Dr. Owen Strachan is the Provost & Research Professor of Theology at Grace Biblical Theological Seminary. Dr. Strachan also hosts the “Antithesis” podcast and is author of the book, “Christianity & Wokeness.
Recently on Twitter Strachan lit out after Kinism tweeting;
“I see 2 forms of “Christian Nationalism” today: One that is problematically ethnocentric and traffics in sinful “kinism,” whatever other claims it may make: AVOID.
Kinism. Unblushing. Unhidden. Anti-gospel. Dead wrong.”
Bret responds,
One does wonder if Dr. Strychnine is only upset with white Christian Nationalism or if Dr. Strychnine would fault a Christian Nationalism that was characterized by minority communities and churches. For example is Dr. Strychnine apoplectic over Kinist churches that are uniquely Korean, Hmong, or Black which are also, per Strychnine, problematically ethnocentric or is it only white Churches that are anti-gospel and dead wrong?
I suspect that Dr. Strychnine has only a problem with white Kinism and white Nationalism. I suspect that he would be perfectly fine with minority expressions of Kinism. I know I am. I am thankful for my friendships with minority member Christian Kinists.
However, Strychnine is correct in accusing Kinism as being unblushing. It is true that we are not ashamed of Biblical Christianity.
Dr. Strychnine goes on to say,
A second that is *not* sinfully ethnocentric and that’s focused on God’s law and public good: THINK THROUGH.
The first is associated with Stephen Wolfe’s “A Case for Christian Nationalism” and his broader program, which undoubtedly has “kinist” elements. The second is being pondered by many folks, alongside matters like theonomy, postmillennialism, and the role of the church and state.
Bret responds,
1.) If people become theonomists if they are consistent they will become Ethnocentric, Kinist and Christian Nationalist. Theonomy implies ethnocentrism, kinism and Christian Nationalism.
2.) I am pretty sure that Dr. Stephen Wolfe would be appalled at the notion that he is associated with theonomy. I know that many theonomists are appalled at the notion that they would be identified with Wolfe’s Natural Law project.
3.) Dear reader you need to understand that kinism has become a acid test for Biblical Christianity. Those “Christians” who refuse kinism are to be suspect since somewhere in their DNA they have adopted Cultural Marxist (WOKE) categories. As Achord and Dow’s book “Who is My Neighbor” demonstrates what is called Kinism has been for a millennium Christianity 101. Get the anthology. Look at the quotes from Augustine, Aquinas, and the Reformers. Over and over again our Fathers were what Dr. Strychnine is warning against.
We end this entry by demonstrating Dr. Wolfe’s inconsistencies. Remember, it has been my point consistently that Wolfe’s problem is that he is all over the map on the issue of Christian Nationalism, particularly as it pertains to the ethnic component. We see that clearly in this quote and response;
Just watched this day old video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7uNskiI-cA
which claims that “they” are going to gate keep Christian Nationalism by creating a fake version while slandering Wolfe’s.
Strachan here is basically just executing Embraces, Extend, Extinguish (EEE).
> A second that is *not* sinfully ethnocentric and that’s focused on God’s law and public good: THINK THROUGH.
Does anyone really think he would have ever said this if Wolfe wasn’t gaining traction?