Believing That Race Is Real Is A Gospel Issue

“Now of course, belonging to a people (nation) is always more than being descended from a common ancestor but it is never less than that. The chief addition to belonging to a nation is embracing a shared faith/religion. This explains why many people have a short definition of nation that reads; “A nation is particular ethnos who share a common religion which together creates a common culture (law, customs, language), as normatively sharing a common geographic setting.” Clearly, like Israel of old, the foreigner may dwell among a particular people but the foreigner will always be understood by himself and the people as a foreigner – even as treated with dignity.”

Reed M. Walters

To dismiss as important the issue that race is real simply because it is not directly related to the gospel is foolish and it is foolish because the issue of race is directly related to the Gospel. To deny race is part of the egalitarian push to deny distinctions. The ultimate distinction that the consistent egalitarian who denies race wants to deny is the distinction between God and man. It ought to be obvious now that this is where all this distinction denying is leading. First we started with the denial of the distinction between races and now we are denying the distinction between male and female. How can people not see that it won’t be long till the egalitarians  overtly stating what they are secretly presupposing and that is that there is no distinction between God and man?

If there is no distinction between God and man then there can be no Gospel. So, dismissing the issue of race because it is not directly related to the gospel is a non-sequitur that can only be championed by people who have no ability to do consequential thinking.

Clergy who deny the existence of distinctions in races and yet affirm the existence of the distinction of God and man are just one generation from their children being consistent.

Now, can people be saved by the Gospel who remain practitioners and champions of egalitarianism? Only God knows but I would think that it depends on far they take their egalitarianism. You see, egalitarianism is another religion, with another definition of sin, another definition of Jesus, another definition of salvation, and another definition of sanctification. How wrong must one be before they are so wrong that they can’t be Christian?

Only God knows. But why try to press the boundaries to find out?

Culture, Peoples, and Beliefs

“The idea that some cultures are better than others and that some are worse than others was the most common Christian thing until our brains were broken and we were forced to pretend not to know things.”

Dr. Stephen Wolfe
X post

Bret responds

The above is true but it is more true than Wolfe might even like to admit. Culture is not something that drops out of the sky. Culture is the result of a particular set of beliefs as embraced and lived out be a particular ethnic people group. This is why we can say that culture is theology externalized. When we say that culture is theology externalized we are noting that a particular ethnic group have owned a particular theology and they are, as a particular people living out that particular theology. This is why it can also be said that culture is the outward manifestation of a particular people groups inward beliefs.

Because culture is one part genetics and one part plausibility structure as owned by that genetic grouping it is the case that should either of those two factors be changed out, the result will be a different culture. So, if one changes either the people group who are doing the believing or if one changes out the set of beliefs that the particular people group believe the consequence will be a different culture. This explains why if you have different races occupying the same geographic space that there will be conflict even if those different races hold the same beliefs. There will be conflict because genetics matter and genetics are one of the two factors that comprise culture. The same is true if you flip the scenario. If you have the same racial/ethnic people group occupying the same geographic area but some of the people in that people group own a different religion there will be conflict that rises up between the varying belief systems. For example, White people who embrace Marxism, living cheek by jowl with white people who embrace Biblical Christianity will not get along.

Now, imagine what we are trying to do now in the West. We are trying to put together in the same geographic space different peoples groups with different religious beliefs. We are trying to place alien Mooselimbs, Jews, and Indians (dot not feather) Hindus, etc. together with white Christians into one living space and we are expecting that there is going to be harmonious culture. It is as rational as to geld a horse and then expect it to be fruitful.

Let us add to what was said above; since cultures are a combination of particular people and their particular beliefs this necessitates thinking that some particular people(s) and beliefs are better than other particular peoples and/or beliefs. If one culture is superior to another culture or if one culture is inferior to another the reason for that superiority or inferiority is going to be found in one of the two realities that comprise culture. Culture A is going to be superior to culture B either because the people themselves are a superior people or the beliefs of the people in culture A or superior to the beliefs of people in culture B or some combination of the two.

We cannot argue that cultures are superior or inferior to other cultures without arguing also that the reason this is so is because a combination of distinct ethnic/racial people groups and their beliefs are at the same time superior and/or inferior to another.

Now, because of the West’s revolutionary egalitarianism we don’t like saying or observing these truths that used to be accepted as a matter of fact. In America the civil rights legislation of the 1960s prohibited us from thinking the obvious. But the denial of the obvious doesn’t make the obvious go away. Peoples are different and different peoples build different cultures. Beliefs are different and different belief systems build different cultures. Different peoples with the same belief system will build different cultures. People who are the same with different belief systems will build different cultures.

This really isn’t that difficult… unless you’re an egalitarian.

The Christian & The Prospect Of Suffering

13 And who is he who will harm you if you become followers of what is good? 14 But even if you should suffer for righteousness’ sake, you are blessed. “And do not be afraid of their threats, nor be troubled. But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts, and always be ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you, with meekness and fear.”

I Peter 3

Here Peter returns to a point that he had dropped earlier;

I Peter 2:12 having your conduct honorable among the Gentiles, that when they speak against you as evildoers, they may, by your good works which they observe, glorify God in the day of visitation.

The ideas being communicated in each of these passages is that Christians will be challenged by the wicked as to their beliefs … indeed they may even suffer persecution … and in those situations Christians both by their conduct and by their words are responsible to give an apologetic … a defense of the faith. They are to provide a reason for the hope that is in them.

Peter begins here by bringing up

I.) The Possibility of Suffering/Persecution

The Apostle opens in vs. 13 by suggesting that generally speaking those who are followers of good, will be left alone. In vs. 14 though Peter does allow that there will be times when Christians suffer for righteousness sake. Of course we see that throughout the Scriptural record as well as throughout Church history. There are times, especially when the surrounding culture and visible church goes into steep decline, when Christians will suffer for righteousness sake. That is, Christians will suffer because they are doing or speaking the right thing… they are living and speaking consistent with their Christian faith.

II.) Next Peter Enjoins The Proper Response to Suffering/Persecution

Peter says that in light of that unjust persecution and suffering that the response is to first realize that we are blessed. Peter is perhaps recalling here the words of our Lord Christ who also anticipated that Christians would suffer and be persecuted;

Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake, For theirs is the kingdom of heaven. 11 Blessed are you when they revile and persecute you, and say all kinds of evil against you falsely for My sake. 12 Rejoice and be exceedingly glad, for great is your reward in heaven, for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you.

So, the first response that we are to have should it ever be the case that we are unjustly persecuted and so suffering is to realize that we are blessed. We can rejoice and be glad in the midst of unjust suffering because we know that such suffering is promissory of future great reward and we can rejoice and be glad in the midst of unjust suffering and persecution because we know we are keeping the very best of company being counted as among the prophets. I mean, who doesn’t want to be identified with the great prophets of God who went before us?

Peter then combines the reminder that those are blessed who suffer persecuted for righteousness sake with the admonition to “not be afraid of their threats.” This is the second response we are to have in the face of persecution and suffering. Fear not.

The last few weeks we have been considering the why behind these word “do not be afraid of their threats.” The reason for knowing no fear in light of suffering, persecution, and threats, is that the Lord God omnipotent reigns. God is sovereign and has called His people, “The apple of His eye.” The Holy Spirit has reminded us that all things work together for the good of those God loves and are called according to His purpose. God has explicitly told us that He has engraved our names on the palms of His hands (Is. 49:16). For these reasons we are not to be afraid of their threats. God is our God due to the fact that we have been united to Christ.

The third response Peter writes here to the flock as it pertains to people breathing out threats and persecuting us is to

Sanctify (Set Apart) The Lord Christ in your hearts

This call echoes Isaiah 8:13 where we read;

13 The LORD of Hosts is the One you shall regard as holy. Only He should be feared; only He should be dreaded.

This call from Peter then to Sanctify the Lord Christ in your hearts in the face of persecution and suffering seems to counsel on how to overcome the fear that Peter warns against. Peter writes in essence, “very well, there is this possible persecution and suffering and in light of that there is a natural response to have fear. Well, little flock, the way to deal with the understandable fear of man is to replace it with the fear of God. Sanctify (set apart – hold as holy and distinct) the Lord God in your hearts.”

You see a genuine fear of God – a genuine setting apart God will calm the swells that can overwhelm a understandable fear of men who are breathing out threats against us.

So to “sanctify Christ” as most versions have it or to “sanctify God” was to count His Name as holy (sanctified) above all other names. To “Sanctify Christ” means to own the fear of God, as the only fear which men ought to cherish, resulting in the safeguard against all undue fear of men.

