Man is a hopelessly religious creature who, even when in denial of owning a religion or even when damning all religions, betrays an violent allegiance to religion. This is no different with the Wuhan Virus mythic narrative. The ChiCom virus has become a religion that is being wildly embraced by the West in order to provide meaning, ritual, and protection from the animistic cosmic forces that seek to cast the viral evil eye on people who don’t fall in line with the Covid narrative religion.

In Animistic cultures people seek to satisfy the gods by offering up the proper attitude of respect and deference to the gods. Animists live in constant mortal fear of what the assorted gods of forests, streams, and animals can do to them and in order to ward off evil it is characteristic for the true believer to carry with them a totem to ward off the evil that would otherwise be done to them without the totem.

Usually totems are tribe or clan unique. However, as the great effort is to congeal the whole globe into one giant tribe the result is that all men across the globe have been given a new totem to ward off evil. That new totem, embraced by all men as a symbol that is believed to ward of evil is the mask. And just as the non-animistic world understood that the totem had no inherent power so the non-animist today realizes that the mask is total pagan gibberish even while understanding at the same time that the totem serves as a psychological crutch that is seen as life saving by the animist trusting in it. So, the mask has become nothing but a animistic totem that has no objective power in it but nonetheless is seen as having great power because it is connected to the great god of science who has promised that if the mask is always kept on evil can be kept at bay. We notice here the irony that Science has become melded with animism. Who could have guessed?

Also consider that the temporal purpose of all religions is control. In the Christian religion control is needed because man is by nature a sinner. As such the Christian religion turns to God’s Word to teach man how to control himself in a God-honoring manner. Indeed, control is so much a part of the Christian religion that all Christians as those who have the Spirit of God as marked by “self-control.” This new form of religio-Scientifc Animism likewise exists to the end of controlling men. The difference between Christianity and all other religions is that Christianity teaches a control that is internal before external while all other religions including our current “Maskianity” exerts external control by the machinations of some agency outside of man, most normally the State. The mask is not only the new totem of NWO man it is also the sign of control as exercised by the witch-doctors of the New World Order. Just as Muslim women are controlled by Muslim men via the wearing of the burqua so the Globalist elite will control the New World Order man by the mask.

With the requirement of the mask the God-State is demonstrating its sovereignty and absolute control over the masses. This control will eventually morph into other areas. Eventually the NWO man will be told by the Globalist elites they can remove their totems as long as they take the NWO witch-doctor’s magic potion vaccine. This control will extend to NWO man being convinced that he must accept a guaranteed income as coming from the state since it is so Wuhan dangerous in the outside world. The mask is the first step in turning Western man into absolute grass feeding sheep. |

Of course when the personal God of the Bible is surrendered for impersonal gods the result is always the elimination of the mannishness of man. Man himself becomes an impersonal being who has no meaning. This has been typical wherever we find the rise of Revolution. In France it was the ubiquitous “citoyen.” Among the Bolsheviks it was “comrade.” Among the Maoists it was the ominpresent “Mao suit.” All of these were Revolutionary techniques to level man into a impersonal polyglot thus more easily controlled. The same is happening with the mask. In a crowd of mask-wearers one person is much the same as every other person. Now add to this the fact that the RNA alteration intended for us in the vaccines which has the hoped for result of homogenizing the human herd and the NWO inches ever more forward in achieving the Revolutionary dream of absolute leveling.

Of course a impersonal humankind means the loss of familial love, the loss of the ties that bind among kith and kin, and the loss of our humanity. However, that is the effect of all religions besides the Christian religions. All religions, besides Christianity ends up losing the many for the sake of the one undifferentiated mass with the consequence that genuine love is lost and replaced with the power that bespeaks control.

If we desire to continue to tease out the religion that is the ChiCom virus we find that the chief sin in this religion is fellowship. Note the absolute frenzy that is being pursued by the elite to keep people apart. The mask is obvious. There is also social distancing. There are the recent orders coming from some states to limit family gatherings during the Christian holidays of Thanksgiving and Christmas. There is the insistence on washing hands – a habit often typical of people who are social misfits (Think Howard Hughes). There is the strict limitations in many states of gathering for worship. None of this bunkum has anything to do with the “disease” but it sure is handy in alienating people one from another. Clearly the god-state is communicating that human contact is sin.

The sad thing is that so many churches and clergy have exchanged the truth of serving God for the lie of serving the God state and so have themselves become agents of control for this new Covid religion. “Christian” Clergy have genuinely become the enemy of Christianity and Biblical Christians and they are enemies of God by invoking God’s word for their aberrant and bastardized faith. They are rabbits bowing to the God-states demand that they cancel worship of the thrice Holy God. They are withholding the bread and wine – body and blood – of Christ from their flock. They are silencing the voices of God’s saints raising praise to Him in song. They are keeping their thirsty saints away from the proclamation of God’s Word. They may be genuinely deceived but that does not make them any less wolves in sheep’s clothing. I would not want to be them when the day of the great assize arrives.

The Wuhan Virus is the new religion of the New World Order man and this religion is the wedge that will open the door for every black as Luciferian night reality that these sons of Belial have in store for us.

But keep in mind saints of God and so be of good cheer… throughout the centuries many a hammer of evil has worn itself out on the anvil of Biblical Christianity. God is not mocked and He will not allow His Kingdom to be conquered.

“The first step on the road to Reformation is the recovery of the normal relations of Church and State. As soon as one realizes this, there awakens in him the zeal that otherwise slumbers.”

Dr. P. J. Hoedemaker (1839-1910)
Dutch Theologian
Opponent to Abraham Kuyper in Kuyper’s gutting BCF Article 36

The FIRST step on the road to Reformation!

Catch what Hoedemaker is saying. Hoedemaker is saying there will be no Reformation that does not start with getting the relation between Church and State right. Why is this the case? Because a State not pinioned on Christian principles with Magistrates who rule consistent with God’s law is a State that is seeking to undermine every Christian principle in the social-order as a whole. One cannot have a Christian social-order while at the same time having a State that is operating upon the basis of some other religion. (And if the State is not operating upon the foundation of a Christian world and life view then it is operating upon the foundation of a anti-Christ world and life view.)

Another aspect of this to consider is that when the “normal relations of Church and State” are askew what this by necessity means is that the State is going to have a disproportionate negative influence on the behalf of some false god. This is especially true in a social-order like ours where the civil state is in everything from our corn-flakes to our tampons to our schools to our colonoscopy. When the “normal relations of Church and State” are not proper in a social-order as top down as ours the result will be that the Church will eventually go as pagan as the State. This is because it remains true that crown and miter always walk together. My point here is heard in the mouth of A. A. Hodge when he wrote,

If the national life in general is organized upon non-Christian principles, the churches which are embraced within the universal assimilating power of that nation will not long be able to preserve their integrity.”

~ A. A. Hodge / 1823 – 1886

As the State here now is the agency which is most responsible for the organization of national life in general in is inevitable that if the “normal relations of Church and State” are out of whack so that the State is beholden to some other God than the God of the Bible the effect will be the paganization eventually of even the Church. We are seeing this today in spades as the visible Church today is increasingly a pale reflection of the theology that drives the State; to wit, Cultural Marxism.

So, Hoedemaker is exactly right. Until the Church and State relationship is once again founded on the absolute authority of Jesus Christ as King of Kings and Lord of Lords those desiring Reformation in their country are just pissing in the wind.

