Category: Marxism/Cultural Marxism

A Resurfaced Technique From The French Revolution’s Terror Stage

In Revolutionary France during the time of Terror it was called denunciation;

“Denounce the crimes, denounce the criminals, a double award awaits you: the voice of your conscience, for denunciation is a virtue: and a legitimate reward, for the National Convention is just and desires that each virtuous act should be a means by which the sans culotte may improve his lot… “

December 1793 Commission Temporaire
Ad hoc revolutionary authority installed in the city of Lyon after the Federalist revolt

In China during the time of Mao’s Cultural Revolution it was called “Struggle Sessions,” or denunciation rallies. These were were violent public spectacles intended to shame and humiliate people for “wrong think.” These sessions also became opportunities for people to demonstrate their patriotism. It was so bad it was not uncommon for even children to turn in their parents, or spouses to turn in their mate.

Today in America it is called “Virtue signaling.” We see it when CREC ministers (Sumpter, Wilson, Brito, Hemmke, etc.) denounce Kinists. We see it when Dr. Moanin’ Owen Strachan denounces Dr. Stephen Wolfe for Wolfe’s support of Christian Nationalism. We see it when the Steve Hemmke denounces Darryl Dow by writing a pitiful review of a book Hemmke never read, we see it when Rod Dreher denounced Thomas Achord despite Achord’s previous kindness to Dreher’s family. These new struggle session are breaking out everywhere.

What we are finding in our current Evangelical/Reformed version of the struggle session is those who are not sufficiently WOKE, per the standards of their Cultural Marxism and CRT are denounced for their thought crimes. Usually it comes in the version of “Racist,” or “Kinist” or “Anti-Semite.” The effect of it all is to force the modern church culture in the West to align with the worldview of WOKE-ism.

The only way to triumph over this insanity is in the name of Jesus Christ and by His authority to return their denunciations and so denounce them as traitors to Jesus Christ and Biblical Christianity. By the means of the Word of God accompanied by necessary deductions from the Word of God these people need to be stopped from filling out their roles as Soviet Commissars. These thought police must be eliminated.

In the words of John Moody

“We don’t have to be “kind and gentle” to wolves, false teachers, and those betraying the church and openly compromising with the wicked.

Love them like God does, enough “to shatter their teeth” if necessary to stop their evil.”

Doug Wilson Forbids Jew Malice, But Does Not Tell Us What It Is

“Here would be a small sampling of the sorts of things that sometimes fly in our ranks that shouldn’t sometimes fly in our ranks. And even if you don’t agree with my assessments here, this at least can have the benefit of explaining my behavior to you….

Jew-malice: of all the dead ends, of all the cul-de-sacs, of all the dry holes, of all the fruitless trees, of all the clouds without rain, of all the foam on all the waves on all the oceans, of all the gin joints . . .”

Doug “The Gatekeeper” Wilson
Blog & Mablog

Of course this requires the question of what precisely is defined as Jew malice in Doug’s world? Would Doug accuse RJR of Jew malice because RJR doubted 6 Million? Is it Jew malice to recite world history of the contest between Jews and Christians? Is it Jew malice to refer to the Jews as “The Synagogue of Satan” just like Scripture does? How about all those Church Councils in history that made not nice proclamations regarding the Jews? Just exactly how does “Ditches” Doug define this “Jew malice,” because the last thing I want to do is fall out of favor with Dougie.

I mean was Luther guilty of Jew malice? Was Chrysostom? Was Augustine? Was Calvin? I can give you quotes from each of these chaps that I’m pretty sure if anyone else said what those chaps said Doug would be phoning the “Jew malice” constables. I mean, seriously, there is no way Doug would countenance John Calvin. Doug would read Calvin out of Doug’s movement.

Sucks to be Calvin.

So what about it Doug? If you are going to gatekeep the Conservative Christian armada could you please tell us precisely and exactly what counts and doesn’t count as Jew malice. We are all waiting to hear from you on this so we don’t fall out of your Eminence’s favor.

With Apologies to John Lennon — IMAGINE

Imagine there’s no ISIS
It’s easy if you try
No Infidel among us
Around us, no PC lies
Imagine all the Nations
Living for God’s Praise

Imagine there are no Marxists

It isn’t hard to do
No equality BS
And no dialectic too
Imagine all God’s people
Living as postmills

You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
I hope someday you’ll join us
And the World will then be won

Imagine no CRT
I wonder if you can
No envy or malice
The fulfillment of God’s plan
Imagine all God’s people
Conquering all the world…

You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
I hope someday you’ll join us
And the world will be then won

György Lukács, the Frankfurt School & Some of its Tactics & Goals

“The question is, Who will free us from the yoke of Western Civilization?”
 
György Lukács
Cultural Marxist

“I saw the revolutionary destruction of society as the one and only solution. A worldwide overturning of values cannot take place without the annihilation of the old values and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries.”

György Lukács
Cultural Marxist

“Münzenberg, along with György Lukács and the founders of the Frankfurt School, had seen what in the West only Madison avenue seems to have learned, that language leads to action — and that control of words and their overtones can be far more effective than hand-grenades or nuclear power to force or or intimidate someone into saying “A” when he really believes “B” and that that is most of the battle. The Tinkers-to-Evers-to-Chance in this were John Dewey, cultural Marxism, and the Frankfurt school.”

Ralph de Toledano
Cry Havoc

“By following Gramsci’s lead Marcuse had managed to find a surrogate for the working class that Horkheimer had been searching for; students and minority groups. Marcuse stated that the student radicals should aim for the radicalization of university departments. Of pivotal importance to this idea was his introduction of the concept employed so successfully by Freud and György Lukács, of so-called sexual liberation as a means of social control.”

Alasdair Elder
The Red Trojan Horse — pp. 62

In post WW II America a political movement that had been around since the 1920’s began to gain leverage in America. In its beginnings it was called “The Frankfurt School,” but as time passed it began to be known as Cultural Marxism, or Political Correctness, or multiculturalism. The leaders of this movement began to be the gurus on American Universities and with their teachings and their books they began to have influence beyond their numbers. Names like Antonio Gramsci, Herbert Marcuse, Theodore Adorno, György Lukács, Max Horkheimer and Erich Fromm became the Generals leading a student rank and file who would accomplish the long march through the Institutions, seeking to overturn the previous identity of every Institution wherein was heard the footfall of the march. The final goal of this march was the overthrow, shredding, and destruction of every vestige of biblical Christianity that remained in the DNA of the West.

As mentioned György Lukács, was one of the early Cultural Marxists who became Commissar for Education and Culture during the short lived Hungarian Jewish Bolshevik regime that lasted for four months in 1919. Lukács complained when finally thrown out of power that the Red Hungarians mistake was that the didn’t spill blood fast enough. During his time as Deputy to the Commissar of Education in Hungary Lukács was remembered for his action in undermining traditional morality by teaching Hungarian children in government schools debauched sexuality.

In the 1920s, this Hungarian Marxist, György Lukács, set out to address a contradiction within orthodox Marxist dogma: for Marx, a society’s dominant ideology was a “superstructure,” a mere reflection of its more basic economic structure. Thus, the ruling class of capitalists who controlled the money and the means of production also created and controlled its dominant ideas. But a workers’ revolution of the sort Marx predicted could, Marx thought, only come from the subordinated class, i.e., the workers themselves. This question then arises: what will convince workers to revolt when the very ideas in their heads are implanted by their overlords? To answer this question, Lukács, in his History and Class Consciousness (1923), argued for a more subjective conception of class consciousness than the one favored by Marx. Workers (the proletariat) had to have their consciousness raised in order to muster up the appetite for revolution.
In analyzing this we note a contradiction. Marxism is a materialistic worldview. The non-material doesn’t exist. Yet, we see the Marxist Lukács here talking about the necessity to change “ideas.” Ideas are not material, as such, they do not exist.

Now I think the Cultural Marxist right about the necessity to change “ideas” but I don’t think it was consistent with their materialistic worldview. Which might explain why the classical Marxists (now called “vulgar Marxists) did not like the Gramscian neo-Marxists.

The primary goal of the Frankfurt School, of whom Lukács was a member  was to translate Marxism from economic terms into cultural terms. It would provide the ideas on which to base a new political theory of revolution based on race and culture, harnessing new “oppressed” groups (minorities, sexual perverts, feminists) to replace the faithless proletariat. The Frankfurt school was/is committed to smashing the Christian religion, and morals, It would also build a constituency among academics, who could build careers studying and writing about the new oppression. Toward this end, Herbert Marcuse-who favored polymorphous perversion-expanded the ranks of Gramsci’s new proletariat by including homosexuals, lesbians, and transsexuals. Into this was spliced György Lukács radical sex education and cultural terrorism tactics. Gramsci’s ‘long march’ was added to the mix, and then all of this was wedded to Freudian psychoanalysis and psychological conditioning techniques. The end product was Cultural Marxism, now known in the West as multiculturalism and its goal It was the hope of Lukács and the other members of the Frankfurt school to, in the words of fellow Frankfurt School member Willi Münzenberg;

“We must organize the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilization stink.”

Race Marxism, Whiteness As Property, and Adjacent Whiteness

In Race Marxism (vs. Economic Marxism — also now referred to as “vulgar Marxism”) whiteness is considered a property that white people and adjacent white people have. As such given the paradigm of Marxism, White people are the new bourgeois class in Race Marxism, owning the property of whiteness which they use to oppress the have nots who do not own whiteness. So, just as the Economic Marxists warred against the bourgeois class in the name of the proletariat (worker) class so Race Marxism wars against the white race in the name of the new proletariat and pervert class.

Keep in mind that as whiteness is a property that white people have this means that it is at least possible for non-white people to own this property even though they are not white. This is labeled, by the Critical Race Theory crowd as being “adjacent white.” Once upon a time these same people were referred to as “Uncle Toms” but now it is “adjacent white.” Some examples wherein Black people are accused of being adjacent white are as follows;

Larry Elder — “Conservative” Black man who ran for Governor of California was named by the L.A. Times as “the Black face of White Supremacy.”

Condoleezza Rice — Named a “foot soldier for White Supremacy” after disagreeing w/ the approach of race relations implemented by CRT in practice.

Clarence Thomas has been called in the media, “A Black, White Supremacist.”

Dave Chappelle — Who is accused of “white privilege” due to his jokes about trans activists.

Kanye West — Who, according Ta Nehisi Coates should no longer be considered “Black” because he donned a “Make America Great Again,” hat and supported Trump on some issues.

All of this means that whereas Marx’s cry was for “Workers of the World Unite,” the new Neo-Marxism cry is for “Non-Caucasians & Perverts of the World Unite,” in order to throw off the oppression of the Hetero-Whiteness “Haves.”

 

If you are White… you ARE the enemy

So, we see from all this CRT really ultimately isn’t about race. It is about racial Marxism seeking to overthrow the remnants of Christian order that was brought to life by white people. CRT is a Marxist ideology that uses “race” as a cover to advance its revolutionary aims.

 

So, to recap;

 

Whereas in classical Marxism (what the Frankfurt school referred to as “vulgar Marxism”) all past history has been determined by class conflict, Cultural Marxism (neo-Marxism, Western Marxism) insist that all past history has been determined by racial-sexual conflict. The vulgar Marxist antithesis between have and have nots in Western Marxism becomes an antithesis between White & Adjacent people/sexual perverts and all non-Caucasians and non-Heterosexuals. A more simplified version of this is the antithesis between the oppressors (Which is always white heterosexuals) and the oppressed (Which is always non-Caucasians and/or sexual perverts). Any increase in the well being or prosperity of White (adjacent) Heterosexual is not to be countenanced.

The interest of these groups are in absolute antithesis. Any increase in the well-being prosperity of (adjacent) White heterosexual is a diminishing of well being and prosperity of the non-Caucasian / pervert.

As such conflict between these two groups is an unavoidable conflict. This is why you hear that “White people will never cease being racist.” They philosophical system of Neo-Marxism could not survive and continue if the conflict could be resolved. This is also why you hear constant carping about “systemic racism.” Because the social order in the West was built by the white man that system is racist no matter what accommodations might be made. The West can not be healed unless it is first destroyed. As in vulgar Marxism, so in Neo-Marxism conflict cannot be resolved.

All of this explains why the Cultural Marxist, their fellow travelers, as well as their useful idiots can not be negotiated with. They must be destroyed. There is no compromising with WOKE-ism, or Critical Theorists. They must be utterly vanquished.

Only Christianity can do this but it must be a Christianity that has attacking on its mind and is resolved to give no quarter. In battle Christianity must raise the black flag and look for either complete repentance from the enemy or short of that a sequestering of the enemy away from any cultural gatekeeper status. They must be made to be the equivalent of hewers of wood and drawers of water. Any other solution allows them to rise up again to poison us.