Continuing To Respond to Mike Horton’s Stupid TGC Article

“The problem with Christian nationalism is not that some Christians are taking a biblical idea too seriously,” says Dr. Horton, professor of systematic theology and apologetics at Westminster Seminary California, “but that they are confusing America with Israel under the old covenant. From a biblical perspective, it’s actually heretical. It confuses the law with the gospel.”
 
TGC Article
 
1.) Horton clearly thinks that the Old Covenant was one of strict law. Per Horton, there was no gospel in the old covenant. If Horton believed there was Gospel in the Old Covenant then there would no problem with 21st century Christians owning a nationalism. However, since in Horton’s Hermeneutics the Old Covenant in terms of Israel being organized as a nation is all law and no gospel therefore no Nationalism today should be pursued because that would be testifying that you also were desiring all law and no gospel. For Horton, the very fact that you desire your people to prosper under God’s authority (Christian Nationalism) is proof positive that you are a heretic.

2.) Here are just a few people that Horton is calling a heretic. I could easily multiply this many many times over.

A.) “[Governments] must make good laws for the purpose of maintaining true religion and hindering all religions damaging to the souls, to limit them … the magistrate should not allow creeds and practices of heretics and blasphemers … A Christian government should not allow the exercise of religions which threaten the foundations of the true Christian religion, but should resist it.”

Gisbert Voetius
17th century Dutch theologian

B.) “The Christian cannot be satisfied so long as any human activity is either opposed to Christianity or out of all connection with Christianity. Christianity must pervade not merely all nations, but also all of human thought.”

J. Gresham Machen
20th Century Father of OPC

C.) “As the universe constitutes one physical and moral system, it was necessary that his headship as Mediator should extend to the whole and to every department thereof, in order that all things should work together for good to his people and for his glory, that all his enemies should be subdued and finally judged and punished, and that all creatures should worship him, as his Father had determined. Rom. viii. 28; 1 Cor. xv. 25; Heb. x. 13; i. 6; Rev. v. 9–13.

Hence the present providential Governor of the physical universe and “Ruler among the nations” is Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews, to whose will all laws should be conformed, and whom all nations and all rulers of men should acknowledge and serve. “He hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS. Rev. xix. 16.”

Archibald Alexander Hodge, A Commentary on the Confession of Faith, ed. William H. Goold (British edn, London: T. Nelson and Sons, 1870), pp 294-95.

D.) “Nationalism, within proper limits, has the divine sanction; an imperialism that would, in the interest of one people, obliterate all lines of distinction is everywhere condemned as contrary to the divine will. Later prophecy raises its voice against the attempt at world-power, and that not only, as is sometimes assumed, because it threatens Israel, but for the far more principal reason, that the whole idea is pagan and immoral.

Now it is through maintaining the national diversities, as these express themselves in the difference of language, and are in turn upheld by this difference, that God prevents realization of the attempted scheme… [In this] was a positive intent that concerned the natural life of humanity. Under the providence of God each race or nation has a positive purpose to serve, fulfillment of which depends on relative seclusion from others.”

-Geerhardus Vos,
Biblical Theology

But his (St. Paul) assurance as a Christian did not supersede his patriotism as a Jew; for in the very passage which follows that glorious expression of his assurance, we find that although triumphing as a believer in Jesus, he had a heaviness and sorrow in his heart on account of his own dear nation. He saw that the church of God — although it would truly inviolably be preserved to the end, by its great Creator, Redeemer, and Sanctifier, the Living and Triune Jehovah — was yet about to emigrate, and no longer to prove conservative of his nation; and he had so much nationalism in his religion that while he repeats his triumph as a Christian, he weeps as a Jew. Nay, higher still. The Lord Jesus knew full well, that the Church of God was safe, that the gates of hell could not prevail against His Church; and His bosom glowed with the most unlimited philosophy: yet while He rejoiced in spirit, because the will of His Father was about to be accomplished, He forgot not that the tears of his patriotism dropped over the tomb of Jerusalem.

Therefore it is, that we cannot allow our spirituality as Christians entirely to supersede our patriotism as Britons. Therefore it is, that we plead for Nationalism in our religion.

And we would rescue from the religion of mere poetry, and consecrate to a higher cause, the rapturous language of our Scottish Bard —

“Breathes there a man with soul so dead
that never to himself hath said
This is my own, my native land?
Whose heart has not within him burn’d
As home his footsteps turn’d
From wandering on some foreign strand

The inspired prophets were patriots, were, therefore, national protesters against idolatry and every evil work. Therefore they were Reformers. They were Reformers and patriots. Our own Reformers were patriots as well as Christians; and therefore they decided not only matters connected with Christian doctrine, but they decided on matters connected with National rule; not only against heresy in doctrine but also against usurpation in politics.

Rev. Hugh M’Neile, M.A.
Sermon — Nationalism in Religion
Delivered — 08 May, 1839

E.) Paul had two classes of brethren; those who were with him the children of God in Christ; these he calls brethren in the Lord, Philip, i. 14, holy brethren, &c. The others were those who belonged to the family of Abraham. These he calls brethren after the flesh, that is, in virtue of natural descent from the same parent. Philemon he addresses as his brother, both in the flesh and in the Lord. The Bible recognizes the validity and rightness of all the constitutional principles and impulses of our nature. It therefore approves of parental and filial affection, and, as is plain from this and other passages, of peculiar love for the people of our own race and country.

Charles Hodge
Commentary Romans 9

 
2.) Keep in mind that Christian Nationalism is merely Christian Familialism writ large. One can not get to Christian Nationalism without first owning Christian familialism. Israel itself was not a nation without first being tribal and those tribal lines were based on a common patriarch. So, for Horton to be consistent he would have to say that not only Christian Nationalism is heretical because it confuses law and gospel, but he would also have to say that Christian familialism is heretical for the same reason.
 
And guess what … I’m quite sure that Horton does insist that there is no such thing as a Christian family. (I know for a fact that David Van Drunen believes that.) If Horton is consistent with his R2K he would have to testify as family is not a place where one finds grace therefore there is no such thing as a “Christian family.” Per R2K to speak of Christian family is to confuse categories.
 
3.) It is Mike Horton who is actually heretical here in his denial that;
 
a.) There was no Gospel in the Old Covenant
b.) That the Kingdom of God is exactly synonymous with only the Church so that families, nations, schools, courts, etc. can never be considered “Christian.”

4.) Here is a note out of the Scofield Bible — the handbook of Dispensationalism.

“Israel rashly exchanged grace for the law at Sinai.”

This is what Horton and the Escondido R2K lads are vomiting. Horton is in bed with C. I. Scofield. Now, he may be giving all this Dispensationalism  a smiley Reformed Meredith Kline face but at the end of the day the man is pure on Scofieldean on this point.

Meet the new boss… same as the old boss.

 
We really should be as concerned with the whole Escondido Westminster California heresy as we are with Greg Johnson at PCA Memorial Church in St. Louis.

Author: jetbrane

I am a Pastor of a small Church in Mid-Michigan who delights in my family, my congregation and my calling. I am postmillennial in my eschatology. Paedo-Calvinist Covenantal in my Christianity Reformed in my Soteriology Presuppositional in my apologetics Familialist in my family theology Agrarian in my regional community social order belief Christianity creates culture and so Christendom in my national social order belief Mythic-Poetic / Grammatical Historical in my Hermeneutic Pre-modern, Medieval, & Feudal before Enlightenment, modernity, & postmodern Reconstructionist / Theonomic in my Worldview One part paleo-conservative / one part micro Libertarian in my politics Systematic and Biblical theology need one another but Systematics has pride of place Some of my favorite authors, Augustine, Turretin, Calvin, Tolkien, Chesterton, Nock, Tozer, Dabney, Bavinck, Wodehouse, Rushdoony, Bahnsen, Schaeffer, C. Van Til, H. Van Til, G. H. Clark, C. Dawson, H. Berman, R. Nash, C. G. Singer, R. Kipling, G. North, J. Edwards, S. Foote, F. Hayek, O. Guiness, J. Witte, M. Rothbard, Clyde Wilson, Mencken, Lasch, Postman, Gatto, T. Boston, Thomas Brooks, Terry Brooks, C. Hodge, J. Calhoun, Llyod-Jones, T. Sowell, A. McClaren, M. Muggeridge, C. F. H. Henry, F. Swarz, M. Henry, G. Marten, P. Schaff, T. S. Elliott, K. Van Hoozer, K. Gentry, etc. My passion is to write in such a way that the Lord Christ might be pleased. It is my hope that people will be challenged to reconsider what are considered the givens of the current culture. Your biggest help to me dear reader will be to often remind me that God is Sovereign and that all that is, is because it pleases him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *