10.) Doesn’t household mean household?
9.) How do children who are disallowed from the covenant make it a new and better covenant?
8.) Let me get this straight. Does the Baptist really expect me to believe that the Jews were absolutely incensed at the idea that Gentiles were now in the covenant without circumcision but accepted that their children were no longer in the covenant even with circumcision — and they accepted the latter without so much as a whimper recorded in the NT? You want me to believe that on one day Jewish children were included in the covenant and on the next day they had to wait until they were old enough to vote for Jesus on the matter. Hello?
7.) I didn’t wait for my children to ask me into their hearts before I named them and made them a part of my family. Why should I expect God to wait for His covenant seed to ask Jesus into their hearts before He names them in Baptism and makes them part of the family of God?
6.) I can’t get my mind around the fact that Pentecost amounted to the excommunication of children.
5.) “Forbid not the children to come unto me,” must mean something.
4.) If I were a Baptist and required explicit instructions from the New Testament before I baptized infants then I could not give communion to women? Imagine how that would go over.
3.) I read the Bible as one book … one story.
2.) I believe the children go with the parents. Call me old fashioned.
And the number one reason I am not a Baptist,
No one can tell me if I’ve reached the age of accountability yet.
More reasons,
11.) Jesus said infants could be members of the Kingdom of God. I think we can take His word for it.
12.) Who says Infants can’t have faith? Faith is God’s gift after all and He will bestow that gift on whomever He so chooses.
13.) Jesus didn’t say, “You must become as an adult to enter into the Kingdom of God.”
14.) We are saved by faith alone, not by the claim of faith alone.
When Baptists say that what is required is faith, what they really mean is what is required is a claim of faith.