WOKE Has Given Us Gender Neutral “Theybies” …. Baptists Have Long Given Us Religious Neutral Babies

“Theybies” (Rhymes with Babies)

Theybies are babies that are being raised in a gender-neutral environment to defend against gender socialization. The purpose of this parenting strategy is to not push children into gender stereotypes or roles and let them choose what to become.

This is merely Baptist thinking continuing on into gender. I mean compare Baptist reasoning to “Theybie” reasoning,

Baptists are those who raise babies in a covenant-neutral environment to defend against their children being raised with the conviction that they are Christian. The purpose of this covenant-less strategy is to not push children into a covenant commitment so to let them choose what to become in terms of their religion.

Quigley On Globalist Technique … FDR Seeking to Apply that Technique

“Their (The mid 20th century Globalists) desire to win over the opposition by cooperation worked with Smuts but failed with Hertzog, worked with Gandhi but failed with Menon, worked with Stresemann but failed with Hitler, and has shown little chance of working with any of the Soviet leader.”

Carroll Quigley
Tragedy & Hope — p. 954

Now, having read the quote above read the quote below in that prism.

“I just have a hunch that Stalin is not that kind of man. Harry [Hopkins] says he’s not and that he doesn’t want anything except security for his own country, and I think that if I give him everything I possibly can and ask nothing from him in return, noblesse oblige, he won’t try to annex anything and will work with me for a world of democracy and peace.”

FDR’s response to advice from Ambassador William C. Bullitt to pursue a containment policy against the Soviet Union (1943)

FDR was certainly the wickedest President in the 20th century.

1.) FDR successfully pushed into the European conflict. This is the policy he pursued, and this is what eventuated.

2.) FDR wanted the Japs to attack Pearl Harbor. He knew they were going to attack Pearl Harbor. He left the door open for them to attack Pearl Harbor. When the Japs attacked Pearl Harbor, they were doing precisely what FDR was praying they would do and had arranged for them to do.

3.) FDR is responsible for the seizure of Eastern Europe by Stalin.

4.) FDR signed off on Stalin’s desire to have Russians returned to Russia for death that had left Russia even prior to the Communists gaining victory in Russia in 1918.

5.) FDR is responsible for operation Keel Haul.

6.) FDR is responsible for the concessions made to Stalin at Teheran and Yalta.

7.) FDR was responsible for the deepening of the Great Depression. His policies pursued, once in office in 1933, guaranteed that the Great Depression would become even greater.

Dabney – You Become What You Worship

“Rome’s saint and angel worship is but baptized paganism, and like all other, it tends to degrade the worshipers. Hence, the importance of the prohibition of idolatry. Nothing but infinite perfection should be the object of religious worship. The reverence and admiration which worship implies invest every quality of the object worshiped with sanctity. Blemishes are always reproduced in the votaries. The worship of an imperfect object is therefore the deification of defects. Rom. 1:25, 26; Ps. 115:8. But the more the worshiper is corrupted, the more degraded will be the divinities which he will construct for himself out of his defiled heart, until the vile descent is realized which St. Paul describes in Rom. 1:22, 23.”
R. L. Dabney
Ch 31 In Dabney’s Systematic Theology

You become what you worship and you worship what you have become.

1.) All of is explanation of why it is of first importance to think well upon and about God. Nobody worships a God that they have not already understood to one degree or another. Doxology presupposes theology. Worship presupposes epistemology. If that isn’t true worshipers are left worshiping an “unknown god” which is still a god known enough to know that while unknown, he must be worshiped.

Do you want to be excellent parents to your children? Then make sure they think long, hard, and well about the God of the Bible. Make sure they learn not only who God is but also see that they learn what the concrete implications are to knowing God. If you want to measure your children’s behavior (or your own) then every time you see misbehavior, ask yourself, “what is it that my child is wrongly thinking and believing about God that is driving that behavior.” After all,

“As a man thinketh in his heart so he is.”

Proverbs 23:7

2.) Worship takes the knowledge of God and hones it to a razor-sharp reality. When we worship, we are grinding even deeper into our character and personality what it is we believe about the God we serve.

 “Those who make them (idols) become like them, and so do all who trust in them.”  Psalm 115:8

This means that if you show me the person, I will tell you about their God.

3.) This idea then flips into cultural considerations. If it is the case that showing me the person allows me insights into the God, they worship then it is also the case that showing me any given culture or subculture allows me insights into the God that culture is reflecting. Culture is, after all, only theology externalized as poured over particular people groups.

4.) Note Dabney’s statement, “blemishes are always reproduced in the votaries.” If any individual, family, church, or culture thinks wrongly about God that blemished thinking will out. Again, this is why we must spend our whole lives checking and re-checking how it is we think about God and what we think about God.

5.) All of this reinforces the idea that theology remains the Queen of the Sciences. What we believe and then worship gets into every other thing we do. What we believe and then worship gets into everything we say, our mannerisms, our priorities, and our relationships. Indeed our whole lives are nothing but lived out theology.

6.) Nobody gets a pass here. Even the Atheist who claims there is no God is animated by what he thinks about the god he denies exists.

7.) When one has a particular culture or people group who become divided amongst themselves on the character and nature of God (as the Wests currently is) the results are explosive. No people can exist as a people without a harmony of conviction on the nature and character of God. Now, those kinds of culture may not articulate their disagreements in quite that way but the fact is that their ownership of different cosmologies as driven by their differences in theology proper accounts for the divisiveness that exists in the culture. Such differences account for what we today call “culture wars.” Where there is no harmony of thought regarding theology there one can eventually expect blood in the streets because two or more gods can never co-exist in the same family, church, or culture.

8.) Of course, if one will not worship and serve the God of the Bible the only other option left is the worship of the creature and that in turn means either anarchy as each man does what is right in his own eyes or it means the tyrannical State, Church, or family as some covenantal hierarchy will seek to take the place as God walking on the earth. If man will not have God, then man will have man as God and man will get man as God, good and hard.

9.) This quote then emphasizes that we worship well. We should think long and hard about what our worship is communicating. Is our worship reflecting the character of the Triune Holy God?

Allow me to suggest that most of the modern Worship in the contemporary West is absolute trash. The sense of majesty is completely gone. The idea that we are meeting with the thrice Holy God has disappeared. The Gospel absolution in the liturgy (if it even exists in a worship service) is not thirsted for any longer because men no longer are convinced how benevolent and gracious God is in taking us for Himself as redeemed sinners in Jesus Christ as wooed by the Holy Spirit.

Our worship today in Protestant churches (exceptions notwithstanding) is just as bad as what Dabney was complaining about in the churches of Rome during His time. (Rome continues to suck as to this issue.)

Christ’s Humiliation

Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus, who, being in the form of God, did not consider it [b]robbery to be equal with God, but [c]made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bond servant, and coming in the likeness of men. And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death of the cross. Therefore God also has highly exalted Him and given Him the name which is above every name, 10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth, 11 and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

1. A Plea For Loving Others. (Philippians 2:1-2)

2. A Principle For Loving Others. (Philippians 2:3,4)

3. A Pattern For Loving Others. (Philippians 2:5-11)

In Christian theology we speak of both the humiliation of Christ and then the exaltation of Christ. During the Holy Week of Lent season, which Palm Sunday kicks off we find Christ going through the valley of His most extreme humiliation. This great Christological passage in Philippians 2 traces out that extreme humiliation.

Of course we are mindful that Palm Sunday marks the beginning of the humiliation. It is true that the crowds are jubilant with praise upon Christ entering but that Jesus sees this not as exaltation but as humiliation is recorded in Luke’s Gospel 19,

41 And when he was come near, he beheld the city, and wept over it, 42 Saying, If thou hadst known, even thou, at least in this thy day, the things which belong unto thy peace! but now they are hid from thine eyes.

Scripture records Jesus weeping only three times. Once @ Lazarus Tomb (John 11), once here, and once in Gethsemane (Hebrews 5:7-9). Each time in connection to death. First, Lazarus’s death, then here over the prospects of Jerusalem’s death, and over His own death in Hebrews.

So, it is easy to read the Palm Sunday passage and not see the beginning pangs of this week of Humiliation. However, Christ is experiencing profound sadness and the humiliation he suffers from here on out just continues to intensify.

The text this morning talks about Christ humbling himself but the Greek word in this text is ἐταπείνωσεν  (etapanosin – hard a and o) and communicates a humbling that moves into humiliating.

To make or bring low, humble, humiliate; pass: To be humbled. From tapeinos; to depress; figuratively, to humiliate.

I bring this out because too often in our Christian world we often mean by the word “humble” the idea of somebody willing to forego applause, or somebody who is willing and even happy to take the lower position or perform tasks that are not noticed. And that is all well and good but during this descent into humiliation that begins on Palm Sunday our Lord Christ is moving beyond humble to genuinely humiliating.

But let’s not get ahead of ourselves here because the Cross becomes the apex of the humiliation ritual that our Lord Christ undertakes in order to meet the just demands for the trespassing of God’s just standard.

There is ever increasing degrees of humiliation in this passage.

The first movement of humility here mentioned is the incarnation.

Paul’s statement that Christ was “in the form of God” are words that would have been understood at his time as saying with stark explicitness the deity of Jesus Christ. The phraseology in Greek that St. Paul uses was the linguistic coin of his day. The phraseology was first popularized by Aristotelian philosophy and as such, it was the most natural way of expressing the divinity of Jesus Christ.

The word “Form” as in “being in the form of God” is the equivalent to our saying “Christ Jesus having the specific character of God. In the Greek thought of that time “Form” was that body of qualities which distinguished Christ from all other spiritual beings. It is a way of directly saying that “the incarnate Christ was God.” If Jesus Christ was not in the form of God He would not be God, not having those characterizing qualities which make God God.

Note Humiliation in passage
Note Exaltation in passage

Talk about Kenosis

emptied
ἐκένωσεν (ekenōsen)

Verb – Aorist Indicative Active – 3rd Person Singular
Strong’s 2758: (a) I empty, (b) I deprive of content, make unreal. From kenos; to make empty, i.e. to abase, neutralize, falsify

Some versions translate “made himself of no reputation.” Other’s translate “emptied himself.” Some versions render this “he made himself nothing.” I prefer the “he made of Himself no reputation.”

Often this passage will be made to say too much as if this emptying means that Jesus Christ surrendered His divine nature. This, of course, would be a mistake. The emptying of Himself here points more to the abasement of Himself then the deletion of His divine qualities.

All illustrations fail when we come to these kinds of truths but I often think of Mark Twain’s “The Prince & The Pauper” with this passage. If you remember Tom Canty and Prince Edward looking like doubles switch themselves. Prince Edward takes on the Pauper’s Tom Canty’s life. He remains Prince Edward with all of his dignity as King but no one recognizes Him and no one pays him deference save one soldier returning from war but that only in order to humor the now King Edward. In the story the Prince, quite w/o realizing what he was doing emptied himself. Christ, quite realizing what He was doing emptied or abased Himself. He still retained His Kingship but very few recognized him. His glory does periodically break out but on the whole, in His person, his glory is banked and He is not recognized for who He is and all this so that He might honor the Father.

The important thing to note for our purposes this morning is that when Christ empties himself we should not read that as Christ loses his Divine nature. It is perhaps better to think rather than Christ losing His divine nature he instead adds a human nature to His one person.

But of course, you do see the humiliation here, don’t you?

That’s the journey of our Lord Christ’s humiliation was not merely low, but lowest. A humiliation that moves from cradle to cross only intensifying with the passage of time.

This “making of Himself no reputation” is repeated in every ancient orthodox creed and confession?

Why? Because this humiliation matters. It’s what makes redemption real. Why insist on all this humiliation of the Messiah? Well, first and most important it was what the OT Scriptures taught to expect. (Isaiah 53)

Secondly, the alternatives don’t provide a redemption where there is a substitute who pays the penalty for sin. All the early cults tried to avoid this humiliation;

Docetism said Jesus just “appeared” to suffer — a divine hologram playing at humanity.

Gnosticism couldn’t imagine God wearing flesh — it saw the physical world as flawed and unworthy.

Arianism claimed Jesus wasn’t fully God, just a next-level creation.

But without the humiliation of Christ beginning in the incarnation and reaching its apex during Holy Week and Good Friday, we remain dead in our trespasses and sin. The wages of sin being death, there had to be a God-Man who would die as humiliated and cursed on a tree.

And so when we consider the Lenten season, we are reminded once again that it is not primarily about us. Yes, we rightly remind ourselves of the need for ongoing repentance. Yes, we rightly remind ourselves of the reality of our suffering with Christ. Yes, we deny ourselves during this season, but all of this is really second tier. Lent screams at us the suffering and humiliation of Christ. A suffering and humiliation that begins with the incarnation moves on to the Cross, and ends in the grave.

Now we pivot to talk more about the next level of humiliation the Philippians passage speaks of and that is the Cross. Our Lord Christ in His Humiliation, the Holy Spirit says, became obedient to death … even the death on the Cross.

Doubtless there are exceptions but by and large must moderns are not familiar with just exactly the humiliation that was found in anybody being crucified.

“In 1986, The American Medical Association published an article titled “The Physical Death of Jesus Christ”. It details the entire process of Jesus’ trial to His death on the cross. In Luke 22, before Jesus is arrested, it is written that He was in great distress & sweating blood. Although rare, it is recognized as Hematidrosis, caused by high amounts of stress. One can literally sweat blood.

At the time, the crucifixion was considered the worst death for the worst of criminals. But this is not all Jesus faced. The Lord Christ endured whipping so severe that it tore the flesh from His body. He was beaten so horrific that His face was torn & His beard ripped. A crown of thorns, 2-3 inches long cut deeply into His scalp. The crown was not like a sweat brow that somebody might wear playing sports. The Crown was an oval shaped head gear that was comprised of 8 inch thorns that were literally sharp as nails. This crown was doubtless then pulled securely over our Master’s brow.

If there is any doubt that this was all intended as humiliation we are reminded that they mocked him now at this point saying, “Hail King of the Jews.”

What is happening here is the kind of thing that happens when a point is being made to all who gaze upon this. It is a strong and convincing point. Avoid this at all cost.

The leather whip used to flog Him had tiny iron balls & sharp bones. The balls caused internal injuries while the sharp bones ripped open His flesh. His skeletal muscles, veins, & bowels we’re exposed, causing major blood loss. Most men do not survive this kind of torture. After Jesus was severely flogged, He was forced to carry His own cross while people mocked & spat on Him.

The cross beam he carried appx. 650 yards weighed somewhere in the vicinity of 80 pounds. You can imagine how torturous that would be for someone is Christ’s condition.

All this explains why Paul can write… “He became obedient to death … even the death on the cross.” This was not just any death.

Now, keep in mind that all of this inhuman torture is the physical incarnation of what sin deserves. In other words … in all this humiliation we are being taught what God’s just penalty against sin begins to look like.

Well, crucifixion was a process meant to instill excruciating pain, creating a slow & agonizing death. Nails as long as 8 inches were driven into Jesus’ wrists & feet. The Roman soldiers knew the tendon in the wrists would tear & break, forcing Jesus to use His back muscles to support Himself to breathe. Imagine the struggle, the pain, the courage. Jesus endured this reality for 3 hours!

The Gospel of John writes that after Jesus’ death, a Roman soldier pierced His side with a spear & blood & water came out. Scientists explain that from hypovolemic shock, the rapid heartrate causes fluid to gather in the sack around the lungs & heart. The gathering of fluid in the membrane around the heart is called Pericardial effusion & the lungs, Pleural effusion.

To the world, Christianity is as foolish as it can get. They believe it’s for the weak. But when you are confronted by the reality of the cross, it’s clearly not a pretty sight. It is brutal & horrific. This is the weight Jesus carried. The weight of the sins of the world, all so that we can live. God’s wrath is fully satisfied in Jesus. This is what it took. Repent & believe! Jesus is “God among us” in the flesh. Jesus is our Savior. Jesus loves you so much, He went through this spiritual and physical punishment for your sins and mine. Jesus is Lord, Almighty God, Everlasting Father.”

THE DEPTH OF CHRIST’S DESCENT into humiliation. This was Humiliation With Purpose Jesus didn’t come to impress. He came to empty Himself. Philippians 2 says it plainly: “Though He was in the form of God, He did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped… He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to death — even death on a cross.”

So, we have considered the humiliation of Christ and I would have you remember that when we speak of Christ’s humiliation we generally speak of it in three movements…. Incarnation to Cross to grave. Next week we will speak of Christ’s exaltation which also has three movements. From Resurrection to Ascension to Session. This is how Theologians often think of Christ’s humiliation and exaltation.

We should end by noting that this was all purposeful. This humiliation first was for the Father that the Father could not be charged with injustice and untruthfulness. The Father had promised throughout the Scripture that without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sin. From the beasts slain to cover Adam and Eve, to Passover Lamb wherein the blood is sprinkled on the Mantle of the doorway, to the OT sacrificial system with its oceans of blood and its rivers of sprinkling, everywhere Scripture declared in archetype form that there must come one who should do what the blood of bulls and beasts could never do but could only point to … and that is the taking away of sin.

And then after the Cross is about honoring and vouchsafing the name of the Father, the Cross is about the Triune God’s love for His people. Because Christ paid this price of humiliation we ourselves will never experience this kind of eternal humiliation. Because of Christ’s humiliation we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ. Because of Christ’s humiliation we can know that we know that we have eternal life because all that come to the Father by Christ, the Father will in no wise cast out.

So, as hard as this humiliation is to consider, we Christians understand that without it we would be just as miserable as those who currently seek to live their lives bearing their own sins.

Praise God for Lent and the reminder it is of Christ in our place.

 

 

 

 

 

When The Laity Began to Hate – With Apologies to Kipling

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1222561269657658

They were not seeking a fight
Their lives had them out straight
Their sin was in being white
When the laity began to hate

Their “Pastors” were full WOKE
Throwing around their ample weight
Their accusations were a joke

When the laity began to hate

Their rebuttals were sure and solid
The Clergy began to berate
With their outrage worn and squalid
When the laity began to hate

The laity had become based
They would not just “accept their fate”
They refused to be replaced
When the laity began to hate

Wilson could not frighten
J. White could not make them abate
They had themselves become enlightened
On the issue of race they’d debate
Now the laity knows how to hate