Over here R2K aficionado and Cemetery Professor Dr. R. Scott Clark argues that America was never a Christian nation.

https://heidelblog.net/2020/11/the-strange-persistence-of-theocracy-in-america-1/?fbclid=IwAR3A3jsFujwuvozT5YJrwDh_s5ZJGRdsSEVgnpvYKyxWUUys4Wiwtzv3_uE

Now I will interact with this a wee bit but it should be noted that the position of R2K in general is that it is not possible for nations to be Christian. As such, we really are in “Captain Obvious” territory where we find a guy who holds that it is not possible for any nation to be Christian argues that these united States were never a Christian nation. What next Scott — an argument that water is wet?

1.) Clark argues that it is a myth that America was founded as a Christian nation. He also argues that it is a myth that America was founded as a non-Christian nation as is pushed by the ridiculous 1619 Project. So, Scott has argued here that America was founded as neither a Christian nation nor as a non-Christian nation. This may cause the poor person who doesn’t have a Ph.D to pop their eyes and ask, “Wait a minute. How can it be the case that America was founded as neither a Christian nor a non-Christian nation? What’s left?”

But of course such a person hasn’t learned the R2K dialectics where no nation is ever founded on any religion as all nations exist as entities who inhabit the common square that is swayed by no religion but rather all the folks of all the different religions in any set nation are governed by natural law. R2K is the perfect religion for multiculturalism since it requires that the religion of no religion be the national faith of the people as combined with a willingness for the multifaiths in the multicultural national environment to have their gods agree to play second fiddle to the no-god god of R2K. Really, what happens in this arrangement is that the State becomes the god of the nation as it ends up with the authority to autonomously define what Natural law teaches.

Scott mocks theonomists and theocrats on the left and on the right but the fact of the matter is that Scott practices his own kind of theonomy and theocracy. In Scott’s theocracy the God is the State and in Scott’s theonomy is autonomous humanist law. Now, of course Scott will jump up and down insisting that is not the case but the only people he is convincing by that are his fellow R2K travelers. Non-practitioners of R2k understand that all nations are bound by religion and understand that R2K is its own religion.

2.) Next Scott goes after another favorite R2K hate shibboleth next in attacking “fundamentalism.” Scott conveniently decides to give his own unique definition of fundamentalism (a trait practiced by all fundamentalists) and then attacks his sui generis definition of fundamentalism.

Scott’s definition of fundamentalism is anyone who believes the following doctrines; pre-tribulational premillennialism, Dispensationalism, abstinence from alcohol, 6-day-24-hour creation and the myth of Christian America. Now Clark doesn’t tell us if one has to believe all these markers to be a fundamentalist or if it only takes belief in one of these markers to be a fundamentalist. Personally, I excoriate the first three of Scott’s markers while holding to the last two. Maybe, in Scottie’s world that makes me 2/5’s a fundamentalist? On this score Scott’s lack of precision makes it difficult to know who he does and does not have in his cross-hairs. However, were I a poker playing man I’d be pushing all my chips in the middle of the table on the bet that Scott would label me a dreaded “fundamentalist.” (But that’s “ok” because if I’m allowed to make my own definition of fundamentalist like Scott does, you can be sure that I find Scott to be a R2K fundamentalist.)

3.) Along the way Scott takes to the woodshed some poor anonymous OPC pastor who once told Scott that he would not have voted to ordain Machen since Machen held to a day-age view of creation. What Scott doesn’t tell us is that he would not vote to ordain a candidate who holds with deep conviction a 24-7 view of creationism.

4.) Scott suggests that David Barton, the R2K bête noire author who supports the Christian America myth is the only chap that is looked to for guidance on the idea of Christian America. Personally, I really really don’t like David Barton but I still believe in the historical reality of Christian America. I don’t need to read Barton’s hagiography in order to come to that conclusion. I only need to read the original State Constitutions as they almost uniformly were constructed on a Christian basis. I only need to read the sabbath laws that were on the books of most of the original states. Beyond that I can read about the influence of Scripture on the Declaration of Independence by Gary T. Amos. I can read Benjamin F. Morris’ work on the influence of Christianity on America. I can read Presbyterian Minister David W. Hall’s “The Genevan Reformation and the American Founding.” I can read M. Stanton Evan’s work on the subject. I can read the election sermons of the Puritans and the Black Robed Regiment. There are numerous other authors out there besides the crackpot David Barton that one can turn to find the hard evidence that America was founded as a Christian Nation. In the end it is Scott’s R2K presupposition that will not allow him to get past his guiding mythos that it is impossible for a Nation to be Christian.

5.) To his credit Scott also disagrees with the notion curried among the left that there was no Christian influence on America. It seems that Scott wants to say on one hand that there were Christians in America’s founding but that the Laws, Institutions and documents were never Christian in an objective sense because if the founding Laws, Institutions and documents were Christian in an objective sense (that is that Christianity was instantiated in America’s Laws, Institutions, and Documents) then the R2K jig is up. So, Scott wants to concede that subjectively there were Christians who influenced our founding without stipulating that in an objective sense America was Christian. However, it is indisputable that America was founded as a Christian nation as a cursory look at the original State Constitutions by themselves would prove.

6.) Scott says his expertise and reading in the 16th and 17th century era moves him to conclude that the idea that America was founded as a Christian nation is “mostly false.” Besides, some guy named Mark Edwards agrees with him therefore it must be so. Again, though, dear reader, please understand that Scott’s reading is all through his R2K prism which invariably dictates that it is impossible for any nation to be Christian.

7.) It is true that these united States experienced a worldview shift as among its cultural gatekeepers with the rise, first of Unitarian Deism and then later with Emersonian Transcendentalism, but even with the rise of these anti-Christ worldviews an argument can be made that rank and file independent minded Americans with their family bibles remained deeply influenced by Biblical Christianity. (Will it disappoint Scott to know that I agree with him in the idea that the 1st great and 2nd great awakening, on the whole, were not beneficial to the Church or nation?)

8.) Scott, by listing notable Christians in America’s founding and by conceding that there was indeed faithful Christians associated with the founding demonstrates that he has a problem making a needed distinction between individuals in a nation being Christian and the nation itself having a Christian founding as evidenced by its Laws, Institutions, and Documents. It’s almost as if Scott is counting noses of all the Christian founders and the Enlightenment founders and then concluding that if there are more Enlightenment founders than Christian founders that proves America was not founded as a Christian nation. However, that is not the alone place to consider when seeking to answer the question; “Was America founded as a Christian nation.” The place to look is the colonial / state laws, the founding documents, charters, and state Constitutions, as well as the Institutions themselves. Doesn’t prayer to open up Court sessions count for anything? What about days called by Magistrates for prayer and fasting? What about placing one’s hand on the Bible to take a oath? These things indicate something about our founding Scott.

9.) At the end of his article Scott takes a swipe at postmillennialists. Of course he took a swipe earlier at theonomists and theocrats. We’ve already established above that Scott himself is a theonomist and a theocrat. It’s ok Scott… all people are. We should now speak to Scott’s swipe at postmillennialism. Keep in mind that Scott is a rabid amillennialist. (All R2K types are.) As a rabid amillennialist it is Scott’s expectation that the nations will not bow the knee to the Lord Christ in time and space. As such any call for any nation to become decidedly and definitively Christian violates Scott’s eschatology. It just can’t happen in an eschatology that anticipates disaster and defeat for the expansion of the Kingdom of God beyond the walls of the Church.

10.) Scott promises a part II where he will turn his tender caresses towards the theonomists and theocrats. When Scott fires that salvo we will be here to give as good as we get.

Dear Pastor,

Sodomites, then, are your enemy, and the enemy of your family, no? In such a situation, what does Christ command?

“Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you.” He presses his case even further: “…love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to get anything back.”

Then he points out that such behavior will bring us great reward from the “…Most High, because he is kind to the ungrateful and wicked. Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful.”

I don’t see much wiggle room there, or any exegetical tricks that allows for Orwellian twists of phrase like, “…my hating is an expression of my love for the Lord.”

I would be willing to wager that, if you pray with just a bit of persistence and ask God to grant you the ability to love sodomites, that he will grant you that ability, because he is a God of mercy who keeps his promises, and surely if he has commanded you to love your enemies, he will grant you the ability to do that. Not that it won’t be difficult: with God all things may be possible, but that doesn’t mean they are easy. No, usually the process is so difficult that it feels like your heart will break and you will likely just die before it’s over.

Best Regards,

Brad

Pastor Bret responds,

Dear Brad,

Your problem is that you are defining love differently than I do. I define love as acting towards others consistent with what God’s law teaches. God’s law teaches that sodomy requires the death penalty. You are defining love consistent with some kind of sentimental warm fuzzy. We are in different worlds and will not agree. You don’t think I’m being loving. I think my disposition towards the Christ hating sodomite to be the very marrow of love. I also think your love is really hatred. By your standard of “love” no parent should discipline their child because, “well that just wouldn’t be loving.”

I also think your “love” is hatred because you are not considering your hatred towards all those children who will be entrapped into the same lifestyle because sodomy was not criminalized. Your “love” for the sodomite, is hatred for the judicially innocent who will fall into this sin because the practitioners of this sin were released from the taboo that once properly made it “the love that dare not speak its name.” Because of people like you with all your love sodomy is now the love that won’t shut the hell up. By all your love you have let sodomites out of the closet with the effect that Christians have replaced them in the closet. Christianity is now the “love that dare not speaks its name,” as your attempt to chastise me proves.

Of course you have completely ignored the command of Scripture to

“hate that which is evil and to cling to that which is good.”

You also have to deal with the Psalmist who said…

”21 Do not I hate them, O Lord, that hate thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against thee?22 I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies.”

Now keep in mind that if this is a Messianic Psalm then this is Christ saying this.

You accuse me of “exegetical tricks,” and of “Orwellian twists.” Allow me to return service if you don’t mind and accuse you of reading the Scripture through your postmodern emotions. Throughout the Scripture we find love being expressed by what people today would call “hatred.”

We see it in Jesus attacking His enemies. You remember those times … “White washed sepulchers full of dead men’s bones,” and “You are of your Father the devil,” and “brood of vipers.” Are you really going to tell me that Jesus was not being loving here?

And what of St. Paul who told his enemies to go castrate themselves?

Yours is an effeminate Christianity. I want nothing to do with it.

I would be willing to wager that, if you pray to the God who is and not the god of your imagination and ask the God who is to open your eyes and give you wisdom and the ability to have a love that hates that which is opposed to that which you properly love, the God of the Bible, who is angular and will never be made smooth, will grant you the ability to understand how a biblical hate serves biblical love.

Praying that the Spirit of Christ will grant you repentance Brad.

Thank you so much for spending the time to write me.

Respectfully yours,

Pastor Bret

In 1960 the Presidential race was nip and tuck between Nixon and Kennedy. Illinois was a key battleground state that year and Mayor Richard Daley Chicago was the 800 pound guerrilla in Illinois. As goes Chicago in 1960 so went Illinois.

The story is now legendary as told by Kennedy adviser Theodore White. In the wee hours of the morning after the election Illinois began to bubble with results. The down state finally turned their totals in with the result that Nixon was 3000 votes up over Kennedy.

Daley swung into action picking up the phone and making some calls to the Lieutenants of the Daley political machine. Some time in the same evening Daley phoned Jack Kennedy and assured him that all was in hand. Before it was all over key Cook County precincts turned over their vote count and once the dust had settled Kennedy won by 8K votes in Illinois and with its 27 Electoral votes Kennedy secured victory.

Mayor Daley had waited before turning in the Cook County totals… waiting until the Illinois downstate votes were turned in … waiting so he knew how many votes he needed in Cook county in order to cancel the downstate Illinois rural vote total.

