Correcting Presidential Historian Michael Beschloss

We could be six days away from losing our rule of law and losing the situation where we have elections we can all rely on. There’s at least a significant chance that this country could be consumed by violence all over the next week, after this election.”

Michael Beschloss
Presidential Historian

1.) We haven’t had the rule of law here in a very very long time. If we had had the rule of law in 1998 Bill Clinton would have been convicted of what he was impeached for and removed from office. Remember, everyone agreed he committed perjury.  If we had the rule of law there would have been legal consequences for Bush II lying about Weapons of Mass Destruction… Hillary Clinton would have suffered legal consequences for lying about Benghazi … Barack Obama would’ve suffered legal consequences for slandering the Cambridge police department… Jim Comey, Peter Strozk, Lisa Page, John Brennan would have suffered legal consequences for their treason in screaming “Russia, Russia, Russia.” If we had the rule of law Trump, Fauci, Birx, and countless others would be in jail for rushing poison masking as vaccine to be injected into the muscles of people.
Get your head out of your southern most aperture Beschloss and quit warning about the possible rule of law. I was a child when we lost the rule of law in this country.

2.) Elections we can all rely on?

You mean like the 1960 Kennedy vs. Nixon Presidential election?
You mean like Lyndon Johnson’s “election” to be the Democratic Candidate in the 1948 US Senate contest?

3.) Beschloss is right on one thing. The Democrats have so pissed in our election pool nobody from either side is going to trust the result of this election and this especially if the DEMS pull the “we’re going to have to stop counting because we are tired” routine. If elections are not decided until days later nobody is going to be satisfied. The DEMS created this atmosphere. Let them live with the consequences.

If this whole thing burns down around us (an outcome I would not be dissatisfied with) then let it rest at the feet of the party that was willing to cheat in order to put a guy who barely campaigned and yet received more votes than Barack Obama into office.

Author: jetbrane

I am a Pastor of a small Church in Mid-Michigan who delights in my family, my congregation and my calling. I am postmillennial in my eschatology. Paedo-Calvinist Covenantal in my Christianity Reformed in my Soteriology Presuppositional in my apologetics Familialist in my family theology Agrarian in my regional community social order belief Christianity creates culture and so Christendom in my national social order belief Mythic-Poetic / Grammatical Historical in my Hermeneutic Pre-modern, Medieval, & Feudal before Enlightenment, modernity, & postmodern Reconstructionist / Theonomic in my Worldview One part paleo-conservative / one part micro Libertarian in my politics Systematic and Biblical theology need one another but Systematics has pride of place Some of my favorite authors, Augustine, Turretin, Calvin, Tolkien, Chesterton, Nock, Tozer, Dabney, Bavinck, Wodehouse, Rushdoony, Bahnsen, Schaeffer, C. Van Til, H. Van Til, G. H. Clark, C. Dawson, H. Berman, R. Nash, C. G. Singer, R. Kipling, G. North, J. Edwards, S. Foote, F. Hayek, O. Guiness, J. Witte, M. Rothbard, Clyde Wilson, Mencken, Lasch, Postman, Gatto, T. Boston, Thomas Brooks, Terry Brooks, C. Hodge, J. Calhoun, Llyod-Jones, T. Sowell, A. McClaren, M. Muggeridge, C. F. H. Henry, F. Swarz, M. Henry, G. Marten, P. Schaff, T. S. Elliott, K. Van Hoozer, K. Gentry, etc. My passion is to write in such a way that the Lord Christ might be pleased. It is my hope that people will be challenged to reconsider what are considered the givens of the current culture. Your biggest help to me dear reader will be to often remind me that God is Sovereign and that all that is, is because it pleases him.

2 thoughts on “Correcting Presidential Historian Michael Beschloss”

  1. You seem to be scholarly and well-read—yet you spout baseless claims that are supported by nothing more than absurd Facebook posts written in all caps, and that paragon of journalistic integrity Fox News.

    It’s not surprising that people who base their identities (and profession in your case) on being people of faith (the belief in that which cannot be proven or seen, but only felt in your gut) carry that same level of fact-checking and need for evidence for their opinions into the social and political spheres.

    Also, I imagine your church has renounced its tax exempt status since you clearly spout political messaging here and no doubt make your opinions heard in your church as well.

    1. 1.) Yes … Just like the Church Rafael Warnock pastors we have renounced our tax exempt status.

      2.) I am scholarly and well read. That explains why my claims are well supported and therefore are not baseless.

      3.) I agree that FOX News exceptions notwithstanding is liberal to the core and therefore does lack Journalistic integrity. Rupert Murdoch is almost as bad as CNN or MSNBC.

      4.) Don’t fool yourself. You are every bit the person of religion as I am and so are also basing your identity on your Christless faith. It’s just that my faith is Christianity while your faith is Humanism of some variety.

      5.) Proven by whose standards? I certainly am not interested in proving the reality of the triune God of the Bible to someone who has a faith that a-priori disallows the existence of the God who is. Indeed, the denial of the God of the Bible is the embrace of perfect irrationality on your part. Because of that your criticism are only a matter of mirth for me.

      6.) I pray that you will know the joy of repenting so that you may escape God’s just wrath currently upon you. Only by trusting Christ can you think right once again and escape the wrath to come.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *