe the reality of the situation. People who are opposed to faggotry are not fearful of sodomites. If they were fearful of sodomites they would keep their mouths shut and not say anything. Rather people who are opposed to the ghey lifestyle understand that it is the destroyer of civilization when it is allowed to be given sanction and celebrated. Really, if the truth was known those who oppose sodomy should be known as “homo-philes” since opposition to sodomy is the most loving disposition one can take in relation to the practice of sodomy. It is nothing but pure hatred for sodomites and those judicially innocent who will be lured into their lifestyle to accept sodomites as being normative. Just as one does not love a disobedient and errant child by not disciplining them so a society or culture does not love the sodomite by communicating that their aberrant behavior is not aberrant. It is love for the sodomite that causes the Biblical Christian to raise their voice against the perversion that is sodomy.

This linguistic deception that we are speaking of here, of course, does not end with the movement from sodomite, to homosexual, to ghey, to homophobe. No, this social engineering tool has been used repeatedly to move the Overton window leftward on what is counted and not counted as socially acceptable.

A recent linguistic weapon that has been unleashed against Western Civilization in the hopes of destroying it is the term “White supremacy.” This sobriquet is hurled at white folks for preferring their own people, culture, customs and history. It is thrown like a javelin in the face of people who want to maintain the ways of their Christian fathers. Now, the ironic thing here is that those who are doing the hurling are those who we might rightly label as “Multi-Cultural supremacists.” Their complaint of “white supremacy” is born of their hatred of white people due to the mixed multitude pursuit of multi-cultural supremacy.

Remember, there is no such thing as neutrality. As such the end of white supremacy (which is simply the age old habit of all peoples to prefer that which is familiar and known) is the rise of multi-culture mixed multitude supremacy. The complaint against “white supremacy,” is in fact a linguistic tool to untether white people from the normal and godly instinct to want to protect Christian civilization as it has been built by Christian white people over the centuries.

Think about it this way. Nobody in China or Japan complains about Yellow Supremacy. Nobody in Nigeria complains about Black Supremacy. However, in countries settled by the White man there is a hue and cry to end White supremacy and, as hinted at above, this is only because there is a desire to turn the Christian white man into a slave who becomes a hewer of wood and a drawer of water.

Ultimately, as has been said before many times on Iron Ink, this attack on the White man and “white supremacy” is a proxy war against Christianity. In God’s sovereign providence and completely by grace alone it is the white man who has been perfumed with Christ and having the smell of Christ about us we have built great civilizations that were anchored in the tenets of Biblical Christianity. Naturally enough, Christ hating civilizations and men hating Christ and Christianity are now insisting on the need to end “White supremacy, but what they are really after is rolling Jesus Christ off of his throne so that ugly cultures can be built in honor to the gods of the mixed-multitudes. These are gods who delight in seeing wombs scraped of life, gods who delight in surgeons cutting off breasts and penises, gods who delight in statutory raised to honor those who excelled in casting off the “chains” of Biblical Christianity.

Of course the potency of this movement to overthrow “white supremacy” comes not primarily from the mixed multitude, though there are plenty of haters here. No, the primary potency of this movement comes from white people who have been turned into Orcs, Goblins, and Necromancers by consuming (usually quite unknowingly) the premises, assumptions, and presuppositions of the Marxists. These useful idiots and Shabbos Goy have been employed to pour dross into Biblical Christianity so that our churches spew the ugliest and most vile lies from pulpits thus turning Christianity into a repellent and poisonous sludge stew. These useful idiots and Shabbos Goy have been employed to normalize the abnormal so that nearly of all our Institutions are tripping over themselves to see who can first hoist the rainbow flag while putting kitty litter in all our public places so that the Furries among us can feel welcome. These Shabbos Goy and useful idiots have spent generations crafting legislation that weakens the central Christian Institution of family so that normal family life is now seen as a key expression of white supremacy that needs to be eliminated.

But it all begins with linguistic deception. The subtle changing of our language to push us, societally, in a certain aberrant direction. Statist education becomes known as “public-schooling.” Equality (which itself is poison) morphs into the pursuit of equity. The glorious and dignified work of keeping hearth and home is dismissed as “oh, you’re just a housewife,” as if such a role is worse than being imprisoned. Formerly, when one was convicted of a crime they went to prison or jail. Now they go to a “correctional facility.” The Department of War (a properly labeled office if there ever was one) was changed out to the more benign “Department of Defense.” “Father,” and “Mother” on official documents has now become “Parent 1” and “Parent 2.” I am sure that soon enough the word “parent” will be eliminated for something thought to be less offensive. And let’s not even begin to mention the laundry list of acceptable labels for the sexual deviants. My favorite among these is how “pedophile” is now known as a “minority attracted person.”

When the language changes it is a precursor to a cultural change that is coming in its wake. Keep your eyes peeled for these subtle and sometimes not so subtle changes because they are going to only accelerate in their arrival upon the cultural scene.