Election 2024 — A Brief Reprieve?

Do you suppose the Democratic party has learned anything from their defeat in 2024?Do you think that they will now reverse themselves touching their conviction that the planet is going to implode from climate change? Do you think that they will give up on the whole utter nonsense of “The Green New Deal?” Do you think that Democratic Governors will cease appointing sexual freaks like Rachel Levine to key posts in their administrations? Do you think that some Democrat will now arise who will say loudly and boldly, “Sex change operations for children at hospitals receiving state funding will no longer be a thing?” or “We are no longer housing males who pretend to be females with the female population in our prisons?” Will some Democrat say, “The whole concept of required DEI hiring as policy was not well thought out from the beginning.” Will Democrats give up on the policy of equity where they discriminate against able bodies cis-gendered whites in favor of crippled, lesbian, minorities?” Will some prominent white Democrat come out and say; “I love white people,” or “we must pursue policy that will strengthen and advantage our core population so that the whole country can prosper?” Will some Democrat apologize for the statement that “white supremacy groups are the greatest extant domestic terrorist threat to our country?” Will any Democrat, after the drubbing of 2024, now pursue a policy that finds the health of the traditional family as a cornerstone?” Will some Democrat come out and say, “Our push for sodomite marriage was not beneficial to our country?”

To the contrary, I suspect that the Democratic party is now so much the vehicle of the New World Order Cultural Marxist left that it will double down on the agenda that Democrats have been pursuing since the rise of the Clintons and the Obamas. I think this radical Cultural Marxism is in their bloodstream and as a party they will not be able to shift. Instead, what I anticipate is that they will now try to cloak their extremism. 2028 front running candidates like Gavin Newsom and Gretchen Whitmer will still run from the left while still desperately seeking to present themselves as moderate.

What has happened is that the Democrats have become Darth Vader’s embodiment of “The Empire” and we should be certain that they are even now plotting to “strike back.” The unfortunate reality here is that the coalition that defeated the Democratic Empire in 2024 may well not be stable enough to consistently defeat the Empire. This is due to the fact that in way of principle many of the Rebel forces hold to the same ideas of the Empire, even if those principles have not worked themselves out to their logical conclusions. For example, Rick Grenfell and Peter Thiel who are both part of the rebel forces are themselves sodomites. Tulsi Gabbard is Buddhist. Vivek Ramaswamy is Hindu. RFK Jr., Trump, and Matt Gaetz are all sexual Draculas. The Rebel forces are littered with Zionists from the new Sec. Def. to Huckabee as the new Ambassador to Israel. Still, we can continue to hope that God still draws straight lines with crooked sticks. But we shouldn’t count on in this case.

All of this reminds us that the Church must continue to be salt and light – and that to the Rebel forces as much as the Empire stormtroopers. The Church must lift up Jesus Christ as King of Kings and Lord of Lords who alone can deliver men from those sins that they are so tenaciously clinging to thinking that in those sins they will find meaning and fulfillment when in point of fact those very sins explains their unbearable guilt, their constant misery and continuing alienation from themselves, others, and from God.

Having said that we must admit that the Church itself, in many if not most of its expressions, is the Church of the Empire. It will not be a reforming agent until it is first Reformed. I have concluded that will not likely happen without abandoning the current infrastructure of conservative denominations. These denominations are maintained by men who have embraced Cultural Marxist leftist principles and so is of no use in terms of being salt and light. It is not a certainty but it is a pretty safe bet that our political parties will not reform the Church until the Church becomes again Reformed itself so it can be an agent of Reformation.

So, it looks we have been given a window of opportunity to get our house in order before we could see the Empire striking back.

Let us pray that we put the time we have to good use.

“Who Is My Neighbor;” The Anthology That Proves Kinism — 2nd Edition

Over the past couple years I have had numerous people ask me where they can buy a copy of “Who Is My Neighbor.” This book is an anthology of quotes from History, Church Fathers, Founding Fathers, and numerous others proving that Kinism has always been the position of Western man. These quotes demonstrate that what we call “Kinism” today (of whatever stripe or variety) has always been held throughout Western Civilization as being the norm. The quotes from the Church Fathers in the book demonstrate that Kinism was the norm in the Church as well. Indeed, it was just basic Christianity 101. People who rant and rave against Kinism (and their name is legion) are alone as seen in the testimony of the quotes found in this volume.

Today Kinism is denied by people like Doug Wilson, Andrew Sandlin, Joe Boot, and Owen Strachan, John Piper, and numerous others. Indeed, to find a member of the clergy who embraces what is found in this 2nd edition of “Who Is My Neighbor” is almost unheard of. That fact is part of the proof of how badly the Western church is in decline.

This book also supports with unmistakable clarity the necessity for Christian ethno-Nationalism. (Frankly, Christian ethno-Nationalism is merely the logical consequence of Kinism.) If ever a book proved that Kinism was believed in all times and in all places wherever God has granted the Church orthodoxy this book proves it.

But of course, Kinism is denounced today almost universally in the Church and Christian Nationalism likewise is inveighed against at every turn. The men who put this anthology together are to be greatly thanked for this work.

Like the first edition this edition will be ignored. People will try to drop it down the memory hole. They will insist that those who have put this book together are guilty of quote mining or taking quotes out of context. They are fools. It is simply the case that prior to 1950 or so you couldn’t find a churchmen who would contradict what is found in this book and if you did find a churchmen who did contradict it they were Anabaptist or belonged to some other crazy cult.

Those who oppose Kinism and Christian Nationalism have all of history against them. They have the Scriptures against them. They have the reality of God implanted natural affections against them. The Church will not know Reformation again apart from returning to this doctrine.

https://www.westernfrontbooks.com/store/products/wimn?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR3A-NiqsAbpmm2HJ2SFG_G0VmPdZQdmZuqpaxqly6ZsHFVH5Xl27QLyB-Q_aem_AzTVEHvqwmvhDCUgMElmag

O. B. Frothingham & The Spirit of the Age

“The interior spirit of any age is the spirit of God and no faith can be living that has that spirit against it. No church can be strong except in that alliance. The life of the time appoints the creed of the time and modifies the establishment of the time.”

O. B. Frothingham

Note first when OBF speaks of “God” he is not speaking of the Christian God but is speaking of man as God. It is man who creates the spirit of the age and so it is man who is Frothingham’s God.

Second, we would offer that this explains the current condition of the “Conservative” church today. The “conservative” Church is in alliance to one degree or another with Cultural Marxism, since Cultural Marxism is the spirit of the age. This quote also explains that rabid hatred for Theonomy in the Church because theonomy always pushes back against the spirit of the age. As the Church is infected with the spirit of the age the Church hates theonomy.

This quote also explains the rise of the Church growth movement and then after that the rise of the Emergent Church. They are both reflections of Christianity as syncretized with a Cultural Marxism which is now the spirit of the age.

Frothingham gives us a classical definition of humanism. If there is no God and no divine law word then if the Church wants to prosper it must yield to the Spirit of the age — a spirit defined by sovereign man’s will. This quote is also a pledge of allegiance to philosophical existentialism which teaches that existence precedes essence, which is to say that man has no nature and as such man can, at any moment, completely remake himself in to whatever he wants himself to be. Man has no “ought” in his life from above or from his past to which he is required to conform. He is a totally free being without constraints. All that exist is the existential moment and this moment is uninfluenced by any sense of oughtness … by any sense of what has gone before … by any sense of outside norms. Because of this existentialism that Frothingham identifies man takes up the great Luciferian commandment of “Do What Thou Wilt,” and if man will not take up this existentialism/humanism man will be left to be solitary swimming against the cultural current and too often likewise alone in the modern church. He will be as Bunyan’s “Pilgrim” in the classic “Pilgrim’s Progress.”

This kind of philosophy gives us what has been called “the religious spirit of transgression,” but it can only be known as such by those who have not quaffed from this spirit. This is so because even the idea of “transgression” can only be spoken of by those who have a standard beyond and/or above them. Those who embrace this Frothingham philosophy cannot speak of “transgression” because they have no objective measure for what is in bounds morally and what is out of bound morally. The only time modern man can speak of transgression  is when someone commits the sin of not transgressing.

All of this means that for modern man to be religious today he must be one who is determinedly non-Christian. He must be the man who breaks every commandment of God. He must be the man who forswears any taboo of the past that was based on Christian reasoning and/or tradition. This means the religious people in our culture today, per the Frothingham quote, are the Feminists, the sexual perverts, the George Floyd rioters and those who supported them. The deeply religious people of our age are those who overthrow the faith once and forever delivered unto the saints in favor of rainbow flags, illegal immigration, Lesbian Bishops, and new creeds like the Cultural Marxist Belhar Confession.

For our modern deeply Frothinghamian religious age, it is the case that the more wicked a person is, by the previous standard of Christianity, the greater their faith is seen to be and the more intensely is their religious commitment exhibited. This means that the flaming sodomite, the proud surgically created hermaphrodite, the militant feminist are some of the most deeply devoted religious people you will ever meet. It’s just that their religion is the religion described in the Frothingham quote. These are folks living out the religious creed of their time.

In all this we are reminded, as Christians, that when we dip into this mindset, or give in an inch to this Spirit of the Age we are at that moment committing celestial treason. We have joined in high rebellion against the God of the Bible. When we insist that the Church must move in the direction of this new religion or must be sympathetic with these religious adherents of this different faith, we at that point denying the truth that the Church is the pillar and ground of truth.

We are thus living in an age where the question that demands being answered is, “Who will live more consistently in terms of their faith?” One has to give a tip of the cap to the Frothingham religionists who are so dedicated to their faith that they will surgically remove body parts, who will alter their speech and dress in order to keep the commandments of their religious order, who will completely unsex themselves in order to follow their religious code of transgression.

Unfortunately, for them, all those who hate God love death and try as they may to be good little religious doobies their religion of transgression will only end in both temporal and eternal death. The Frothingham age, undergirded by anti-Christ philosophy inspired by Hegel, and Kant, before Frothingham and carried on by Sartre, Camus, and the postmodernists after Frothingham, is dying. This is a philosophy built on sand and now the waves of reality are blasting it and unsurprisingly the house is collapsing. It can not bring the blessedness and freedom it promises.

Stolen Election 2020

In 2008 George W. Bush was an extremely unpopular two term President. His approval ratings were all time lows. John McCain became the Republican nominee and was saddled with an economy (remember the 2008 Wall Street Market crash) that was horrid. In that election cycle that heavily favored the “out of power” party due to  a severe decline in the economy that almost always ends with the incumbents being thrown out of office, Barack Hussein Obama received 69,498,516 votes with 52.9% of total votes cast.

In 2012 Obama runs again for President and with the power of incumbency combined with a stable economy and a weak opponent (Mittens Romney) Obama garners; 65,915,795 votes with 51.1% of votes cast. Incumbents almost always are re-elected with the power of the White House behind them.

The recipe for throwing out incumbents is one or more of the following;

1.) A serious downturn in the economy

2.) A major foreign policy blunder
3.) Exposed significant corruption

Obama’s first term had avoided all of these and so he was re-elected with a comfortable margin over the weak neo-conservative candidate Mitt Romney.

In 20216 Hillary Clinton runs as Obama’s heir apparent. She has a good economy to run on. She faces a man who is considered one of the weakest candidates in Republican history ranking right up there with Wendell Willkie according to some. Despite having the power of incumbency (She was Obama’s Sec. State) and despite a decent, if not spectacular economy, Hillary is deeply unpopular and loses to Donald John Trump garnering 46.1% of the vote which translates to 65,853,514 votes.

In 2020 Trump runs for re-election. The nation is in turmoil from a manufactured pandemic. Prior to the pandemic though Trump was atop an economy that was better than any economy since Ronald Reagan’s second term. Trump runs against geriatric Joe Biden, who even in 2020 was showing signs of dementia. Remember the Democrats had not allowed Joe to lose the Iowa Democratic primary that year by reporting that the results could not be known for over two weeks due to a technological problems. By the time the results of Iowa election came in they were both disputed and any bump that might have been given to the winning candidate was no longer possible. Biden then finished 5th in New Hampshire but because of the support of James Clyburn he wins South Carolina and goes on to be the Democratic nominee. Biden runs a campaign from his basement, seldom doing campaign events due to fears of Covid. Despite his lackluster campaigning Biden wins a staggering 81,283,501 votes. The incumbent Donald Trump earns more votes (74,223,975) for a sitting President than had ever occurred previously in history.

Keep in mind that all this happens in the context of changed election laws in states allegedly precipitated by the pandemic. Biden received more votes from the Black community than was even cast for Barack Obama. Biden receives more votes for President than any man in US History.

Now in 2024 Trump runs again against Kamala Harris. It is true that Harris was running with a bad economy even though she had the power of incumbency behind her. As we know Kamala, as a black female, loses and in her loss she receives fewer black votes than Biden did. Trump receives fewer votes (roughly 600,000 fewer coming in at 73,663,351) than he did when he lost to Biden in 2020.

All of this to demonstrate, via vote totals, that it is beyond the ability to reckon that Biden was not elected by a well organized cheating campaign aided and abetted by the scamdemic. Clearly, the DEMS cheated again in 2024 but less efficiently so since several states had tightened up their election laws after 2020. The cheating of the DEMS is seen in 2024, by way of just one example, all the free media they received from the Lugenpress reporting “objective news.”

I would bet my retirement that the DEMS stole election 2020 and nobody will ever convince me otherwise. The DEMS cheated in a host of different ways. One of the major ways was exposed on the documentary 2000 mules. The DEMS used the fake Covid scamdemic to change election laws which allowed them to steal an election.

Further, I would bet that the DEMS tried to steal election 2024 but they couldn’t overcome the wave for Trump given how some states had tightened up election laws.

Texas State Congressman James Talarico Says Something Really Stupid

“Christian Nationalists are not interested in Christian values. They are only interested in legislating Christian dominance. Christian Nationalism (CN) is putting prayer in schools and taking free lunches out. CN is teaching the bible in schools but refusing to give teachers a pay raise. CN is forcing schools to post the ten commandments while nominating a candidate for President who has violated almost all of them. It is not about Jesus. It is about power.”

James Talarico
Texas State Congressman

1.) If Christian Nationalists are not interested in Christian values then they are not, by definition, Christian Nationalists.

2.) What could possibly be wrong with legislating Christian dominance? Is it only Christianity when one legislates the dominance of other non Christian religions?

3.) I am a Christian Nationalist. I am not interested in putting prayer in schools but I am interested in taking “free” lunches out. In point of fact, what I am really interested in is legislating a dominance that results in closing down completely government schools.

4.) There is no such thing as a free lunch. Somebody, somewhere is paying for that lunch.

5.) I am a Christian Nationalist. As a Christian Nationalist I am opposed to the humanist hacks they call “teachers” to teach the Bible in government schools. Can you imagine how badly they would do so? I am also opposed to giving teachers a school raise. In point of fact, in my Christian Nationalist world all government school teachers would be out of work since all government schools would be shut down. I would shut down government school since, as a Christian Nationalist, wanting dominance, I do not want humanists being dominant over children as seen in their teaching the children that humanism should be dominant in their thinking.

6.) If schools are shut down then the idea of posting the ten commandments is now big deal. However, if government schools are not shut down, why shouldn’t the ten commandments be posted since the refusal to post them demonstrates the States desire to have its religion be dominant.

7.) This chap was adamantly opposed to posting the 10 commandments in Texas schools and he contributed to killing the bill in Texas.

8.) In desiring to post the ten commandments while nominating Trump who has violated all of them, Christians are involved in contradiction for sure. However, all because someone supports something wrong (nominating Trump) doesn’t mean it is wrong for them to support a good thing (posting the ten commandments.) It merely means they are inconsistent. Talarico’s inconsistencies are all over this stupid quote. Does that mean everything the man does is wrong?

9.) What ever could be possibly wrong with wielding power? So what if it is about power? When one embraces Christ are they at that point no longer to have authority or power? Should they not have the power of Fathers or Husbands? Should they not have the power of employer or politician?

10.) Why is it that the idea of embracing Jesus automatically means the idea of giving up power? I don’t doubt that for some Jesus is used as a mask to grab power but that doesn’t mean that automatically Christianity and power are incompatible.