Libidinous Sex & the Death Cult

James 1:14 But every man is tempted when he is drawn away by his own lust and enticed. 15 Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin; and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.


A social order trajectory that begins with unconstrained libidinous passion will end in social order horror that consumes individuals, families, and nations. For example the French intelligentsia philosophes embarked on the trajectory of emancipating the sexual impulse from the moral order and the end result was the tender strokes of Madame la’ Guillotine. What began as a loosening of sexual mores ended with the loosening of heads off of shoulders. The Marquis de Sade becomes the face of this Mephistophelaic sexuality. 

Consider also, as example, the Weimar Republic of the 1920’s. What began as the Sexual cabaret of Europe in the 1920’s where every kind of fetish and deviance possible could be had for the right price ended with unnamed tyranny and rampant death for the “fatherland.” The  face favoring this sexual playground of Berlin was Magnus Hirschfield.
 
Consider also the Bolshevik Revolution. The poster child for this sexual debacle was the femme fatale, Alexandera Kollentai and she led the way in sexual freedom for women. Women, under communist rule, were considered as belonging to no man but as belonging to the state for purchase. Kollontai, with Lenin’s approval, sought to destroy the concept of marriage and families. The results of this sexual freedom was so disastrous that even the Communist realized that they had to reverse course lest they wipe themselves out by sexual freedom.
 
There is a nexus between the liberation of sex from God ordained expression and the consequent social order blood in the streets that naturally follows. We are witnessing that again in the West as we seek to eliminate any boundaries for sex. One can name any number of people in order to brand the movement here. Alfred Kinsey. and Hugh Hefner, come immediately to mind.

In the end it almost seems that there is a principle at work here… a truism that demonstrates that immoral and unfettered sex guarantees unfettered death.Of course modernity denies this and introduces, as it can, all kinds of technology or legislation in order to diminish the principle that immoral and unfettered sex guarantees unfettered death. For example modernity insists that the releasing of malignant sexuality can be controlled by chemical birth control or by a cocktails of drugs to put the STD’s into abeyance. Modernity says that the damage of malignant sexuality as it invades family life can be softened by no-fault divorce and the truism that “children are resilient.” Modernity will redefine family in order to make deviant sexuality appear as the “new normal.”

The New Normal …. The New Abnormal

“Wouldn’t it it be great to just be normal, to blend into society?” She wonders aloud. “Put it this way — I’m the new normal.”

Brutlyn Jenner

A member of the perverted 0.4 % of the population which is transgender is telling us that he is the “new normal.” The new normal? How can 0.4% of the population be the new normal? Even if you add the 1.8% of the population that is sodomite or lesbian and the 0.7% who self identify as bi-sexual one is still left with less than 3% of the population insisting that they are the “new normal.” How can 2.9% of the population end up with enough leverage to tell the other 97.1% that they are the “new normal”?

The answer to that is found in the reality that the percentage of those who are driving this agenda are merely using the sexually ill as a conduit to promulgate their anti-Christian agenda. The LGBTQ crowd is merely a weapon being used by the Cultural Marxists in order to over throw the last remaining residual desiderata of Christianity as a social order force. As such, the muscle for the advance of normalcy of the LGBTQ crowd, numerically minuscule as they are, is lodged not in their numbers but in the elite gatekeeper crowd who desire the complete extinguishing of the objective transcendent standards which Christianity brings. However, in the end we do not really give up on objective transcendent standards but rather we merely change out one set of objective transcendent standards for a different set of objective standards. The Marquis de Sade was going after something like this when he posited that the notion of right and wrong was a ignis fatuus. Modern made, entrenched in his Sadeian existence, reasons that the very fact he has a desire is a sign that that said desire exists in nature. Now, the fact that the desire exists means that nature wills the desire and as such it would be wrong (sin) not to act on a desire which nature has implanted within modern man. You pick your god, whether of the supernatural extra mundane variety or of the prometheus ubermensch variety, you dance to His or its tune.

What I really wanted to get to in this post is to tease out a implication in Brutlyn’s statement. This is a  point I have been hammering for a very long time. When Brutlyn insists “I am the new normal,” by necessity he is tacitly affirming that people not like herm are now the new “abnormal.” If Brutlyn is the new normal, then everyone not like Brutlyn or who understand the perversion in Brutlyn’s behavior are now the new “abnormal.” This underscores, in a distinct way, the point I’ve insisted upon repeatedly and that is once the pervert is allowed out of the closet this requires the Biblical Christian to be stuffed in the closet in order to replace the pervert. Brutlyn is now the new normal and now people who share Biblical convictions are the new “abnormal” and as the new “abnormal” Christians are at the same time the new perverts.

This “new normalcy” that Brutlyn speaks of is represented as a legislative bill that just passed the New York state legislature which makes discrimination against transsexuals a crime. The results of this “new normalcy” will be the public stopping of the mouths of Christians in the work place. Transexuals out of the closet. Christians into the closet.

Knowing folks in New York, I know Christians already have it bad when they have to turn down invitations at the office for donating to buy surprise gifts to congratulate sodomites on being married and having successful adoptions. (I know personally friends who have had to stay away from signing congratulations cards and showing up at surprise parties. Their absence at the parties are loudly missed as well as their lack of signature on any card).

With the passage of this legislation in New York, the next abomination will be congratulation parties for the successful transitioning of transsexuals in addition to transsexuals being allowed to use diverse restrooms.

Lastly this bill will apply to all Christian establishments with over 10 employees and woe to the Christian who owns a restaurant.

I hope all y’all are ready for the “new normal.”

Going Slow-mo on James K. A. Smith’s Po-mo II

“The point is that, for the most part, we make our way in the world by means of under-the- radar intuition and attunement — that we live not so much by what we know but instead by know how. Being desiring, imaginative animals, our primary orientation to the world is visceral and not cerebral.”

James K. A. Smith
Desiring the Kingdom — p. 60

If this is true then why are closed head injuries a bad thing?

Hoover Chronicles FDR’s Failures which brought us to War

In his book, “Freedom Betrayed,” former President Hoover chronicles 19 failures on FDR that moved the US inexorably towards an unnecessary  war (WW II). Hoover’s case is compelling.

Over the next few days I will list these failures as given by Hoover and you can judge if WW II was a “good war.”

Failure #1 — Roosevelt’s lost statesmanship was in recognition of Communist Russia in November, 1933. Four Presidents and five Secretaries of State — Democrats as well as Republicans — had (with knowledge of the whole purpose and methods of international Communism) refused such action. They knew and said the Communists would be able to penetrate the US, carrying their germs of destruction of religious faith, freedom of men, and independence of nations. They considered our recognition of Soviet Russia would give it prestige and force among other nations. All of FDR’s puerile agreements with them that they would not deal in their wickedness within our borders were on the record repudiated in less than 48 hours. A long train of Communists and fellow travelers were taken into the highest levels of the (FDR) administration. Fifth column action spread over the country, with a long series of traitorous acts during his (FDR) remaining 12 years in the Presidency.

Going Slow-Mo on James K. A. Smith’s Po-Mo

“Instead, because for the most part we are desiring, imaginative, non-cognitive animals, our desire for the Kingdom in inscribed in our dispositions and habits and functions quite apart from our conscious reflection.”

James K. A. Smith
Desiring the Kingdom — p. 56

1.) Did Smith write this as a non-cognitive animal quite apart from his conscious reflection?

2.) How does Smith know that our desires are inscribed in our disposition and habits unless he first self consciously reflected on that truth?

3.) If all this is happening quite apart from our conscious reflection then why is Smith bothering us with his conscious reflection on all this?

4.) Quick … without consciously reflecting, and only by means of your desire, tell me what a “disposition” is. Tell me what a “habit” is. Tell me what “conscious reflection” is. Tell me what a desire is.