“He who is unaware of his ignorance, will only be misled by his knowledge.”
I would have to say that herein we find the problem with to many in our clergy corps who are bright and educated but are still intellectual scofflaws. They have this vast pool of knowledge about any number of things from 16th century Elizabethan Puritanism, to Textual Criticism of the 18th Century Continentals, to the influence of Mercersburg theology on Philip Schaff as it influenced his Church history and yet the church languishes under their leadership. It is not that the subjects named above are bad. I want people around who know about those subjects. The problem is not with their areas of expertise. The problem is with their amazing ignorance, of which they are completely unfamiliar with, which puts all their grand learning in the service of the most idiotic and harmful of projects. For example how in the world could otherwise intelligent people come up with R2K, Federal Vision, or the New Perspective on Paul unless the quote by Whatley applies? We are a Church led by people who have not yet determined the difference between IQ and discernment, between the kind of mental acuity required for graduate and post-graduate work and the kind of mental acuity needed for the work of everyday living. We have a clergy corps who are long on theory but short on the ability to see the implications of where their theory is going to take us as a people.
And because of this, matters are going to get progressively worse in the Church.
2 thoughts on “The Problem with our Cognoscenti”
The crazy stuff did not just spring up spontaneously. It has roots in theosophy. See Neo-Calvinism and Christian Theosophy: Franz Van Baader, Abraham Kuyper, Herman Dooyeweerd, by J. Glenn Friesen. Westminster Seminary pushing a form of theosophy got the ball rolling among the Presbyterians. The Dutch Reformed Churches had plenty of their own clowns.