This is not easy. I know I have failed at this in my past. I know if I had sanctified God in my heart and so feared God more than men the harassment and persecution of men would have not knocked me off my center. So, learning the fear of God… learning to set apart God is an arrows that warriors should have in their quiver because warriors are inevitably going to have to deal with persecution and suffering at one level or another.

One more word here. Peter says we are to sanctify God in your hearts.

Moderns tend to want to drive a dichotomy between head and heart. We have all kinds of silly sayings

Follow your heart
Affairs of the heart
In the 1960 Prez campaign Americans heard constantly, “In your heart you know he’s right.”

However the idea that there is this vast dichotomy between head and heart is just nonsense if we are going to understand the language in its Biblical context.

Gordon Clark dealt with this issue two generations ago. After collating all the Scripture that referred to heart Clark noted;

In eighty percent or more of (Bible verses)… the context shows… that the intellect or man’s mind is intended. Maybe ten percent mean volition (will). Another ten percent signify the emotions. Hence the actual usage very nearly identifies the heart with the intellect.

So, it would be a mistake to imagine that Peter is speaking of the “heart” here as though it is referring to the center of our emotions over against the mind with which we think. That kind of dichotomy is a stranger to Biblical thinking. In Biblical terminology the “heart” is the location of our reasoning (Romans 1:21), meditation (Psalms 19:14), understanding (Proverbs 8:5), thinking (Deuteronomy 7:17; 8:5) and believing (Romans 10:10). It is just here—in the center of our thinking and reasoning—that Christ is to be consecrated as Lord, when we are suffering and being persecuted.

So, biblically speaking, “set apart Christ as the Lord in your hearts,” means think as a Christian on this matter. It means to resolve to think properly. We are take ourselves into our hands and talk back to ourselves saying,

“Very well then, matters are getting difficult here. I am surrounded by the Philistines and they are breathing out threats and are persecuting me. I am languishing here. Very well, I must take myself in hand and at this very moment think properly about Christ as being Lord … I must sanctify God as Lord and be done with this fear of man and get on with the battle at hand.”

Then Peter gives some counsel on what more should be done in these situations;

III.) Be Ready to Give an Apologetic

and always be ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you, with meekness and fear.” I Peter 3

Now here we should first note that there is only one possible way to always be ready to give this kind of defense and that is by knowing what we believe and why we believe it and what we don’t believe and why we don’t believe it. There is no defending the Gospel hope … there is no defending the reason for the hope that is in us that is absent of knowing our undoubted Catholic Christian faith.

This verse is why I drill your children so much on the catechism. It is why we have worldview classes with the covenant seed. It is why I try while in the pulpit to get into the doctrine the way I do. All of that is explained by this first. I want you and the children and myself to have the ability to give a defense for the hope that lies within us.

It explains why I write the volumes I write on Iron Ink. It explains the existence of Iron Rhetoric. It explains my reading habits. Frankly, I am scared to death that some time will arise when I am not able to give a reason for the hope that is in me. As a minister I likewise daily wonder if I have done enough to help people likewise to be able to give a reason for the hope that lies within them.

This passage teaches us that Christianity is just not a label we wear. Christianity should be seen as a vocation much like being a Doctor or a Lawyer is a vocation. It should be our jobs … our callings to be Christian and like being a Doctor or a Lawyer that requires hard and long study. It requires putting our shoulder to the wheel of learning. Only in such a way can we be ready to give an apologetic … a defense for the reason for the hope that lies within us.

And never was there a time that this was more needed than our time. We are living in a church and cultural insane asylum. The proof of that was brought forth by the renown pollster George Barna in 2021 as he spoke in a Church in Virginia. I can only imagine that matters have deteriorated since then… Barna

Cited recent data indicating that just 6% of American people have a biblical worldview, despite 51% believing they do. The Cultural Research Center, which did the survey, concluded that 94% of Americans do not have a biblical worldview… According to Barna’s research, the worldview problem is in the church as well, with just 21% of evangelicals holding to a biblical worldview. Quick math tells us that 79% of Evangelicals do NOT have a Biblical worldview.

If one does not have a Biblical worldview, whatever one might be giving as the reason for the hope that lies within him it won’t be reasons that are reflective of what is taught in God’s Word.

Consider just one very recent piece of evidence of this lack of a Christian Worldview existing in the Reformed Churches.

Not many weeks ago a ordained minister named Littlepage in a PCA Washington DC church recently announced during a sermon that he was leaving the PCA church because the Lord had led he and his wife to become Roman Catholic. The head of the Home Missions department in the PCA was setting in the service and he along with the Elders and congregation cheered when Littlepage made the announcement. The head of the Home Missions called for the Leaders and Shepherdesses to come forward and lay hands on this departing minister. In the course of all this the now Roman Catholic but still ordained PCA minister was allowed to administer the Lord’s Table.

Talk about not having a Christian Worldview… not only as pertaining to the Minister, but as pertaining to the head of the Mission to North America and as pertaining to the Church Elders and as pertaining to the congregation. It would exhaust me to count all the different ways that this whole show was blasphemous. Do you think any of those people could give a acceptable reason for the hope that lies within them?

So, I return to the thought that we need to start thinking of our Christian faith as a vocation. To those of you here (and I know you’re present) who do constantly seek to sharpen your blade, I salute you. I salute you because you are so rare and as your Pastor allow me to commend you and to urge you to press on. I know what it means to work 80 hours a week, raise a family, and try to continue to pile up the ability to give reason for the hope that lies within me. I know it is not easy… but as you can learn your faith, learn it. While driving around listen to lectures/sermons. While preparing meals in the Kitchen or while in the laundry room pursue the knowing of what you believe and why you believe it and what you don’t believe and why you don’t believe it.

And then when God opens a door, step through it. There is such a need for godly reasoning in private conversations and in the public square.

Be ready to give a defense. There was a time when we might have been able to just let the professionals be the ones giving a defense, but we are living in a time when what is required is “all hands on deck.”

And what of that “hope that lies within us?”

Well clearly that hope is the magnificence of our Lord Jesus Christ who out of love for the Father and for His people took upon Himself a human nature and as the God-Man paid the just penalty for our sin so that God’s name would be cleared of any accusation and so that we could have peace with God. He who knew no sin, became sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of Jesus Christ. The hope that lies within us means that the grave holds less terror because we belong to Christ. Then the hope that lies within us means that we no longer walk as the pagans do with their darkened understanding.

Indeed, as we increasingly understand our undoubted Catholic Christian Faith our whole lives become a testimony of the hope that lies within us.

Friends, the visible church and culture desperately needs folks who can give a reason for the hope that lies within them. More important than that even though is that this is what we are called to in order to honor our master and liege-Lord… our great Captain, the Lord Jesus Christ.

A Revival?

In light of the recent Charlie Kirk Llamapalooza there are any number of people chortling that we are either in a revival or are on the cusp of revival. I however, do not agree in the slightest. I mean, I wish that were true – it would be a decades long prayer answered if it was true, but it’s just not true.

Now, don’t get me wrong. I have no doubt that there are folks genuinely being confronted with the claims of Jesus Christ and for that I rejoice. However, revival or Reformation or renewal, or whatever one might want to call it is clearly not in the cards.

How do I know this? How can I say this? I can say this by looking at some leading indicators which would communicate and signify that we are in the midst of Reformation.

A few key signs of Reformation really occurring;
 
1.) Existing conservative Churches are emptied out. Since the bureaucracy of the Institutional Church will never allow Reformation one sign of Reformation occurring is the disappearance of the modern putatively conservative Reformed, and Lutheran denominations.
 
2.) Larger numbers of people pull their children out of Government schools. Reformation means that people are done with false religions (see #1 above) and the largest false religion in these united States are the Government schools which serve to indoctrinate and catechize America’s children into a anti-Christ way of thinking. 
 
3.) People quit voting for the uni-party. Reformation would mean that converts quickly learn that the Republicans and Democrats are a uni-party that only intend to give lip service (if even that) to Christianity.

4.) Large numbers of people would quit sending their children to the current Universities and Colleges … especially the Christian colleges. These are places where people go to lose their faith or to have their faith reinterpreted through an alien grid.

5.) Divorce rates would plummet. Families would be strengthened. The Christian faith and worldview would be passed down from generation to generation.

6.) The end of seeing putatively Christian Magistrates going to the Bagel wailing wall in order to be caught on camera “praying.”

7.) The end of the Welfare-Warfare state — the end of the “Invite the world, Invade the world” policy. Soon following the Kirk Llamapalooza Trump announced that he was going to sell the Bagel’s six Billion dollars of war ordnance. Further Trump announced that he thought the Ukraine would win the current war and he has committed sending arms to NATO so that NATO can send arms to the Ukraine. Also, the numbers that the Trump administration are touting in relation to their “success” on repatriating illegals are completely bogus.

I could go on and on but the point here is that the Kirk Llamapalooza event is no indicator that we are experiencing “revival.” What it does prove we are experiencing is the proverb that “there is a sucker born every minute.”

The Kirk Extravaganza…. Random Observations II

“In the present ubiquity of ignorance, one cannot but suspect that many who call themselves Christians do not understand what the word means, and that some who would vigorously repudiate Christianity are more Christian than many who maintain it. p. 14. Towards the end of 1938 we experienced a wave of revivalism which should teach us that folly is not the prerogative of any one political party or any one religious communion, and that hysteria is not the privilege of the uneducated. … The religious fervor has been a fervor for democracy. It may engender nothing better than a disguised and peculiarly sanctimonious nationalism, accelerating our progress towards the paganism which we say we abhor. To justify Christianity because it provides a foundation of morality, instead of showing the necessity of Christian morality from the truth of Christianity, is a very dangerous inversion.” pp. 18-19.

T.S. Eliot
‘The Idea of a Christian Society’

I continue to comment on the Kirk extravaganza by way of random observations. I find this kind of extravaganza to be fascinating, in part because of my life long interests. My degree work in under-grad was politics, history, and religion-philosophy. My degree work in graduate school (Seminary) was theology and cross-cultural ministry. My reading since graduating from both has continued to be largely in these fields while also including sociology and economics. In the Kirk Extravaganza this all comes together as stirred in one pot. The attraction for me to this thing is like a honey bee’s attraction to a flower. I find it fascinating.

Yesterday’s observations earned for me the comment from another conservative clergy Baptist that the reasons for my observations and my unwillingness to jump on the MAGA Kirk extravaganza train is because I am a purist. To that accusation, I can only proclaim that “I am guilty as charged,” right along with the Apostle Paul, Athanasius, Chrysostom, Augustine, Gottschalk of Orbais, Hus, Luther, Calvin, Cromwell, Paisley, Knox, Goodman, Dabney, Machen, etc. There could be worse company to keep. Honestly though, it seems to me the only place left if one is not a purist is to admit that one is a compromiser.

It ought to be clear from yesterday’s post that I am very leery of what is happening. As I said yesterday, I am with St. Paul that we ought to rejoice that whether in pretense or truth Christ is proclaimed. You will see in today’s post that I point out where the Gospel was proclaimed.

Some have (I think rightly) pointed out that the Kirk extravaganza has more than a few parallels with the way the murder of Horst Wessel was used by the National Socialists in the 1930s. The 22 year old Wessel was murdered by the Communists and he became, by the arts of Joseph Goebbels, a martyr for the Nazis around which to rally the German people. That story is limned out a wee bit here;

https://goldengate.substack.com/p/remembering-horst-wessel

I don’t think there can be any doubt whatsoever that Charlie Kirk’s murder is being used in a way that can only be described as propaganda. This is also seen in the way that Kirk’s memory is being fought over. “Kirk was about to become Roman Catholic say the Roman Catholics.” “Kirk was on a trajectory wherein he was going to fully understand the Bagel problem say the Groypers .” “Charlie would want us to….” “Do it for Charlie…” “We are all Charlie Kirk now.” These are all examples of how Kirk is being apotheosized before our very eyes.

Like all symbols Kirk is transcending reasonable analysis that may properly critique real faults with the man and is being lifted up to an untouchable status . Think Abraham Lincoln, or Martin Luther King, or George Washington. Kirk is reaching pantheon status. I don’t do pantheon because the best of men are men at best.

So, the assassination of Kirk has become our Horst Wessel moment. True or not I have no problem with one possible result of our current Horst Wessel moment and that is the destruction of the Marxist left. Even if the memory of the martyred Kirk is being used to manipulate people into supporting the destruction of the Marxist left I am good with that. What I’m not good with is how easily this whole thing could “jump the shark.” I am not convinced that the MAGA movement is particularly Christian and this Horst Wessel moment could be easily used by the Peter Theils, Bill Gates, Larry Ellisons, Mark Zuckerbergs, Jeff Bezos and the rest of the NWO, AI tech villains whose money is behind much of the MAGA movement. Those people scare me almost as much as the Marxist left.

So, I remain cynical. Very cynical regarding this cultural moment. But, I am a cynical chap so that should surprise no one.

Well, on to my random observations;

1.) J. D. Vance went out of his way to proclaim “Christ is King.” A good amount of cheering resulted. You’ll know that MAGA and Republicans are serious about “Christ is King,” when we start seeing sodomites removed from the Government where “Christ is King.”

You’ll know the Republicans are serious about their Christianity when they start seeking to shove the sodomites back in the closet just as they are now trying to shove the Trannies back in the closet.

Below is a list of Sodomites working in the Trump administration appointed by Trump proving that MAGA doesn’t really believe that “Christ Is King.”

Scott Bessent, 62, treasury secretary. The highest-ranking openly sodomite official in US history.

Ric Grenell, 58, presidential envoy for special missions. He was Trump’s director of national intelligence during his first term.

Tammy Bruce, 62, the new State Department Lesbian spokesperson was a Fox News contributor.

Jacob Helberg, 35, sodomite undersecretary of state for economic growth, energy, and the environment.

Bill White, 57, sodomite ambassador to Belgium.

Art Fisher, 49, sodomite ambassador to Austria.

2.) “Politics at its core is a process of critiquing other people and getting them to change. Christianity … The Gospel message, the message of Jesus begins with repentance. Christianity calls upon you to change…. The only thing that really matters is when we repent of our sins.” 

Tucker Carlson
Kirk Extravaganza

Carlson made the point that this doesn’t mean we are politically passive but he rightly pointed out that change that is top down (politics) has to come in concert with change that is inside out (conversion). That is exactly right.

I thought Carlson’s brief time was the best of the night overall. That still doesn’t mean I don’t think he is CIA or CIA adjacent. I think most of these influencers are operatives for one or several intelligence agencies somewhere.

2.) Tulsi Gabbard talked about “God” a great deal in her speech last night. Gabbard is a practicing Hindu. Pray tell, what God was she talking about last night? She also talked about right and wrong a great deal. Since right and wrong are always descendent from some God or god concept it’s really important to know if Gabbard is talking about right and wrong per her god Vishnu.

3.) Rubio and Hegseth’s presentations were quite good except where Hegseth offered that the gates of hell will not prevail over Charlie Kirk. That was pretty close to idolatry.

My only question for Rubio is… “Where has this Christianity been before last night? Why have you never spoken of it before.” I’m pretty confident that Rubio had a good speechwriter and I find it hard to believe he really knew his material.

Still… whether in pretense or truth Christ was proclaimed.

4.) In his speech Dr. Ben Carson reference W. Cleon Skousen’s book “The Naked Communist” written in the 1950s. Great book dealing with the Marxist intent to destroy the US from the inside out. I would highly recommend reading that book. Though dated the book still resonates. I thought Carson was sincere and the most genuine of all the politicians who spoke.

Unfortunately Dr. Carson also referenced “our Judeo-Christian values.” YUCK.

5.) “I challenge the ministers out there to talk about what the Bible says and not what the Leftists say.”

Dr. Ben Carson
Kirk Extravaganza

This is much needed counsel. Right now the US Clergy is just awful, notable exceptions notwithstanding. Keep in mind clergy that the Bible talks about;

a.) Just weights and measures and so the clergy should be talking about how evil the Federal Reserve is (8th Word)

b.) Not stealing (8th word) and so the clergy should talk about unjust taxation and how Government steals via purposely creating inflation.

c.) How the stranger and the alien is to be regulated and so clergy should talk about the wickedness of illegal immigration (5th word)

d.) About the reality of nations and how we are to disciple the nations as Christians and so clergy should preach on how the Scripture supports Christian Nationalism. (5th Word)

e.) About the importance of family (Ordo Amoris) and so clergy should preach on how the Scripture teaches Kinism and that those clergy who fight against Kinism are anti-family and anti-Christ. (5th Word)

f.) About how Government is God’s instrument and as God’s instrument Government is obligated to rule pursuant to God’s standard articulated by God’s Law-Word. (Magistrate enforces both tables.)

g.) About man as the image of God therefore Clergy should preach on how perverse sexuality is a striking at the image of God in man… an attempt to rip the image of God off of man. (7th Word)

h.) About the sacredness of life (6th commandment) and therefore clergy should talk about the need for capital punishment, protecting the unborn, protecting the aged and infirm, by way of government passed statute.

i.) About the centrality of family (again) and so clergy should preach on how the church and the state should both legislate in order to protect and build up the family unit. (5th Word)

If your minister has never touched these issues at one time or another in the last 5 years or so… flee for your life.

