A Couple Observations on Marxism

A key thing to keep in mind about Marxism in all its forms — whether economic or racial — is its faith dynamic. Marxists have, as an article of faith, that their famed materialistic dialectic along which history putatively runs and progresses will eventually yield Utopia. The key thing here is that if asked how that happens they cannot answer that question. It is a faith article. Perhaps the greatest Marxist article of faith. Their faith teaches them that should they keep working the work of their materialistic dialectic (what they fancy as History known by “science”– i.e. — Scientific Gnosticism) that eventually will end with the result of Utopia. However, to repeat, they cannot tell you how their dialectic will eventually yield Utopia.

It is akin to the Christian who will tell you that life ends in heaven. If you ask a Christian how they know that will happen they will point to their Holy Book and say, “I know because that is what God tells me.” It is an article of faith. In the same way the Marxists believes that as long as they walk in the sanctified Marxist life by working the work of the dialectic the end result will be Utopia and they know this because the holy writings of Marx and their later prophets tell them that.

But, if one doesn’t share their faith, its all so much bull-skubala.

All of this is one reason why Marxism is called a Christian heresy.

Don’t miss the fact that this means that Marxism, in all its varieties (Critical Race Theory, Economic Marxism, Cultural Marxism, etc.) is a Religion, every bit as much as any religion you’d like to name.


“As a simple piece of first advice for pushing back against Critical Race Theory, then, ‘stop assuming it has good intentions.'”

James Lindsey
Race Marxism — p. 254

One of the truths I learned in Undergrad was that it is not possible to negotiate with Marxists because one can only trust the Marxists to be Marxist. The came is true with Race Marxism. These people are not like you. They can not be trusted, they can not be given the benefit of the doubt, and they can not be negotiated with. They can only be conquered because they are lizard people.

Give not one inch to these people and that includes their fellow travelers and their useful idiots. This includes our current addlepated clergy who are toting water for the Cultural Marxists.

Folks, you must take a war footing with the Marxists (and keep in mind in many respects “We’re all Marxists now”). No compromise. No surrender. Your goal should be to defeat them with the Gospel understanding if they do not repent they must be crushed and utterly defeated.

Once you understand who they are, do not even debate them. If you do debate them you must do so as a presuppositonalist. You can not defeat these people if you allow them their presuppositions as the standard for argumentation. Debating them, should it happen, must happen by forcing them to accept your presuppositions. If you do not do that you will lose every single time. Once you understand who they are you are better served just mocking the hades out of them and their ideas.

These people (especially the epistemologically self-conscious ones) are slippery as snakes. They purposefully misuse language, using linguistic deception, so as to confuse their opponents. They have no interest in a honest debate. Their motto is to win at all costs and as such that needs to be our motto also when dealing with these people.

Author: jetbrane

I am a Pastor of a small Church in Mid-Michigan who delights in my family, my congregation and my calling. I am postmillennial in my eschatology. Paedo-Calvinist Covenantal in my Christianity Reformed in my Soteriology Presuppositional in my apologetics Familialist in my family theology Agrarian in my regional community social order belief Christianity creates culture and so Christendom in my national social order belief Mythic-Poetic / Grammatical Historical in my Hermeneutic Pre-modern, Medieval, & Feudal before Enlightenment, modernity, & postmodern Reconstructionist / Theonomic in my Worldview One part paleo-conservative / one part micro Libertarian in my politics Systematic and Biblical theology need one another but Systematics has pride of place Some of my favorite authors, Augustine, Turretin, Calvin, Tolkien, Chesterton, Nock, Tozer, Dabney, Bavinck, Wodehouse, Rushdoony, Bahnsen, Schaeffer, C. Van Til, H. Van Til, G. H. Clark, C. Dawson, H. Berman, R. Nash, C. G. Singer, R. Kipling, G. North, J. Edwards, S. Foote, F. Hayek, O. Guiness, J. Witte, M. Rothbard, Clyde Wilson, Mencken, Lasch, Postman, Gatto, T. Boston, Thomas Brooks, Terry Brooks, C. Hodge, J. Calhoun, Llyod-Jones, T. Sowell, A. McClaren, M. Muggeridge, C. F. H. Henry, F. Swarz, M. Henry, G. Marten, P. Schaff, T. S. Elliott, K. Van Hoozer, K. Gentry, etc. My passion is to write in such a way that the Lord Christ might be pleased. It is my hope that people will be challenged to reconsider what are considered the givens of the current culture. Your biggest help to me dear reader will be to often remind me that God is Sovereign and that all that is, is because it pleases him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *