Doug Wilson Forbids Jew Malice, But Does Not Tell Us What It Is

“Here would be a small sampling of the sorts of things that sometimes fly in our ranks that shouldn’t sometimes fly in our ranks. And even if you don’t agree with my assessments here, this at least can have the benefit of explaining my behavior to you….

Jew-malice: of all the dead ends, of all the cul-de-sacs, of all the dry holes, of all the fruitless trees, of all the clouds without rain, of all the foam on all the waves on all the oceans, of all the gin joints . . .”

Doug “The Gatekeeper” Wilson
Blog & Mablog

Of course this requires the question of what precisely is defined as Jew malice in Doug’s world? Would Doug accuse RJR of Jew malice because RJR doubted 6 Million? Is it Jew malice to recite world history of the contest between Jews and Christians? Is it Jew malice to refer to the Jews as “The Synagogue of Satan” just like Scripture does? How about all those Church Councils in history that made not nice proclamations regarding the Jews? Just exactly how does “Ditches” Doug define this “Jew malice,” because the last thing I want to do is fall out of favor with Dougie.

I mean was Luther guilty of Jew malice? Was Chrysostom? Was Augustine? Was Calvin? I can give you quotes from each of these chaps that I’m pretty sure if anyone else said what those chaps said Doug would be phoning the “Jew malice” constables. I mean, seriously, there is no way Doug would countenance John Calvin. Doug would read Calvin out of Doug’s movement.

Sucks to be Calvin.

So what about it Doug? If you are going to gatekeep the Conservative Christian armada could you please tell us precisely and exactly what counts and doesn’t count as Jew malice. We are all waiting to hear from you on this so we don’t fall out of your Eminence’s favor.

With Apologies to John Lennon — IMAGINE

Imagine there’s no ISIS
It’s easy if you try
No Infidel among us
Around us, no PC lies
Imagine all the Nations
Living for God’s Praise

Imagine there are no Marxists

It isn’t hard to do
No equality BS
And no dialectic too
Imagine all God’s people
Living as postmills

You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
I hope someday you’ll join us
And the World will then be won

Imagine no CRT
I wonder if you can
No envy or malice
The fulfillment of God’s plan
Imagine all God’s people
Conquering all the world…

You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
I hope someday you’ll join us
And the world will be then won

Linkage Between R2K & The Enlightenment

In speaking of the Enlightenment author Rudolph Soan wrote;

“A natural law, a natural state, a natural society, and a natural religion shown as the great ideas on the intellectual horizon, and carried away the world of the 18th century in a movement of passionate endeavor. These battles prepared the way for the rise of modern Humanity.” 

This quote demonstrates for us how it is R2K is a return to the Enlightenment project. R2K, with its full throated praise for Natural law and fallen man’s ability to read Natural Law aright as pertaining to all spheres save for the Church indicates its commitment to a Christ-less natural social-order as governed by a natural state under the auspices of a natural religion that serves as the great North Star for a religion-less people.

Of course the implication of all this R2K “thinking” is that natural law for the public square supersedes God’s law, and as against a Godly social order R2K posits that as we live in the common realm, we live and move and have our being in the humanistic natural state.

In the words of R. J. Rushdoony;

 Because of its hostility to faith, the Enlightenment stressed reason as a great arbiter as well as the supplanter of Revelation. Natural law replaced Gods law, the state as Gods’ ministry of justice was replaced by a state defining law, creating law, declaring what is Good and evil for itself, and natural society, that is, life lived in terms of nature; replace life as envisioned by God’s law. Religion instead of being ordered by God’s grace and law, instead of being derived from revelation, now found its source in nature.

R2K, being a “theology” inspired by Enlightenment categories, makes the very same move for the common realm.

R2K is not Calvinism, nor is it basic Christianity. Instead R2K is Christianity reinterpreted through the lens of Enlightenment categories. In brief, R2K is heresy.

McAtee Helps Wilson with some Context

“But who co-opted these minorities in the first place? Who enlisted them to do this awful thing? Who is using them as a cat’s paw? White people, that’s who. Woodrow Wilson was white. FDR was white. LBJ was white. Earl Warren was white. Margaret Sanger was white. King Charles III is white. Out of the six justices who voted for Roe, only one was black. Elizabeth Warren is white. Ted Kennedy was white. Nelson Rockefeller was white. John Roberts is white. Jimmy Carter is white. Nancy Pelosi is white. Hillary Clinton is white, ditto Bill. John Dewey was white. Richard Rorty is white. Keith Olbermann is white. The overwhelming number of Ivy League grads are white. Shall I go on?

Doug Wilson
Blog & Meh-Blog
Sin, Skin and Kin

First can we admit that among the political players that Doug mentions that they themselves are often likewise merely cat’s paws of a much bigger interest. In other words, those white people among the political players are being moved and animated by another whole level of Malthusian chicanery that often is peopled by a minority that is white when convenient and not white when not convenient?

Yes, and Herbert Marcuse was white, and so is David Axelrod, and Max Horkheimer, and Janet Yellin, and Timothy Geitner, and Chuck Todd and Spielberg, Katzenberg and Geffin, and George Soros, and Louis Brandeis and Felix Frankfurter, Felix Weil and FDR’s handler Bernard Baruch, and Nixon’s handler Henry Kissinger, and Samuel Untermeyer, and George Lukacs, and Wilhem Reich and Sigmund Freud, and Leon Bronstein, and the overwhelmingly considerable percentage of Harvard graduates are “white.” Shall I go on?

But per Doug, this noticing is likely all just so much people group malice.

György Lukács, the Frankfurt School & Some of its Tactics & Goals

“The question is, Who will free us from the yoke of Western Civilization?”
 
György Lukács
Cultural Marxist

“I saw the revolutionary destruction of society as the one and only solution. A worldwide overturning of values cannot take place without the annihilation of the old values and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries.”

György Lukács
Cultural Marxist

“Münzenberg, along with György Lukács and the founders of the Frankfurt School, had seen what in the West only Madison avenue seems to have learned, that language leads to action — and that control of words and their overtones can be far more effective than hand-grenades or nuclear power to force or or intimidate someone into saying “A” when he really believes “B” and that that is most of the battle. The Tinkers-to-Evers-to-Chance in this were John Dewey, cultural Marxism, and the Frankfurt school.”

Ralph de Toledano
Cry Havoc

“By following Gramsci’s lead Marcuse had managed to find a surrogate for the working class that Horkheimer had been searching for; students and minority groups. Marcuse stated that the student radicals should aim for the radicalization of university departments. Of pivotal importance to this idea was his introduction of the concept employed so successfully by Freud and György Lukács, of so-called sexual liberation as a means of social control.”

Alasdair Elder
The Red Trojan Horse — pp. 62

In post WW II America a political movement that had been around since the 1920’s began to gain leverage in America. In its beginnings it was called “The Frankfurt School,” but as time passed it began to be known as Cultural Marxism, or Political Correctness, or multiculturalism. The leaders of this movement began to be the gurus on American Universities and with their teachings and their books they began to have influence beyond their numbers. Names like Antonio Gramsci, Herbert Marcuse, Theodore Adorno, György Lukács, Max Horkheimer and Erich Fromm became the Generals leading a student rank and file who would accomplish the long march through the Institutions, seeking to overturn the previous identity of every Institution wherein was heard the footfall of the march. The final goal of this march was the overthrow, shredding, and destruction of every vestige of biblical Christianity that remained in the DNA of the West.

As mentioned György Lukács, was one of the early Cultural Marxists who became Commissar for Education and Culture during the short lived Hungarian Jewish Bolshevik regime that lasted for four months in 1919. Lukács complained when finally thrown out of power that the Red Hungarians mistake was that the didn’t spill blood fast enough. During his time as Deputy to the Commissar of Education in Hungary Lukács was remembered for his action in undermining traditional morality by teaching Hungarian children in government schools debauched sexuality.

In the 1920s, this Hungarian Marxist, György Lukács, set out to address a contradiction within orthodox Marxist dogma: for Marx, a society’s dominant ideology was a “superstructure,” a mere reflection of its more basic economic structure. Thus, the ruling class of capitalists who controlled the money and the means of production also created and controlled its dominant ideas. But a workers’ revolution of the sort Marx predicted could, Marx thought, only come from the subordinated class, i.e., the workers themselves. This question then arises: what will convince workers to revolt when the very ideas in their heads are implanted by their overlords? To answer this question, Lukács, in his History and Class Consciousness (1923), argued for a more subjective conception of class consciousness than the one favored by Marx. Workers (the proletariat) had to have their consciousness raised in order to muster up the appetite for revolution.
In analyzing this we note a contradiction. Marxism is a materialistic worldview. The non-material doesn’t exist. Yet, we see the Marxist Lukács here talking about the necessity to change “ideas.” Ideas are not material, as such, they do not exist.

Now I think the Cultural Marxist right about the necessity to change “ideas” but I don’t think it was consistent with their materialistic worldview. Which might explain why the classical Marxists (now called “vulgar Marxists) did not like the Gramscian neo-Marxists.

The primary goal of the Frankfurt School, of whom Lukács was a member  was to translate Marxism from economic terms into cultural terms. It would provide the ideas on which to base a new political theory of revolution based on race and culture, harnessing new “oppressed” groups (minorities, sexual perverts, feminists) to replace the faithless proletariat. The Frankfurt school was/is committed to smashing the Christian religion, and morals, It would also build a constituency among academics, who could build careers studying and writing about the new oppression. Toward this end, Herbert Marcuse-who favored polymorphous perversion-expanded the ranks of Gramsci’s new proletariat by including homosexuals, lesbians, and transsexuals. Into this was spliced György Lukács radical sex education and cultural terrorism tactics. Gramsci’s ‘long march’ was added to the mix, and then all of this was wedded to Freudian psychoanalysis and psychological conditioning techniques. The end product was Cultural Marxism, now known in the West as multiculturalism and its goal It was the hope of Lukács and the other members of the Frankfurt school to, in the words of fellow Frankfurt School member Willi Münzenberg;

“We must organize the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilization stink.”