I.) “Andrew (Torba) I pray you understand the true biblical gospel, which has nothing to do with your kinist message of ethnic preservation and propagation. I say this in love: you are promoting a false gospel.”
Baptist Idiot (Tautology alert)
1.) There is a category confusion here that has gained a wide-spread footing and that is to reduce Christianity to “the gospel.” The gospel is at the heart of Biblical Christianity inasmuch as it answers the question, “How shall I be saved.” However it is Biblical Christianity as a whole that provides the answer to another question that arises for those who have been united to Christ and so redeemed by the Gospel and that question that Biblical Christianity answers is “How shall we then live.”
I add this because it is true, in a sense, that the Gospel, narrowly considered, doesn’t have anything to do with ethnic preservation and propagation unless, of course, one observes that the Gospel can’t be preached to white people who have experienced genocide. Further, because this is true it is quite possible for someone who follows the model of Biblical Christianity in preserving and propagating their people to still advocate for the gospel of Jesus Christ.
So, once again, as is customary for these blithering idiots (with apologies to all blithering idiots for suggesting that y’all are as bad as these people), they are confusing categories.
2.) Still, to take this as Strachan obviously intends it, we would counter with the observation that it would be a strange true gospel if that gospel meant that one ignores the ongoing attempted genocide of your people because of Strachan’s version of LUV. It would be a strange true gospel if that gospel meant that we LUV our children enough to turn a blind eye to their being replaced. it would be a strange true gospel if that gospel meant that we LUV God enough to ignore the 6th commandment. Strachan would have us believe that the true gospel once embraced is a ethnocide pact.
3.) Moanin’ Owen is fundamentally opposed to the Gospel in its broadest sense. You see, Jesus told the disciples to baptize and disciple the nations (not merely individuals), which cannot happen if those nations cease to exist. The true Gospel is about the reconciliation of the nations to God, not deeming the existence and health of nations as irrelevant, such as Strychnine Strachan would have it.
II.) “Real talk: You go against inter-ethnic marriage, you go against God.”
Rev. Dr. Owen Strychnine Strachan
Pssst…. someone tell Moanin’ Owen that Ezra (ch. 9) and Nehemiah (13) are two books in the Bible and he might want to consult before tweeting such abject stupidity.
III.)“So, if someone is going to use what I just said to try to say I am a Kinist or something they just have no clue what they are talking about.”
55:00 mark
I have a real problem here with this. Jon is communicating here as if there is something wrong with being called a Kinist. Jon is acting as if it would be the worst thing in the world to be (gasp) a “Kinist. This mindset keeps Kinists behind the 8 ball in the minds of the people he is influencing.
Now, if Jon doesn’t think that there is any problem with Kinism then he wouldn’t care about being called a “Kinist.” But Jon is afraid of being called a Kinist and he wants people to not dare call him a Kinist. This suggest that somehow being a Kinist is out of bounds for Jon and that is to give in to the idiots out there who are shrieking about the presence of Kinists in the Church.
The funny thing is, is that from what I hear Jon saying in this podcast (“The Shadow that follows Liberalism”) it moves me to conclude that the man is indeed what is called a weak “weak Kinist.” When people name Jon Harris as a Kinist they are exactly correct even if Jon is repulsed.
Bottom line? I don’t think Jon has any idea what Kinism is except as he has heard it described from its enemies.
IV.) “Know, that culture is linked to lineage, at least on a mass scale.”
The Shadow That Follows Liberalism — 102:15
The problem here is that one can NOT get to a mass scale apart from individuals of a particular lineage maintaining their particular lineage by not marrying inter-racially.
IMO, Jon, desires to say that “Kinists like” convictions are right on a mass scale but wrong on a micro scale and this does not follow. One can not get to the mass apart from the micro.
And I note this as one who understands that advocacy for legal definitions of purity of lineage are stupid and counter-productive. I say this as someone who understands that inter-racial marriages are going to happen. However, inter-racial marriages should be discouraged if we want to keep a Anglo-Protestant culture as Jon says he desires. Inter-racial marriage may not be sin, but it is normatively unwise.
On the whole I consider Jon to be friend to the cause to crush WOKE, but I think the man is still simmering and has not yet come to full boil. Time will tell.
This was excellent; we see the cognitive dissonance that Harris has to suppress in order to continue down the path to a logical conclusion on this issue; and Owen is a lost cause, not much else to say about that. I mentioned you going on Jon’s show the other day, knowing it wouldn’t happen; but these are the points that I was hoping you could point out-JK