6.) Congress Critter Anna Paulina Luna invokes Martin Luther King, along with JFK and George Washington as being American luminaries whom Charlie Kirk is now standing alongside in the American pantheon.

I’m sorry…. but MLK was a Communist and a whoremonger while JFK was a Leftist and a whoremonger.
7.) The Roman Catholic Jack Posobiec spoke and he was raising Charlie Kirk’s prayer beads for all to see. There is no possibility of success for Christian Nationalism by joining with Papists. I realize many people have a difficult time seeing that Protestants and Roman Catholics cannot co-exist together in one nation but history bears that out. Eventually, this will become more clearly seen. It’s one reason I keep Nick Fuentes at a very long arm’s length away. Candice Owen is a problem for the same reason. Clearly both Fuentes and Owen can say helpful things but when considered as a whole … be very very careful

8.) “Charlie asked me if I were scared of dying and I said there’s a lot worse things than death and one of those things is if we lost the constitutional rights in this country and our children were raised as slaves. And I said to charlie sometimes the best consolation we can hope for is that we get to die with our boots on. Well Charlie died w/ his boots on to make sure we didn’t have to undergo those fates that are worse than death.”

RFK Jr.
Kirk Extravaganza

I thought this was particularly poignant but I would say that we are a good deal now more slaves to the Federal Government than when RFK’s Uncle and Father died with their boots on.

I thought this segment from RFK Jr.’s speech to be particularly good, though I’m not sure that Kirk wasn’t assassinated by the shadow powers as a means to put us in greater slavery.

9.) “Charlie Kirk is in heaven because his Savior sacrificed himself for Charlie Kirk.”

Dr. Frank Turek
Kirk Extravaganza

This is a great truth succinctly and well put. I thought Turek did a grand job though his Arminianism did leak through for those with ears to hear from time to time. I rejoiced over Turek’s time at the podium because he rubbed up against the truth and it is clear that he is a sincere man who loved Kirk very much.

10.) Pure religion and undefiled before our God and Father is this, to visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.  James 1:27

I am persuaded that Stacey Sheridan’s speech at the Kirk extravaganza was the most revealing of the character of Charlie Kirk. Kirk cared for the widow and the orphan and he did so in the name of Jesus the Christ. More than anything else I’ve ever read, heard, or listened from Charlie Kirk the way he took care of Sheridan and her daughter impressed me the most and brought me to tears.

11.) “Charlie knew that the purpose of life was to know Christ and to make him known so as to populate heaven.”

Dr. Frank Turek

Another great pithy and well put truth from Turek.

12.) Vance invoked the idea that Charlie was a combination of Athens and Jerusalem. Tertullian, the Early Church Father, asked long ago; “What has Athens to do with Jerusalem?” Vance invoked Socrates. No Christian salutes Socrates. J. D. Vance revealed his Roman Catholic slip.

13.) J. D. Vance kept insisting that “we are all children of God.” This idea was communicated by most of the speakers. This is the liberal idea of “the Fatherhood of God over all.”

It’s just not true that we are all children of God. In point of fact only the elect are the children of God. All others are aliens and strangers to God.
Now we don’t know who is elect and who is non-elect but part of the Christian message to the unbeliever is that “all are not the children of God but you can be a child of God if you will own your sin, repent, and trust Jesus Christ.”

This errant slogan that we are all “Children of God,” along with its counterpart that “we are all brothers” is one of the greatest hindrances to preaching Christ in the Church.  It is was cooked up by the Liberals (Modernists) in the early 20th century and it continues to be a by-word among many members of the clergy and of Christians in general.

14.) Generally speaking those considered the lesser lights speaking at the Kirk Extravaganza were far superior to those considered to be the greater lights. People like Sheridan, Turek, Carson, were far better than the luminaries.

15.) Interesting that FBI director Kashyap Pramod Vinod Patel did not speak at this extravaganza.

I think I will have one more entry here. I have yet to listen closely to both Trump’s meanderings and to Erica Kirk’s speech. I have listened to both but now closely.

One thing I find interesting in all this is all the hostility pointed in  my direction for critiquing this Kirk extravaganza. It’s almost as if there is a certain (MAGA) portion of the population that finds anyone suspicious if they do anything except cheer mindlessly. This is exactly what the Horst Wessel effect produces.

Instead, we must keep our eyes upon Jesus, the author and finisher of our faith, who for the joy set before Him, despised the Cross, enduring the shame.