And this is the exact thing that has happened in 2020 in Georgia, North Carolina, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. All these states excepting Georgia are run by Democratic Governors. All of these states excepting Georgia also have Secretary of States who are Democratic Operatives. State Secretary of States are the Executives in the State who are responsible for the election vote counting. More on that anon.

Another thing that we have in common here in 2020 with Mayor Daley and 1960 Cook county and Chicago is the waiting game. In 1960 Daley waited to turn in his vote totals until he knew how many votes he needed to overcome from the Illinois downstate totals. This is exactly what happened election night 2020.

One election night 2020 all of these states were chugging alone with their vote count when they suddenly stopped counting and said they would take up the count later. Philadelphia tweeted at 2130 on election night that they were closing up counting till 0900 the next morning. Presumably they had never heard of the concept of a night shift.

Now, keep in mind that other states that were razor thin close did not need just stop counting votes. Florida didn’t stop counting so that they could go home and get their beauty sleep. Ohio gave us vote totals without having to get their nap time before finishing the count.

However, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Georgia, and Pennsylvania quit counting votes.

And why was that?

Well, isn’t it obvious? Like Mayor Daley in 1960 who waited to find out how many votes he needed to overcome the downstate total these Democratic run States in 2020 quit counting votes in the middle of the process in order to create the votes (from the new “mail-in” category) they needed in order to overcome the vote totals they were seeing. Indeed, this pattern as practiced in several states is suggestive that this was pre-planned by the Democrats going into the election. Was the word out from the DNC and the Biden campaign to count votes for awhile and then stop the count and then do a 1960 Mayor Daley and create the mail-in votes needed to give Biden the win.

So, to summarize; It looks like that the Dems had a game plan in their Dem controlled battleground swing states. The idea was to create enough mail in ballots in their urban minority districts to offset the count in the rest of the state. This is why we saw the sudden stoppage of vote counting that was going for Trump in Georgia, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Michigan.

There are lines of circumstantial evidence that supports the supposition that these states stuffed the ballot box for Biden.

1.) Republicans kept the Senate

2.) Republicans gained seats in the US House and though unlikely it is still possible that Republicans could flip the House of Representatives.

3.) Republicans gained State legislative assemblies down ballot

This last one means that Republicans took State Senates and State Houses away from Democrat control and gained more of a majority than they already had.

4.) Trump increased the percentage of minority vote significantly.

Now … having done ALL THIS, we are supposed to believe that Trump lost the Presidency?

The next piece of circumstantial evidence for Biden cheating is the percentage of registered voters voting in some of these urban areas. The percentage is off the historic charts. Are we really to believe that 89% of possible voters in these urban areas actually voted, breaking records going back to 1876?

I for one don’t believe it.

The next piece of circumstantial evidence is found in the whistle-blowers coming forth to testify of cheating. These are being chronicled by James O’Keefe of the project Veritas. Here is a link,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KATWF2itINE

Also dead people have been discovered to have voted in Michigan.

Now, add to all this that the Lugenpresse (in this case FOX) and how they are running cover for the cheating. FOX’s announcing Arizona for Biden is criminal. Even its announcement circa 8pm Tuesday night that the US House of Representatives was going to be maintained by the Democrats was worthy of people being fired – especially in light of the fact that the Republicans have picked up so many seats and still have a slim mathematical chance of flipping the House. If there were fines for media lying FOX wouldn’t have enough money to cover the fines.

So, there is a twofold thrust going in the 2020 coup. The first is stopping the vote and creating “mail in” votes to overcome Trump’s lead. The second is the Lugenpresse wing of the Democratic party running cover for all this cheating.

After-thought

As I said earlier, the Democrats had to win no matter what in order for the Global Reset to continue to be pursued. Look for the ChiCom virus scare to exponentially inflated so that people once again are full of fear and so look to the FEDS to be saved. This will be the means by which the Global Reset is pursued.